RETRACTED: Evaluation of the positive effects on insulin-resistance and ß-cell measurements of vildagliptin in addition to metformin in type 2 diabetic patients.

We evaluated the positive effects of vildagliptin in addition to metformin on glycemic control and ß-cell function in type 2 diabetic patients. One hundred and seventy-one type 2 diabetic patients were instructed to add vildaglipin 50mg twice a day or placebo to metformin for 12 months. Body mass index (BMI), glycemic control, fasting plasma insulin (FPI), HOMA-IR, HOMA-ß, fasting plasma proinsulin (FPPr), proinsulin/fasting plasma insulin ratio (Pr/FPI ratio), C-peptide, glucagon, vaspin, visfatin, and omentin-1 were evaluated. Before, and after 12 months since the addition of vildagliptin, patients underwent a combined euglycemic hyperinsulinemic and hyperglycemic clamp, with subsequent arginine stimulation. Vildagliptin+metformin were more effective than placebo+metformin in reducing body weight and BMI, glycemic control, HOMA-IR, glucagon and insulin resistance measurements. Vildagliptin+metformin gave also a better increase of HOMA-ß, and of all ß-cell parameters after the clamp. We also recorded a significant correlation between M value increase and the decrease of vaspin, visfatin, and omentin-1 obtained with vildagliptin+metformin. Vildagliptin, in addition to metformin, proved to be effective in improving ß-cell function and in reducing insulin resistance measurements.

Effects of exenatide and metformin in combination on some adipocytokine levels: a comparison with metformin monotherapy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of exenatide on levels of serum adipocytokines and on ß-cell function. The study was conducted between 2008 and 2012. After a run-in period with metformin, 174 patients with type-2 diabetes were randomly distributed to either a group receiving exenatide at 10 µg twice daily, or a group receiving the placebo, for 12 months. We evaluated body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, glycemic control, lipid profile, fasting plasma insulin (FPI), HOMA-IR, HOMA-ß, fasting plasma proinsulin (FPPr), proinsulin : fasting plasma insulin ratio (Pr/FPI ratio), C-peptide, glucagon, retinol binding protein-4 (RBP-4), visfatin, omentin-1, and microalbuminuria. We used ELISA methods to assess the various parameters. Patients also underwent a combined euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic and hyperglycemic clamp, with subsequent arginine stimulation. After 12 months, a combination of exenatide and metformin produced a better decrease in body mass, BMI, glycemic control, FPI, FPPr, FPPr/FPI ratio, HOMA-IR, and glucagon level. Treatment with exenatide + metformin was superior to the placebo + metformin in increasing HOMA-ß, C-peptide, and ß-cell function. Significant negative correlations were found between M value, an index of insulin sensitivity, and measured adipocytokines. In conclusion, the combination of exenatide + metformin plays a role in improving some adipocytokine levels, and is better than metformin alone. The significant negative correlation between M value and measured adipocytokines is another confirmation of the positive effects linked to the improvement in insulin sensitivity.

Olmesartan/amlodipine combination versus olmesartan or amlodipine monotherapies on blood pressure and insulin resistance in a sample of hypertensive patients.

Despite the wide range of antihypertensive medications, about 45.5% of treated patients fail to achieve the desired blood pressure (BP) target. This study evaluated the effects of an olmesartan/amlodipine single pill combination compared to olmesartan or amlodipine monotherapies on BP, lipid profile, insulin resistance, and insulin sensitivity parameters. Two hundred and seventy-six patients were randomly assigned to olmesartan (20 mg), amlodipine (10 mg), or a single pill containing olmesartan/amlodipine (5/20 mg) for 12 months. We evaluated the following parameters at the baseline, and after 6 and 12 months: body weight, body mass index (BMI), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), and lipid profile. At the baseline, and after 6 and 12 months, patients underwent an euglycemic, hyperinsulinemic clamp to assess M value. Olmesartan/amlodipine gave a greater decrease in SBP and DPB compared to amlodipine and olmesartan at 6 (P < .05) and 12 months (P < .01). There was a decrease in FPG with olmesartan/amlodipine after 12 months compared to amlodipine (P < .05). Olmesartan/amlodipine decreased FPI and homeostasis model assessment index compared to both baseline (P < .05) and olmesartan and amlodipine (P < .05). Olmesartan/amlodipine gave an increase in M value, compared to baseline (P < .01) and to olmesartan monotherapy (P < .05) and amlodipine monotherapy (P < .01). In this randomized, double-blind clinical trial, olmesartan/amlodipine combination resulted more effective than olmesartan and amlodipine monotherapies in reducing BP, in improving insulin resistance, and insulin sensitivity parameters in patients with stage I essential hypertension. The combination also resulted in less peripheral edema.

