Clinical and radiological outcome following trauma-related reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a frequently used therapy for complex proximal humeral fractures and posttraumatic disorders. The present study's purpose was to assess the clinical and radiological outcome of primary and secondary RSA, and to analyze the impact of refixation of the greater tuberosity (GT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 28 patients with primary fracture RSA and 18 patients with RSA due to posttraumatic disorders were examined with a mean clinical follow-up of 2.5 ± 1.73 years. Operative details and radiographs were retrospectively reviewed. Additional analyses were performed for healed and non-healed GT in primary RSA. RESULTS: Patients with fracture RSA had higher Constant-Murley score (CMS) than secondary RSA without reaching significance (p = 0.104). No significant difference was present for the quality of life measured by the Short Form 36 (SF 36) and the range of motion. In primary RSA, 78.6% GT healed anatomically. Compared to non-healed GT, patients with healed GT had a significantly higher CMS (p = 0.011), external rotation (p = 0.026) and forward flexion (p = 0.083), whereas DASH score was lower without a significant difference (p = 0.268). SF 36 showed no significant difference. Patients with healed GT had a more neutral glenoid version (p = 0.009). CONCLUSION: Superior range of motion and clinical outcome scores were present for anatomically healed GT. Therefore, refixation of the tuberosities is recommended. Secondary RSA can result in inferior results compared to primary RSA, so patients need to be adequately informed.

Are there associations between hip geometry and bone quality? An analysis on 3074 adults from a general population.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with reduced bone mineral density and altered hip geometry are susceptible for hip pathologies. Knowledge on associations between bone properties and hip geometric parameters might facilitate identification of patients at risk for hip pathologies. The aim of the present study was to identify associations of bone properties assessed by quantitative ultrasound (QUS) at the heel and hip geometric parameters like center-edge angle (CE), neck-shaft angle (NSA) and alpha angle. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Hip geometric parameters (CE, NSA and alpha angle) of 3074 participants from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania were assessed on magnetic resonance imaging. QUS was performed on both calcanei providing broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA), speed of sound (SOS) and stiffness-index. Based on the stiffness-index the individual osteoporotic fracture risk (low, moderate or high) was determined. Associations between QUS-based and hip geometric parameters were calculated in linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, body height and weight. Interactions of QUS markers with age and sex on hip geometric parameters were tested. RESULTS: Significant inverse associations between BUA (ß = - 0.068), SOS (ß = - 0.024) as well as stiffness-index (ß = - 0.056) and CE were present, while fracture risk was positively associated with CE (ß for high = 1.28 and moderate = 2.54 vs. low fracture risk). Interactions between BUA and sex as well as between SOS and age were detected in the models for CE. Furthermore, there was an inverse relation between fracture risk and NSA that was restricted to the moderate risk (ß for moderate vs. low fracture risk = - 0.60). There were no significant associations between QUS parameters and alpha angle. CONCLUSIONS: In the general population, several associations between QUS-based bone properties or fracture risk and hip geometry are present. Less dysplastic hips had a lower stiffness-index and a higher fracture risk, whereas more valgus hips had a lower fracture risk.

Gender-specific factors influencing the glenoid version and reference values for it.

BACKGROUND: Glenoid version is an important factor in the evaluation of shoulder stability and shoulder pathologies. However, there are neither established reference values nor known factors that influence the glenoid version, even though valid reference values are needed for diagnostic and orthopaedic surgery like corrective osteotomy and total or reverse shoulder arthroplasty (TSA/RSA). The aim of our population-based study was to identify factors influencing the glenoid version and to establish reference values from a large-scale population cohort. RESULTS: Our study explored the glenoid versions in a large sample representing the general adult population. We investigated 3004 participants in the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). Glenoid version was measured for both shoulders via magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Associations with the glenoid version were calculated for sex, age, body height, body weight and BMI. The reference values for glenoid version in the central European population range between -9° and 7.5°, while multiple factors are associated with the glenoid version. CONCLUSION: To achieve a reliable interpretation prior to orthopaedic surgery, sex- and age-adjusted reference values are proposed.

Reference values and influencing factors of the glenohumeral subluxation index: a study on 3004 participants.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of this study was to examine the glenohumeral subluxation index (GHSI) in a large general population cohort and to define reference values. Glenohumeral subluxation is important in the development and prediction of pathological states of the shoulder joint and in total shoulder arthroplasty. Therefore, another objective was to examine the influence of age, sex, body mass index, and body height and weight on GHSI. METHODS: GHSI according to Walch was measured on bilateral magnetic resonance imaging of 3004 participants of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP, aged 21-90 years). SHIP drew a sample of the adult general population of Pomerania (Northeastern Germany). Reference values for GHSI were assessed by quantile regression models. Associations of sex, age, and anthropometric markers with the GHSI were calculated by linear regression models. RESULTS: A reference range between 42% and 55% for men with a mean of 49% ± 4% was defined, while the upper reference limit for women was 1% higher (mean, 50% ± 4%). Age was inversely associated with the GHSI in males (P < 0.001), while no significant association in females was observed (P = .625). Body weight and body mass index were positively associated (P < .001) without effect modification by sex. Heavy mechanical oscillations on the upper extremity showed no significant association with GHSI (P = .268). CONCLUSION: The reference values for GHSI were expanded to a range of 42%-57% on magnetic resonance imaging. Several associations between GHSI and anthropometric properties are present. According to these associations, adjusted formulas are provided to enable individual, patient-specific diagnostics and therapy. Nevertheless, the clinical picture cannot be neglected.

