Surgical margin status in relation to surgical approach in the management of early-stage cervical Cancer: A Canadian cervical Cancer collaborative (4C) study.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical margin status in women undergoing surgery for early-stage cervical cancer is an important prognostic factor. We sought to determine whether close (<3 mm) and positive surgical margins are associated with surgical approach and survival. METHODS: This is a national retrospective cohort study of cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy. Patients with stage IA1/LVSI-Ib2(FIGO 2018) with lesions up to 4 cm at 11 Canadian institutions from 2007 to 2019 were included. Surgical approach included robotic/laparoscopic (LRH), abdominal (ARH) or combined laparoscopic-assisted vaginal/vaginal (LVRH) radical hysterectomy. Recurrence free survival(RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Chi-square and log-rank tests were used to compare groups. RESULTS: 956 patients met inclusion criteria. Surgical margins were as follows: negative (87.0%), positive (0.4%) or close <3 mm (6.8%), missing (5.8%). Most patients had squamous histology (46.9%); 34.6% had adenocarcinomas and 11.3% adenosquamous. Most were stage IB (75.1%) and 24.9% were IA. Mode of surgery included: LRH(51.8%), ARH (39.2%), LVRH (8.9%). Predictive factors for close/positive margins included stage, tumour diameter, vaginal involvement and parametrial extension. Surgical approach was not associated with margin status (p = 0.27). Close/positive margins were associated with a higher risk of death on univariate analysis (HR = non calculable for positive and HR = 1.83 for close margins, p = 0.017), but not significant for OS when adjusted for stage, histology, surgical approach and adjuvant treatment. There were 7 recurrences in patients with close margins (10.3%, p = 0.25). 71.5% with positive/close margins received adjuvant treatment. In addition, MIS was associated with a higher risk of death (OR = 2.39, p = 0.029). CONCLUSION: Surgical approach was not associated to close or positive margins. Close surgical margins were associated with a higher risk of death. MIS was associated with worse survival, suggesting that margin status may not be the driver of worse survival in these cases.

Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.

OBJECTIVE: Although minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIS-H) has been associated with worse survival compared to abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for cervical cancer, only 8% of patients in the LACC trial had microinvasive disease (Stage IA1/IA2). We sought to determine differences in outcome among patients undergoing MIS-H, AH or combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy (CVLH) for microinvasive cervical cancer. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of all patients undergoing hysterectomy (radical and non radical) for FIGO 2018, microinvasive cervical cancer across 10 Canadian centers between 2007 and 2019 was performed. Recurrence free survival (RFS) was estimated using Kaplan Meier Survival analysis. Chi-square and log-rank tests were used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: 423 patients with microinvasive cervical cancer were included; 259 (61.2%) Stage IA1 (22/8.5% with LVSI) and 164(38.8%) IA2. The median age was 44 years (range 24-81). The most frequent histology was squamous (59.4%). Surgical approach was: 50.1% MIS-H (robotic or laparoscopic), 35.0% AH and 14.9% CVLH. Overall, 70.9% underwent radical hysterectomy and 76.5% had pelvic lymph node assessment. There were 16 recurrences (MIS-H:4, AH:9, CVLH: 3). No significant difference in 5-year RFS was found (96.7% MIS-H, 93.7% AH, 90.0% CVLH, p = 0.34). In a sub-analysis of patients with IA1 LVSI+/IA2(n = 186), survival results were similar. Further, there was no significant difference in peri-operative complications (p = 0.19). Patients undergoing MIS-H had a shorter median length of stay(0 days vs 3 (AH) vs. 1.5 (CVLH), p < 0.001), but had more ER visits (16.0% vs 3.6% (AH), 3.5% (CVLH), p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: In this cohort, including only patients with microinvasive cervical cancer, no difference in recurrence was found by surgical approach. This may be due to the low rate of recurrence making differences hard to detect or due to a true lack of difference. Hence, this patient population may benefit from MIS without compromising oncologic outcomes.

Predicting recurrence and recurrence-free survival in high-grade endometrial cancer using machine learning.

OBJECTIVE: To develop machine-learning models to predict recurrence and time-to-recurrence in high-grade endometrial cancer (HGEC) following surgery and tailored adjuvant treatment. METHODS: Data were retrospectively collected across eight Canadian centers including 1237 patients. Four models were trained to predict recurrence: random forests, boosted trees, and two neural networks. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to select the best model based on the highest area under the curve (AUC). For time to recurrence, we compared random forests and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) model to Cox proportional hazards. RESULTS: The random forest was the best model to predict recurrence in HGEC; the AUCs were 85.2%, 74.1%, and 71.8% in the training, validation, and test sets, respectively. The top five predictors were: stage, uterus height, specimen weight, adjuvant chemotherapy, and preoperative histology. Performance increased to 77% and 80% when stratified by Stage III and IV, respectively. For time to recurrence, there was no difference between the LASSO and Cox proportional hazards models (c-index 71%). The random forest had a c-index of 60.5%. CONCLUSIONS: A bootstrap random forest model may be a more accurate technique to predict recurrence in HGEC using multiple clinicopathologic factors. For time to recurrence, machine-learning methods performed similarly to the Cox proportional hazards model.

Factors associated with an increased risk of recurrence in patients diagnosed with high-grade endometrial cancer undergoing minimally invasive surgery: A study of the society of gynecologic oncology of Canada (GOC) community of practice (CoP).

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is a standard surgical approach for comprehensive surgical staging in women with endometrial cancer. As rates and complexity of MIS are steadily increasing, it is important to identify potential risk factors which may be associated with this approach. This study evaluates the impact of local factors on the risk of disease recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients diagnosed with high grade endometrial cancer (HGEC) who underwent MIS between 2012 and 2016 at eight Canadian centers. Data was collected from medical records. The 75th percentile was calculated for estimated uterine volume and weight. All recurrences were categorized into two groups; intra-abdominal vs. extra-abdominal. To search for significant covariates associated with recurrence-free survival a Cox proportional hazard model was performed. RESULTS: A total of 758 patients were included in the study. Intra-uterine manipulator was used in 497 (35.8%) of patients. Vaginal lacerations were documented in 9.1%. Median follow-up was 30.5 months (interquartile range 20-47). There were 157 who had disease recurrence (20.71%), including 92 (12.14%) intra-abdominal and 60 (7.92%) extra-abdominal only recurrences. In univariate analysis myometrial invasion, LVI, stage, uterine volume and weight > 75th percentile and chemotherapy were associated with increased risk of intra-abdominal recurrence. In multivariable analysis only stage, and specimen weight > 75th percentile (OR 2.207, CI 1.123-4.337) remained significant. Uterine volume, and weight were not associated with increased risk of extra-abdominal recurrences. CONCLUSION: For patients diagnosed with HGEC undergoing MIS, extracting a large uterus is associated with a significantly increased risk for intra-abdominal recurrence.

Evaluating the diagnostic performance of preoperative endometrial biopsies in patients diagnosed with high grade endometrial cancer: A study of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (GOC) Community of Practice (CoP).

BACKGROUND: High grade cancers account for a disproportionate number of recurrences in patients with endometrial cancer. Accurately identifying these cases on endometrial biopsies allows for better surgical planning. This study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of general pathologists (GP) compared to gynecological pathologists (GYNP) in interpreting preoperative biopsies. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients diagnosed with high grade endometrial cancer (HGEC) between 2012 and 2016 at eight Canadian cancer centres. Data was collected from medical records. Pre-operative biopsies were categorized into groups; biopsies read by GP, GYNP and GP reviewed by GYNP. Rates of HGEC on pre-operative biopsy were calculated. Fisher exact test was used to compare differences between the groups. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted for HGEC prediction. RESULTS: Of 1237 patients diagnosed with HGEC, 245 (19.8%) did not have a preoperative diagnosis of high-grade disease. Discordancy was identified in 91/287 (31.71%) of biopsies reported by GP, and in 114/910 (12.53%) of biopsies reported by a GYNP (p < 0.0001). Compared to GP, GYNP were 3.24 (CI 2.36-4.45) times more likely to identify high grade disease on preoperative biopsy. Patients whose biopsy was reported by a GYNP were more likely to have a comprehensive staging procedure (OR 1.77 CI 1.33-2.38) and less likely to receive adjuvant therapy (OR 0.71 CI 0.52-0.96). CONCLUSION: GYNP are more likely to identify HGEC on pre-operative biopsies. Due to high rates of overall discordancy, it is possible that surgical staging procedures should not be based solely on preoperative biopsy. Further strategies to improve pre-operative biopsies' accuracy are needed.

