[Expression and purification of recombinant N-terminal protein of SARS S1 subunit expressed in E. Coli].

OBJECTIVE: To express and purify the recombinant N-terminal protein of SARS virus S1 subunit and to study its role in SARS immune response. METHODS: The gene encoding N-terminal 334 amino acid residuals of SARS virus S1 subunit was cloned and expressed in E. Coli. After purification, the recombinant protein was identified by anti-SARS positive sera from recovered SARS patients. The sera from health donors, which were collected before the out-break of SARS, were used as negative control in the study. RESULTS: Sequencing analysis confirmed that the desired DNA sequence in recombinant plasmid was correct and had the same sequence of natural N-terminal of SARS virus S1 subunit. The molecular weight of recombinant fusion protein is about 64 000. The recombinant S1 protein could react with three antibody positive samples from recovered SARS patients, which showed specific bands at 64 000, but not with the control samples according to results of western blot. CONCLUSION: The recombinant N-terminal protein of SARS virus S1 subunit displays specific reaction with SARS antibody and may provide a good tool for further research of immune response to SARS virus.

Prevalence of antinuclear and anti-liver-kidney-microsome type-1 antibodies in patients with chronic hepatitis C in China.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection may induce autoimmune response and autoantibodies can be detected in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. However, the reported positive rate of autoantibodies in CHC patients in China varies considerably. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-liver-kidney-microsome type 1 autoantibodies (anti-LKM-1) in a large cohort of CHC patients, and analyzed the factors related to the presence of the autoantibodies. METHODS: A total of 360 CHC patients were enrolled in this study. Serum ANA and anti-LKM-1 were detected by indirect immunofluorescence and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Clinical analysis was performed to disclose the related factors to autoantibody production. RESULTS: The prevalence of ANA and anti-LKM-1 in CHC patients was 12.5% (45/360) and 2.5% (9/360), respectively. Women had a higher prevalence than men (18.9% vs 11.4%, P = 0.046). Patients with positive autoantibodies had lower HCV RNA levels (1.2 x 10(7) copies/L vs 7.2 x 10(7) copies/L, P < 0.05). Positive ANA was associated with higher serum globulin (P < 0.05). Stratified analysis showed that there were no significant differences in age, HCV genotype, disease course, clinical stage, prevalence of cirrhosis and interferon therapy between autoantibody-positive and -negative subgroups. CONCLUSION: Autoantibodies can be induced in the course of CHC, and some CHC patients can even develop autoimmune hepatitis.

[Detection and the production mechanism of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-liver/kidney microsomal tpe 1 antibodies (anti-LKM1) in patients with chronic hepatitis C].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and anti-liver/ kidney microsomal type 1 antibodies (anti-LKM1) in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC)and to explore the mechanism of production of these autoantibodies. METHODS: Serum samples were collected from 360 patients with CHC (case group), 69 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and 69 patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (control group). Serum ANA and anti-LKM1 were detected by indirect immunofluorescence (HF) technique and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), respectively. Multi-factor analysis was performed to explore the correlations of the production of autoantibodies with some factors such as age, sex, viral loads, HCV genotype, biochemical parameters and clinical characteristics. RESULTS: Fifty-four (15%) of 360 patients infected with HCV were positive in autoantibodies. The prevalence of ANA and anti-LKM1 were 12.5% (45/360) and 2.5% (9/ 360), respectively. The positive rate of autoantibodies in patients with CHC was significantly higher than that in patients with CHB (15% vs 2.9%, P = 0.006), but significantly lower than that in patients with AIH (15% vs 47.9%, P < 0.001). Twenty-one (11.35%) of 185 male patients and 33 (18.86%) of 175 female patients were positive in autoantibodies, the difference in positive rate was significant (P < 0.05). HCV virus loads in the autoantibodies negative group were higher than that in the autoantibodies positive group (7.2 x 10(7) copies/L vs 1.23 x 10(7) copies/L, P < 0.05). There were not significant differences in age and genotype between the autoantibody positive group and the autoantibody negative group. The serum biochemical parameters of the autoantibody positive group were similar to those of the autoantibody negative group. The differences were not significant for the course of disease, clinical symptom, the incidence of cirrhosis between the autoantibody positive group and the autoantibody negative group. The prevalence of autoantibodies was not different for patients with or without interferon treatment (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Autoantibodies related to AIH can be detected in CHC patients; interferon may not induce the production of autoantibodies; it is very likely that HCV infection induces the autoimmune reaction and the production of autoantibodies.

Detection of antibodies against SARS-CoV in serum from SARS-infected donors with ELISA and Western blot.

Recombinant fragments of S proteins from the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) coronavirus (SARA-CoV) were generated and used in a Western blot (WB) assay that was compared to a commercial SARS ELISA method. In 85% of confirmed SARS cases (n = 20), the S2 recombinant fragment based WB was positive and this was comparable to the commercial ELISA using heat killed SARS-CoV. WB using the other four recombinant fragments in confirmed SARS cases generated lower rates of detection (S1--75%, S1-N--25%, S1-C--55%). Evaluation of sera from healthy controls (n = 60) resulted in two weakly positive ELISA results with the remainder being negative while the S2 protein WB demonstrated three positive results from the 20 controls with a history of SARS contact and no positive results in 40 noncontact controls. A discrepancy between the ELISA and S2 WB arose when evaluating per-2003 sera from individuals (n = 10) with SARS-like symptoms (ELISA--100% positive, S2 WB--30% positive). These data suggest that the S2 WB assay may be particularly useful in ELISA-negative SARS cases and in some ELISA-positive non-SARS cases.

[The cloning, expression, purification and identification of SARS virus S2 gene and study on its immunological characteristics].

AIM: To express S2 protein of SARS virus fused with Trx and then detect its reactivity to the sera from convalescent SARS patients. METHODS: The Trx-S2 fusion protein was expressed in E.coli. After purification, the Trx-S2 fusion protein was detected by Western blot with 6 serum samples of convalescent SARS patients and 6 serum samples of healthy donors. RESULTS: According to the SDS-PAGE analysis, the relative molecular mass (M(r)) of the Trx-S2 fusion protein is about 76 x 10(3). The fusion protein could react with all the sera from convalescent SARS patients but not with the sera from healthy donors. CONCLUSION: The Trx-S2 fusion protein provides a basis for the research on its role in the course of SARS virus infection of host cells and preparation of recombinant vaccine against SARS virus.