Simultaneous stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain metastases using single-isocenter dynamic conformal arc therapy: a prospective monocentric registry trial.

BACKGROUND: Single-isocenter dynamic conformal arc (SIDCA) therapy is a technically efficient way of delivering stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to multiple metastases simultaneously. This study reports on the safety and feasibility of linear accelerator (LINAC) based SRS with SIDCA for patients with multiple brain metastases. METHODS: All patients who received SRS with this technique between November 2017 and June 2019 within a prospective registry trial were included. The patients were irradiated with a dedicated planning tool for multiple brain metastases using a LINAC with a 5 mm multileaf collimator. Follow-up was performed every 3 months, including clinical and radiological examination with cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These early data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 65 patients with 254 lesions (range 2-12) were included in this analysis. Median beam-on time was 23 min. The median follow-up at the time of analysis was 13 months (95% CI 11.1-14.9). Median overall survival and median intracranial progression-free survival was 15 months (95% CI 7.7-22.3) and 7 months (95% CI 3.9-10.0), respectively. Intracranial and local control after 1 year was 64.6 and 97.5%, respectively. During follow-up, CTCAE grade I adverse effects (AE) were experienced by 29 patients (44.6%; 18 of them therapy related, 27.7%), CTCAE grade II AEs by four patients (6.2%; one of them therapy related, 1.5%), and CTCAE grade III by three patients (4.6%; none of them therapy related). Two lesions (0.8%) in two patients (3.1%) were histopathologically proven to be radiation necrosis. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous SRS using SIDCA seems to be a feasible and safe treatment for patients with multiple brain metastases.

Re-irradiation strategies in combination with bevacizumab for recurrent malignant glioma.

The place of bevacizumab (BEV) in salvage re-irradiation (Re-RT) settings of malignant glioma is poorly defined. In the current study risk/benefit profiles of two BEV-based Re-RT protocols were analyzed and compared with that of salvage BEV plus irinotecan (BEV/IRI). According to interdisciplinary tumor board recommendations, patients were assigned to one of three BEV-based treatment protocols: (1) BEV/IRI, (2) Re-RT (36 Gy/18 fx) with concomitant BEV (Re-RT/BEV), and (3) Re-RT with concomitant/maintenance BEV (Re-RT/BEV→BEV). Prognostic factors were obtained from proportional hazards models. Adverse events were classified according to the NCI CTCAE, v4.0. 105 consecutive patients were enrolled from 08/2008 to 05/2014. Patients undergoing Re-RT experienced longer time intervals from initial diagnosis to BEV treatment (median: 22.0 months vs. 13.7 months, p = 0.001); those assigned to Re-RT/BEV→BEV rated better on the performance scale (median KPSREC: 90 vs. 70, p = 0.013). Post-recurrence survival after BEV-based treatment (PRS) was longest after Re-RT/BEV→BEV (median: 13.1 months vs. 8 months, p = 0.006). PRS after Re-RT/BEV and BEV/IRI was similar. Multivariately, higher KPSREC and Re-RT/BEV→BEV were associated with longer PRS. Treatment toxicity did not differ among groups. Re-RT/BEV→BEV is safe, feasible and effective and deserves further prospective evaluation.

High-Grade Glioma Radiation Therapy and Reirradiation Treatment Planning Using Translocator Protein Positron Emission Tomography With 18F-GE-180.

Purpose: Translocator protein (TSPO) positron emission tomography (PET) using 18F-GE-180 shows high tumor-to-brain contrast in high-grade glioma (HGG), even in areas without magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast enhancement. Until now, the benefit of 18F-GE-180 PET in primary radiation therapy (RT) and reirradiation (reRT) treatment planning for patients with HGG has not been assessed. Methods and Materials: The possible benefit of 18F-GE-180 PET in RT and reRT planning was retrospectively evaluated through post hoc spatial correlations of PET-based biological tumor volumes (BTVs) with conventional MRI-based consensus gross tumor volumes (cGTVs). To find the ideal threshold for BTV definition in RT and reRT treatment planning, tumor-to-background activity thresholds of 1.6, 1.8, and 2.0 were applied. Spatial overlap of PET- and MRI-based tumor volumes was measured by the Sørensen-Dice coefficient (SDC) and the conformity index (CI). Additionally, the minimal margin to include the entire BTV into the expanded cGTV was determined. Results: Thirty-five primary RT and 16 reRT cases were examined. BTV1.6, BTV1.8, and BTV2.0 were significantly larger than corresponding cGTV volumes in primary RT (median volumes: 67.4, 50.7, and 39.1, respectively, vs 22.6 cm3; P < .001, P < .001, and P = .017, respectively; Wilcoxon test) and reRT cases (median volumes: 80.5, 55.0, and 41.6, respectively, vs 22.7 cm3; P = .001, P = .005, and P = .144, respectively; Wilcoxon test). BTV1.6, BTV1.8, and BTV2.0 showed low but increasing conformity with cGTVs in the primary RT (SDC: 0.51, 0.55, and 0.58, respectively; CI: 0.35, 0.38, and 0.41, respectively) and reRT setting (SDC: 0.38, 0.40, and 0.40, respectively; CI: 0.24, 0.25, and 0.25, respectively). The minimal margin required to include the BTV within the cGTV was significantly smaller in the RT versus the reRT setting for thresholds 1.6 and 1.8 but not significantly different for threshold 2.0 (median margin: 16, 12, and 10, respectively, vs 21.5, 17.5, and 13 mm, respectively; P = .007, P = .031, and P = .093, respectively; Mann-Whitney U test). Conclusions: 18F-GE-180 PET provides valuable information in RT treatment planning for patients with HGG. 18F-GE-180-based BTVs with a threshold of 2.0 were most consistent in primary and reRT.

Systematic in vitro analysis of therapy resistance in glioblastoma cell lines by integration of clonogenic survival data with multi-level molecular data.

Despite intensive basic scientific, translational, and clinical efforts in the last decades, glioblastoma remains a devastating disease with a highly dismal prognosis. Apart from the implementation of temozolomide into the clinical routine, novel treatment approaches have largely failed, emphasizing the need for systematic examination of glioblastoma therapy resistance in order to identify major drivers and thus, potential vulnerabilities for therapeutic intervention. Recently, we provided proof-of-concept for the systematic identification of combined modality radiochemotherapy treatment vulnerabilities via integration of clonogenic survival data upon radio(chemo)therapy with low-density transcriptomic profiling data in a panel of established human glioblastoma cell lines. Here, we expand this approach to multiple molecular levels, including genomic copy number, spectral karyotyping, DNA methylation, and transcriptome data. Correlation of transcriptome data with inherent therapy resistance on the single gene level yielded several candidates that were so far underappreciated in this context and for which clinically approved drugs are readily available, such as the androgen receptor (AR). Gene set enrichment analyses confirmed these results, and identified additional gene sets, including reactive oxygen species detoxification, mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (MTORC1) signaling, and ferroptosis/autophagy-related regulatory circuits to be associated with inherent therapy resistance in glioblastoma cells. To identify pharmacologically accessible genes within those gene sets, leading edge analyses were performed yielding candidates with functions in thioredoxin/peroxiredoxin metabolism, glutathione synthesis, chaperoning of proteins, prolyl hydroxylation, proteasome function, and DNA synthesis/repair. Our study thus confirms previously nominated targets for mechanism-based multi-modal glioblastoma therapy, provides proof-of-concept for this workflow of multi-level data integration, and identifies novel candidates for which pharmacological inhibitors are readily available and whose targeting in combination with radio(chemo)therapy deserves further examination. In addition, our study also reveals that the presented workflow requires mRNA expression data, rather than genomic copy number or DNA methylation data, since no stringent correlation between these data levels could be observed. Finally, the data sets generated in the present study, including functional and multi-level molecular data of commonly used glioblastoma cell lines, represent a valuable toolbox for other researchers in the field of glioblastoma therapy resistance.

Stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole-brain radiotherapy in patients with 4-10 brain metastases: A nonrandomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is no randomized evidence comparing whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of multiple brain metastases. This prospective nonrandomized controlled single arm trial attempts to reduce the gap until prospective randomized controlled trial results are available. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included patients with 4-10 brain metastases and ECOG performance status ≤ 2 from all histologies except small-cell lung cancer, germ cell tumors, and lymphoma. The retrospective WBRT-cohort was selected 2:1 from consecutive patients treated within 2012-2017. Propensity-score matching was performed to adjust for confounding factors such as sex, age, primary tumor histology, dsGPA score, and systemic therapy. SRS was performed using a LINAC-based single-isocenter technique employing prescription doses from 15-20Gyx1 at the 80% isodose line. The historical control consisted of equivalent WBRT dose regimens of either 3Gyx10 or 2.5Gyx14. RESULTS: Patients were recruited from 2017-2020, end of follow-up was July 1st, 2021. 40 patients were recruited to the SRS-cohort and 70 patients were eligible as controls in the WBRT-cohort. Median OS, and iPFS were 10.4 months (95%-CI 9.3-NA) and 7.1 months (95%-CI 3.9-14.2) for the SRS-cohort, and 6.5 months (95%-CI 4.9-10.4), and 5.9 months (95%-CI 4.1-8.8) for the WBRT-cohort, respectively. Differences were non-significant for OS (HR: 0.65; 95%-CI 0.40-1.05; P =.074) and iPFS (P =.28). No grade III toxicities were observed in the SRS-cohort. CONCLUSION: This trial did not meet its primary endpoint as the OS-improvement of SRS compared to WBRT was non-significant and thus superiority could not be proven. Prospective randomized trials in the era of immunotherapy and targeted therapies are warranted.

Integrative analysis of therapy resistance and transcriptomic profiling data in glioblastoma cells identifies sensitization vulnerabilities for combined modality radiochemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Inherent resistance to radio/chemotherapy is one of the major reasons for early recurrence, treatment failure, and dismal prognosis of glioblastoma. Thus, the identification of resistance driving regulators as prognostic and/or predictive markers as well as potential vulnerabilities for combined modality treatment approaches is of pivotal importance. METHODS: We performed an integrative analysis of treatment resistance and DNA damage response regulator expression in a panel of human glioblastoma cell lines. mRNA expression levels of 38 DNA damage response regulators were analyzed by qRT-PCR. Inherent resistance to radiotherapy (single-shot and fractionated mode) and/or temozolomide treatment was assessed by clonogenic survival assays. Resistance scores were extracted by dimensionality reduction and subjected to correlation analyses with the mRNA expression data. Top-hit candidates with positive correlation coefficients were validated by pharmacological inhibition in clonogenic survival assays and DNA repair analyses via residual γH2AX/53BP1-foci staining. RESULTS: Inherent resistance to single-shot and similarly also to fractionated radiotherapy showed strong positive correlations with mRNA expression levels of known vulnerabilities of GBM, including PARP1, NBN, and BLM, as well as ATR and LIG4-two so far underestimated targets. Inhibition of ATR by AZD-6738 resulted in robust and dose-dependent radiosensitization of glioblastoma cells, whereas LIG4 inhibition by L189 had no noticeable impact. Resistance against temozolomide showed strong positive correlation with mRNA expression levels of MGMT as to be expected. Interestingly, it also correlated with mRNA expression levels of ATM, suggesting a potential role of ATM in the context of temozolomide resistance in glioblastoma cells. ATM inhibition exhibited slight sensitization effects towards temozolomide treatment in MGMT low expressing glioblastoma cells, thus encouraging further characterization. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we describe a systematic approach integrating clonogenic survival data with mRNA expression data of DNA damage response regulators in human glioblastoma cell lines to identify markers of inherent therapy resistance and potential vulnerabilities for targeted sensitization. Our results provide proof-of-concept for the feasibility of this approach, including its limitations. We consider this strategy to be adaptable to other cancer entities as well as other molecular data qualities, and its upscaling potential in terms of model systems and observational data levels deserves further investigation.

