RESUMO
A 59-year-old male with an secundum atrial septal defect status post repair with an Amplatzer occluder in 2001 was admitted with sepsis and MRSA bacteremia. Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE) showed presence of an overlying mobile echogenic structure on the left atrial surface of the device suggestive of a vegetation/infected thrombus. This is only the 3rd case description of late endocarditis involving the Amplatzer ASD closure device in an adult.
Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana/etiologia , Comunicação Interatrial/cirurgia , Dispositivo para Oclusão Septal/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Daptomicina/uso terapêutico , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Endocardite Bacteriana/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Catheter ablations are traditionally performed using fluoroscopic guidance, exposing both patients and medical staff to the risks of radiation. Nonfluoroscopic catheter ablation has been used successfully to treat limited types of arrhythmias in children, but whether this approach has broad application in adults is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of fluoroless catheter ablation in adults being treated for a range of arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective analysis was performed in 2 patient groups (both n = 60): (1) the nonfluoroscopy (NF) group consisting of consecutive adult patients, in which catheter positioning was accomplished exclusively with intracardiac electrograms (IE), electroanatomic mapping (EAM), and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE); and (2) the fluoroscopy (F) group, in which catheter positioning was additionally guided by fluoroscopy. The patients in the F group were selected to match the types of arrhythmias in the NF group. All ablation procedures were performed by one operator. The total procedure time did not differ between groups for any specific type of arrhythmia ablated. Acute procedural success was similar in both groups (NF, 59/60 [98%] and F, 60/60 [100%]). The complications were limited to a groin pseudoaneurysm in the NF group, and pericardial effusion and groin hematoma in the F group. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablations were efficiently and effectively performed in adults with a variety of arrhythmias using only IE, EAM, and ICE for catheter guidance. This nonfluoroscopic technique was feasible, posed no additional safety concerns, and should be readily implementable in most electrophysiology laboratories.
Assuntos
Arritmias Cardíacas/cirurgia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Técnicas Eletrofisiológicas Cardíacas , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Arritmias Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Arritmias Cardíacas/fisiopatologia , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Doses de Radiação , Radiografia Intervencionista , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Cryothermal ablation (CTA) for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is considered safer than radiofrequency ablation (RFA) since it eliminates the risk of inadvertent AV block. However, it has not been widely adopted due to high late recurrence rate (LRR). In an effort to improve LRR, we evaluated a new approach to cryothermal mapping (CTM): "time to tachycardia termination" (TTT). METHODS: This single-center study had 88 consecutive patients who underwent CTA using TTT for AVNRT. The CTA catheter was positioned in sinus rhythm at the posteroseptal tricuspid annulus, and then AVNRT was induced. The CTA target site was identified by prompt tachycardia termination in ≤20 s during CTM. Procedural success was defined as no inducible AVNRT and ≤1 single AV nodal echoes. RESULTS: Acute procedural success was achieved in 87 of 88 patients (98.9 %) and was similar to prior studies for both CTA and RFA. No permanent AV block was observed. LRR was 3.7 % at a mean follow-up of 19.7 months. LRR was equivalent to that commonly reported for RFA and improved when compared to conventional CTA. CONCLUSION: TTT for CTA of AVNRT provides enhanced safety and similar long-term efficacy when compared to RFA. Based upon this experience, TTT provides an enhancement to conventional CTA that appears to result in improved long-term outcomes. In light of these findings, it seems reasonable to undertake additional randomized trials to determine whether RFA or CTA using TTT is the optimal approach for the catheter ablation of AVNRT.
Assuntos
Mapeamento Potencial de Superfície Corporal/métodos , Criocirurgia/métodos , Cirurgia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Taquicardia por Reentrada no Nó Atrioventricular/diagnóstico por imagem , Taquicardia por Reentrada no Nó Atrioventricular/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Significant aortic insufficiency (AI) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement affects device performance and end-organ perfusion. This study examined the development and progression of AI after implantation of continuous-flow LVAD. METHODS: Seventy-nine patients undergoing Heart Mate II (Thoratec Corp, Pleasanton, CA) LVAD implantation for predominantly destination therapy (n = 69 [87%]) were examined. Preoperative and postoperative echocardiograms for all patients were reviewed at the intervals of 0 to 3, 3 to 6, 6 to 12, 12 to 18, and 18 to 24 months. AI was graded on an interval scale of 0, none; 0.5, trivial; 1, mild; 1.5, mild to moderate; 2, moderate; 2.5, moderate to severe; and 3, severe. Development and progression of AI were analyzed. RESULTS: The incidence of significant AI (mild or greater) was 52% (n = 41). Median time to AI development was 187 days. The median duration of VAD support was 761 days. Mild AI developed in 41 patients (52%). No severe AI developed. In the Cox regression model (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]), aortic valve closure (2.51 [1.06 to 5.89]; p = 0.03), and age (1.04 [1.008 to 1.08]; p = 0.01) were independent predictors of AI development. There was no difference in mortality rates in the two groups (p = 0.40 by log-rank test). A mixed-model linear regression analysis showed a significant overall progression of AI over time (ß ± standard error, 0.06 ± 0.02; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: AI develops over time in a significant number of Heart Mate II LVAD patients. AI is more common in patients with closed aortic valves and in the older age group. As more patients require long-term VAD support, the development of AI will need careful attention and monitoring.