RESUMO
With the recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS), mitochondrial whole-genome sequencing has begun to be applied to the field of the forensic biology as an alternative to the traditional Sanger-type sequencing (STS). However, experimental workflows, commercial solutions, and output data analysis must be strictly validated before being implemented into the forensic laboratory. In this study, we performed an internal validation for an NGS-based typing of the entire mitochondrial genome using the Precision ID mtDNA Whole Genome Panel (Thermo Fisher Scientific) on the Ion S5 sequencer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Concordance, repeatability, reproducibility, sensitivity, and heteroplasmy detection analyses were assessed using the 2800 M and 9947A standard control DNA as well as typical casework specimens, and results were compared with conventional Sanger sequencing and another NGS sequencer in a different laboratory. We discuss the strengths and limitations of this approach, highlighting some issues regarding noise thresholds and heteroplasmy detection, and suggesting solutions to mitigate these effects and improve overall data interpretation. Results confirmed that the Precision ID Whole mtDNA Genome Panel is highly reproducible and sensitive, yielding useful full mitochondrial DNA sequences also from challenging DNA specimens, thus providing further support for its use in forensic practice.
Assuntos
Genoma Mitocondrial , DNA Mitocondrial/genética , Haplótipos , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/métodos , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Análise de Sequência de DNA/métodosRESUMO
Forensic DNA phenotyping (FDP) has recently provided important advancements in forensic investigations, by predicting the physical appearance of a subject from a biological sample, using SNP markers. The majority of operable prediction models have been developed for iris color; however, replication studies to understand their applicability on a worldwide scale are still limited for many of them. In this work, 4 models for eye color prediction (IrisPlex, Ruiz, Allwood and Hart models) were systematically evaluated in a sample of 296 subjects of Italian origin. Genotypes were determined by a custom NGS-based panel targeting all the predictive SNPs included in the 4 tested models. Overall, 60-69% of the Italian sample could be correctly predicted with the IrisPlex, Ruiz and Allwood models, applying the recommended threshold. The IrisPlex model showed the lowest frequency of errors (17%), but also the highest number of inconclusive results (18%). In the absence of the threshold, the highest proportion of correct predictions was again obtained with the IrisPlex model (76%), followed by the Allwood (73%) and the Ruiz (65%) models. Lastly, the Hart predictive algorithm had the lowest error rate (2%), but the majority of predictions (87%) were restricted to the less informative categories of "not-blue" and "not-brown", and correct color predictions were obtained only for 11% of the sample. As observed in previous studies, the majority of incorrect and undefined predictions were ascribable to the intermediate category, which represented 25% of the Italian sample. An adjustment of the IrisPlex (multinomial logistic regression) and Ruiz models (Snipper Bayesian classifier) with Italian allele frequencies gave only minor improvements in predicting intermediate eye color and no remarkable overall changes in performance. This suggests an incomplete knowledge underlying the intermediate colors. Considering the impact of this phenotype in the Italian sample as well as in other admixed populations, future improvements of eye color prediction methods should include a better genetic and phenotypic characterization of this category.