Same-Day Discharge Among Patients With Obesity Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynaecologic Oncology Surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the likelihood of same-day discharge (SDD) among patients with obesity undergoing laparoscopic gynaecologic oncology surgery and identify predictors of SDD. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of gynaecologic oncology patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures between January 2012 and June 2016. Patients were categorized as non-obese, obese class I/II and obese class III (BMI <30, 30-39.9, and ≥40 kg/m2, respectively). We used univariate and multivariable logistic regression to identify variables associated with SDD. RESULTS: Of 496 patients, 288 were non-obese, 161 were obese class I/II, and 47 were obese class III. Overall, 182 patients (36.7%) were discharged same day; 44% of these were non-obese, 30% class I/II and 15% class III. On multivariable analysis, we found negative predictors for SDD to be obesity (OR 0.54; P = 0.03), procedure length (OR 0.51; P < 0.01), and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score (OR 0.63; P < 0.01), while we found being pre-booked for SDD (OR 9.16; P <0.01) was a positive predictor of SDD. Among all patients with obesity, only procedure length (OR 0.47; P < 0.01) and being pre-booked for SDD (OR 9.67; P < 0.01) were associated with SDD when we controlled for BMI, ASA score, intraoperative complications, type of surgery, and surgical start time. Patients discharged same day were less likely to present to the emergency department within 30 days of surgery (OR 0.48; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Among the study cohort and after controlling for potential confounders, women with class I, II, and III obesity had a much lower likelihood of SDD than non-obese women. The only significant predictors of SDD among patients with obesity were duration of procedure and pre-booking for SDD. Further study is needed to identify strategies to improve SDD rates among patients with obesity.

Correlation of differential ascites volume with primary cytoreductive surgery outcome, lymph node involvement, and disease recurrence in advanced ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: High-grade serous ovarian cancer accounts for a disproportionate number of deaths from gynecologic malignancies. It typically presents at an advanced stage and with a high volume of ascites a common presenting feature. The aims of this study is to evaluate the association between ascites volume at the time of primary surgery for advanced stage ovarian cancer with surgical outcomes and patterns of recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective review of stage III/IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients who underwent primary surgery at two centers between March 2003 to June 2016. Patients were categorized as low-volume ascites (≤ 200 mL) vs high-volume (≥ 1 L). Patients with an unknown volume of ascites or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. Patients' characteristics were compared for the two groups. Probability of recurrence over time and the HR from a proportional hazards model for sub-distribution were calculated. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients were included, 90 (42.9%) patients in the low-volume and 120 (57.1%) patients in the high-volume group. Patients in the low-volume group were older with a median age of 60.2 years vs 56.8 years in the high-volume group and had lower serum CA-125 levels (mean 223 vs 971.5 U/mL). The low-volume group had better surgical outcome with suboptimal debulking (> 1 cm residual disease) in only 17.8 % vs 39.2 % in the high-volume group and had longer median time to recurrence (2.8 years in low-volume vs 1.6 years high-volume group). At the time of recurrence, the low-volume group had a less disseminated pattern of recurrence, lower rates of ascites (20 % in the low-volume group vs 37.2 % in the high-volume group), and a trend toward lower serum CA125 levels (mean 352.8 vs 596.9 U/mL). CONCLUSIONS: Advanced stage serous ovarian cancer patients who present with low-volume ascites have lower serum CA125 levels, more optimal cytoreduction rates, and longer disease-free interval. The low-volume group had less ascites, less disseminated disease, and a trend toward lower serum CA125 levels at the time of recurrence.

The Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology for Obese and Morbidly Obese Patients.

BACKGROUND: Surgical interventions are the mainstay of treatment for many gynecological cancers. Although minimally invasive surgery offers many potential advantages, performing laparoscopic pelvic surgery in obese patients remains challenging. To overcome this, many centers have shifted their practice to robotic surgery; however, the high costs associated with robotic surgery are concerning and limit its use. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the feasibility of performing laparoscopic gynecologic oncology procedures in obese and morbidly obese patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent laparoscopic surgeries by a gynecologic oncologist from January 2012 to June 2016 at a designated gynecologic oncology center. Patients were categorized as nonobese (body mass index [BMI] < 30 kg/m), obese (BMI 30-39.9 kg/m), and morbidly obese (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m). Intra and postoperative complications and outcomes were recorded. Group differences were computed with Kruskal-Wallis nonparametric test (continuous) or Fisher exact test (categorical). RESULTS: Of 497 patients, 288 were nonobese (58%), 162 obese (33%), and 47 morbidly obese (9%). Complex surgical procedures were performed in 57.4% of obese patients and 55.3% of morbidly obese patients. Although morbidly obese and obese patients had longer operative times (mean of 181 and 166 minutes vs 144 minutes, P = 0.014), conversion from laparoscopy to laparotomy occurred in 9.05% of all patients, with no group differences. Low intraoperative (9%-11%) and severe postoperative (2.41%) complication rates were observed overall, with no group differences. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of emergency room visits 30 days postoperation between the 3 BMI groups (P = 0.6108). Average length of postoperative stay was statistically significant (P = 0.0003) but was low overall (1-2 days). Hospital readmission rates were low, with the lowest rate among morbidly obese patients (2.13%). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that laparoscopic gynecologic-oncology procedures for obese patients are feasible and safe.

Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy in gynecologic oncology: A systematic review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To compare same-day discharge (SDD) versus traditional admission to the hospital following minimally invasive hysterectomy (conventional laparoscopy and robotic assisted laparoscopy) for the treatment of gynecologic malignancies. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted in which MEDLINE and Cochrane Center Register of Controlled Trials were searched using terms related to same-day discharge, outpatient, and hysterectomy. We reviewed published English language trials and studies that compared safety, feasibility, readmission rate, emergency department (ED) visits, complication rate, and associated risk factors for admission. Studies of any design that included at least 20 patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy (conventional laparoscopy and robotic laparoscopy) for gynecologic oncology indications were included. RESULTS: The literature review yielded 421 citations, of which 27 full-text articles were reviewed. Six comparative studies met eligibility criteria. Study data were abstracted and inputted into structural electronic forms. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that in comparison to admission post minimally invasive hysterectomy with or without full staging, SDD in gynecologic oncology procedures is safe, and feasible. It is associated with low complication and readmissions rates, few visits, and low rates of unscheduled visits within the follow up period of two to six weeks after surgery.

Fertility sparing treatment of complex atypical hyperplasia and low grade endometrial cancer using oral progestin.

OBJECTIVE: Oral progestin is an alternative to hysterectomy for women with complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) or grade one endometrial cancer (G1EC) who wish fertility preservation. We evaluated treatment efficacy and fertility outcomes in this population. METHODS: Women <45 y treated with oral progestin for CAH or G1EC were identified from two cancer centers. Data were obtained from medical records and telephone questionnaires. Time until complete response (CR), and from CR until recurrence was censored for patients without events and analyzed for associations with patient and treatment characteristics; cumulative incidence functions were used to estimate event probability over time. RESULTS: 44 patients were identified, 19 (43%) with CAH and 25 (57%) with G1EC. Median age was 36.5 y (26-44). 24 (55%) achieved CR (median time: 5.7 months). Older age was associated with a lower likelihood of CR (HR 0.84, p=0.0003, 95% CI, 0.8-0.9). CR probability appeared to plateau after 12 months of therapy. Among those with CR, 13 (54%) recurred (median time 3.5 y). 24 patients (55%) underwent hysterectomy; 3 (13%) were upstaged. 11 (25%) underwent fertility treatment with the following outcomes: 6 (55%) no pregnancy, 2 (18%) at least one live infant, and 3 (27%) spontaneous abortion. One achieved a live birth without intervention. CONCLUSION: Oral progestin is an effective temporizing fertility-sparing treatment for women with CAH/G1EC. Fertility specialist involvement is recommended due to the low live birth rate without intervention. Progestin therapy should be re-evaluated at 1 year in non-responders due to a low probability of success. Hysterectomy is recommended after childbearing due to a high recurrence rate.

