Evaluation of Uncertainties in the Anthropogenic SO2 Emissions in the USA from the OMI Point Source Catalog.

Satellite remote sensing is a promising method of monitoring emissions that may be missing in inventories, but the accuracy of these estimates is often not clear. We demonstrate here a comprehensive evaluation of errors in anthropogenic sulfur dioxide (SO2) emission estimates from NASA's OMI point source catalog for the contiguous US by comparing emissions from the catalog with high-quality emission inventory data over different dimensions including size of individual sources, aggregate vs individual source errors, and potential bias in individual source estimates over time. For sources that are included in the catalog, we find that errors in aggregate (sum of error for all included sources) are relatively low. Errors for individual sources in any given year can be substantial, however, with over- or underestimates in terms of total error ranging from -80 to 110 kt (roughly 10-90th percentile). We find that these errors are not necessarily random over time and that there can be consistently positive or negative biases for individual sources. We did not find any overall statistical relationship between the degree of isolation of a source and bias, either at a 40 or 70 km scales. For a sub-set of sources where inventory emissions over a radius of 70 km around an OMI detection are larger than twice the emissions within 40 km, the OMI value is consistently overestimated. We find, as expected, that emission sources not included in the catalog are the largest aggregate source of difference between the satellite estimates and inventories, especially in more recent years where source emission magnitudes have been decreasing and note that trends in satellite detections do not necessarily track trends in total emissions. We find that the OMI-based SO2 emissions are accurate in aggregate, when summed over a number of sources, but must be interpreted more cautiously at the individual source level. Similar analyses would be valuable for other satellite emission estimates; however, in many cases, the appropriate high-quality reference data may need to be generated.

Record-Breaking Increases in Arctic Solar Ultraviolet Radiation Caused by Exceptionally Large Ozone Depletion in 2020.

Measurements of solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) performed between January and June 2020 at 10 Arctic and subarctic locations are compared with historical observations. Differences between 2020 and prior years are also assessed with total ozone column and UVR data from satellites. Erythemal (sunburning) UVR is quantified with the UV Index (UVI) derived from these measurements. UVI data show unprecedently large anomalies, occurring mostly between early March and mid-April 2020. For several days, UVIs observed in 2020 exceeded measurements of previous years by up to 140%. Historical means were surpassed by more than six standard deviations at several locations in the Arctic. In northern Canada, the average UVI for March was about 75% larger than usual. UVIs in April 2020 were elevated on average by about 25% at all sites. However, absolute anomalies remained below 3.0 UVI units because the enhancements occurred during times when the solar elevation was still low.

An Analysis of Factors Associated with 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels in White and Non-White Canadians.

Vitamin D status was assessed in 19-79 year old whites (8351 participants of European ancestry) and non-whites (1840 participants encompassing all other ancestries) from cycles 1 to 3 (years 2007-2013) of the Canadian Health Measures Survey. Status was assessed using the U.S. Institute of Medicine (IOM) 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] cut point values of 30 and 40 nmol/L. Overall, median 25(OH)D concentrations were significantly higher in whites [58.9 (28.6, 100.1) nmol/L; 5th and 95th percentile] compared with non-whites [43.5 (19.0, 83.2); P < 0.001]. Values were higher in females [58.5 (27.5, 101.3) nmol/L] when compared with males [53.5 (24.2, 92.7) nmol/L] and increased with age. Non-whites were more likely to have 25(OH)D values below IOM established cut points for optimum bone health with 20.1 (16.0, 24.2) and 42.2% (36.8, 47.7) of non-whites having serum 25(OH)D concentrations <30 and <40 nmol/L, respectively. The corresponding values for whites were 5.9 (4.6, 7.2) and 16.1% (14.0, 18.3). Values were lower during the first quarter when compared with the third quarter. Supplement intake was an important factor in determining 25(OH)D levels, but it did not alone account for the difference in status. Equivalent increases in 25(OH)D levels were observed in whites and non-whites during the summer months, suggesting there was no functional difference in sun exposure response. It is apparent that a complex interaction of factors affect 25(OH)D values in free-living Canadians.