RESUMO
Introduction Up to 30% of CML patients will require a therapeutic change during follow-up, due to intolerance and/or resistance to first-line TKI approach. In this context, bosutinib (BOS) has not only demonstrated its effica-cy, but also presents a favorable safety profile, without comorbid conditions representing an absolute contraindication to its use. Methods To gain further into BOS treatment in real-life, we conducted a retrospective analysis on the outcome of CML patients receiving BOS in 18 hematological centers, all belonging to the "REL" (Lombard Hematology Network). Results Of 546 regularly followed CML cases, a total of 132 patients were reported as being treated with BOS, most frequently (62.9%) in second line. Interestingly, most patients (63.6%) switched to BOS due to intol-erance to the previous TKI, while resistance to the last treatment was reported in the remaining 36.4% of patients. Despite a permanent discontinuation rate of 18.9%, over 80% of patients achieved at least an MMR and seven cases were able to attempt treatment-free remission. Conclusion Although in this survey BOS represented the preferred option especially in patients intolerant rather than resistant to previous TKIs, we confirmed that BOS represents a safe and effective therapeutic option be-yond first line in the real-life setting.
RESUMO
The aim of supportive autografting is to reduce the side effects from stem cell transplantation and avoid procedure-related health disadvantages for patients at the lowest possible cost and resource expenditure. Economic evaluation of health care is becoming increasingly important. We report clinical and laboratory data collected from 397 consecutive adult patients (173 non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 30 Hodgkin lymphoma, 160 multiple myeloma, 7 autoimmune diseases, and 28 acute leukemia) who underwent their first autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). We considered primary endpoints evaluating health economic efficacy (eg, antibiotic administration, transfusion of blood components, and time in hospital), secondary endpoints evaluating toxicity (in accordance with Common Toxicity Criteria), and tertiary endpoints evaluating safety (ie, the risk of regimen-related death or disease progression within the first year after PBSCT). A time-dependent grading of efficacy is proposed with day 21 for multiple myeloma and day 25 for the other disease categories (depending on the length of the conditioning regimen) as the acceptable maximum time in hospital, which together with antibiotics, antifungal, or transfusion therapy delineates four groups: favorable (≤7 days on antibiotics and no transfusions; ≤21 [25] days in hospital), intermediate (from 7 to 10 days on antibiotics and <3 transfusions, ≤21 to 25 days in hospital or ≥7 days on antibiotics and no transfusions; from 21 to 30 days [25 to 34] in hospital), unfavorable (>7 days on antibiotics, >3 but <6 transfusions; >30/34 days in hospital after transplantation), and very unfavorable (>10 days on antibiotics, >6 transfusions; >30 to 34 days in hospital). The multivariate analysis showed that (1) PBSC harvests of ≥4 × 10(6)/kg CD34 + cells in 1 apheresis procedure were associated with a favorable outcome in all patient categories except acute myelogenous leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (P = .001), (2) ≥5 × 10(6)/kg CD34 + cells infused predicted better transplantation outcome in all patient categories (P < .0001) except acute myelogenous leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia, (3) 1 or 2 aphereses (P = .001) predicted good outcome, (4) toxicity increased with higher graft volume reinfused (>500 mL) (P = .002), and (5) patients with a central venous catheter during both collection and infusion of PBSC had a more favorable outcome post-PBSCT than peripheral access (P = .007). The type of mobilization regimen did not affect the outcome of auto-PBSCT. The present study identified predictive variables, which may be useful in future individual pretransplantation probability evaluations with the goal to improve supportive care.