Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders in renal transplant recipients: report of over 20 years of experience.

INTRODUCTION: Despite the benefits of immunosuppressive medications to improve graft function, they have several adverse effects, such as development of neoplasms in renal transplant recipients. Posttransplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are not uncommon complications, so we conducted a study to evaluate the characteristics of affected patients. METHODS: We enrolled 2117 kidney recipients from June 1984 to March 2004 in order to find pathological and clinical evidence of neoplasms. We collected and analyzed all data on PTLD patients. RESULTS: Overall there were 46 recipients with different types of neoplasms, among which the most common types were diseases of the skin (24 cases, 52.2%), Kaposi's sarcoma (15 cases, 32.6%), and PTLD (14 cases, 30.4%). The mean (+/- SD) age of PTLD patients at the time of transplantation was 37.86 +/- 9.67 years and 42.8% were women. Median and mean (+/- SD) time interval to PTLD diagnosis were 38.5 and 50.35 +/- 41.7 months, respectively (range 1 to 146 months). Types of PTLD in these patients were kidney lymphoma (14.3%); gastrointestinal (14.3%); brain lymphoma; tonsils; palatine; Hodgkin's lymphoma, large cell lymphoma, and acute lymphoblastic lymphoma (each 7.1%), with 28.6% unspecified types. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates after transplantation were 71.4%, 51.4%, and 44.3%, respectively. Despite discontinuing immunosuppressive therapy in PTLD patients, five of six surviving had graft function up to a mean time of 105.4 +/- 57.6 months after transplantation. CONCLUSION: Our findings showed that the prevalence of PTLD was 0.66%, which was less than reports from Western countries. The fact that there were surviving grafts for a considerable time despite discontinuing immunosuppressive therapy is of great importance.

Anxiety and depression: a comparison between renal transplant recipients and hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and depression are known causes of morbidity among patients with chronic illnesses. There is controversy whether hemodialysis or renal transplanted subjects have less severe anxiety or depression symptoms. We designed this study to evaluate these symptoms in the two groups of subjects. METHODS: In a case-control study performed in 2006, we randomly selected 32 transplant recipients and 39 hemodialysis patients. The two groups were matched for gender, age, marital status, educational background, and somatic comorbidities. Symptoms of anxiety and depression were compared between the groups using the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale. RESULTS: Anxiety score was significantly lower among transplant recipients compared with hemodialysis patients (8.61 +/- 3.09 vs 10.41 +/- 2.77; P=.01). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the score for depression (P>.05). In transplant recipients, the severity of anxiety was higher among those with a history of graft rejection and those <35 years at the time of transplantation (P<.05). The severity of depressive symptoms was higher among subjects with lower educational status (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Depressive symptoms did not seem to improve after renal transplantation, which highlights the need for screening and appropriate treatment of depression. Transplant recipients with a history of rejection or a young age at the time of transplantation should receive more attention for psychiatric problems.

Outcome of Kaposi's sarcoma and graft following discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs in renal transplant recipients.

PURPOSE: Owing to the use of immunosuppressive drugs, renal transplant recipients are at risk for malignancies including Kaposi's sarcoma (KS). Following the diagnosis, physicians tend to decrease the doses of immunosuppressive drugs to lower tumor progression rate. On the other hand, those who receive lower doses of immunosuppressive drugs are at a higher risk for acute rejection. In this study, we evaluated the outcome of KS on renal allografts following discontinuation or decrease in the doses of drugs. METHODS: Since 1984, 14 (nine men and five women) among 2000 cases of renal transplantation have been diagnosed as KS. In 11 patients, cyclosporine was completely discontinued, the dosage was decreased to half of the initial dose in other cases. Except one case, we discontinued either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. RESULTS: During 57 months of follow-up on average, the serum creatinine level remained normal in 10 but increased in four cases. Kidney function deteriorated in two of these four patients at the beginning of study. Three patients died with normal serum creatinine levels. Discontinuation of immunosuppressive drugs caused complete remission of KS in all patients except one who received chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Discontinuation of immunosuppressants following the diagnosis of KS caused complete remission of this cancer in almost all patients and seemed to be relatively safe for kidney graft function.

The impact of hepatitis B infection on outcome of kidney transplantation: a long-term study.

BACKGROUND: With the success of kidney transplantation, liver disease has emerged as an important cause of morbidity and mortality in kidney recipients. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection on patients and graft survival in both short- and long-terms. METHODS: 99 renal transplant patients infected with HBV on follow-up in two major transplant centers were included in a retrospective study. These patients were grafted between 1986 and 2005 and divided into two groups: (1) those only positive for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and (2) those who were also positive for hepatitis C virus antibodies (HCV Ab). RESULTS: There were 88 patients with HBsAg(+) and 11 with both HBsAg(+) and HCV Ab(+). The mean±SD age of patients was 38.8±13.2 years, and the median follow-up after transplantation was 19 months. Although not significant, the allograft survival rate in the first group (HBV(+)) was better compared to that in the second group (HBV(+) and HCV(+)); 1, 5 and 10 years graft survival rates were 91, 77 and 62 in the first group and 70, 56 and 28 in the second group, respectively (P=0.07). The overall mortality was 5% (4 of 88) in the first and 27% (3 of 11) in the second group (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Renal allograft recipients with HBV and HCV infections has a poor survival rate compared to patients with only HBV infection. However, there is no significant difference in terms of renal graft survival between the two groups.

Sun protection in Iranian kidney transplant recipients: knowledge, attitude and practice.

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) are at increased risk of developing skin cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitude, and practices of KTRs regarding skin cancer after transplantation and to identify the role of education in motivating these patients to practice sun-protective behaviours. METHODS: Two hundred and fifty KTRs in a referral hospital were interviewed using a questionnaire. All patients received a skin cancer information booklet after completion of the questionnaire. Six months later, these patients were invited and interviewed again about their skin cancer-prevention practices. RESULTS: The patients consisted of 153 men and 97 women patients with a mean age of 35.9 +/- 14.2 years and mean of 49.7 +/- 53.1 months after their transplantation. A total of 102 patients (40.8%) mentioned receiving skin care advice after transplantation. Nonetheless, the majority of patients did not have appropriate skin cancer-prevention practices. Patients who had received advice on skin care after transplantation were significantly more likely to do skin self-examination (chi-squared test; P < 0.001) and have less sun exposure daily (Mann-Whitney test; P = 0.019) than those who did not. Half of the patients (125 patients) participated in the second part of the study 6 months after the first interview and providing skin care instruction booklet. Although regular skin self-examination and sunscreen use was significantly increased (P = 0.006 and P = 0.001, respectively), but daily sun exposure was not changed significantly (P = 0.64). CONCLUSIONS: Post-transplantation education does not necessarily lead to patients' awareness about their increased risk of skin cancer, and subsequent motivation to practice effective sun protection. Health professionals and dermatologists in particular need to establish better methods of dissemination of information, repeatedly and at the proper time.