Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Assunto principal
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Interv Cardiol ; 28(6): 600-8, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26643006

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Assess the evolution of right-to-left shunt (RLS) after transcatheter patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure. BACKGROUND: Despite the high number of interventional procedures performed worldwide, limited systematic data on the long-term abolition of RLS after percutaneous closure are available. METHODS: All patients treated at our Institution between February 2001 and July 2009 were included in this single center, prospective study, and were asked to repeat late contrast transcranial Doppler (cTCD). Rate of complete closure, residual RLS (i.e., a shunt that persists after closure), and recurrent RLS (i.e., a shunt that reappears after a previous negative cTCD) was assessed. RESULTS: Long-term follow-up was completed in 120 patients (56% male). RLS was still detectable 4.9 ± 2.3 years (range 1.3-10.3) after the procedure in 55 patients; 20 (17%) had residual RLS and 35 (29%) had recurrent RLS. Multivariate analysis revealed that significant predictors of residual RLS included post-procedural shunt at transesophageal echocardiography (OR 3.07, 95%CI 0.97-9.7), use of a bigger device (35 vs 25 mm, OR 3.85, 95%CI 1.22-12.2) and length of follow-up (OR 0.75, 95%CI 0.57-0.98), while only length of follow-up (OR 0.77, 95%CI 0.62-0.95) was associated with recurrent RLS. Neurological recurrences (1 stroke, 6 transient ischemic attacks) were equally distributed between the groups. CONCLUSION: A significant number of recurrent and residual shunts may be observed by cTCD up to 5 years after PFO closure. Management of late RLSs includes periodic re-evaluation, exclusion of device-induced complications or secondary sources of RLS, and optimization of antithrombotic treatment with or without a second intervention.


Assuntos
Forame Oval Patente/diagnóstico por imagem , Forame Oval Patente/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Ecocardiografia Doppler , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Feminino , Seguimentos , Forame Oval Patente/complicações , Humanos , Ataque Isquêmico Transitório/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Recidiva , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/epidemiologia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
Eur Heart J Case Rep ; 7(6): ytad253, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37378054

RESUMO

Background: Coronary artery spasm (CAS) is a pathological condition resulting from transient functional narrowing of the coronary arteries leading to myocardial ischaemia and in some rare cases even to sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). The most important preventable risk factor is use of tobacco, whereas possible precipitating factors include some medications and psychological stress. Case summary: A 32-year-old woman was hospitalized with burning chest pain. The immediate investigations revealed the diagnosis of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, because of ST elevations in one single lead and increased high-sensitivity troponin. Due to ongoing chest pain and a severe impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 30% with apical akinesia, a prompt coronary angiography (CAG) was scheduled. After aspirin administration, she developed anaphylaxis with pulseless electrical activity (PEA). She could be resuscitated successfully. CAG revealed multi-vessel CAS for which she received calcium channel blockers. Five days after, she suffered from a second SCA due to ventricular fibrillation and was resuscitated again. Repeated CAG showed no critical coronary artery occlusion. LVEF improved progressively during hospitalization. Drug therapy was increased, and a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) was implanted for secondary prevention. Discussion: CAS may in some instances lead to SCA, especially in case of multi-vessel involvement. Allergic and anaphylactic events can trigger CAS, which are frequently underestimated. Regardless of the cause, cornerstone of CAS prophylaxes remains optimal medical therapy as in the avoidance of predisposing risk factors. In case of life-threatening arrhythmia, the implantation of an ICD should be considered.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA