Impact of Pressure Recovery Adjustment on Aortic Valve Area Classification of Disease Severity in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of pressure recovery (PR) adjustment on disease severity grading in patients with severe aortic stenosis. The authors hypothesized that accounting for PR would result in echocardiographic reclassification of aortic stenosis severity in a significant number of patients. DESIGN: A retrospective observational study between October 2013 and February 2021. SETTING: A single-center, quaternary-care academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (≥18 years old) who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). INTERVENTIONS: TAVI. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 342 patients were evaluated in this study. Left ventricle mass index was significantly greater in patients who continued to be severe after PR (100.47 ± 28.77 v 90.15 ± 24.03, p = < 0.000001). Using PR-adjusted aortic valve area (AVA) resulted in the reclassification of 81 patients (24%) from severe to moderate aortic stenosis (AVA >1.0 cm2). Of the 81 patients who were reclassified, 23 patients (28%) had sinotubular junction (STJ) diameters >3.0 cm. CONCLUSION: Adjusting calculated AVA for PR resulted in a reclassification of a significant number of adult patients from severe to moderate aortic stenosis. PR was significantly larger in patients who reclassified from severe to moderate aortic stenosis after adjusting for PR. PR appeared to remain relevant in patients with STJ ≥3.0 cm. Clinicians need to be aware of PR and how to account for its effect when measuring pressure gradients with Doppler.

Preoperative Pulmonary Artery-to-Aorta Diameter Ratio as a Predictor of Postoperative Severe Right Ventricular Failure and 1-Year Mortality After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association of pulmonary artery diameter and pulmonary artery- to-aorta diameter ratio (PA/Ao) with right ventricular failure and mortality within 1 year after left ventricular assist device implantation. DESIGN: This was a retrospective observational study between March 2013 and July 2019. SETTING: The study was conducted at a single, quaternary-care academic center. PARTICIPANTS: Adults (≥18 years old) receiving a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Inclusion if (1) a chest computed tomography scan was performed within 30 days before the LVAD and (2) a right and left heart catheterization was completed within 30 days before the LVAD. INTERVENTIONS: A left ventricular assist device was used for intervention. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 176 patients were included in this study. Median PA diameter and PA/Ao ratio were significantly greater in the severe right ventricular failure (RVF) group (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed PA/Ao and RVF as predictors for mortality (area under the curve = 0.725 and 0.933, respectively). Logistic regression analysis-predicted probability gave a PA/Ao ratio cutoff point of 1.04 (p < 0.001). Survival probability was significantly worse in patients with a PA/Ao ratio ≥1.04 (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The PA/Ao ratio is an easily measurable noninvasive indicator that can predict RVF and 1-year mortality after LVAD implantation.

Tissue Doppler Imaging (E/e') and Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: Although American and European consensus statements advocate using the ratio of the transmitral E velocity and tissue Doppler early diastolic mitral annular velocity (E/e') in the assessment of left-sided heart filling pressures, recent reports have questioned the reliability of this ratio to predict left atrial pressures in a variety of disease states. The authors hypothesized that there is a clinically significant correlation between E/e' and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) in patients with severe aortic stenosis. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The study comprised 733 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: PCWP and E/e'ave (average of the lateral and medial annulus tissue Doppler velocities) were measured with a pulmonary artery catheter and transthoracic echocardiography during preprocedural evaluation. Patients were grouped by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50% and LVEF <50%. Spearman rank correlation, analysis of variance, and t and chi-square tests were used to analyze the data. Seventy-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant correlation between E/e'ave and PCWP (n = 79, Spearman r = 0.096; p = 0.3994). This correlation did not improve when ventricular function was considered (LVEF <50%: n = 11, Spearman r = -0.097; p = 0.776 and LVEF ≥50%: n = 68, Spearman r = 0.116; p = 0.345). There was no statistically significant difference in mean PCWP between each range of E/e'ave. CONCLUSION: A clinically relevant relationship between E/e' and PCWP was not observed in patients with severe aortic stenosis.