Global structures, practices, and tools for provision of chronic peritoneal dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Worldwide, the uptake of peritoneal dialysis (PD) compared with hemodialysis remains limited. This study assessed organizational structures, availability, accessibility, affordability and quality of PD worldwide. METHODS: This cross-sectional study relied on data from kidney registries as well as survey data from stakeholders (clinicians, policymakers and advocates for people living with kidney disease) from countries affiliated with the International Society of Nephrology (ISN) from July to September 2022. RESULTS: Overall, 167 countries participated in the survey. PD was available in 79% of countries with a median global prevalence of 21.0 [interquartile range (IQR) 1.5-62.4] per million population (pmp). High-income countries (HICs) had an 80-fold higher prevalence of PD than low-income countries (LICs) (56.2 pmp vs 0.7 pmp). In 53% of countries, adults had greater PD access than children. Only 29% of countries used public funding (and free) reimbursement for PD with Oceania and South East Asia (6%), Africa (10%) and South Asia (14%) having the lowest proportions of countries in this category. Overall, the annual median cost of PD was US$18 959.2 (IQR US$10 891.4-US$31 013.8) with full private out-of-pocket payment in 4% of countries and the highest median cost in LICs (US$30 064.4) compared with other country income levels (e.g. HICs US$27 206.0). CONCLUSIONS: Ongoing large gaps and variability in the availability, access and affordability of PD across countries and world regions were observed. Of note, there is significant inequity in access to PD by children and for people in LICs.

Home versus in-centre haemodialysis for people with kidney failure.

BACKGROUND: Home haemodialysis (HHD) may be associated with important clinical, social or economic benefits. However, few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated HHD versus in-centre HD (ICHD). The relative benefits and harms of these two HD modalities are uncertain. This is an update of a review first published in 2014. This update includes non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of HHD versus ICHD in adults with kidney failure. SEARCH METHODS: We contacted the Information Specialist and searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 9 October 2022 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We searched MEDLINE (OVID) and EMBASE (OVID) for NRSIs. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs and NRSIs evaluating HHD (including community houses and self-care) compared to ICHD in adults with kidney failure were eligible. The outcomes of interest were cardiovascular death, all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, all-cause hospitalisation, vascular access interventions, central venous catheter insertion/exchange, vascular access infection, parathyroidectomy, wait-listing for a kidney transplant, receipt of a kidney transplant, quality of life (QoL), symptoms related to dialysis therapy, fatigue, recovery time, cost-effectiveness, blood pressure, and left ventricular mass. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently assessed if the studies were eligible and then extracted data. The risk of bias was assessed, and relevant outcomes were extracted. Summary estimates of effect were obtained using a random-effects model, and results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI for continuous outcomes. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Meta-analysis was performed on outcomes where there was sufficient data. MAIN RESULTS: From the 1305 records identified, a single cross-over RCT and 39 NRSIs proved eligible for inclusion. These studies were of varying design (prospective cohort, retrospective cohort, cross-sectional) and involved a widely variable number of participants (small single-centre studies to international registry analyses). Studies also varied in the treatment prescription and delivery (e.g. treatment duration, frequency, dialysis machine parameters) and participant characteristics (e.g. time on dialysis). Studies often did not describe these parameters in detail. Although the risk of bias, as assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, was generally low for most studies, within the constraints of observational study design, studies were at risk of selection bias and residual confounding. Many study outcomes were reported in ways that did not allow direct comparison or meta-analysis. It is uncertain whether HHD, compared to ICHD, may be associated with a decrease in cardiovascular death (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.07; 2 NRSIs, 30,900 participants; very low certainty evidence) or all-cause death (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.95; 9 NRSIs, 58,984 patients; very low certainty evidence). It is also uncertain whether HHD may be associated with a decrease in hospitalisation rate (MD -0.50 admissions per patient-year, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.02; 2 NRSIs, 834 participants; very low certainty evidence), compared with ICHD. Compared with ICHD, it is uncertain whether HHD may be associated with receipt of kidney transplantation (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.63; 6 NRSIs, 10,910 participants; very low certainty evidence) and a shorter recovery time post-dialysis (MD -2.0 hours, 95% CI -2.73 to -1.28; 2 NRSIs, 348 participants; very low certainty evidence). It remains uncertain if HHD may be associated with decreased systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD -11.71 mm Hg, 95% CI -21.11 to -2.46; 4 NRSIs, 491 participants; very low certainty evidence) and decreased left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (MD -17.74 g/m2, 95% CI -29.60 to -5.89; 2 NRSIs, 130 participants; low certainty evidence). There was insufficient data to evaluate the relative association of HHD and ICHD with fatigue or vascular access outcomes. Patient-reported outcome measures were reported using 18 different measures across 11 studies (QoL: 6 measures; mental health: 3 measures; symptoms: 1 measure; impact and view of health: 6 measures; functional ability: 2 measures). Few studies reported the same measures, which limited the ability to perform meta-analysis or compare outcomes. It is uncertain whether HHD is more cost-effective than ICHD, both in the first (SMD -1.25, 95% CI -2.13 to -0.37; 4 NRSIs, 13,809 participants; very low certainty evidence) and second year of dialysis (SMD -1.47, 95% CI -2.72 to -0.21; 4 NRSIs, 13,809 participants; very low certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on low to very low certainty evidence, HHD, compared with ICHD, has uncertain associations or may be associated with decreased cardiovascular and all-cause death, hospitalisation rate, slower post-dialysis recovery time, and decreased SBP and LVMI. HHD has uncertain cost-effectiveness compared with ICHD in the first and second years of treatment. The majority of studies included in this review were observational and subject to potential selection bias and confounding, especially as patients treated with HHD tended to be younger with fewer comorbidities. Variation from study to study in the choice of outcomes and the way in which they were reported limited the ability to perform meta-analyses. Future research should align outcome measures and metrics with other research in the field in order to allow comparison between studies, establish outcome effects with greater certainty, and avoid research waste.

Peritoneal dialysis versus haemodialysis for people commencing dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dialysis (PD) and haemodialysis (HD) are two possible modalities for people with kidney failure commencing dialysis. Only a few randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated PD versus HD. The benefits and harms of the two modalities remain uncertain. This review includes both RCTs and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of PD, compared to HD, in people with kidney failure initiating dialysis. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies from 2000 to June 2024 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for NRSIs from 2000 until 28 March 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs and NRSIs evaluating PD compared to HD in people initiating dialysis were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two investigators independently assessed if the studies were eligible and then extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using standard Cochrane methods, and relevant outcomes were extracted for each report. The primary outcome was residual kidney function (RKF). Secondary outcomes included all-cause, cardiovascular and infection-related death, infection, cardiovascular disease, hospitalisation, technique survival, life participation and fatigue. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 153 reports of 84 studies (2 RCTs, 82 NRSIs) were included. Studies varied widely in design (small single-centre studies to international registry analyses) and in the included populations (broad inclusion criteria versus restricted to more specific participants). Additionally, treatment delivery (e.g. automated versus continuous ambulatory PD, HD with catheter versus arteriovenous fistula or graft, in-centre versus home HD) and duration of follow-up varied widely. The two included RCTs were deemed to be at high risk of bias in terms of blinding participants and personnel and blinding outcome assessment for outcomes pertaining to quality of life. However, most other criteria were assessed as low risk of bias for both studies. Although the risk of bias (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) was generally low for most NRSIs, studies were at risk of selection bias and residual confounding due to the constraints of the observational study design. In children, there may be little or no difference between HD and PD on all-cause death (6 studies, 5752 participants: RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.07; I2 = 28%; low certainty) and cardiovascular death (3 studies, 7073 participants: RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.58 to 2.59; I2 = 29%; low certainty), and was unclear for infection-related death (4 studies, 7451 participants: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.39 to 2.46; I2 = 56%; very low certainty). In adults, compared with HD, PD had an uncertain effect on RKF (mL/min/1.73 m2) at six months (2 studies, 146 participants: MD 0.90, 95% CI 0.23 to 3.60; I2 = 82%; very low certainty), 12 months (3 studies, 606 participants: MD 1.21, 95% CI -0.01 to 2.43; I2 = 81%; very low certainty) and 24 months (3 studies, 334 participants: MD 0.71, 95% CI -0.02 to 1.48; I2 = 72%; very low certainty). PD had uncertain effects on residual urine volume at 12 months (3 studies, 253 participants: MD 344.10 mL/day, 95% CI 168.70 to 519.49; I2 = 69%; very low certainty). PD may reduce the risk of RKF loss (3 studies, 2834 participants: RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.68; I2 = 17%; low certainty). Compared with HD, PD had uncertain effects on all-cause death (42 studies, 700,093 participants: RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98; I2 = 99%; very low certainty). In an analysis restricted to RCTs, PD may reduce the risk of all-cause death (2 studies, 1120 participants: RR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.86; I2 = 0%; moderate certainty). PD had uncertain effects on both cardiovascular (21 studies, 68,492 participants: RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.19; I2 = 92%) and infection-related death (17 studies, 116,333 participants: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.42; I2 = 98%) (both very low certainty). Compared with HD, PD had uncertain effects on the number of patients experiencing bacteraemia/bloodstream infection (2 studies, 2582 participants: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.18; I2 = 68%) and the number of patients experiencing infection episodes (3 studies, 277 participants: RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.62; I2 = 20%) (both very low certainty). PD may reduce the number of bacteraemia/bloodstream infection episodes (2 studies, 2637 participants: RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.71; I2 = 24%; low certainty). Compared with HD; It is uncertain whether PD reduces the risk of acute myocardial infarction (4 studies, 110,850 participants: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.10; I2 = 55%), coronary artery disease (3 studies, 5826 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.97; I2 = 62%); ischaemic heart disease (2 studies, 58,374 participants: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.28; I2 = 95%), congestive heart failure (3 studies, 49,511 participants: RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.54 to 2.21; I2 = 89%) and stroke (4 studies, 102,542 participants: RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90 to 0.99; I2 = 0%) because of low to very low certainty evidence. Compared with HD, PD had uncertain effects on the number of patients experiencing hospitalisation (4 studies, 3282 participants: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.30; I2 = 97%) and all-cause hospitalisation events (4 studies, 42,582 participants: RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.29; I2 = 91%) (very low certainty). None of the included studies reported specifically on life participation or fatigue. However, two studies evaluated employment. Compared with HD, PD had uncertain effects on employment at one year (2 studies, 593 participants: RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.43; I2 = 97%; very low certainty). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The comparative effectiveness of PD and HD on the preservation of RKF, all-cause and cause-specific death risk, the incidence of bacteraemia, other vascular complications (e.g. stroke, cardiovascular events) and patient-reported outcomes (e.g. life participation and fatigue) are uncertain, based on data obtained mostly from NRSIs, as only two RCTs were included.

Dialysis modality utilization patterns and mortality in older persons initiating dialysis in Australia and New Zealand.

AIM: The benefits of dialysis in the older population remain highly debated, particularly for certain dialysis modalities. This study aimed to explore the dialysis modality utilization patterns between in-centre haemodialysis (ICHD), peritoneal dialysis (PD) and home haemodialysis (HHD) and their association with outcomes in older persons. METHODS: Older persons (≥75 years) initiating dialysis in Australia and New Zealand from 1999 to 2018 reported to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) registry were included. The main aim of the study was to characterize dialysis modality utilization patterns and describe individual characteristics of each pattern. Relationships between identified patterns and survival, causes of death and withdrawal were examined as secondary analyses, where the pattern was considered as the exposure. RESULTS: A total of 10 306 older persons initiated dialysis over the study period. Of these, 6776 (66%) and 1535 (15%) were exclusively treated by ICHD and PD, respectively, while 136 (1%) ever received HHD during their dialysis treatment course. The remainder received both ICHD and PD: 906 (9%) started dialysis on ICHD and 953 (9%) on PD. Different individual characteristics were seen across dialysis modality utilization patterns. Median survival time was 3.0 (95%CI 2.9-3.1) years. Differences in survival were seen across groups and varied depending on the time period following dialysis initiation. Dialysis withdrawal was an important cause of death and varied according to individual characteristics and utilization patterns. CONCLUSION: This study showed that dialysis modality utilization patterns in older persons are associated with mortality, independent of individual characteristics.

