Potentially inappropriate prescribing in older patients admitted to psychiatric hospital.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing including potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescription omissions (PPOs) and to assess related risk factors in older people with major psychiatric illness. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of older patients hospitalized in a psychiatric hospital (n = 164; mean age 74.9 ± 7.3 years; 62% female). The primary endpoint was the prevalence of participants receiving PIMs and PPOs, which was assessed by using the Beers criteria 2012 and the screening tool of older person's potentially inappropriate prescriptions (STOPP) and screening tool of alert doctors to the right treatment (START) criteria. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to assess significant risk factors for PIMs in this population. RESULTS: A total of 1269 drugs were prescribed to included patients (range: 0-19 drugs/day). PIMs were identified in 47% and 79% of participants, based on the Beers 2012 and STOPP criteria, respectively. Most PIMs (70%) concerned psychotropic drugs. The STOPP criteria identified more PIMs (331) than the Beers criteria 2012 (199). According to the START criteria, 59% of participants had PPOs. The number of prescribed medications was significantly associated with the occurrence of PIMs according to the Beers 2012 [OR 1.2 (95% CI 1.1-1.3)] and STOPP [OR 1.5 (95% CI 1.3-1.8)] criteria. CONCLUSION: Potentially inappropriate prescribing, as identified by the Beers and STOPP/START criteria, is highly prevalent among older patients hospitalized with major psychiatric illness. However, the focus on psychotropic drugs prescription without taking into account the benefit of these drugs to individual patients may limit the application of the Beers and STOPP criteria in psychiatric hospitals.

Predictors and risk model development for menopausal age in fragile X premutation carriers.

PURPOSE: Women who carry a fragile X mental retardation 1 premutation are at risk for fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency and should be counseled for a potentially reduced fertility. Multiple factors can affect the age of onset and severity of fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency. In this study, we assessed the predictive power of several factors with menopausal age, a surrogate measure of onset of fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency. METHODS: Genetic, environmental, and reproductive factors were analyzed by Cox proportional hazard models in 1068 women, 385 of fragile X families ascertained through the Nijmegen study and 683 of fragile X families or general population families ascertained through the Atlanta study. RESULTS: The highest association with menopausal age among fragile X mental retardation 1 premutation carriers was found for risk index by CGG repeat size (hazard ratio, 1.43) and smoking (hazard ratio, 1.34). Women from the Nijmegen cohort showed an overall lower age at menopause onset, for which a correction was made. A prediction model based on these two parameters, mean menopausal age of first-degree relatives with the same mutation status and the correction for ascertainment site, estimated the probability of becoming postmenopausal for premutation carriers, with a margin of 7-10%. CONCLUSION: We conclude that this model serves as a first step toward clinical application of fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency prediction.

X chromosome inactivation does not define the development of premature ovarian failure in fragile X premutation carriers.

Since only 20% of female fragile X premutation carriers develop premature ovarian failure (POF, i.e., amenorrhea before age of 40 years), and since X chromosome inactivation (XCI) determines the phenotypic severity of full mutation women, we reasoned that the development of POF in fragile X premutation carriers could be due to skewed XCI (XCI ratio >80:20). To determine inactivation ratios and activities of the premutations, inactivation patterns were assessed in peripheral blood samples from 101 fragile X premutation carriers (mean age 47.1 years, range 12-72) through analysis of the AR and FMR1 loci, respectively. In addition, AR inactivation patterns were assessed in peripheral blood samples from 25 women with idiopathic POF (mean age 31.7 years, range 19-48). We addressed the association between age and skewed XCI because older women are prone to XCI skewness. The median XCI ratios were 68% for premutation carriers with POF (N = 37), 67% for premutation carriers without POF (N = 64) and 61% for women with idiopathic POF (N = 25). The incidence of skewing was similar in all groups, that is, 7 of 37 (18.9%) in premutation carriers with POF, 11 of 64 (17.2%) in premutation carriers without POF, and 3 of 25 (12%) in women with idiopathic POF. There was good concordance between inactivation ratios at the two loci tested in 62 premutation carriers (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.86; P < 0.01). No age-specific skewing was observed. Skewed XCI and activity of the premutation are not associated with POF in fragile X premutation carriers.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of oral delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in healthy older subjects: a randomized controlled trial.

There is a great concern about the safety of THC-based drugs in older people (≥65 years), as most of THC-trials did not include such group. In this phase 1, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial, we evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of three oral doses of Namisol(®), a novel THC in tablet form, in older subjects. Twelve healthy older subjects (6 male; mean age 72±5 years) randomly received a single oral dose of 3mg, 5mg, or 6.5mg of THC or matching placebo, in a crossover manner, on each intervention day. The data for 11 subjects were included in the analysis. The data of 1 subject were excluded due to non-compliance to study medication. THC was safe and well tolerated. The most frequently reported adverse events (AEs) were drowsiness (27%) and dry mouth (11%). Subjects reported more AEs with THC 6.5mg than with 3mg (p=0.048), 5mg (p=0.034) and placebo (p=0.013). There was a wide inter-individual variability in plasma concentrations of THC. Subjects for whom the Cmax fell within the sampling period (over 2h), Cmax was 1.42-4.57ng/mL and Tmax was 67-92min. The AUC0-2h (n=11) was 1.67-3.51ng/mL. Overall, the pharmacodynamic effects of THC were smaller than effects previously reported in young adults. In conclusion, THC appeared to be safe and well tolerated by healthy older individuals. Data on safety and effectiveness of THC in frail older persons are urgently required, as this population could benefit from the therapeutic applications of THC.

Why do parents prefer to know the fetal sex as part of invasive prenatal testing?

Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine whether prospective parents, primarily referred for prenatal diagnosis to exclude Down syndrome, prefer to know the fetal sex as part of invasive testing. Methods. In this prospective study 400 pregnant women undergoing amniocentesis were invited to answer a questionnaire, including information about demographic factors, current pregnancy, and previous children. In two open-ended questions they were asked why they wanted to know the fetal sex after amniocentesis or ultrasound investigation. Scores were given for reasons that could have played a role in the wish whether or not to know the sex of their unborn child. Results. A total of 210 (52.5%) questionnaires were completed. Overall, 69.0% was interested to know the fetal sex as part of the diagnostic test result. The most important reasons were curiosity (77.8%), "just want to know" (68.0%), and "because it is possible" (66.8%). The overall knowledge of sex chromosomal disorders appeared low and did not seem to affect the parent's wish to know the fetal sex. Almost all women (96.6%) planned to have a 20-week ultrasound scan and 96.2% thought the scan to be reliable in detecting the fetal sex. A minority (28%) was willing to learn the fetal sex by ultrasound examination, whereas 65% preferred to learn the fetal sex only after the amniocentesis. Conclusion. Personal values affect the parental desire to know or not to know the fetal sex. This does not appear to be affected by invasive prenatal testing and/or genetic knowledge of sex chromosomal disorders.