RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Large clinical trials and small real-world studies show that a 1L polyethylene glycol and ascorbic acid solution (1L PEG-ASC) is an effective and safe bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Here, the effectiveness and safety of 1L PEG-ASC was evaluated in a large cohort of patients in routine clinical practice in Spain. METHODS: A sub-analysis was performed in an observational, multicenter, retrospective study assessing the effectiveness and safety of 1L PEG-ASC in adult patients undergoing a colonoscopy at 10 centers in Spain. Cleansing quality was assessed with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, scores ≥6 with all segmental scores ≥2 was considered adequate colon cleansing, high-quality was considered as cleansing ≥8 or =3 in the right colon. Polyp and adenoma detection rates, and adverse events were also assessed. RESULTS: Data was collected from 7160 patients: 48.3% males; mean age 58.0, 33.6% ≥65 years old. Adequate overall bowel cleansing was achieved in 95.6% of patients (95% CI 95.1%-96.0%), high quality cleansing in 74.4% (95% CI 73.4%-75.4%) and high-quality right colon cleansing in 66.0% (95% CI 64.9-67.1). The adequate overall cleansing rate was 97.0% with a split-dose and 94.0% with same-day regimen (P<0.0001), and high-quality right colon cleansing was 69.0% and 62.5% (P<0.0001), respectively. Colonoscopy was completed in 97.2% of cases. A multivariate regression analysis revealed that an overnight split-dose regimen and age <65 years were independent predictors of adequate bowel cleansing of the overall colon, age <65 years and female gender were independent predictors of HQ cleansing of the overall colon, and the three covariates were independent predictors of HQ cleansing of the right colon. At least one adverse event was experienced by 3.3% of participants, with nausea (1.5%) and vomiting (1.2%) being the most frequent. CONCLUSION: This sub-analysis confirmed 1L PEG-ASC to be an effective and safe bowel cleansing preparation in a real world setting in Spain.
RESUMO
Acute pancreatitis is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It can develop complications such as fluid collections and necrosis. Infection of necrosis occurs in about 20-40% of patients with severe acute pancreatitis, and is associated with organ failure and worse prognosis. In the past years, the treatment of pancreatic collections has shifted from open surgery to minimally invasive techniques, such as endoscopic ultrasound guided drainage. These guidelines from a selection of experts among the Endoscopic Ultrasound Group from the Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (GSEED-USE) have the purpose to provide advice on the management of pancreatic collections based on a thorough review of the available scientific evidence. It also reflects the experience and clinical practice of the authors, who are advanced endoscopists or clinical pancreatologists with extensive experience in managing patients with acute pancreatitis.
RESUMO
Objetivo Los vómitos en posos de café son un síntoma clásico de hemorragia digestiva alta. Sin embargo, tienen escasa validez semiológica, dado su conocido bajo valor predictivo positivo. Nuestro objetivo es determinar si realizar una gastroscopia urgente en estos pacientes modifica nuestra conducta terapéutica con impacto real en la morbimortalidad. Pacientes y métodos Se trata de un estudio retrospectivo, observacional y descriptivo en el que se analizaron aquellos pacientes que se realizaron una gastroscopia en nuestro centro por vómitos en posos de café en los últimos 4 años (2017-2021). Se establecieron 2 grupos: endoscopia urgente (primeras 24h) y programada (más de 24h) y se evaluaron las diferencias entre ambos grupos en supervivencia, estancia en la UCI, días de ingreso hospitalario y tasa de resangrado. Resultados Se identificaron 314 pacientes, de los que finalmente se incluyeron 276, perteneciendo 176 al grupo de gastroscopia urgente y 109 al de diferida. No se identificaron diferencias en la tasa de ingreso en la UCI, días de estancia hospitalaria, supervivencia ni resangrado a los 30 días. Tampoco se objetivaron diferencias en la tasa de detección de lesiones potencialmente sangrantes ni en la necesidad de terapéutica endoscópica. Conclusiones Los vómitos en posos de café, sin otros datos clínicos de hemorragia digestiva, no son un indicador fiable de la misma, y la realización de una gastroscopia urgente no aporta beneficios en términos de morbimortalidad. Una estrategia conservadora en estos pacientes permitiría diferir endoscopias, evitando riesgos y ayudando al control de gastos sin incidir en el pronóstico del paciente. (AU)
Objective Coffee ground vomiting is a classical symptom of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, the clinical usefulness is limited, due to the low positive predictive value. Our goal is to determine if whether an urgent endoscopy does modify our therapeutic management with a real impact on survival. Patients and methods It is a retrospective, observational and descriptive study. We selected all patients that underwent a gastroscopy in our center for coffee ground vomiting over the last 4 years (2017-2021). Two groups were established: urgent endoscopy (first 24h) and scheduled (over 24h). Then we studied differences between both groups regarding survival, ICU admission, hospitalization days and rebleeding. Results Three hundred and fourteen patients were identified, from which 276 were included, with 176 belonging to the urgency group and 109 to the scheduled group. There were no differences in the ICU admission, hospitalization days, survival or rebleeding after 30 days. There were no differences either in the number of potentially bleeding lesions or the need of endoscopic therapeutic. Conclusions Coffee ground vomiting, without any other data supporting upper gastrointestinal bleeding, does not represent a reliable indicator. Performing urgent endoscopy is not beneficial in terms of morbimortality. Therefore, a more conservative strategy would allow to differ endoscopy, decreasing risks and reducing costs, without affecting the prognosis. (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Endoscopia/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Vômito , Indicadores de Morbimortalidade , Epidemiologia Descritiva , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
No disponible
Assuntos
Humanos , Esôfago de Barrett/etiologia , Esôfago de Barrett/terapia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
A 55-year-old Caucasian male with a long history of smoking and reflux disease underwent endoscopic evaluation for dyspepsia. During upper endoscopy, a 4 cm long Barrett's segment with an 8 mm nodular lesion was detected. The lesion was removed en-bloc by endoscopic mucosal resection and biopsies were taken from the adjacent columnar epithelium. The histology of the lesion revealed high-grade dysplasia with clear resection margins and no lymphovascular invasion. The remaining biopsies did not show any dysplastic changes. He subsequently underwent three sequential sessions of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to eradicate the remaining Barrett's epithelium. When this type of case presents to the clinic for follow-up, what do you do next?