Multicenter registry analysis comparing survival on home hemodialysis and kidney transplant recipients in Australia and New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: In the era of organ shortage, home hemodialysis (HHD) has been identified as the possible preferential bridge to kidney transplantation. Data are conflicting regarding the comparability of HHD and transplantation outcomes. This study aimed to compare patient and treatment survival between HHD patients and kidney transplant recipients. METHODS: The Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry was used to include incident HHD patients on Day 90 after initiation of kidney replacement therapy and first kidney-only transplant recipients in Australia and New Zealand from 1997 to 2017. Survival times were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit method comparing HHD patients with subtypes of kidney transplant recipients using the log-rank test. Adjusted analyses were performed with multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models for time to all-cause mortality. Time-to-treatment failure or death was assessed as a composite secondary outcome. RESULTS: The study compared 1411 HHD patients with 4960 living donor (LD) recipients, 6019 standard criteria donor (SCD) recipients and 2427 expanded criteria donor (ECD) recipients. While LD and SCD recipients had reduced risks of mortality compared with HHD patients [LD adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.57, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46-0.71; SCD HR = 0.65 95% CI 0.52-0.79], the risk of mortality was comparable between ECD recipients and HHD patients (HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.73-1.12). LD, SCD and ECD kidney recipients each experienced superior time-to-treatment failure or death compared with HHD patients. CONCLUSIONS: This large registry study showed that kidney transplant offers a survival benefit compared with HHD but that this advantage is not significant for ECD recipients.

Dialysis initiation in older persons across centres and over time in Australia and New Zealand.

AIM: With improved life expectancy over time, the burden of kidney failure resulting in kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in older persons is increasing. This study aimed to describe the age distribution at dialysis initiation in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ) across centres and over time. METHODS: Adults initiating dialysis as first KRT in ANZ from 1999 to 2018 reported to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry were included. The primary outcomes were the age distribution and the proportion of older persons (75 years and older) initiating dialysis across centres and over time. Secondary outcomes were characterization of the older population compared with younger people and differences in dialysis modality and treatment trajectories between groups. RESULTS: Over the study period, 55 382 people initiated dialysis as first KRT, including 10 306 older persons, in 100 centres. Wide variation in age distribution across states/countries was noted, although the proportion of older persons at dialysis initiation did not significantly change over time (from 13% in 1999 to 19% in 2003, then remaining stable thereafter). Older persons were less likely to be treated with home therapies compared with younger people. Older persons were mostly Caucasians; had higher socioeconomic position, more cardiovascular comorbidities and higher eGFR at baseline; and resided in major cities. Higher proportions of older persons per centre were noted in privately funded facilities. CONCLUSION: Wide variations were noted in the proportions of older persons initiating dialysis across centres and states/country, which were associated with different case-mix across regions, particularly in terms of ethnicity, remoteness and socioeconomic advantage.

Variability and trends over time and across centres in haemodialysis weekly duration in Australia and New Zealand.

AIM: Haemodialysis treatment prescription varies widely internationally. This study explored patient- and centre-level characteristics associated with weekly haemodialysis hours. METHODS: Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry data were analysed. Characteristics associated with weekly duration were evaluated using mixed-effects linear regression models with patient- and centre-level covariates as fixed effects, and dialysis centre and state as random effects using the 2017 prevalent in-centre haemodialysis (ICHD) and home haemodialysis (HHD) cohorts. Evaluation of patterns of weekly duration over time analysed the 2000 to 2017 incident ICHD and HHD cohorts. RESULTS: Overall, 12 494 ICHD and 1493 HHD prevalent patients in 2017 were included. Median weekly treatment duration was 13.5 (interquartile range [IQR] 12-15) hours for ICHD and 16 (IQR 15-20) hours for HHD. Male sex, younger age, higher body mass index, arteriovenous fistula/graft use, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander ethnicity and longer dialysis vintage were associated with longer weekly duration for both ICHD and HHD. No centre characteristics were associated with duration. Variability in duration across centres was very limited in ICHD compared with HHD, with variation in HHD being associated with state. Duration did not vary significantly over time for ICHD, whereas longer weekly HHD treatments were reported between 2006 and 2012 compared with before and after this period. CONCLUSION: This study in the Australian and New Zealand haemodialysis population showed that weekly duration was primarily associated with patient characteristics. No centre effect was demonstrated. Practice patterns seemed to differ across states/countries, with more variability in HHD than ICHD.

Burden of kidney failure from atheroembolic disease and association with survival in people receiving dialysis in Australia and New Zealand: a multi-centre registry study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of mortality in kidney failure (KF). Patients with KF from atheroembolic disease are at higher risk of cardiovascular disease than other causes of KF. This study aimed to determine survival on dialysis for patients with KF from atheroembolic disease compared with other causes of KF. METHODS: All adults (≥ 18 years) with KF initiating dialysis as the first kidney replacement therapy between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2017 according to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry were included. Patients were grouped into either: KF from atheroembolic disease and all other causes of KF. Survival outcomes were assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis adjusted for patient-related characteristics. RESULTS: Among 65,266 people on dialysis during the study period, 334 (0.5%) patients had KF from atheroembolic disease. A decreasing annual incidence of KF from atheroembolic disease was observed from 2008 onwards. Individuals with KF from atheroembolic disease demonstrated worse survival on dialysis compared to those with other causes of KF (HR 1.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.61-2.03). The respective one- and five-year survival rates were 77 and 23% for KF from atheroembolic disease and 88 and 47% for other causes of KF. After adjustment for patient characteristics, KF from atheroembolic disease was not associated with increased patient mortality (adjusted HR 0.93 95% CI 0.82-1.05). CONCLUSIONS: Survival outcomes on dialysis are worse for individuals with KF from atheroembolic disease compared to those with other causes of KF, probably due to patient demographics and higher comorbidity.

Effect of patient- and center-level characteristics on uptake of home dialysis in Australia and New Zealand: a multicenter registry analysis.

BACKGROUND: Home-based dialysis therapies, home hemodialysis (HHD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) are underutilized in many countries and significant variation in the uptake of home dialysis exists across dialysis centers. This study aimed to evaluate the patient- and center-level characteristics associated with uptake of home dialysis. METHODS: The Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry was used to include incident dialysis patients in Australia and New Zealand from 1997 to 2017. Uptake of home dialysis was defined as any HHD or PD treatment reported to ANZDATA within 6 months of dialysis initiation. Characteristics associated with home dialysis uptake were evaluated using mixed effects logistic regression models with patient- and center-level covariates, era as a fixed effect and dialysis center as a random effect. RESULTS: Overall, 54 773 patients were included. Uptake of home-based dialysis was reported in 24 399 (45%) patients but varied between 0 and 87% across the 76 centers. Patient-level factors associated with lower uptake included male sex, ethnicity (particularly indigenous peoples), older age, presence of comorbidities, late referral to a nephrology service, remote residence and obesity. Center-level predictors of lower uptake included small center size, smaller proportion of patients with permanent access at dialysis initiation and lower weekly facility hemodialysis hours. The variation in odds of home dialysis uptake across centers increased by 3% after adjusting for the era and patient-level characteristics but decreased by 24% after adjusting for center-level characteristics. CONCLUSION: Center-specific factors are associated with the variation in uptake of home dialysis across centers in Australia and New Zealand.