Is routine appendectomy at the time of primary surgery for mucinous ovarian neoplasms beneficial?

UNLABELLED: The question whether the appendix should be removed at the time of surgery for apparent early-stage ovarian cancer is controversial. Removal of the appendix in the setting of mucinous histologic type is primarily driven by the existing challenge to distinguish between primary ovarian mucinous neoplasm and metastatic appendiceal carcinoma to the ovary. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the value of an appendectomy at the time of surgery for ovarian mucinous borderline tumors or carcinoma. METHODS: A retrospective single institute-based study was conducted. We identified patients who were operated on by a gynecologic oncologist for an abnormal pelvic mass, which was diagnosed as mucinous adenocarcinoma or mucinous borderline tumor between January 2000 and December 2010. Cases were included in the study if an appendectomy was performed at the time of initial surgery. RESULTS: Seventy-seven cases meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. The ovarian mass of 11 patients (14%) was diagnosed as metastatic appendiceal carcinoma involving the ovary. Evidence of metastatic disease, abnormal-looking appendix, or pseudomyxoma peritonei, were identified at the time of surgery for all of these cases. The condition of 30 patients (39%) and 36 patients (47%) were diagnosed as mucinous borderline ovarian tumor and invasive or microinvasive mucinous ovarian carcinoma, respectively. Evidence of metastasis from the ovary to the appendix was not identified in any of the cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that in cases of apparent early-stage mucinous ovarian borderline tumors and cancer, adding an appendectomy at the time of surgery is not warranted in the absence of a grossly abnormal appendix or evidence of metastatic disease.

Bevacizumab Treatment for Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Serous epithelial ovarian cancer, classified as either high-grade (90%) or low-grade (10%), varies in molecular, histological, and clinicopathological presentation. Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSOC) is a rare histologic subtype that lacks disease-specific evidence-based treatment regimens. However, LGSOC is relatively chemo-resistant and has a poor response to traditional treatments. Alternative treatments, including biologic therapies such as bevacizumab, have shown some activity in LGSOC. Thus, the objective of this systematic review is to determine the effect and safety of bevacizumab in the treatment of LGSOC. Following PRISMA guidelines, Medline ALL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase all from the OvidSP platform, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry were searched from inception to February 2022. Articles describing bevacizumab use in patients with LGSOC were included. Article screening, data extraction, and critical appraisal of included studies were completed by two independent reviewers. The effect of bevacizumab on the overall response rate, progression-free survival, overall survival, and adverse effects were summarized. The literature search identified 3064 articles, 6 of which were included in this study. A total of 153 patients were analyzed; the majority had stage IIIC cancer (56.2%). The overall median response rate reported in the studies was 47.5%. Overall, bevacizumab is a promising treatment for LGSOC, with response rates higher than traditional treatment modalities such as conventional chemotherapy, and is often overlooked as a treatment tool. A prospective clinical trial evaluating the use of bevacizumab in LGSOC is necessary to provide greater evidence and support these findings.

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgically Treated Cervical Cancer with No Residual Disease on Hysterectomy Specimen: A 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) Working Group Study.

Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of macroscopic cervical cancer leads to worse oncologic outcomes than with open surgery. Preoperative conization may mitigate the risk of surgical approach. Our objective was to describe the oncologic outcomes in cases of cervical cancer initially treated with conization, and subsequently found to have no residual cervical cancer after hysterectomy performed via open and minimally invasive approaches. This was a retrospective cohort study of surgically treated cervical cancer at 11 Canadian institutions from 2007 to 2017. Cases initially treated with cervical conization and subsequent hysterectomy, with no residual disease on hysterectomy specimen were included. They were subdivided according to minimally invasive (laparoscopic/robotic (MIS) or laparoscopically assisted vaginal/vaginal hysterectomy (LVH)), or abdominal (AH). Recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Chi-square and log-rank tests were used to compare between cohorts. Within the total cohort, 238/1696 (14%) had no residual disease on hysterectomy specimen (122 MIS, 103 AH, and 13 VLH). The majority of cases in the cohort were FIGO 2018 stage IB1 (43.7%) and underwent a radical hysterectomy (81.9%). There was no statistical difference between stage, histology, and radical vs simple hysterectomy between the abdominal and minimally invasive groups. There were no significant differences in RFS (5-year: MIS/LVH 97.7%, AH 95.8%, p = 0.23) or OS (5-year: MIS/VLH 98.9%, AH 97.4%, p = 0.10), although event-rates were low. There were only two recurrences. In this large study including only patients with no residual cervical cancer on hysterectomy specimen, no significant differences in survival were seen by surgical approach. This may be due to the small number of events or due to no actual difference between the groups. Further studies are warranted.

