Second primary malignancies after commercial CAR T-cell therapy: analysis of the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System.

ABSTRACT: Second primary malignancies were reported in 536 of 12 394 (4.3%) adverse event reports following chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies in the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. Myeloid and T-cell neoplasms were disproportionately more frequently reported, warranting further follow-up.

CAR T-cell product performance in haematological malignancies before and after marketing authorisation.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells represent a potent new approach to treat haematological malignancies. Two CAR T-cell therapies, tisagenlecleucel and axicabtagene ciloleucel, have been approved in Europe and the USA, as well as several other countries, for the treatment of leukaemia and lymphoma. These approvals marked a major milestone in the field of cell and gene therapies. However, the clinical development and regulatory evaluation of these innovative therapies faced several challenges that are considered important lessons learned for future similar products. Here, we examine the products' non-clinical and clinical data packages to outline the challenges encountered during the regulatory evaluation process in Europe, and to provide an update on their performance after authorisation.

National Survey of FACT-Accredited Cell Processing Facilities: Assessing Preparedness for Local Manufacturing of Immune Effector Cells.

The utilization of the human immune system as a therapeutic modality has materialized in the form of novel biologics known as immune effector cells (IECs). However, currently approved IECs rely on autologous cells for manufacturing that are funneled through costly centralized supply chains leading to long wait times and potentially increased mortality. Alternative models for manufacturing at or near the point-of-care in a distributed and local approach are being proposed to overcome such a bottleneck. Cell processing facilities for minimally manipulated products, as well as academic good manufacturing practice facilities, are being considered for such manufacturing tasks. However, the infrastructure and the practices of these facilities remains unstudied. Here, we surveyed the cell processing facilities accredited by the Foundation for Accreditation of Cellular Therapy (FACT) in the United States to better understand their preparedness for local manufacturing of IECs. A structured survey consisting of 40 items was distributed to the directors of 157 facilities. The survey evaluated 6 domains, including facility characteristics, quality practices, personnel, use of automation, experience with IECs, and the perception of the point-of-care model. Thirty-eight facilities completed the survey (24.2%). Most facilities were involved in handling IEC products (35/38, 92.1%), and the majority had infrastructure to support basic operations and quality control such as viability (36/36, 100%), identity (33/36, 91.7%), and sterility (33/36, 91.7%). The quality practices varied among the facilities depending on the types of products processed. A slight majority implemented automation in their workflows (22/38, 57.9%). Facilities expressed a general interest in adopting point-of-care models (23/38, 61%), with financial and human resources identified as the most significant constraints. In conclusion, FACT-accredited cell processing facilities may provide the infrastructure required for local manufacturing. However, there is a need for standardization and minimum quality requirements to effectively implement such models.

ACT To Sustain: Adoptive Cell Therapy To Sustain Access to Non-Commercialized Genetically Modified Cell Therapies.

Genetically modified cell therapies (GMCT), particularly immune effector cells (IEC) such as chimeric receptor antigen (CAR) T cells, have shown promise in curing cancer and rare diseases after a single treatment course. Following close behind CAR T approvals are GMCT based on hematopoietic stem cells, such as products developed for hemoglobinopathies and other disorders. Academically sponsored GMCT products, often developed in academic centers without industry involvement, face challenges in sustaining access after completion of early phase studies when there is no commercial partner invested in completing registration trials for marketing applications. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) formed a task force named ACT To Sustain (Adoptive Cell Therapy to Sustain) to address the "valley of death" of academic GMCT products. This paper presents the task force's findings and considerations regarding financial sustainability of academically sponsored GMCT products in the absence of commercial development. We outline case scenarios illustrating barriers to maintaining access to promising GMCT developed by academic centers. The paper also delves into the current state of GMCT development, commercialization, and reimbursement, citing examples of abandoned products, cost estimates associated with GMCT manufacturing and real-world use of cost recovery. We propose potential solutions to address the financial, regulatory, and logistical challenges associated with sustaining access to academically sponsored GMCT products and to ensure that products with promising results do not languish in a "valley of death" due to financial or implementational barriers. The suggestions include aligning US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) designations with benefit coverage, allowing for cost recovery of certain products as a covered benefit, and engaging with regulators and policy makers to discuss alternative pathways for academic centers to provide access. We stress the importance of sustainable access to GMCT and call for collaborative efforts to develop regulatory pathways that support access to academically sponsored GMCT products.