Climate Change and Environmentally Sustainable Kidney Care in Canada: A Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Survey of Kidney Care Providers.

Background: Climate change impacts health and threatens the stability of care delivery systems, while healthcare is mobilizing to reduce its significant environmental impact. Objective: This study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) about climate change among Canadian kidney care providers. Design setting participants measurements and methods: An electronic KAP survey, created by the Canadian Society of Nephrology-Sustainable Nephrology Action Planning committee, was distributed to kidney care providers across Canada, from March to April 2023. Results: A total of 516 people responded to the survey. Most respondents (79%) identified as women; 83% were aged 30 to 59 years. Nurses and nephrologists made up 44% and 23% of respondents, respectively. About half of the participants felt informed about climate change to an average degree. Most respondents (71%; 349/495 and 62%; 300/489) were either extremely or very concerned about climate change and waste generated in their kidney care program, respectively. The vast majority of respondents (89%; 441/495) reported taking steps to lower their personal carbon footprint. People who felt more informed about climate change presented higher degrees of concern. Similarly, both those who felt more informed and those who reported higher degrees of concern about climate change were more likely to take steps to reduce their carbon footprint. Over 80% of respondents (314/386) were at least moderately interested in learning sessions about environmentally sustainable initiatives in care. Limitations: This survey is at risk of social acceptability, representative, and subjective bias. Overrepresentation from Quebec and British Columbia, as well as the majority of respondents identifying as women and working in academic centers, may affect generalizability of the findings. Conclusions: Most kidney care providers who responded to this survey are informed and concerned about climate change, and their knowledge is directly associated with attitude and practices. This indicates that educational initiatives to increase awareness and knowledge on climate change will likely lead to practice changes.

Contexte: Les changements climatiques ont des répercussions sur la santé et menacent la stabilité des systèmes de distribution des soins médicaux, pendant que le système de santé se mobilise pour réduire son impact significatif sur l'environnement. Objectif: Cette étude visait à évaluer les connaissances, les comportements et les pratiques (CCP) en lien avec les changements climatiques chez les prestataires canadiens de soins rénaux. Conception cadre participants mesures et méthodologie: Un sondage électronique évaluant les CCP, créé par le comité Sustainable Nephrology Action Planning (SNAP) de la Société canadienne de néphrologie, a été distribué aux prestataires de soins rénaux de partout au Canada, de mars à avril 2023. Résultats: Un total de 516 personnes a répondu au sondage. La majorité des répondants (79 %) se sont identifiés comme femmes; 83 % étaient âgés entre 30 et 59 ans. Le personnel infirmier et les néphrologues représentaient respectivement 44 % et 23 % des personnes répondantes. Environ la moitié des participants se disaient moyennement informés sur les changements climatiques. La plupart des répondants se disaient extrêmement préoccupés (349/495; 71 %) ou très préoccupés (300/489; 62 %) par les changements climatiques et les déchets générés par leur programme de soins rénaux. La grande majorité des répondants (441/495; 89 %) déclaraient avoir pris des mesures pour réduire leur empreinte carbone personnelle. Les personnes qui se disaient mieux informées sur les changements climatiques présentaient des degrés plus élevés de préoccupation. Parallèlement, les personnes qui se disaient mieux informées et celles qui se déclaraient plus préoccupées par les changements climatiques étaient plus susceptibles de prendre des mesures pour réduire leur empreinte carbone. Plus de 80 % des répondants (314/386) étaient au moins modérément intéressés par des séances d'information sur les initiatives durables sur le plan environnemental dans le domaine des soins. Limites: Cette enquête présente un risque d'acceptabilité sociale et de biais représentatif et subjectif. La surreprésentation du Québec et de la Colombie-Britannique, ainsi que de la grande proportion de répondants s'identifiant comme femmes et travaillant dans des centers universitaires, peuvent affecter la généralisabilité des résultats. Conclusion: La plupart des prestataires de soins rénaux ayant répondu à cette enquête sont informés sur les changements climatiques et en sont préoccupés; et leurs connaissances sont directement liées à leurs comportements et à leurs pratiques. Ces constats suggèrent que les initiatives éducatives visant à accroître la sensibilisation et les connaissances sur les changements climatiques mèneront probablement à des changements dans les pratiques.

Dialysis Outcomes Across Countries and Regions: A Global Perspective From the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas Study.

Introduction: Kidney failure treated with hemodialysis (HD), or peritoneal dialysis (PD) is a major global health problem that is associated with increased risks of death and hospitalization. This study aimed to compare the incidence and causes of death and hospitalization during the first year of HD or PD among countries. Methods: The third iteration of the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA) was conducted between June and September 2022. For this analysis, data were obtained from the cross-sectional survey of key stakeholders from ISN-affiliated countries. Results: A total of 167 countries participated in the survey (response rate 87.4%). In 48% and 58% of countries, 1% to 10% of people treated with HD and PD died within the first year, respectively, with cardiovascular disease being the main cause. Access-related infections or treatment withdrawal owing to cost were important causes of death in low-income countries (LICs). In most countries, <30% and <20% of patients with HD and PD, respectively, required hospitalization during the first year. A greater proportion of patients with HD and PD in LICs were hospitalized in the first year than those in high-income countries (HICs). Access-related infection and cardiovascular disease were the commonest causes of hospitalization among patients with HD, whereas PD-related infection was the commonest cause in patients with PD. Conclusion: There is significant heterogeneity in the incidence and causes of death and hospitalization in patients with kidney failure treated with dialysis. These findings highlight opportunities to improve care, especially in LICs where infectious and social factors are strong contributors to adverse outcomes.

Capacity for the management of kidney failure in the International Society of Nephrology North America and the Caribbean region: report from the 2023 ISN Global Kidney Health Atlas (ISN-GKHA).

