Predictive Factors for Voiding Dysfunction after Surgery for Deep Infiltrating Endometriosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of pre- and perioperative factors for voiding dysfunction after surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). DESIGN: Single-center retrospective cohort study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 198 women with DIE in the posterior compartment who underwent surgery and a postoperative bladder scan. INTERVENTIONS: Surgical resection of the DIE nodule from the dorsal compartment. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After surgery, 41% of the patients initially experienced voiding dysfunction (defined as >100 mL postvoid residual urine volume at second bladder scan). The number decreased to 11% by the time of hospital discharge. Among those with a need for self-catheterization after discharge (n = 17), voiding dysfunction lasted for a median of 41 days before a return to normal bladder function, with a residual urine volume of <100 mL. The preoperative presence of DIE nodules in the ENZIAN compartment B was associated with postoperative voiding dysfunction (p = .001). The hazard ratio for elevated residual urine volume was highest when the disease stage was B3 (hazard ratio 6.43; CI, 2.3-18.2; p <.001), describing a nodule diameter of >3 cm in lateral distension. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses showed that a first residual urine volume >220 mL has a good predictive value for the risk of intermittent self-catheterization (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.893; p <.001). CONCLUSION: Postoperative voiding dysfunction is frequent; of note, in most cases the problem is temporary. When DIE with an ENZIAN classification B is noted intraoperatively and, most of all, when the diameter of the lesion is >3 cm, a higher risk of postoperative voiding dysfunction is to be expected.

Gestational diabetes is associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy: A case-control study.

AIM: Individuals with SARS-CoV-2 infection and (pre-existing) diabetes, including pregnant women, present with more severe morbidity, as compared to non-diabetic subjects. To date, evidence is limited concerning the role of gestational diabetes (GDM) in severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy, or vice versa. The aim of our study was to investigate the prevalence of GDM in a SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant population and evaluate risk factors for and from severe infection in these patients. METHODS: A case-control study with prospective data collection for the case group and 1:2 matching with historical controls based on parity, BMI and ethnicity was conducted (n = 224). GDM screening was performed at 26 weeks' gestation. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors for GDM and inpatient COVID-19 management. RESULTS: 34.6% of the patients in the case group suffered from GDM, vs. 16.1% in the control group (p = 0.002). 35.7% patients were diagnosed with GDM after, vs. 33.3% before SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR (95%CI) 1.11(0.40-3.08), p = 0.84), with no correlation between time point of infection and GDM diagnosis. SARS-CoV-2 (OR (95%CI) 2.79 (1.42, 5.47), p = 0.003) and BMI (OR (95%CI) 1.12 (1.05, 1.19), p = 0.001) were significant independent risk factors for GDM. CONCLUSION: Data suggests that GDM increases the risk of infection in SARS-CoV-2 infected pregnant women. Meanwhile, SARS-CoV-2 during pregnancy might increase the risk of developing GDM. Vaccination and caution in using protective measures should be recommended to pregnant women, particularly when suffering from GDM.

Mental health in pregnant individuals during the COVID-19 pandemic based on a Swiss online survey.

The aim of our study was to evaluate the mental health of pregnant individuals during the early COVID-19 pandemic and the potential factors associated. A Swiss online survey was proposed to individuals who gave birth during the pandemic period from March 2020. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 questions (GAD-7), and Impact Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) were evaluated and used to defined mental health impairment as a composite outcome. From October, 2020 to February, 2021, 736 participants responded. The anxiety GAD-7 score was moderate in 9.6% and severe in 2.0%. The EPDS was moderate in 21.5% and severe in 32.9%. The IES-R was moderate in 10.3% and severe in 3.9%. Mental health impairment was reported in 37.0%. The association between the risk of mental health impairment and foreign nationality was significant (OR = 1.48; 95%CI [1.06-2.05]) as well as fetal and pregnancy worries because of coronavirus (OR = 1.46; 95% CI [1.08-1.98]) and 1.65; 95% CI [1.22-2.24]). Adjusted ORs were significant for foreign nationality (aOR = 1.51; 95%CI [1.07-2.13]) and pregnancy worries because of coronavirus (aOR = 1.62; 95%CI [1.10-2.40]). Pregnant people and especially foreign national have a high risk of mental health impairment during the pandemic.