Radical trachelectomy: a fertility-sparing option for early invasive cervical cancer.

For the past 15 years gynecological oncologists have been seeking ways to preserve woman's fertility when treating invasive cervical cancer. For some women with small localized invasive cervical cancers, there is now hope for pregnancy after treatment. Many cases of cervical cancer are diagnosed in young woman who wish to preserve their fertility. As more women are delaying childbearing, fertility preservation has become an important consideration. The standard surgical treatment for stage IA2-IB1 cervical cancer is a radical hysterectomy and bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy. This surgery includes removal of the uterus and cervix, radical resection of the parametrial tissue and upper vagina, and complete pelvic lymphadenectomy. Obviously, the standard treatment does not allow future childbearing. Radical trachelectomy is a fertility-sparing surgical approach developed in France in 1994 by Dr. Daniel Dargent for the treatment of early invasive cervical cancer. Young women wishing to bear children in the future may be candidates for fertility-preservation options. The radical trachelectomy operation has been described and performed abdominally, assisted vaginally by laparoscopy and robotically. In this review we discuss the selection criteria for radical trachelectomy, the various possible techniques for the operation, the oncological and obstetric outcomes, and common complications.

Identifying Borderline Ovarian Tumor Recurrence Using Routine Ultrasound Follow-Up.

Borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) are non-invasive tumors frequently diagnosed in young patients. Surgical removal of the uterus, fallopian tubes, ovaries, and omentum is considered definitive management, however fertility-sparing approach is a recognized option. Surveillance is important due to known recurrence, but there is controversy over the effectiveness of follow-up modalities. The objective is to determine the efficacy of ultrasound screening in identifying tumor recurrence. This retrospective chart review evaluated all patients consulted and/or treated surgically at our institution from January 2015 to June 2020 diagnosed with BOT. Patients were excluded if concurrently diagnosed with another gynecologic malignancy, did not have yearly ultrasound follow-up, or were lost to follow-up. This study included 56 patients, 17 of whom underwent fertility preserving surgery. The overall rate of recurrence was 10.7%; with recurrence rates of 23.5% for the fertility preserving surgery population and 5.1% for the definitive surgery population. Ultrasound first identified 5 of the 6 (83.3%) recurrences. Overall time to recurrence was 51.5 months. In conclusion, recurrences were identified on routine ultrasound screening prior to symptom onset or detection via physical exam in 83.3% of cases. While the best modality of follow-up remains controversial, this review provides evidence supporting the use of routine ultrasound follow-up for early detection of BOT recurrence.

The value of human chorionic gonadotropin stimulation test in predicting ovarian response during in-vitro fertilization.

PURPOSE: To assess the predictive value of human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) theca-stimulation test for ovarian reserve in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments. METHODS: 39 women were included in the study. All participants received a single hCG 10000 IU injection on cycle day 2-3. Serum levels of estradiol, testosterone, androstenedione and 17-OH progesterone were measured prior to the injection and on days 1, 3 and 7 following the injection. hCG-induced hormone levels were compared with ovarian response during the subsequent IVF cycle. RESULTS: There were 11 good responders (>10 oocytes) and 22 low responders (<3 oocytes). Before hCG stimulation serum E2 levels were higher in low responders compared to good responders (370.3 ± 443 vs. 138.3 ± 54 pmol/ml). Following hCG stimulation, day 3 androstendione levels showed an increase in good responders compared to low responders. The ratio between day 3 androstendione and day 0 estradiol was significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.03). ROC analysis of this test revealed area = 0.837 (good prediction), which was much better than day 3 FSH (area = 0.635, poor prediction). CONCLUSIONS: These preliminary results demonstrate the potential use of the hCG theca stimulation test in differentiating between good and poor responders. Larger series are needed for further verification of the test in routine clinical application.