The International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas charts the availability and capacity of kidney care globally. In the North America and the Caribbean region, the Atlas can identify opportunities for kidney care improvement, particularly in Caribbean countries where structures for systematic data collection are lacking. In this third iteration, respondents from 12 of 18 countries from the region reported a 2-fold higher than global median prevalence of dialysis and transplantation, and a 3-fold higher than global median prevalence of dialysis centers. The peritoneal dialysis prevalence was lower than the global median, and transplantation data were missing from 6 of the 10 Caribbean countries. Government-funded payments predominated for dialysis modalities, with greater heterogeneity in transplantation payor mix. Services for chronic kidney disease, such as monitoring of anemia and blood pressure, and diagnostic capability relying on serum creatinine and urinalyses were universally available. Notable exceptions in Caribbean countries included non-calcium-based phosphate binders and kidney biopsy services. Personnel shortages were reported across the region. Kidney failure was identified as a governmental priority more commonly than was chronic kidney disease or acute kidney injury. In this generally affluent region, patients have better access to kidney replacement therapy and chronic kidney disease-related services than in much of the world. Yet clear heterogeneity exists, especially among the Caribbean countries struggling with dialysis and personnel capacity. Important steps to improve kidney care in the region include increased emphasis on preventive care, a focus on home-based modalities and transplantation, and solutions to train and retain specialized allied health professionals.

Variability in Reporting eGFR at Dialysis Initiation in Canada: A Research Letter.

Background: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at dialysis initiation is increasingly recognized as a key quality indicator (QI) for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Specifically, guidelines recommend assessing deferral of dialysis initiation until symptoms arise or if the eGFR is ≤6 mL/min/1.73 m2. Despite the recognition of the importance of this QI, how eGFR at the time of dialysis initiation is defined, collected, and tracked at dialysis centers across Canada remains unknown. Objectives: To identify how provincial renal programs define eGFR at dialysis initiation, to compare practice across Canadian provinces, and to determine if there is a consistent benchmark for deferred dialysis start. Design: Cross-sectional survey distributed to the medical leads of each provincial renal program, administered from July 2021 to November 2021. Quebec was not included given it did not yet participate in Canadian Organ Replacement Register (CORR) data submission. Setting: The survey was designed and distributed by the Canadian Society of Nephrology Quality Improvement & Implementation Science Committee (CSN-QUIS) Indicator Working Group. Methods: The survey asked respondents on how eGFR is defined, collected, reported, and perceived barriers to QI data collection. The National Senior Renal Leaders Forum helped identify the key provincial medical leads to disseminate the survey for completion. Results: Surveys were distributed to the medical leads of the 9 provincial renal programs that participate in CORR. In total, there were 8 responses. Five provinces submit eGFR for all new dialysis starts and 3 provinces only submit this information for chronic patients. There is variation in determining when a patient with acute kidney injury requiring dialysis is classified as a chronic patient. Four provinces use a 30-day trigger, 3 provinces use a 90-day trigger, and the patient's nephrologist makes this determination in 1 province. The creatinine used for the eGFR at dialysis initiation was the value measured on the first dialysis session (ie, day 0) for 5 provinces; the last outpatient clinic creatinine value in 2 provinces, and 1 province did not have a standard definition. Three provinces did not have a benchmark target for eGFR at dialysis initiation, 1 province had a target of <9.5 mL/min/1.73 m2, 3 provinces had a target of <10 mL/min/1.73 m2, 1 province had a target of <15 mL/min/1.73 m2. All 8 responding provincial medical leads support the establishment of a national benchmark for this measure. Limitations: This survey was restricted to provincial medical leads and therefore is unable to determine practice at individual dialysis sites. The survey was not anonymous, so it may be subject to conformity bias. Conclusions: There is wide variability in how eGFR at dialysis initiation is measured and reported across Canada. Additionally, there is no consensus on a benchmark target for an intent-to-defer dialysis strategy. Standardization of target eGFR at dialysis initiation may facilitate national reporting and quality improvement initiatives.

Contexte: Le débit de filtration glomérulaire estimé (DFGe) à l'amorce de la dialyse est de plus en plus reconnu comme un indicateur clé de la qualité (IQ) chez les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale terminale (IRT). Plus précisément, les lignes directrices recommandent d'évaluer la possibilité de reporter l'initiation de la dialyse jusqu'à l'apparition des symptômes ou l'atteinte d'un DFGe égal ou inférieur à 6 ml/min/1,73 m2. Bien qu'on reconnaisse l'importance de cet IQ, on ignore encore comment le DFGe est défini, mesuré et suivi au moment de l'initiation de la dialyse dans les centres de dialyse canadiens. Objectifs: Déterminer la façon dont les programmes rénaux provinciaux définissent le DFGe à l'initiation de la dialyse, comparer les pratiques en cours dans les différentes provinces canadiennes et déterminer s'il existe une cible de référence commune pour une initiation différée de la dialyse. Conception: Un sondage transversal distribué entre juillet et novembre 2021 aux directeurs médicaux de chaque programme provincial de soins rénaux. Le Québec n'a pas été inclus puisque la province n'a pas encore participé au Registre canadien des insuffisances et des transplantations d'organes (RCITO). Cadre: Le sondage a été conçu et distribué par le Groupe de travail sur les indicateurs du Quality Improvement & Implementation Science Committee de la Société canadienne de néphrologie (CSN-QUIS). Méthodologie: Les répondants au sondage devaient décrire la façon dont le DFGe est défini, mesuré et rapporté, ainsi que les obstacles perçus à la collecte de données sur les IQ. Le sondage a été distribué aux directeurs médicaux provinciaux identifiés par le biais du National Senior Renal leaders Forum. Résultats: Le sondage a été distribué aux directeurs médicaux des neuf programmes provinciaux de soins rénaux participant au RCITO; huit ont répondu. Cinq provinces soumettent le DFGe pour toute nouvelle initiation d'un traitement de dialyse; trois provinces ne soumettent cette information que pour les patients atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique. Il existe des différences entre les provinces dans la détermination du moment où un patient passe de l'insuffisance rénale aiguë nécessitant une dialyse à l'insuffisance rénale chronique. Quatre provinces utilisent un délai de 30 jours, trois provinces utilisent un délai de 90 jours et dans la dernière province, cette détermination est faite par le néphrologue du patient. Dans cinq des huit provinces sondées, le taux de créatinine utilisé pour établir le DFGe à l'initiation de la dialyse est la valeur mesurée à la première séance de dialyse (au jour 0); deux provinces utilisent la valeur de créatinine mesurée lors de la dernière visite en ambulatoire, et une province n'a pas de définition normalisée. Trois provinces n'ont pas de cible de référence pour le DFGe à l'initiation de la dialyse; cette cible est de moins de 9,5 ml/min/1,73 m2 dans une province, de moins de 10 ml/min/1,73 m2 dans trois provinces, et de moins de 15 ml/min/1,73 m2 dans une province. Les huit responsables médicaux provinciaux ayant répondu au sondage appuient l'établissement d'une valeur de référence nationale pour cette mesure. Limites: Ce sondage n'a été envoyé qu'aux directions médicales provinciales, par conséquent, il ne permet pas de déterminer les pratiques en cours dans chaque site de dialyse. Le sondage n'étant pas anonyme, il pourrait comporter un biais de conformité. Conclusion: Il existe une grande variabilité au Canada dans la façon dont le DFGe est mesuré et rapporté au début de la dialyse. On observe en outre une absence de consensus quant à une cible de référence pour une stratégie d'initiation différée de la dialyse. La normalisation de la valeur cible de DFGe au début de la dialyse pourrait faciliter les initiatives nationales de déclaration et d'amélioration de la qualité.

ISPD Catheter-related Infection Recommendations: 2023 Update.

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter-related infections are important risk factors for catheter loss and peritonitis. The 2023 updated recommendations have revised and clarified definitions and classifications of exit site infection and tunnel infection. A new target for the overall exit site infection rate should be no more than 0.40 episodes per year at risk. The recommendation about topical antibiotic cream or ointment to catheter exit site has been downgraded. New recommendations include clarified suggestion of exit site dressing cover and updated antibiotic treatment duration with emphasis on early clinical monitoring to ascertain duration of therapy. In addition to catheter removal and reinsertion, other catheter interventions including external cuff removal or shaving, and exit site relocation are suggested.

Clinical Implementation of NGAL Testing to Improve Diagnostic Assessment of AKI Episodes in a Canadian Center.

Background: The differential diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) episodes is often challenging. Novel AKI biomarkers have shown their utility to improve prognostic prediction and diagnostic assessment in various research populations but their implementation in standard clinical practice is still rarely reported. Objective: To report the differential diagnostic ability and associated clinical utility of the neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) testing in a real-life setting of a heterogeneous AKI population. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study combined with a clinical audit using questionnaires distributed to consultant nephrologists following NGAL results. Setting: The first 250 consecutive patients with a confirmed AKI where an NGAL test (plasma NGAL [pNGAL] or urine NGAL [uNGAL]) was ordered from a large academic center in Montreal, Canada from January 2021 to August 2021. Patients: Patients were classified into 3 groups based on the final AKI etiology category (functional, intrarenal, and postrenal) following definitive adjudication by 2 independent nephrologists. Methods: The ability of plasma NGAL (pNGAL), urine NGAL (uNGAL), and uNGAL-to-creatinine ratio (uNGAL/Cr) to discriminate intrarenal from functional AKI etiologies was compared to standard urine chemistry (FENa) and proteinuria. A logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between intrarenal AKI and increased biomarker levels. The overall clinical utility and appreciation of the NGAL test was evaluated using a questionnaire completed prospectively by the consultant nephrologist at the time of receiving the NGAL result. The NGAL results were prospectively available to clinicians with a median time of 2.9 (1.3-7.4) hours from the initial order. Results: A total of 214 uNGAL and 44 pNGAL were ordered from 100 functional, 139 intrarenal and 11 postrenal AKI episodes after final adjudication. The discriminative ability of FENa (AUC 0.68 [95% CI: 0.61-0.75]) was lower than uNGAL (AUC 0.80 [95% CI: 0.73-0.86]) and uNGAL/Cr (AUC 0.83 [95% CI: 0.77-0.88]) but better than pNGAL (AUC 0.66 [95% CI: 0.48-0.85]). According to consultant nephrologists, the NGAL testing has led to a change in clinical management in 42% of cases. Limitations: Data reported came from a single center and NGAL was reserved for more complex cases, which limits generalizability. No biopsy has been performed for most AKI cases as the final adjudication was based on a retrospective review of the hospitalization episode. Conclusions: Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin testing can be successfully integrated as part of the diagnostic workup for AKI in clinical practice. The integration of tubular damage biomarkers to functional biomarkers can further improve the differential diagnostic assessment. However, the impact of such biomarkers on AKI management and associated outcomes still needs further validation.

Contexte: Le diagnostic différentiel des épisodes d'insuffisance rénale aiguë (IRA) pose souvent un problème. De nouveaux biomarqueurs d'IRA ont montré leur utilité pour améliorer la prédiction pronostique et l'évaluation diagnostique dans diverses populations de recherche, mais leur application dans la pratique clinique est encore peu rapportée. Objectif: Rendre compte de la capacité de diagnostic différentiel et de l'utilité clinique du test NGAL (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin) dans le contexte réel d'une population hétérogène de patients atteints d'IRA. Devis: Étude de cohorte rétrospective combinée à un audit clinique mené par l'entremise de questionnaires distribués aux néphrologues consultants à la suite du résultat NGAL. Cadre: Les 250 premiers patients consécutifs avec une IRA confirmée, pour qui un test NGAL (plasmatique [pNGAL] ou urinaire [uNGAL]) avait été demandé entre janvier et août 2021 dans un grand centre universitaire de Montréal (Canada). Sujets: Les patients ont été classés en 3 groupes selon la catégorie étiologique finale de l'IRA (fonctionnelle, intrarénale, post-rénale) après révision par deux néphrologues indépendants. Méthodologie: La capacité du pNGAL, du uNGAL et du rapport uNGAL et du rapport uNGAL sur créatinine (uNGAL/Cr) à discriminer les étiologies fonctionnelles des étiologies intrarénales a été comparée à celle des indices urinaires standard de l'urine (FENa) et de la protéinurie. Une régression logistique a servi à évaluer l'association entre l'IRA intrarénale et la hausse des taux des biomarqueurs. L'appréciation du test NGAL et son utilité clinique globale ont été évaluées à l'aide d'un questionnaire rempli prospectivement par le néphrologue consultant lors de la réception du résultat NGAL. Les résultats NGAL ont été mis à la disposition des cliniciens de manière prospective, dans un délai médian de 2,9 [1,3-7,4] heures suivant la prescription initiale. Résultats: En tout, après la révision finale, 214 tests uNGAL et 44 tests pNGAL ont été demandés à partir de 100 épisodes d'IRA fonctionnelle, 139 épisodes d'IRA intrarénale et 11 épisodes d'IRA post-rénale. La capacité discriminante du FENa (SSC: 0,68 [IC 95 %: 0,61-0,75]) était inférieure à celles du uNGAL (SSC: 0,80 [IC 95 %: 0,73-0,86]) et du rapport uNGAL/ Cr (SSC: 0,83 [IC 95 %: 0,77-0,88]), mais supérieure à celle du pNGAL (SSC: 0,66 [IC 95 %: 0,48-0,85]). Les néphrologues ont indiqué que les tests NGAL avaient entraîné un changement dans la prise en charge clinique dans 42 % des cas. Limites: Les données provenaient d'un seul centre et le test NGAL était réservé aux cas plus complexes, ce qui limite la généralisabilité. Dans la plupart des cas, aucune biopsie n'a été effectuée et le diagnostic final était basé sur un examen rétrospectif de l'hospitalisation. Conclusions: En pratique clinique, les tests NGAL peuvent être intégrés avec succès au diagnostic de l'IRA. L'intégration des biomarqueurs de lésions tubulaires aux biomarqueurs fonctionnels peut améliorer davantage l'évaluation du diagnostic différentiel. Cependant, l'impact de ces biomarqueurs sur la prise en charge de l'IRA et les résultats connexes doit encore être validé.

