RESUMO
Misinformation in healthcare is at crisis level worldwide, with the internet as primary source of prevarication. Topical corticosteroids (TCS) are a safe and effective treatment used in multiple dermatological conditions. Nonadherence to prescribed TCS can be due to phobia secondary to misinformation. TCS phobia is a complex multifaceted phenomenon that exploits patients with skin disease, creates cognitive dissonance and can obstruct successful treatment. This study aimed to examine the content of TCS-related misinformation available online. A formal review of PubMed was performed using the terms 'topical corticosteroids' AND 'misinformation' OR 'disinformation' OR 'conspiracy theory, along with an informal Google search using combinations of these terms and further targeted searches on social media applications including Facebook™, Twitter™, Instagram™ and TikTok™. 'Topical steroid withdrawal', 'red skin syndrome' or 'TCS addiction' is a particularly prevalent myth currently being propagated on social media, with most content suggesting that eczema is due to a 'leaky gut' or food intolerance and not to skin inflammation. The risks of potential adverse effects such as skin thinning and stunted growth/development are often exaggerated. Multiple websites promoting misinformation were frequently endorsed by companies advertising consultations or testing to identify 'underlying causes', or 'natural' products as alternative treatments, including 'herbal' remedies, which can contain significant quantities of corticosteroids or other potent ingredients. The dermatology community should be vigilant of the type of TCS-related misinformation online and be active in attempts to counteract it with evidence-based advice.
Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Fármacos Dermatológicos , Dermatopatias , Humanos , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Dermatopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Glucocorticoides , EsteroidesRESUMO
Radiation-induced morphea (RIM) is a rare but recognized late complication of radiotherapy. It was first described in 1905, not long after the initial discovery of X-rays by Roentgen. Characterized by the deposition of excess collagen in the dermis, it results in thickening of the skin. Its frequency is approximately 2 in 1000. We present a series of three cases involving patients receiving radiotherapy treatment for breast cancer, each of which subsequently developed RIM. Because of its rarity, RIM is often misdiagnosed as infection or metastatic disease. This can lead to delayed diagnosis and treatment, leading to poorer outcomes such as chronic pain issues. Early dermatological involvement and tissue sampling to examine histopathological features can avoid this, leading to better care and improved results. A variety of treatment options are available, ranging from topical to systemic, with early induction more likely to result in a positive response.
RESUMO
A 66-year-old woman receiving pembrolizumab for metastatic melanoma presented with tender red nodules on her shins and forearms. Biopsy was consistent with erythema nodosum (EN). The eruption responded to oral minocycline and potent topical steroids. Subsequent investigations detected bihilar lymphadenopathy, biopsied as granulomatous lymphadenitis, confirming the diagnosis of pembrolizumab-associated sarcoidosis. Pembrolizumab was stopped for two cycles and was restarted without recrudescence of EN or bihilar lymphadenopathy. Immunotherapy-associated sarcoidosis is a rare but recognized adverse event related to therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. EN is an uncommon manifestation of immunotherapy-induced sarcoidosis. New-onset bihilar lymphadenopathy in the context of immunotherapy requires prompt histological evaluation to differentiate between immunotherapy-associated sarcoidosis and metastatic progression. We review the literature related to immunotherapy-associated EN.
Pembrolizumab (trade name Keytruda®) is a type of immune therapy that stimulates the body's immune system to fight cancer cells. This immune therapy can cause a variety of rashes. In this article, we describe a patient who developed a red lumpy rash on her limbs that is not commonly described with pembrolizumab. A woman was diagnosed with advanced melanoma and was treated with pembrolizumab. She developed a red lumpy rash on her arms and legs, and a biopsy showed signs of a condition called erythema nodosum. Treatment with an antibiotic tablet and strong steroid ointment were helpful. Scans of her chest showed signs of sarcoidosis in her lungs, which can be associated with erythema nodosum. Pembrolizumab was stopped, and both the rash and lung sarcoidosis stayed away when it was restarted. This type of rash has rarely been described with this kind of immune therapy, and it can be a sign of lung involvement.
Assuntos
Eritema Nodoso , Linfadenopatia , Melanoma , Sarcoidose , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados , Eritema Nodoso/diagnóstico , Eritema Nodoso/etiologia , Eritema Nodoso/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Melanoma/tratamento farmacológico , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Sarcoidose/diagnósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: This study investigated seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific IgG antibodies, using the Abbott antinucleocapsid IgG chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) assay, in five prespecified healthcare worker (HCW) subgroups following the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. SETTING: An 800-bed tertiary-level teaching hospital in the south of Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: Serum was collected for anti-SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid IgG using the Abbott ARCHITECT SARS-CoV-2 IgG CMIA qualitative assay, as per the manufacturer's specifications.The groups were as follows: (1) HCWs who had real-time PCR (RT-PCR) confirmed COVID-19 infection (>1-month postpositive RT-PCR); (2) HCWs identified as close contacts of persons with COVID-19 infection and who subsequently developed symptoms (virus not detected by RT-PCR on oropharyngeal/nasopharyngeal swab); (3) HCWs identified as close contacts of COVID-19 cases and who remained asymptomatic (not screened by RT-PCR); (4) HCWs not included in the aforementioned groups working in areas determined as high-risk clinical areas; and (5) HCWs not included in the aforementioned groups working in areas determined as low-risk clinical areas. RESULTS: Six of 404 (1.49%) HCWs not previously diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection (groups 2-5) were seropositive for SARS-CoV-2 at the time of recruitment into the study.Out of the 99 participants in group 1, 72 had detectable IgG to SARS-CoV-2 on laboratory testing (73%). Antibody positivity correlated with shorter length of time between RT-PCR positivity and antibody testing.Quantification cycle value on RT-PCR was not found to be correlated with antibody positivity. CONCLUSIONS: Seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in HCWs who had not previously tested RT-PCR positive for COVID-19 was low compared with similar studies.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Anticorpos Antivirais , Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Estudos SoroepidemiológicosRESUMO
Coronary lithotripsy is a novel approach to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). It is based on well-established technology dating back to 1980 when lithotripsy was first used to treat renal calculi. Its application in cardiovascular medicine is a more recent development that involves using a low-pressure lithotripsy balloon to deliver unfocused acoustic pulse waves in a circumferential mechanical energy distribution. This causes fracturing of calcification within the surrounding vasculature, facilitating optimal stent deployment. This article aims to review recent clinical experience and the published data regarding intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). All relevant articles were identified via PubMed using keywords including "intravascular lithotripsy", "shockwave" and "coronary". All studies that contained published datasets regarding IVL with patient numbers >50 were included for review. There were 116 results found. After reviewing all the publications, articles were then tabulated and 17 were found to be relevant, including only four clinical studies. In this review we found that intracoronary lithotripsy for heavily calcified arteries appears to be a safe, effective, easy-to-use method of dealing with an otherwise technically-challenging and high-risk scenario. It appears to carry low risk, uses low pressures, and exerts its effects on both superficial and deep intravascular calcium. Further prospective data with long-term follow-up will be required to explore both the off-label uses of IVL (such as post-stent dilatation), and the long-term patency of these vessels.
RESUMO
We provide the details of three cases utilising intravascular lithotripsy, a novel approach to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).