Role of androgens in the treatment of patients with low ovarian response.

The objective of the current report was to provide a summary of knowledge concerning the treatment of women with poor ovarian response with androgens and androgen modulating agents. This involved a review of the literature. The literature search was performed using PubMed. Information concerning the role of androgens and androgen modulating agents in treating women with poor ovarian response is limited. The search of the literature yielded five studies and one case report concerning the treatment of poor responders with androgens. The variations in patient selection, type of androgens employed and the different duration of exposure preclude drawing any definite conclusions. Aromatase inhibitors block the conversion of androgens to oestrogens, thereby promoting an androgen-rich intrafollicular environment. The evidence presented in this review suggests a potential beneficial role for the use of aromatase inhibitors in treating women who have previously experienced failure of standard IVF protocols. The optimal dose and duration of this treatment is yet to be determined. Although the results of studies concerning LH supplementation in poor responders are conflicting, the latest Cochrane review on the use of recombinant LH for ovarian stimulation supports its use in poor responders, based on pooled pregnancy estimates.

Surgical versus medical treatment for secondary post-partum hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Secondary post-partum hemorrhage (PPH) is defined as any abnormal bleeding from the birth canal occurring between 24 hours and 12 weeks postnatally. Treatment usually falls into one of the two categories: surgical evacuation of the uterus or medical treatment. OBJECTIVE: To compare the two different clinical approaches and the implications on future fertility. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: From 1990 to 2002, 168 women diagnosed with late PPH were admitted to the Hadassah Medical Centers in Jerusalem. The cases were divided into two groups according to the planned initial treatment: primary surgical treatment vs. primary medical treatment. RESULTS: Primary surgical treatment was associated with significantly more primary negative events (p=0.01). After the primary event, primary surgical treatment was associated with fewer future deliveries (p=0.04) and resulted in increased rate of secondary infertility of borderline significance (p=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that secondary PPH is related to high rates of immediate and long-term complications. It is possible that a conservative medical approach for secondary PPH may be superior to surgical treatment.

Mifepristone followed by high-dose oxytocin drip for second-trimester abortion: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of mifepristone for priming and induction of second-trimester abortion in conjunction with a high-concentration oxytocin drip. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, pilot study. Thirty patients with 14-25 weeks' gestational age abortion received either 600 mg of mifepristone or placebo in 3 identical capsules followed, 48 hours later, by a high-concentration oxytocin drip (HCOD). RESULTS: The mifepristone group showed significantly higher success rates as compared to the placebo group (92.3% vs. 52.9%, p<0.05). The time interval to abortion (from beginning of HCOD) was also significantly shorter in the mifepristone group as compared to the placebo group (11.3 +/- 6.0 hours vs. 17.6 +/- 6.5 hours, p <0.05). Probability of success as calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method was found to be highly significant (log rank test p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that mifepristone is very effective for priming and induction of second-trimester abortion and shortens significantly the time interval to evacuation following HCOD.

Impact and cost of preoperative computed tomography imaging on the management of patients diagnosed with high-grade endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cost and impact of routine preoperative computed tomography (CT) in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer, and its role in identifying extrauterine disease. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with high-grade endometrial cancer who underwent routine CT scan prior to surgical procedure between September 1, 2005, and January 31, 2015. Cases in which CT findings led to alterations in the treatment plan were documented. Incidental findings unrelated to endometrial cancer diagnosis were captured. Cost of imaging and diagnostic procedures was based on Ontario's Physician Services-Schedule of Benefits. RESULTS: Of 179 patients included, 57 (31.9%) were diagnosed with stage 3-4 disease. CT showed evidence of metastatic disease in 30 (16.8%) patients; however, planned surgical procedure was altered in only nine (5.0%) cases. CT results showed incidental findings requiring follow-up in 78 (43.6%) cases, three of which were second malignancies. We estimate an expenditure of CAD$14 185.85 on routine imaging for every case in which surgical management was changed. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative CT imaging is efficacious in identifying extrauterine disease in patients with high-grade endometrial cancer, although it seldom alters surgical management. Many of these CT scans will identify incidental findings requiring further interventions, resulting in substantial costs.