Reappraisal-related neural predictors of treatment response to cognitive behavior therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder.

BACKGROUND: Although trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy (TF-CBT) is the frontline treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), one-third of patients are treatment non-responders. To identify neural markers of treatment response to TF-CBT when participants are reappraising aversive material. METHODS: This study assessed PTSD patients (n = 37) prior to TF-CBT during functional magnetic brain resonance imaging (fMRI) when they reappraised or watched traumatic images. Patients then underwent nine sessions of TF-CBT, and were then assessed for symptom severity on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale. FMRI responses for cognitive reappraisal and emotional reactivity contrasts of traumatic images were correlated with the reduction of PTSD severity from pretreatment to post-treatment. RESULTS: Symptom improvement was associated with decreased activation of the left amygdala during reappraisal, but increased activation of bilateral amygdala and hippocampus during emotional reactivity prior to treatment. Lower connectivity of the left amygdala to the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, pregenual anterior cingulate cortex, and right insula, and that between the left hippocampus and right amygdala were also associated with symptom improvement. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence that optimal treatment response to TF-CBT involves the capacity to engage emotional networks during emotional processing, and also to reduce the engagement of these networks when down-regulating emotions.

Investigating the neural basis of cognitive control dysfunction in mood disorders.

OBJECTIVES: Dysfunction of cognitive control is a feature of both bipolar disorder (BP) and major depression (MDD) and persists through to remission. However, it is unknown whether these disorders are characterized by common or distinct disruptions of cognitive control function and its neural basis. We investigated this gap in knowledge in asymptomatic BP and MDD participants, interpreted within a framework of normative function. METHODS: Participants underwent fMRI scans engaging cognitive control through a working memory task and completed a cognitive battery evaluating performance across multiple subdomains of cognitive control, including attention, impulsivity, processing speed, executive function, and memory. Analysis was performed in two stages: (i) cognitive control-related brain activation and deactivation were correlated with cognitive control performance in 115 healthy controls (HCs), then, (ii) significantly correlated regions from (i) were compared between 25 asymptomatic BP, 25 remitted MDD, and with 25 different HCs, matched for age and gender. RESULTS: Impulsivity and executive function performance were significantly worse in BP compared to both MDD and HCs. Both BP and MDD had significantly poorer memory performance compared to HCs. Greater deactivation of the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) during the fMRI task was associated with better executive function in healthy controls. Significantly less deactivation in this region was present in both BP and MDD compared to HCs. CONCLUSIONS: Failure to deactivate the MPFC, a key region of the default mode network, during working memory processing is a shared neural feature present in both bipolar and major depression and could be a source of common cognitive dysfunction.

Differential neural predictors of treatment response for fear and dysphoric features of posttraumatic stress disorder.

BACKGROUND: Although trauma-focused cognitive behavioral therapy (TF-CBT) is the frontline treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), at least one-third of patients are treatment nonresponders. This study aimed to identify neural markers of treatment response, specifically the prediction of remission of specific PTSD symptoms. METHODS: This study assessed PTSD treatment-seeking patients (n = 40) before TF-CBT during functional magnetic brain resonance imaging (fMRI) when they processed fearful, sad, happy, and neutral faces. Patients underwent nine sessions of TF-CBT and were independently assessed on the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) following treatment. Treatment responders and nonresponders were compared with healthy controls (n = 40). The severity of PTSD was assessed with the CAPS. fMRI responses were calculated for each emotion face compared to neutral contrast, which were correlated with reduction in PTSD severity from pretreatment to posttreatment. Treatment response was categorized by at least 50% reduction in the severity of PTSD. RESULTS: The activation of left insula during the processing of both sad and fearful faces was associated with a greater reduction of fear but not with dysphoric symptoms after treatment. Connectivity of the left insula to the pregenual anterior cingulate cortex was associated with poorer response to treatment. Responders and controllers had similar levels of activation and connectivity and were different from nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Positive response to TF-CBT is predicted during emotion processing by normal levels of recruitment of neural networks implicated in emotional information. These findings suggest that distinct neural networks are predictive of PTSD fear and dysphoric symptom reduction following TF-CBT.

Neural activity during response inhibition associated with improvement of dysphoric symptoms of PTSD after trauma-focused psychotherapy-an EEG-fMRI study.

Although trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy (TF-CBT) is the frontline treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), up to one half of patients do not respond optimally to this treatment. Inhibitory functions are important for successful management of PTSD, yet there is a dearth of knowledge regarding the extent to which neural mechanisms unpinning response inhibition are associated with TF-CBT response. Treatment-seeking PTSD patients (n = 40) were assessed during a response inhibition task (the Go/No-Go task) while undergoing functional magnetic imaging (fMRI) and event-related potentials (ERP) in separate sessions. PTSD symptom severity was assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale, before undergoing nine sessions of TF-CBT. They were then reassessed post-treatment to estimate reduction in fear and dysphoric symptoms of PTSD. Although neural responses during the inhibitory task did not predict overall symptom change, reduced activation in the left precuneus and the right superior parietal cortex predicted greater improvement in dysphoric symptoms. ERP responses during response inhibition indicated that lower P3 peak latency predicted greater reduction of dysphoric symptoms. There were no significant predictors of changes of fear symptoms. These findings indicate that neural activity associated with response inhibition can act as a predictive biomarker of TF-CBT response for PTSD symptoms. This pattern of findings underscores the importance of delineating the role of biomarkers to predict remission of subtypes of PTSD.

White matter anisotropy and response to cognitive behavior therapy for posttraumatic stress disorder.

Trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy (TF-CBT) is the gold standard treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), up to one-half of PTSD patients remain treatment non-responders. Although studies have used functional MRI to understand the neurobiology of treatment response, there is less understanding of the role of white matter brain structures in response to TF-CBT. Thirty-six treatment-seeking PTSD patients and 33 age-gender matched healthy controls completed diffusion-weighted imaging scans at baseline. Patients underwent nine sessions of TF-CBT treatment and PTSD symptom severity was assessed with the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale before and after completing treatment. Patients were assessed to estimate the reduction in overall symptoms and also specifically fear and dysphoric symptoms of PTSD. Tract-based spatial statistical analyses were performed for the PTSD group to evaluate whole-brain correlations of fractional anisotropy (FA) with improvement in overall, fear, and dysphoric symptoms using non-parametric permutation inference testing (pFWE < 0.05). Next, we evaluated if these significant measures also characterized PTSD from controls. Greater improvement in dysphoric symptoms was found correlated with lower FA in white matter regions associated with the limbic system, frontal cortex, thalamic association and projection fibers, corpus callosum, and tracts related to the brainstem. White matter anisotropy was not found associated with either overall or fear symptoms. FA in the significant clusters was similar between PTSD and controls. White-matter related to key functional regions may also play an important role in response to TF-CBT. Our results underscore the heterogeneity of PTSD and the need to evaluate distinct symptom phenotypes in treatment studies.

Intrinsic connectomes underlying response to trauma-focused psychotherapy in post-traumatic stress disorder.

Although trauma-focused cognitive behavior therapy (TF-CBT) is the frontline treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), up to one-half of patients are treatment nonresponders. To understand treatment nonresponse, it is important to understand the neural mechanisms of TF-CBT. Here, we used whole-brain intrinsic functional connectivity analysis to identify neural connectomic signatures of treatment outcome. In total, 36 PTSD patients and 36 healthy individuals underwent functional MRI at pre-treatment baseline. Patients then underwent nine sessions of TF-CBT and completed clinical and follow-up MRIs. We used an established large-scale brain network atlas to parcellate the brain into 343 brain regions. Pairwise intrinsic task-free functional connectivity was calculated and used to identify pre-treatment connectomic features that were correlated with reduction of PTSD severity from pretreatment to post treatment. We formed a composite metric of intrinsic connections associated with therapeutic outcome, and then interrogated this composite metric to determine if it distinguished PTSD treatment responders and nonresponders from healthy control status and changed post treatment. Lower pre-treatment connectivity for the cingulo-opercular, salience, default mode, dorsal attention, and frontoparietal executive control brain networks was associated with treatment improvement. Treatment responders had lower while nonresponders had significantly greater connectivity than controls at pretreatment. With therapy, connectivity significantly increased for responders and decreased for nonresponders, while controls remain unchanged over this time period. We provide evidence that the intrinsic functional architecture of the brain, specifically connectivity within and between brain networks associated with external vigilance, self-awareness, and cognitive control, may characterize a positive response to TF-CBT for PTSD.