Multifocal high-grade glioma radiotherapy safety and efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Multifocal manifestation of high-grade glioma is a rare disease with very unfavourable prognosis. The pathogenesis of multifocal glioma and pathophysiological differences to unifocal glioma are not fully understood. The optimal treatment of patients suffering from multifocal high-grade glioma is not defined in the current guidelines, therefore individual case series may be helpful as guidance for clinical decision-making. METHODS: Patients with multifocal high-grade glioma treated with conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (RT) in our institution with or without concomitant chemotherapy between April 2011 and April 2019 were retrospectively analysed. Multifocality was neuroradiologically assessed and defined as at least two independent contrast-enhancing foci in the MRI T1 contrast-enhanced sequence. IDH mutational status and MGMT methylation status were assessed from histopathology records. GTV, PTV as well as the V30Gy, V45Gy and D2% volumes of the brain were analysed. Overall and progression-free survival were calculated from the diagnosis until death and from start of radiation therapy until diagnosis of progression of disease in MRI for all patients. RESULTS: 20 multifocal glioma cases (18 IDH wild-type glioblastoma cases, one diffuse astrocytic glioma, IDH wild-type case with molecular features of glioblastoma and one anaplastic astrocytoma, IDH wild-type case) were included into the analysis. Resection was performed in two cases and stereotactic biopsy only in 18 cases before the start of radiation therapy. At the start of radiation therapy patients were 61 years old in median (range 42-84 years). Histopathological examination showed IDH wild-type in all cases and MGMT promotor methylation in 11 cases (55%). Prescription schedules were 60 Gy (2 Gy × 30), 59.4 Gy (1.8 Gy × 33), 55 Gy (2.2 Gy × 25) and 50 Gy (2.5 Gy × 20) in 15, three, one and one cases, respectively. Concomitant temozolomide chemotherapy was applied in 16 cases, combined temozolomide/lomustine chemotherapy was applied in one case and concomitant bevacizumab therapy in one case. Median number of GTVs was three. Median volume of the sum of the GTVs was 26 cm3. Median volume of the PTV was 425.7 cm3 and median PTV to brain ratio 32.8 percent. Median D2% of the brain was 61.5 Gy (range 51.2-62.7) and median V30Gy and V45 of the brain were 59.9 percent (range 33-79.7) and 40.7 percent (range 14.9-64.1), respectively. Median survival was eight months (95% KI 3.6-12.4 months) and median progression free survival after initiation of RT five months (95% CI 2.8-7.2 months). Grade 2 toxicities were detected in eight cases and grade 3 toxicities in four cases consisting of increasing edema in three cases and one new-onset seizure. One grade 4 toxicity was detected, which was febrile neutropenia related to concomitant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Conventionally fractionated RT with concomitant chemotherapy could safely be applied in multifocal high-grade glioma in this case series despite large irradiation treatment fields.

Bevacizumab reduces toxicity of reirradiation in recurrent high-grade glioma.

PURPOSE: The role of bevacizumab (BEV) in the setting of reirradiation (reRT) of malignant glioma recurrences is poorly defined. At our institution, reRT plus BEV was routinely used until its disapproval for glioma treatment by the European Medical Agency. Accordingly, reRT was applied without the addition of BEV since 2017. Here we present for the first time outcome and toxicity profiles of reRT plus BEV and reRT alone for malignant glioma recurrences. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All adult patients consecutively undergoing reRT of a recurrent malignant glioma (37 anaplastic astrocytoma, WHO III; 124 glioblastoma, WHO IV) between 2007 and 2017 were included. In one group of patients, BEV (10 mg/kg bodyweight) was applied concomitantly on days 1 and 15 of reRT. Radiation toxicity referred to clinically significant toxicities of proven symptomatic radionecrosis (RN) and symptomatic oedema (SE) requiring steroid treatment for more than six weeks after reRT. Post-recurrence survival (PRS) and freedom from RN/SE were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were obtained from proportional hazards models. RESULTS: BEV plus reRT was applied in 124 and reRT alone in 37 patients. Both groups were comparable in terms of their patient-, tumour-, and RT/reRT-related variables. PRS was independent from the applied reRT protocols. RN/SE was less frequently seen after reRT plus BEV absolutely (27/124 (21.8%) vs. 14/37 (37.8%) patients; p = 0.025) and over time (1-year RN/SE rate: 23.9% vs. 54.1%; p = 0.013). The unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratio for RN/SE was doubled in case of reRT alone. Absence of BEV remained the only risk factor for RN/SE in multivariate models (p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: Concomitant BEV effectively reduces treatment toxicity of reRT and should be reconsidered in future reRT protocols.