Smoking cessation treatment for COPD smokers: the role of pharmacological interventions.

Because stopping smoking is such a pressing necessity for COPD smokers physicians should use smoking cessation treatments aggressively. For optimal efficacy smoking cessation in COPD smokers should combine behavioral and pharmacological treatments. Three types of pharmacological treatments are proven to be safe and effective: Nicotine Replacement Therapy (NRT), Bupropion and Varenicline. Use of NRT, bupropion or varenicline, single or in combination, at standard doses or at high doses, for 8-12 weeks or for more than 6-12 months have proven to help these patients to quit. For optimizing efficacy these medications can also be introduced some weeks before actual quitting. In COPD smoking patients that are not interested in stopping completely or abruptly these medications can be used to aid cessation in a more gradual way. Pharmacotherapy to aid cessation in COPD smokers have proven to be highly cost effective.

Smoking cessation treatment for COPD smokers: the role of counselling.

Smoking cessation is the only therapeutic intervention that can prevent COPD smokers from the chronic progression of their disorder. The most important intervention for helping these smokers to quit is a combination of counseling plus pharmacological treatment. The characteristics of the counseling should be different depending if this intervention is offered to smokers with a previous diagnosis of COPD or if the intervention is offered to smokers who have been recently diagnoses with COPD. The counseling of patients who have been recently diagnosed should include: a) explanation of the direct relationship between smoking and COPD, b) encouraging these patients to quit and c) using of spirometry and measurements of CO as a motivational tools. The counseling of patients who have been previously diagnosed should include: a) encouragement to make a serious quit attempt, b) an intervention that increases motivation, self-efficacy and self-esteem, c) and the intervention should also control depression and be directed to weight gain control.

Pharmacology of nicotine and its therapeutic use in smoking cessation and neurodegenerative disorders.

During the last decade, nicotine has been used increasingly as an aid to smoking cessation and has been found to be a safe and efficacious treatment for the symptoms of nicotine withdrawal. This period has also seen significant advances in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the psychopharmacological responses to nicotine, including, particularly, those that have been implicated in nicotine addiction. This paper reviews this decade of progress in the specific context of the therapeutic application of nicotine to the treatment of smoking cessation. Other putative future applications, particularly in the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders, are also reviewed.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of nasal nicotine delivery. A review and comparison to other nicotine systems.

Rapid drug delivery (arterial "boli') and high drug concentrations occur with nicotine inhaled in smoke. These are believed to be key elements in producing addiction to cigarettes. Preparations which reduce the rate of delivery and/or concentration of nicotine have been introduced as treatments for smoking cessation. These nicotine medications work by relieving withdrawal and preventing relapse associated with abrupt cessation of smoking. The pharmacokinetics of each system are expected to affect efficacy and treatment dependence. Nasal administration systems have been developed to more closely approximate cigarette delivery for improved efficacy in clinical application and for more control in systematic testing of nicotine. With laboratory tested nasal application systems (clinical drug and experimental devices), venous plasma concentrations after a single dose range between 5 and 12 micrograms/L. Higher steady-state blood nicotine concentrations (16 to 29 micrograms/L) have been reported for ad libitum clinical self-administration with a nicotine nasal spray. Time to peak plasma concentration (tmax) with nasal administration is around 11 to 13 minutes for 1 mg doses. This rise time is slower than for cigarette delivery but faster than the other nicotine treatments. Venous plasma concentrations are considerably lower than tobacco product concentrations and fall within the range of the lower dose nicotine treatments (e.g. 2 mg gum vs 4 mg gum). The profile of nasal nicotine administration was designed for certain subsets of smokers. Efficacy trials show consistent superiority of nasal administration over placebo although the comparative efficacy among nicotine treatments remains to be determined. The more rapid onset and user control of nasal nicotine may impose a higher risk for treatment dependence compared with a slower, passive system such as the patch. It may not produce more dependence than other faster-acting treatment systems (e.g. nicotine gum).

Nicotine gum, 2 and 4 mg, for nicotine dependence. A double-blind placebo-controlled trial within a behavior modification support program.

The effectiveness of nicotine gum in combination with a behavior modification program was studied. The nicotine dependence of participating smokers (N = 322) was assessed. One hundred sixty-eight smokers were labeled as high nicotine dependent and 154 as moderate to low dependent. In a randomized double-blind procedure, the high-dependent smokers were given gum containing 4 mg of nicotine (87) or 2 mg of nicotine (81) and the smokers with medium or low dependence were given gum containing 2 mg (76) or a placebo gum (78). The smokers were also randomized to familiarizing themselves with the medication a week before quit day (112) or to regular use, that is starting gum use on the quit day (122). In the high-dependent group, sustained and chemically verified nonsmoking rates at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years were, respectively, 60%, 39%, and 34% in the subjects given the 4-mg dose compared with 41%, 16%, and 16% for those using the 2-mg dose. In the group with medium or low dependence, the success rates at the same time periods were 70%, 49%, and 39% for the subjects given the 2-mg dose and 38%, 22%, and 17% for those given placebo gum. The differences in success rates were significant at least at the p < 0.02% level for all comparisons. Familiarizing with the gum as compared with regular use gave fewer reports of side effects, 15% vs 34%, p < 0.001. A trend toward better success rates at 6 weeks, although not statistically significant, was observed for the familiarization group, 61% vs 52%. The study shows that high nicotine-dependent smokers need higher doses of nicotine replacement, in this case the 4-mg dose rather than the 2-mg dose, whereas 2 mg is superior to placebo among less dependent smokers. These results compare favorably with those reported from the more recent nicotine patch therapy.

Effects of a nicotine-enriched cigarette on nicotine titration, daily cigarette consumption, and levels of carbon monoxide, cotinine, and nicotine.

To test whether cigarettes with low tar, low carbon monoxide, and medium nicotine yield produce less dangerous effects than cigarettes low in tar and CO but high in nicotine, 12 subjects were recruited to smoke nicotine-enriched cigarettes. The subjects smoked three types of cigarettes in the three experimental conditions: (1) their own brand; (2) cigarettes with 4.8 mg tar, 4.0 mg CO, and 0.5 mg nicotine; (3) cigarettes with 5.8 mg tar, 4.1 mg CO, and 1.1 mg nicotine. Subjects monitored their daily consumption for 12 weeks; 4 weeks for each condition. During laboratory visits, the subjects smoked a cigarette while their heart rate and carbon monoxide in expired air were measured pre- and post-smoking. A blood sample was drawn and analyzed for nicotine and cotinine in each experimental condition. No significant differences in daily cigarette consumption were found, although a trend (P less than 0.07) in the direction of fewer nicotine-enriched cigarettes per day was found. Levels of CO varied significantly among the three conditions: The subjects' own brands yielded the highest level, while the nicotine-enriched cigarette yielded the lowest level. No differences were found for nicotine or cotinine levels. A second purpose of the experiment was to record the degree of nicotine titration displayed by individual smokers, tar and CO levels remained constant in the experimental cigarettes. No general titration effect was observed, although for daily consumption it approached significance. When the subjects' nicotine dependence, measured with a tolerance questionnaire, was taken into account, a correlation with daily consumption was found (r = 77, P less than 0.005). A cigarette with low tar and CO, but medium to high nicotine yield, would seem to produce less hazardous effects and is worthy of further investigation. The controversial question of whether smokers titrate for nicotine is a function of the individual's nicotine dependence.

Effectiveness of nicotine patch and nicotine gum as individual versus combined treatments for tobacco withdrawal symptoms.