Neurophysiological markers of attention distinguish bipolar disorder and unipolar depression.

BACKGROUND: Attentional deficits are common in both symptomatic and symptom-remitted patients with bipolar disorder (BP) and major depressive disorder (MDD). However, whether the level of neurocognitive impairment in attentional processing is different between these two disorders, or not, is still unclear. Thus, we investigated the P300 event-related potential component as a biomarker of cognitive dysfunction to differentiate BP and MDD. METHODS: Twenty-three age and gender matched BP, 20 MDD and 23 healthy controls (HC) were part of a discovery cohort to identify neurophysiological differences between groups and build a classification model of these disorders. The replication of this model was then tested in an independent second cohort of 17 BP, 19 MDD and 19 HC. All participants were symptom-remitted for at least two weeks. We compared neural responses to target stimuli during an auditory oddball task, computing peak amplitude and latency of the P300 component extracted from the midline centro-parietal electrode. RESULTS: BP had significantly smaller P300 amplitudes compared to both MDD and HC, whereas there were no differences between MDD and HC. The differences between groups were replicated in the second cohort, however the accuracy level of the classification model was only 53.5%. LIMITATIONS: Small sample sizes may have led to low accuracy levels of the classification model. CONCLUSION: Specific neural mechanisms of attention and context updating seem not to recover with symptom remission in BP. These findings contribute to the detection of a potential electrophysiological marker for BP, which may allow its differentiation from unipolar major depressive disorder.

Amygdala Activation and Connectivity to Emotional Processing Distinguishes Asymptomatic Patients With Bipolar Disorders and Unipolar Depression.

BACKGROUND: Mechanistically based neural markers, such as amygdala reactivity, offer one approach to addressing the challenges of differentiating bipolar and unipolar depressive disorders independently from mood state and acute symptoms. Although emotion-elicited amygdala reactivity has been found to distinguish patients with bipolar depression from patients with unipolar depression, it remains unknown whether this distinction is traitlike and present in the absence of an acutely depressed mood. We addressed this gap by investigating patients with bipolar disorder (BP) and unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) in remission. METHODS: Supraliminal and subliminal processing of faces exhibiting threat, sad, happy, and neutral emotions during functional magnetic resonance imaging was completed by 73 participants (23 BP patients and 25 MDD patients matched for age and gender, number of depressive episodes and severity; 25 age- and gender-matched healthy control subjects). We compared groups for activation and connectivity for the amygdala. RESULTS: BP patients had lower left amygdala activation than MDD patients during supraliminal and subliminal threat, sad, and neutral emotion processing and for subliminal happy faces. BP patients also exhibited lower amygdala connectivity to the insula and hippocampus for threat and to medial orbitofrontal cortex for happy supraliminal and subliminal processing. BP patients also demonstrated greater amygdala-insula connectivity for sad supraliminal and subliminal face processing. Both patient groups were distinct from control subjects across several measures for activation and connectivity. CONCLUSIONS: Independent of valence or level of emotional awareness, amygdala activation and connectivity during facial emotion processing can distinguish BP patients and MDD patients. These findings provide evidence that this neural substrate could be a potential trait marker to differentiate these two disorders largely independent of illness state.

Outcome predictability biases cued search.

Within the domain of associative learning, there is substantial evidence that people (and other animals) select among environmental cues on the basis of their reinforcement history. Specifically, people preferentially attend to, and learn about, cueing stimuli that have previously predicted events of consequence (a predictiveness bias). By contrast, relatively little is known about whether people prioritize some (to-be-predicted) outcome events over others on the basis of their past experience with those outcomes (a predictability bias). The present experiments assessed whether the prior predictability of a stimulus results in a learning bias in a contingency learning task, as such effects are not anticipated by formal models of associative learning. Previously unpredictable stimuli were less readily learned about than previously predictable stimuli. This pattern is unlikely to reflect the use of strategic search processes or blocking of learning by the context. Instead we argue that our findings are most consistent with the operation of a biased learning mechanism. (PsycINFO Database Record