Os acromiale: prevalence and associated patient-related factors-a population-based study of three thousand and fifty participants.

PURPOSE: The presence of os acromiale is of clinical relevance before performing shoulder surgery but ethnic differences and little information regarding associated factors seem to be present. Population-based studies to clarify these topics are essential so the purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence, anatomy, and associations of os acromiale in a general adult population. METHODS: Both shoulders of 3050 participants from the population-based Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP) were assessed on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Associations with the os acromiale were calculated for sex, age, body height, body weight, and heavy mechanical oscillations on the upper extremity. RESULTS: In total, 1.9% (58/3050) had an os acromiale, while 21 were unilateral left, 23 were unilateral right, and 14 were bilateral. Sixty-eight meso-acromions, three pre-acromions, and one meta-acromion were detected. Os acromiale were more frequent in men (right side: p = 0.037, left side: p = 0.005). Overall, no differences in sides (p = 0.808), to participants' age (right: p = 0.993, left: p = 0.499), body height (right side: p = 0.241, left side: p = 0.154), and the exposure to heavy mechanical oscillations on the upper extremity (right: p = 0.054, left: p = 0.117) were detected. CONCLUSION: Our results support the genetic theory for the aetiology of the os acromiale due to the lower prevalence of the os acromiale in north-eastern Germany compared to the worldwide prevalence (1.9 to 7%) and the lacking association to lifestyle, age, gender, or sides. Additionally, it is important to be aware of possible os acromiale before surgery.

What Are the Reference Values and Associated Factors for Center-edge Angle and Alpha Angle? A Population-based Study.

BACKGROUND: The available evidence regarding normal ranges for the center-edge angle and the alpha angle derives from a few small studies, and associated factors such as sex and anthropometric factors have not been well evaluated. Knowing more about normal values for these parameters is critical, because this can inform decisions about when to perform elective hip preservation surgery. Population-level studies would provide considerable clarity on these issues, but to our knowledge, no such studies are available. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: The purposes of this study were (1) to use MRI in patients of a population-based study to establish normal values for the alpha and center-edge angles in the normal adult hip; and (2) to determine whether age, sex, or anthropometric variables were associated with differences in these values. METHODS: We used MRI images (1.5 T) of 3226 participants of the Study of Health in Pomerania (SHIP). SHIP is a population-based study that started with 4308 participants in 1997. Participants were recruited randomly from official inhabitant data files as a stratified cluster sample of the population from a defined region in northeastern Germany. To ensure a representative epidemiologic cohort, stratification variables were sex, age, and city of residence. Between 2008 and 2012, 1094 of these participants underwent whole-body MRI with pelvic sequences in the second followup. In parallel, the next cohort, SHIP-Trend, started with the same protocol in which 2132 participants underwent MRI examination. Reference values were calculated by quantile regressions for the 2.5 and 97.5 percentiles. Associations with the demographic features sex, age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference were analyzed by bivariate linear regression models. RESULTS: The mean center-edge angle was 31° (± 7°) with a corresponding calculated normal range of 17° to 45°. The mean alpha angle was 55° (± 8°) with a corresponding calculated normal range between 39° and 71°. Men (30° ± 7°) had a lower center-edge angle than women (32° ± 8°) (p < 0.001, ß = 1.4°; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9°-1.9°) and a higher alpha angle (57° ± 8° versus 52° ± 7°, p < 0.001, ß = 5.7°; 95% CI, 5.2°-6.3°). Moreover, a higher center-edge angle for the left side was found (33° ± 8° versus 30° ± 8°, p < 0.001, ß =3.2°; 95% CI, 3.0°-3.4°). In addition to sex, we found that age, height, waist circumference, and BMI affected both center-edge angle and alpha angle. Weight was associated with the alpha angle as well. Because of these associations, age- and sex-adjusted reference values with belonging formulas were calculated. CONCLUSIONS: The range of normal center-edge and alpha angles is quite wide. Therefore, only markedly abnormal angles may be associated with pathology. Moreover, center-edge angle and alpha angle are associated with age, sex, and anthropometric factors, which have to be taken into account for better interpretation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The association of abnormal radiographic values with true clinical hip pathology is tenuous at best. Assuming that a patient with an abnormal radiograph requires treatment is unwise. The clinical picture has to be substantial for therapeutic decisions.