[Differential impact and heterogeneous needs. A peer-led training program for improving chronic patients' health status and health behaviors]. / Impacto diferencial, necesidades heterogéneas. La formación entre iguales para mejorar la salud y los hábitos de vida de los pacientes crónicos.

OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of the peer-led training for chronic patients on their health status and behaviors. DESIGN: Descriptive, transversal pretest and posttest quantitative approach. PLACEMENT: Andalusia. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred sixty-four patients with Diabetes, fibromyalgia and heart failure, trained at the School of Patients between 2013 and 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Peer-training intervention for self-efficacy for chronic patients. MAIN MEASUREMENT: Self-reported health status, activity limitation, diet and physical activity. Statistical analysis included descriptive and bivariate statistics, correlation coefficient and net gains for paired variables. RESULTS: Health status improved after the training, with less limitations and better diet and physical activity, with significant differences by sex, chronic illness, education level and marriage status. Improvement areas where identified for the training strategy, with special attention on the needs of more vulnerable groups (women, people with less education level). CONCLUSIONS: The peer training had a positive impact, with differences depending on social profiles. 1-year and 2-years posttest measurements are needed and a qualitative study is required in order to better evaluate the peer-led strategy and to adapt it to participants' needs and expectations.

Economic Analysis of Cochlear Implants in Adults With Bilateral Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss. A Systematic Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness or cost-utility of cochlear implants (CI) in adults with severe to profound bilateral hearing loss. DATABASES REVIEWED: PubMed (Medline), The Cochrane Library, Embase via Elsevier, EBSCOhost CINAHL, and Scopus. METHODS: The study included adult participants with severe to profound bilateral neurosensory hearing loss. The analysis encompassed quality of life improvements, costs, cost-effectiveness, cost-utility, cost-benefit, quality-adjusted life year (QALY), incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR). Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, case series, and prospective or retrospective cohort studies published in English between 2010 and 2023 were retrieved. Exclusion criteria included incomplete studies, abstracts, clinical cases, editorials, letters, studies involving pediatric populations, single-side deafness, methodology research, noneconomic aspects of CI, mixed child and adult data, and studies published before 2010. The risk of bias was assessed following the criteria outlined in Appendix I of the economic evaluation's quality assessment as per the NICE Guideline Development Method. RESULTS: Ten articles met the criteria and were included in the qualitative synthesis. One study conducted a prospective cost-utility analyses, one carried out a cost-benefit analyses, one was a randomized controlled clinical trial focusing on cost-utility, and another was a clinical trial addressing cost-effectiveness. Six studies employed Markov models, and one study utilized uniquely the Monte Carlo method. None quantified the economic impact of improved hearing on cognitive function. CONCLUSIONS: The heterogeneity of sources impacted data quality. Unilateral and sequential bilateral CI appeared to be cost-effective when compared with bilateral hearing aids or nontechnological support. When properly indicated, simultaneous bilateral CIs are cost-effective compared to no interventions and to unilateral cochlear implantation through differential discounting or variations from the base cases, especially with a life expectancy of 5-10 years or longer.

Impacto diferencial, necesidades heterogéneas. La formación entre iguales para mejorar la salud y los hábitos de vida de los pacientes crónicos / Differential impact and heterogeneous needs. A peer-led training program for improving chronic patients' health status and health behaviors

OBJETIVO: Evaluar el impacto de la formación entre iguales de la Escuela de Pacientes sobre la salud autopercibida y los hábitos de vida de las personas con enfermedades crónicas. DISEÑO: Descriptivo, transversal de evaluación cuantitativa pretest/postest. EMPLAZAMIENTO: Andalucía. PARTICIPANTES: Novecientos sesenta y cuatro pacientes con diabetes, fibromialgia e insuficiencia cardíaca participantes en la Escuela de Pacientes entre 2013 y 2015. INTERVENCIONES: Sesión de formación para formadores en autocuidados para personas con enfermedades crónicas. Mediciones principales: Se usó un cuestionario que midió salud autopercibida, limitaciones, dieta y actividad física. El análisis estadístico fue descriptivo, bivariante, de correlaciones y de ganancias netas. RESULTADOS: Tras realizar la formación se observó una mejoría de la salud, con menos limitaciones y mejor dieta y ejercicio físico, con diferencias estadísticamente significativas en función del sexo, enfermedad, nivel de estudios y estado civil. Se plantean propuestas de mejora de la estrategia formativa, con atención a las necesidades específicas de los colectivos más vulnerables: mujeres y personas con menor nivel educativo. CONCLUSIONES: El impacto de la formación fue positivo y diferencial en función de los perfiles de participantes. Se recomienda profundizar en los resultados, a través de metodología cualitativa, realizar mediciones postest posteriores y adaptar la estrategia formativa a la heterogeneidad de las necesidades de la población formada

OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of the peer-led training for chronic patients on their health status and behaviors. DESIGN: Descriptive, transversal pretest and posttest quantitative approach. PLACEMENT: Andalusia. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred sixty-four patients with Diabetes, fibromyalgia and heart failure, trained at the School of Patients between 2013 and 2015. INTERVENTIONS: Peer-training intervention for self-efficacy for chronic patients. Main measurement: Self-reported health status, activity limitation, diet and physical activity. Statistical analysis included descriptive and bivariate statistics, correlation coefficient and net gains for paired variables. RESULTS: Health status improved after the training, with less limitations and better diet and physical activity, with significant differences by sex, chronic illness, education level and marriage status. Improvement areas where identified for the training strategy, with special attention on the needs of more vulnerable groups (women, people with less education level). CONCLUSIONS: The peer training had a positive impact, with differences depending on social profiles. 1-year and 2-years posttest measurements are needed and a qualitative study is required in order to better evaluate the peer-led strategy and to adapt it to participants' needs and expectations

[Fibromyalgia: Patient perception on their disease and health system. Qualitative research study]. / Fibromialgia: percepción de pacientes sobre su enfermedad y el sistema de salud. Estudio de investigación cualitativa.

OBJECTIVE: To know the experiences and expectations of persons with fibromyalgia towards the health system and its professionals. METHODS: Qualitative study with three focal groups. The first focal group included patients with fibromyalgia, 20 women and 1 man, receiving care in the public health system, with different assistance paths and progression. Informed Consent was required. Content analysis was done. RESULTS: Patients describe a difficult experience, with symptoms that may involve incapacity for daily activities. Until knowing their diagnosis, they feel a lack of understanding and also loneliness. They develop different coping strategies, as looking for information or association. From the health system they expect: attention and a fast diagnosis, accessibility to consultations, medical exams and therapies or an impulse for research. They want trained professionals, proactive attitudes, interest, empathy and information. DISCUSSION: Qualitative methods seem suitable for delving into patient experience. Health assistance must improve patients' quality of life, facilitating their assistance process and offering companionship, interest, comprehension and support.

Fibromialgia: percepción de pacientes sobre su enfermedad y el sistema de salud. Estudio de investigación cualitativa / Fibromyalgia: Patient perception on their disease and health system. Qualitative research study

Objetivo Conocer la experiencia y vivencia de personas con fibromialgia y sus expectativas sobre el sistema sanitario y sus profesionales. Métodos Diseño cualitativo a través de grupos focales. Se realizaron tres grupos, uno con pacientes que pertenecían a asociaciones de fibromialgia. Participaron 20 mujeres y 1 varón. Se incluyeron personas que recibían atención en el sistema sanitario público, con distintas trayectorias asistenciales y evolución. Se pidió consentimiento informado. Análisis de contenido. Resultados Describen una vivencia difícil con una sintomatología que puede ser incapacitante para las actividades cotidianas. Hasta que reciben el diagnóstico, perciben incomprensión y soledad. Desarrollan distintas estrategias de afrontamiento, como buscar información o asociarse. Esperan del sistema sanitario: atención y diagnósticos ágiles, acceso a consultas, pruebas que necesiten y terapias beneficiosas o impulso a la investigación. Quieren profesionales con formación para abordar la fibromialgia, una actitud proactiva, interés, empatía e información. Discusión La metodología cualitativa fue idónea para profundizar en la experiencia de pacientes. La atención sanitaria debe dirigirse a mejorar su calidad de vida facilitando su proceso asistencial y ofreciendo acompañamiento, interés, comprensión y apoyo(AU)

Objective To know the experiences and expectations of persons with fibromyalgia towards the health system and its professionals. Methods Qualitative study with three focal groups. The first focal group included patients with fibromyalgia, 20 women and 1 man, receiving care in the public health system, with different assistance paths and progression. Informed Consent was required. Content analysis was done. Results Patients describe a difficult experience, with symptoms that may involve incapacity for daily activities. Until knowing their diagnosis, they feel a lack of understanding and also loneliness. They develop different coping strategies, as looking for information or association. From the health system they expect: attention and a fast diagnosis, accessibility to consultations, medical exams and therapies or an impulse for research. They want trained professionals, proactive attitudes, interest, empathy and information. Discussion Qualitative methods seem suitable for delving into patient experience. Health assistance must improve patients’ quality of life, facilitating their assistance process and offering companionship, interest, comprehension and support(AU)