Nicotine gum and transdermal nicotine have been shown to relieve withdrawal and double success rates over placebo in trials of smoking cessation. This study tested whether combining the two methods would relieve withdrawal more effectively compared to either treatment alone. Twenty-eight smokers served as their own controls in each of four conditions: active gum + active patch (double active), active gum + placebo patch (gum only active), placebo gum + active patch (patch active) and placebo gum + placebo patch (double placebo). This "double placebo" design controls sensory, psychological and ritual variables associated with each drug form. Withdrawal symptoms were rated four times daily for 3 days in each condition. Total baseline (smoking) withdrawal scores using visual analogue scales (VAS) averaged 101.1. During cessation, total withdrawal increased to 187.0 for the double placebo condition, 142.2 for the active gum/placebo patch treatment and 128.3 for the active patch/placebo gum treatment. The double active condition equalled smoking with score 99.2. All pairwise comparisons were significant (P < 0.001) except between the two single active conditions and between smoking versus the double active condition. Significant time-of-day effects by treatment on withdrawal were observed for the double placebo condition (P < 0.05) with less withdrawal in the morning. The findings suggest: 1) combining nicotine gum with transdermal nicotine may be superior to either treatment alone, 2) more symptoms may be nicotine specific (relieved by replacement) than previously thought.

Nicotine may relieve symptoms of Parkinson's disease.

Two elderly patients with Parkinson's disease were treated with nicotine gum and patch. Reliable changes in symptomatology were noted, using a single-subject, placebo-control reversal design. Improvement was associated with active nicotine dosing and involved diminished tremor and disorganized thinking in one patient and diminished bradykinesia and increased energy in the other.

Combination nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation: rationale, efficacy and tolerability.

Currently available nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) medications provide effective treatment for tobacco dependence, typically doubling success rates compared with placebo. A strategy for further improving the efficacy of NRT is to combine one medication that allows for passive nicotine delivery (e.g. transdermal patch) with another medication that permits ad libitum nicotine delivery (e.g. gum, nasal spray, inhaler). The rationale for combining NRT medications is that smokers may need both a slow delivery system to achieve a constant concentration of nicotine to relieve cravings and tobacco withdrawal symptoms, as well as a faster acting preparation that can be administered on demand for immediate relief of breakthrough cravings and withdrawal symptoms. This article reviews 5 published studies that have examined the effectiveness of combination NRT compared with monotherapy in providing withdrawal relief and smoking cessation, and examines other factors relevant to the promotion of combination NRT for treating tobacco dependence. The data show that there are conditions under which combinations of NRT products provide greater efficacy in relieving withdrawal and enabling cessation than monotherapy, but the findings are not robust and additional research is warranted to better understand the magnitude and generality of the benefits of combination therapy. There are also regulatory and commercial obstacles that must be considered. Nonetheless, combination NRT has the potential to provide effective treatment of tobacco dependence in persons whose dependence is refractory to currently available treatments.

Cessation of long-term nicotine gum use--a prospective, randomized trial.

Nicotine gum is an important adjunct for smoking cessation for many smokers, and long-term use of nicotine gum will occur in a small percentage of patients. To date, no method of cessation in long-term users has been studied in a randomized trial. We enrolled 26 subjects at the Mayo Clinic site of the Lung Health Study who had used nicotine gum for more than 6 months to participate in a trial where subjects were randomly assigned to: (1) abrupt cessation, (2) taper with placebo gum, or (3) taper with active gum. At the end of the 6-week trial, the percentage of subjects abstinent from gum use and not smoking was not different among the three groups: 66.7% for the abrupt cessation group, 71.4% for the taper with placebo gum group and 60% for the taper with active gum group. One subject in the taper with placebo gum group relapsed to smoking during the trial but was abstinent from smoking again at long-term follow-up. Long-term follow-up (median 284 days) showed 65% of subjects were abstinent from all nicotine products. Motivated subjects can stop long-term nicotine gum use without relapse to gum use or smoking by either abrupt cessation or brief tapering.

Assessment of the smoker who wants to quit.

This paper describes assessments that can be useful when giving smokers help to stop. The assessments discussed are: motivation, amount smoked, dependence, lung function, carbon monoxide (CO), earlier cessation experience, knowledge of nicotine's role, comorbidity, body weight, vital signs and cardiovascular risk factors. The rationale for each assessment is given. The most important factors to assess are probably motivation, dependency and CO in expired air.

[Tobacco addiction and its treatment using replacement therapy]. / Závislost na tabáku a její lécba náhradní terapií.

Tobacco or nicotine dependence is now established as a disease and listed by several countries and by the World Health Organization. The characteristics and mechanisms of tobacco dependency will be described as well as its assessment and implications for treatment.