Representativeness of the PDOPPS cohort compared to the Australian PD population.

BACKGROUND: The Peritoneal Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (PDOPPS) is an international, prospective study following persons treated by peritoneal dialysis (PD) to identify modifiable practices associated with improvements in PD technique and person survival. The aim of this study was to assess the representativeness of the Australian cohort included in PDOPPS compared to the complete Australian PD population, as reported to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry. METHODS: Adults with at least one PD treatment reported to ANZDATA Registry during the census period of PDOPPS Phase I (November 2014 to April 2018) were compared to the Australian PDOPPS cohort. The primary outcomes were the representativeness of centres and persons. Secondary outcomes explored the association of person characteristics with consent to study participation. RESULTS: After data linkage, 511 PDOPPS participants were compared to 5616 Australians treated with PD. Within centres eligible for PDOPPS, selected centres were similar to other Australian centres. The PDOPPS participants' cohort tended to include older persons, more males, a higher proportion of Caucasians and more persons with higher socioeconomic advantage compared to the Australian PD population. Differences in distribution across sex and ethnicities between the PDOPPS cohort and the overall PD population were in part due to the selection and consent processes, during which females and non-Caucasians were more likely to not consent to PDOPPS participation. CONCLUSION: Sampling methods used in PDOPPS allowed for good national representativeness of the included centres. However, representativeness of the unweighted PDOPPS sample was suboptimal in regard to some participant characteristics.

Quality of Life and Hemodynamic Effects of Switching From Hemodialysis to Hemodiafiltration: A Canadian Controlled Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Recent randomized clinical trials have demonstrated beneficial effects of hemodiafiltration (HDF) compared with hemodialysis (HD) on mortality and hemodynamic stability. Data on quality of life in HDF compared with HD is limited. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether patients receiving HD experience improvements in quality of life, hemodynamic and laboratory parameters after switching to HDF. DESIGN: Observational controlled cohort study. SETTING & PATIENTS: Adult patients receiving maintenance dialysis were followed for 3 months both before and after transfer to a new unit, where they received HDF. Prior to transfer, control patients were already treated by HDF. METHODS: Quality of life at baseline and follow-up was measured using the validated minutes to recovery (MR) question. Dialysis data were collected for 3 consecutive sessions monthly; laboratory values were collected monthly. Wilcoxon signed rank test and repeated measures analysis of covariance were used to evaluate pre/post transfer changes and quantile regression to identify predictors of change in recovery time. RESULTS: Of 227 patients, 82 died, were transplanted, were hospitalized or did not transfer, leaving 123 subjects and 22 controls for analysis. MR did not improve with switching to HDF, although patients with MR > 60 min before transfer experienced a significant decrease in their MR, compared with controls. There was no improvement in intradialytic hypotension with HDF. There were no differences in laboratory values before vs after switch. LIMITATIONS: Nonrandomized single-center study, including only small numbers of patients and covering a short follow-up period; hemodynamic values only evaluated over 1 week per month; residual kidney function not recorded. CONCLUSIONS: In this Canadian experience of HDF, patients remained stable with respect to several laboratory and dialysis related parameters. Switch to HDF was associated with substantially reduced recovery time in patients with MR > 60 minutes at baseline.

CONTEXTE: De récents essais cliniques randomisés ont démontré les effets bénéfiques de l'hémodiafiltration (HDF) comparativement à l'hémodialyse (HD) sur la mortalité et la stabilité hémodynamique. Les données sur la qualité de vie des patients traités par HDF plutôt que par HD sont toutefois limitées. OBJECTIF: Déterminer si des patients préalablement traités par HD bénéficient d'une amélioration de leur qualité de vie et de changements observables dans leurs paramètres hémodynamiques et de laboratoire en passant à l'HDF. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Étude de cohorte observationnelle contrôlée. SUJETS: Des adultes recevant une dialyse d'entretien ont été suivis pendant trois mois avant et après le transfert à une nouvelle unité, où ils ont reçu l'HDF. Les patients témoins étaient traités par HDF avant le transfert. MÉTHODOLOGIE: La qualité de vie à l'inclusion et lors du suivi a été mesurée à l'aide d'une question validée sur le temps de récupération (TR). Les données de dialyse ont été recueillies pour trois séances consécutives par mois; les valeurs de laboratoire ont été recueillies mensuellement. Le test de rang de Wilcoxon et des mesures répétées ANCOVA ont servi à évaluer les changements pré/post-transfert, tandis que la régression par quantile a été employée pour déterminer les facteurs prédictifs d'un changement dans le TR. RÉSULTATS: Sur les 227 patients admissibles, 82 ont été exclus ­ soit parce qu'ils sont décédés, ont été transplantés, ont été hospitalisés ou n'ont pas été transférés ­ ce qui a laissé 123 sujets et 22 témoins pour l'analyse. Le passage à l'HDF n'a pas amélioré le TR, bien que les patients dont le TR était supérieur à 60 min avant le transfert aient observé une réduction significative de ce dernier par rapport aux témoins. L'hypotension intradialytique est demeurée inchangée avec l'HDF et aucune différence n'a été observée entre les valeurs de laboratoire mesurées avant et après le changement de modalité. LIMITES: Étude monocentrique non randomisée sur un faible échantillon et couvrant une courte période de suivi; valeurs hémodynamiques évaluées uniquement sur une semaine par mois; fonction rénale résiduelle non enregistrée. CONCLUSION: Dans cette expérience de passage à l'HDF qui s'est tenue au Canada, les paramètres de laboratoire et de dialyse des patients sont demeurés stables. Cependant, chez les patients dont le temps de récupération était supérieur à 60 minutes, le passage à l'HDF a été associé à une réduction considérable de celui-ci.

