Power Has Pitfalls: (In)accuracy of Administrative Data for Nonoperative Management of Appendicitis.

INTRODUCTION: Nonoperative management (NOM) of uncomplicated appendicitis is increasingly common. Effectiveness of NOM has been studied by identifying patients via International Classification of Diseases (ICD) 9/ICD-10 codes for uncomplicated appendicitis and no code for appendectomy. We sought to assess the accuracy of such administrative definitions. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for appendicitis at five sites across the United States. Initial management plan and clinical severity were recorded by trained abstractors. We identified a gold standard cohort of patients with surgeon-diagnosed uncomplicated appendicitis and planned NOM. We defined two administrative cohorts with ICD-9/ICD-10 codes for uncomplicated appendicitis and either no surgery during initial admission (definition #1) or no surgery on day 0-1 of admission (definition #2). We compared each definition to the gold standard. RESULTS: Among 1224 patients with uncomplicated appendicitis, 72 (5.9%) underwent planned NOM. NOM patients were older (median [Q1-Q3] of 37 [27-56] versus 32 [25-44] y) and less frequently male (51.4% versus 54.9%), White (54.1% versus 67.6%), and privately insured (38.9% versus 50.2%) than patients managed operatively. Definition #1 had sensitivity of 0.81 and positive predictive value of 0.87 for NOM of uncomplicated appendicitis. Definition #2 had sensitivity of 0.83 and positive predictive value of 0.72. The gold standard cohort had a true failure/recurrence rate of 23.6%, compared with apparent rates of 25.4% and 39.8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative definitions are prone to misclassification in identifying planned NOM of uncomplicated appendicitis. This likely impacts outcomes in studies using administrative databases. Investigators should disclose how misclassification may affect results and select an administrative definition that optimally balances sensitivity and specificity for their research question.

A longitudinal examination of suicide-related thoughts and behaviors among bariatric surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: Past research suggests self-harm/suicidality are more common among adults who have undergone bariatric surgery than the general population. OBJECTIVES: To compare prevalence of self-harm/suicidal ideation over time and identify presurgery risk factors for postsurgery self-harm/suicidal ideation. SETTING: The Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery-2 is a cohort study with presurgery and annual postsurgery assessments conducted at 10 U.S. hospitals. METHODS: Adults with severe obesity undergoing bariatric surgery between March 2006 and April 2009 (n = 2458). Five-year follow-up is reported. Self-reported history of suicidality assessed retrospectively via the Suicide Behavior Questionnaire-Revised (SBQ-R) and self-reported self-harm/suicidal ideation assessed prospectively via the Beck Depression Inventory-Version 1 (BDI-1). RESULTS: The SBQ-R was completed by 1540 participants; 2217 completed the BDI-1 pre- and postsurgery. Over 75% of participants were female, with a median age of 46 years and body mass index of 45.9 kg/m2. Approximately one fourth of participants (395/1534) reported a presurgery history of suicidal thoughts or behavior (SBQ-R). The prevalence of self-harm/suicidal ideation (BDI-1) was 5.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.7-6.8) presurgery and 3.8% (95% CI, 2.5-5.1) at year 1 postsurgery (P = .06). Prevalence increased over time postsurgery to 6.6% (95% CI, 4.6-8.6) at year 5 (P = .001) but was not significantly different than presurgery (P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: A large cohort of adults with severe obesity who underwent bariatric surgery had a prevalence of self-harm/suicidal ideation that may have decreased in the first postoperative year but increased over time to presurgery levels, suggesting screening for self-harm/suicidality is warranted throughout long-term postoperative care. Several risk factors were identified that may help with enhanced monitoring.

A population-level analysis: the influence of hospital type on trends in use and outcomes of lower extremity angioplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The use of infrainguinal percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) has increased, but patterns of use have not been well studied. Academic institutions (AIs) and nonacademic institutions (NAIs) may have developed different practice patterns and may have different associated outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective statewide population-based administrative database was evaluated for patients undergoing PTA (1997-2004). RESULTS: A total of 1718 patients underwent PTA for claudication (51.9%), rest pain (12.1%), and ulceration or gangrene (23.1%). The use of infrainguinal stents (62.4% vs 60.8%), elective procedures (76.3% vs 79.8%), in-hospital death (1.6% vs 2.2%), 30-day mortality (2.1% vs 3.3%), readmission rates (17.1% vs 15.9%), and reintervention rates after readmission (38.5% vs 42.9%) were similar between groups. Increased use of PTA was noted in AIs versus NAIs (239.5% vs 53.9%). AIs were significantly less likely to perform PTA for rest pain (7.5% vs 14.4%, P < .05). CONCLUSION: AIs had a more recent increase in the use of PTA, but less often used PTA for patients with rest pain compared with NAIs. Both center types had higher than expected 30-day readmission and reintervention rates. Further understanding of the implementation and associated outcomes of PTA is required.