Impact of left ventricular filling parameters on outcome of patients undergoing trans-catheter aortic valve replacement.

AIM: To assess the impact of left ventricular (LV) filling parameters on outcomes following trans-catheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 526 TAVR patients were compared with 300 patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) treated conservatively. Clinical variables were collected along with echocardiographic data at baseline, 1 month, and 6 months after study entry. End points included all-cause mortality and the combination of death and heart failure admission. LV filling parameters associated with mortality included reduced A wave velocity (P = 0.005) and shorter deceleration time (DT) (P = 0.0005). DT was superior to all other parameters (P = 0.05) apart from patients with atrial fibrillation in whom E/e' was better. Short DT (<160 ms) was associated with lower survival than long DT (≥220 ms; P = 0.002) or intermediate DT (P = 0.05), even after adjustment for age, gender, stroke volume index (SVI), and co-morbidities. However, patients with short baseline DT exhibited greater improvement in DT, E/A, and systolic pulmonary pressure at follow-up than patients with baseline DT ≥160 ms (P < 0.05 for all time x group interactions). Most importantly, among patients with short DT, TAVR was associated with better survival than conservative treatment (46 ± 7 vs. 28 ± 12% at 3 years, P = 0.05), even after adjustment for age, gender, and SVI (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Short DT is an independent predictor of adverse outcome following TAVR. Nevertheless, LV filling parameters improve in most patients post TAVR, and TAVR is associated with improved survival compared with conservative therapy, even in patients with evidence of elevated LV filling. Thus, evidence of elevated LV filling should not be viewed as a contraindication for TAVR.

Hemodynamic performance and outcome of percutaneous versus surgical stentless bioprostheses for aortic stenosis with anticipated patient-prosthesis mismatch.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to compare the performance and midterm survival of transcutaneous aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgically implanted stentless aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for severe aortic stenosis in patients anticipated to have patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 86 and 49 consecutive TAVR and SAVR patients with severe aortic stenosis and calculated minimal effective orifice area larger than the best projected effective orifice area. Cox hazard analyses were used to assess the effect of TAVR versus SAVR on outcome. RESULTS: The peak and mean transprosthetic gradient at discharge were lower (P < .001 for both) in the TAVR group. Mild or greater aortic regurgitation was more frequent in the TAVR group (61% vs 7%; P < .0001). At 3 months of follow-up, the mean gradient in the TAVR group was similar to that of the SAVR group but the prevalence of aortic regurgitation was still higher. The unadjusted 3-year survival rate was superior in the SAVR versus TAVR group (91.6% ± 4% vs 67.0% ± 7%; P = .01). Adjustments for both age and comorbidity resulted in loss of the difference in mortality between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with anticipated PPM, TAVR offers an immediate lower incidence of PPM than SAVR but a greater prevalence of aortic regurgitation. The differences in transaortic gradients became nonsignificant 3 months postoperatively. The question of whether TAVR is a suitable substitute for SAVR in patients with anticipated PPM, in particular, those who are older and sicker, warrants additional investigation.