Expanding access to CAR T cell therapies through local manufacturing.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells are changing the therapeutic landscape for hematological malignancies. To date, all six CAR T cell products approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are autologous and centrally manufactured. As the numbers of approved products and indications continue to grow, new strategies to increase cell-manufacturing capacity are urgently needed to ensure patient access. Distributed manufacturing at the point of care or at other local manufacturing sites would go a long way toward meeting the rising demand. To ensure successful implementation, it is imperative to harness novel technologies to achieve uniform product quality across geographically dispersed facilities. This includes the use of automated cell-production systems, in-line sensors and process simulation for enhanced quality control and efficient supply chain management. A comprehensive effort to understand the critical quality attributes of CAR T cells would enable better definition of widely attainable release criteria. To supplement oversight by national regulatory agencies, we recommend expansion of the role of accreditation bodies. Moreover, regulatory standards may need to be amended to accommodate the unique characteristics of distributed manufacturing models.

Long-term response to autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is an effective treatment approach for patients with relapsed or refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). However, identifying the factors that influence long-term response to this therapy is necessary to optimize patient selection and treatment allocation. We conducted a literature review and meta-analysis to investigate the use of autologous anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy in both pediatric and adult patients with R/R B-ALL, using several databases including MEDLINE, Cochrane Central, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, Journals@Ovid, Embase, and clinicaltrial.gov. A total of 38 reports were analyzed, which enrolled 2134 patients. Time-to-event endpoints were estimated using reconstructed patient survival data. The study explored key modulators of response, including costimulatory domains, disease status, age, and lymphodepletion. The median overall survival and event-free survival were 36.2 months [95% CI 28.9, NR] and 13.3 months [95% CI 12.2, 17], respectively. The overall response rate was 76% [95% CI 71, 81]. The use of 4-1BB costimulatory domain in the CAR construct, administration of low-dose cyclophosphamide lymphodepletion, and pretreatment morphologic remission were associated with better overall survival, with hazard ratios of 0.72, 0.56, and 0.66, respectively. Morphologic remission and 4-1BB domain were associated with better event-free survival, with hazard ratios of 0.66 and 0.72, respectively. These findings suggest that CAR T cell therapy may offer long-term benefits to patients with R/R B-ALL. However, further research is needed to optimize patient selection and better understand the impact of various factors on the outcome of CAR T cell therapy.

CAR NK-92 cell-mediated depletion of residual TCR+ cells for ultrapure allogeneic TCR-deleted CAR T-cell products.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a major risk of the administration of allogeneic chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-redirected T cells to patients who are HLA unmatched. Gene editing can be used to disrupt potentially alloreactive T-cell receptors (TCRs) in CAR T cells and reduce the risk of GVHD. Despite the high knockout rates achieved with the optimized methods, a subsequent purification step is necessary to obtain a safe allogeneic product. To date, magnetic cell separation (MACS) has been the gold standard for purifying TCRα/ß- CAR T cells, but product purity can still be insufficient to prevent GVHD. We developed a novel and highly efficient approach to eliminate residual TCR/CD3+ T cells after TCRα constant (TRAC) gene editing by adding a genetically modified CD3-specific CAR NK-92 cell line during ex vivo expansion. Two consecutive cocultures with irradiated, short-lived, CAR NK-92 cells allowed for the production of TCR- CAR T cells with <0.01% TCR+ T cells, marking a 45-fold reduction of TCR+ cells compared with MACS purification. Through an NK-92 cell-mediated feeder effect and circumventing MACS-associated cell loss, our approach increased the total TCR- CAR T-cell yield approximately threefold while retaining cytotoxic activity and a favorable T-cell phenotype. Scaling in a semiclosed G-Rex bioreactor device provides a proof-of-principle for large-batch manufacturing, allowing for an improved cost-per-dose ratio. Overall, this cell-mediated purification method has the potential to advance the production process of safe off-the-shelf CAR T cells for clinical applications.