No disponible
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esôfago de Barrett/patologia , Esôfago de Barrett/cirurgia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/patologia , Vigilância da População , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Metaplasia , Mucosa Gástrica/patologia , Biópsia , Ablação por Cateter/métodos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
No disponible
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Isquemia/diagnóstico por imagem , Enteropatias/etiologia , Volvo Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Volvo Intestinal/patologia , Pneumatose Cistoide Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Isquemia/terapia , Gastrostomia , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Obstrução Intestinal/complicações , Parede Abdominal/patologiaRESUMO
No disponible
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Cirurgia Bariátrica/normas , Obesidade Mórbida/cirurgia , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios , Tromboembolia/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Risco , EspanhaRESUMO
Durante los últimos años estamos asistiendo a un importante incremento en el número y tipo de técnicas endoscópicas bariátricas: se han propuesto distintos modelos de balones, sistemas de suturas, inyección de sustancias, colocación de prótesis, etc. También se han incorporado técnicas endoscópicas de revisión para aquellos casos de pacientes intervenidos de cirugía bariátrica que presentan recuperación ponderal. Todo ello obliga a la necesidad de protocolizar, posicionar y regularizar todas estas técnicas, mediante un consenso que permita su aplicación clínica con el máximo rigor médico y evidencia científica disponibles. Tras editar una primera parte de Consideraciones Generales, en esta segunda revisaremos las indicaciones, metodología y resultados de cada una las principales técnicas que se realizan en nuestro país, con intención de establecer una base y unos requisitos mínimos que faciliten y favorezcan la correcta práctica diaria de estos procedimientos en las Unidades de Endoscopia Bariátrica
During the last years we have been witnessing a significant increase in the number and type of bariatric endoscopic techniques: we have different types of balloons, suture systems, injection of substances and malabsorptive prosthesis, etc. Also, some endoscopic revisional procedures for patients with weight regain after bariatric surgery have been incorporated. This makes it necessary to protocolize, position and regularize all these techniques, through a consensus that allows their clinical application with the maximum medical rigor and scientific evidence available
Assuntos
Humanos , Obesidade/cirurgia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal/métodos , Cirurgia Bariátrica/métodos , Bariatria/normas , Seleção de PacientesAssuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/métodos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/métodos , Bulas para o Paciente , Esôfago de Barrett/epidemiologia , Serviços de Informação/normas , Serviços de Informação , Disseminação de Informação/métodos , Esôfago de Barrett/prevenção & controle , Serviços de Informação/organização & administração , Serviços de Informação/tendênciasRESUMO
Los tumores gastroenteropancreáticos endocrinos (TEGEP) pertenecen al grupo de tumores neuroendocrinos. Los tumores TEGEP se diferencian, fundamentalmente, en 2 grupos: los tumores endocrinopancreáticos y los tumores carcinoides. En ambos grupos la sintomatología puede quedar producida por la producción de una hormona por el tumor. Por la localización de estos tumores, las diferentes técnicas de endoscopia digestiva juegan un papel fundamental en la localización, tipificación histológica y citológica, e incluso para su resección endoscópica. En el presente artículo se describen los distintos procedimientos endoscópicos disponibles que son útiles para la localización y el manejo de estos tumores (AU)
Gastroenteropancreatic endocrine tumors can be broadly divided into two groups: pancreatic endocrine tumors and carcinoid tumors. In both types of tumor, patients can present with a clinical syndrome related to hormone secretion by the tumor. Due to the location of these tumors, the various endoscopic techniques play a major role in their localization and histological and cytological confirmation, and even in their endoscopic resection. The present article describes the endoscopic procedures available for the localization and management of these tumors (AU)