Peritoneal Dialysis After Liver Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease following liver transplantation is a major long-term complication. Most liver transplant recipients with kidney failure will be treated with dialysis instead of kidney transplantation due to noneligibility and shortage in organ availability. In this population, the role of peritoneal dialysis (PD) as a modality of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility regarding safety, technique survival, and dialysis efficiency of PD in liver transplant recipients requiring KRT for maintenance dialysis. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING: Interventional and observational studies reporting the use of PD after liver transplantation. PATIENTS: Adult liver transplant recipients with kidney failure treated with maintenance KRT. MEASUREMENTS: Extracted data included eligibility criteria, study design, demographics, and PD modality. The following outcomes of interest were extracted: rate of peritonitis and microorganisms involved, noninfectious peritoneal complications, technique survival, and kidney transplantation-censored technique survival. Non-PD complications included overall survival, liver graft dysfunction, and hospitalization rate. METHODS: The following databases were searched until July 2020: MedLine/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library. Two reviewers independently screening all titles and abstracts of all identified articles. Due to the limited sample size, observational designs and study heterogeneity expected, no meta-analysis was pre-planned. Descriptive statistics were used to report all results. RESULTS: From the 5263 identified studies, 4 were included in the analysis as they reported at least 1 outcome of interest on a total of 21 liver transplant recipients, with an overall follow-up duration on PD of 19.0 (Interquartile range [IQR]: 9.5-29.5) months. Fifteen episodes of peritonitis occurred in a total cumulative PD follow-up of 514 patient-months, representing an incidence rate of 0.35 per year. These episodes did not result in PD technique failure, mortality, or impairment of liver graft function. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include the paucity of studies in the field and the small number of patients included in each report, a risk of publication bias and the impossibility to directly compare hemodialysis to PD in this population. These results, therefore, must be interpreted with caution. CONCLUSIONS: Based on limited data reporting the feasibility of PD in liver transplant recipients with kidney failure, no signal was associated with an increased risk of infectious complications. Long-term studies evaluating this modality need to be performed. REGISTRATION PROSPERO: CRD42020218374.

CONTEXTE: L'insuffisance rénale chronique est une complication majeure à long terme survenant après une transplantation hépatique. La plupart des transplantés du foie qui développent une insuffisance rénale seront traités par dialyze plutôt que par une greffe rénale; En raison de la pénurie d'organes et par non-éligibilité à la greffe rénale, la plupart des transplantés du foie qui developpent une insuffisance rénale avancée seront traités par dialyse. L'importance de la dialyse péritonéale (DP) comme modalité de remplacement rénal demeure toutefois inconnue dans cette population de patients. OBJECTIFS: Étudier la faisabilité de la DP en matière d'innocuité, d'efficacité et de survie de la technique chez les receveurs d'une greffe hépatique qui nécessitent une thérapie de remplacement rénal comme dialyse d'entretien. TYPE D'ÉTUDE: Revue systématique. CADRE: Les études interventionnelles et observationnelles signalant l'utilisation de la DP après une transplantation hépatique. SUJETS: Des adultes ayant subi une transplantation hépatique et dont l'insuffisance rénale secondaire est traitée par thérapie de remplacement rénal. MESURES: Les données extraites comprenaient les critères d'admissibilité, la méthodologie de l'étude, les caractéristiques démographiques des sujets et la modalité de DP. Les résultats d'intérêt suivants ont été extraits : le taux de péritonites et les microorganismes impliqués, les complications péritonéales non infectieuses, la survie de la technique et la survie de la technique censurée par la transplantation rénale. Les complications non liées à la DP comprenaient la survie globale, la défaillance du greffon hépatique et le taux d'hospitalisation. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les bases de données Medline/PubMed, Embase, CINAHL et Cochrane Library ont été consultées jusqu'en juillet 2020. Deux réviseurs indépendants ont examiné les titres et résumés de tous les articles recensés. Aucune méta-analyse n'a été planifiée en raison de la nature observationnelle et de l'hétérogénéité attendue des études retenues, et de la faible taille de l'échantillon. Des statistiques descriptives ont été utilisées pour présenter les données. RÉSULTATS: Des 5263 études recensées, seules quatre ont été incluses dans l'analyse, rapportant un total de 21 transplantés hépatiques, dont la durée médiane sur DP s'établissait à 19.0 mois (IIQ: 95 à 29.5). Au cours d'un suivi cumulatif de 514 mois-patients sur DP, 15 épisodes de péritonite ont été observés, soit un taux d'incidence de 0,35 par année. Ces épisodes n'ont pas entraîné d'échec de la DP, ni de mortalité ou d'altération de la fonction du greffon hépatique. LIMITES: Les limites comprennent le manque d'études sur le sujet, le faible nombre de patients inclus dans chaque rapport, un risque de biais de publication et l'impossibilité de comparer directement l'hémodialyse à la DP dans cette population. Les résultats doivent ainsi être interprétés avec prudence. CONCLUSION: Selon les données limitées portant sur la faisabilité de la dialyse péritonéale chez les receveurs d'une greffe hépatique atteints d'insuffisance rénale, aucun signal notable n'est associé à un risque accru de complications infectieuses. Des études à long terme évaluant cette modalité sont nécessaires.

International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas: structures, organization, and services for the management of kidney failure in Oceania and South East Asia.

Oceania and South East Asia (OSEA) is a socioeconomically, culturally, and ethnically diverse region facing a rising epidemic of noncommunicable diseases, including chronic kidney disease (CKD). The second iteration of the International Society of Nephrology Global Kidney Health Atlas aimed to provide a comprehensive evaluation of kidney care in OSEA. Of the 30 countries/territories in OSEA, 15 participated in the survey, representing 98.5% of the region's population. The median prevalence of treated kidney failure in OSEA was 1352 per million population (interquartile range, 966-1673 per million population), higher than the global median of 787 per million population. Although the general availability, access, and quality of kidney replacement therapy (i.e., dialysis and transplantation) was high in OSEA, inequalities in accessibility and affordability of kidney replacement therapy across the region resulted in variability between countries. According to the survey results, in a third of the participating countries (mostly lower-income countries), less than half the patients with kidney failure were able to access dialysis, whereas it was readily available to all with minimal out-of-pocket costs in high-income countries; similar variability in access to transplantation was also recorded. Limitations in workforce and resources vary across the region and were disproportionately worse in lower-income countries. There was little advocacy for kidney disease, moderate use of registries, restricted CKD detection programs, and limited availability of routine CKD testing in some high-risk groups across the region. International collaborations, as seen in OSEA, are important initiatives to help close the gaps in CKD care provision across the region and should continue receiving support from the global nephrology community.