Scalable Manufacturing of CAR T cells for Cancer Immunotherapy.

As of April 2021, there are five commercially available chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies for hematological malignancies. With the current transition of CAR T cell manufacturing from academia to industry, there is a shift toward Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-compliant closed and automated systems to ensure reproducibility and to meet the increased demand for cancer patients. In this review we describe current CAR T cells clinical manufacturing models and discuss emerging technological advances that embrace scaling and production optimization. We summarize measures being used to shorten CAR T-cell manufacturing times and highlight regulatory challenges to scaling production for clinical use. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE ∣: As the demand for CAR T cell cancer therapy increases, several closed and automated production platforms are being deployed, and others are in development.This review provides a critical appraisal of these technologies that can be leveraged to scale and optimize the production of next generation CAR T cells.

Mitigating Deficiencies in Evidence during Regulatory Assessments of Advanced Therapies: A Comparative Study with Other Biologicals.

Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs) comprising cell therapy, gene therapy, and tissue-engineered products, offer a multitude of novel therapeutic approaches to a wide range of severe and debilitating diseases. To date, several advanced therapies have received marketing authorization for a variety of indications. However, some products showed disappointing market performance, leading to their withdrawal. The available evidence for quality, safety, and efficacy at product launch can play a crucial rule in their market success. To evaluate the sufficiency of evidence in submissions of advanced therapies for marketing authorization and to benchmark them against more established biological products, we conducted a matched comparison of the regulatory submissions between ATMPs and other biologicals. We applied a quantitative assessment of the regulatory objections and divergence from the expected data requirements as indicators of sufficiency of evidence and regulatory flexibilty, respectively. Our results demonstrated that product manufacturing was challenging regardless of the product type. Advanced therapies displayed critical deficiencies in the submitted clinical data. The submitted non-clinical data packages benefited the most from regulatory flexibility. Additionally, ATMP developers need to comply with more commitments in the post-approval phase, which might add pressure on market performance. Mitigating such observed deficiencies in future product development, may leverage their potential for market success.

Linking Scattered Stem Cell-Based Data to Advance Therapeutic Development.

The biomedical field has witnessed remarkable advances in analytical tools and technologies that have expanded our understanding of healthy and diseased human tissue and, at the same time, enable extensive molecular characterization of living cells. The volume of scientific data generated is expanding in an unprecedented manner; however, these data remain scattered across research groups worldwide. Access to various data sources in a systematic fashion could hugely benefit the progress of nascent fields such as stem cell-based therapeutics. We explore here the currently available databases for stem cell research, and we propose creating a common portal to access these different databases that could act as a translational link between basic and clinical research to advance stem cell-based therapeutic development.

Concise Review: A Comprehensive Analysis of Reported Adverse Events in Patients Receiving Unproven Stem Cell-Based Interventions.

The promise of stem cell (SC) therapies to restore functions of damaged tissues and organs brings enormous hope to patients, their families, loved ones, and caregivers. However, limits may exist for which indications SC therapies might be useful, efficacious, and safe. Applications of innovative therapies within regulatory boundaries and within the framework of controlled clinical trials are the norm in the scientific and medical community; such a system minimizes patient risk by setting a clear and acceptable safety and efficacy profile for new therapeutics before marketing authorization. This careful clinical validation approach often takes time, which patients suffering from terminal or debilitating diseases do not have. Not validated, unproven stem cell interventions (SCI) that promise a working treatment or cure for severe diseases have therefore found their way into the patient community, and providers of such treatments often take advantage of the public's willingness to pay large amounts of money for the misguided hope of a reliable recovery from their illnesses. We conducted a review of scientific publications, clinical case reports, and mass media publications to assess the reported cases and safety incidents associated with unproven SCI. The review also analyzes the main factors that were identified as contributing to the emergence and global rise of the "stem cell tourism" phenomenon. Stem Cells Translational Medicine 2018;1-10.