Glyco-metabolic profile among type 2 diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the glyco-metabolic profile among type 2 diabetic patients with erectile dysfunction (ED). We evaluated 88 type 2 diabetic males, aged 62.78 ± 9.26 years. We administered patients the IIEF (International Index of Erectile Function) questionnaire to assess erectile function, organ function, sexual desire, and satisfaction level during and after the sexual intercourse and the SAS (self-rating anxiety scale) and SDS (self-rating depression scale) questionnaires to evaluate anxiety and depression. We evaluated: BMI, abdominal circumference, glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), HOMA index, lipid profile, testosterone, free testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, and sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG). The IIEF questionnaire showed that in the examined sample there were 50 patients (56.8%) affected by ED, and 38 patients (43.2%) without ED. Comparing the two groups, 57.9% of patients without ED, and 70.0% of patients with ED were smokers, and the difference between the two groups was significant (p<0.05). Furthermore, 23.7% of patients without ED, and 38.0% of patients with ED had a history of chronic ischemic heart disease (p<0.05 between the two groups). Patients with ED were older, and, surprisingly, had lower levels of HbA(1c). Furthermore, patients with ED had higher levels of FPI, and lower levels of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone. The prevalence of ED in Italian type 2 diabetic males with mean age of 62 years is about 56% and it is linked to higher levels of FPI, but lower levels of HbA(1c), free testosterone and dihydrotestosterone.

Effects of a standardized oral fat load on vascular remodelling markers in healthy subjects.

The most adequate way to experimentally reproduce the post-prandial lipemia condition appears to be the administration of a standardized oral fat load (OFL) to fasting patients. We studied the effects of a standardized OFL on markers of vascular remodelling in healthy subjects. We enrolled 286 Caucasians aged >or= 18 of either sex. The OFL was given after a 12-h fast. Blood samples were drawn before and 3, 6, 9 and 12h after the fat load. The following parameters were evaluated: body mass index (BMI), blood glucose (BG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), lipid profile, nitrites and nitrates, adiponectin (ADP), metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). High density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) decrease was present in subjects after 6h. Triglycerides (Tg) change was observed after 6h. Nitrites/nitrates variation was observed after 6 and 9h during OFL. Adiponectin level was decreased after 6 and 9h during OFL. Both MMP-2 and MMP-9 levels were higher after 6h during OFL. We observed that nitrites/nitrates and ADP significantly decreased and MMP-2 and MMP-9 significantly increased after a standardized OFL. Other studies need to confirm the direct acute effects of post-prandial lipemia on vascular damage.

Modification of vascular and inflammation biomarkers after OGTT in overweight healthy and diabetic subjects.

We evaluated the effect of an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) on the level of biomarkers of vascular remodelling. We enrolled 256 Caucasian overweight healthy subjects (H) and 274 overweight type 2 diabetic patients (D). All patients underwent basal measurements of blood glucose (BG), nitrites/nitrates, adiponectin (ADP), matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) before and after OGTT. Nitrites/nitrates decrease was present after 60, 90, 120, and 180 min in both groups. Nitrite/nitrate levels were decreased at baseline, after 30 and 60 min in D group compared to H group. ADP decrease was present after 90, 120, and 180 min, in both groups. ADP levels were lower in D group than in H group during OGTT. MMP-2 increase was present after 60, 90, and 120 min in H group, while MMP-2 increase was observed after 90, 120, and 180 min in D group. MMP-2 levels were higher in D group than in H group during OGTT. MMP-9 increase was present in H group after 60, 90, 120, and 180 min, while MMP-9 increase was observed after 90, 120, and 180 min in D group. MMP-9 levels were higher in D group than in H group during OGTT. Postprandial glycemia induces an acute increase in biomarkers of vascular remodelling.

Orlistat and L-carnitine compared to orlistat alone on insulin resistance in obese diabetic patients.

Our study wants to evaluate the effects of one year treatment with orlistat plus L-carnitine compared to orlistat alone on body weight, glycemic and lipid control, and insulin resistance state in type 2 diabetic patients. Two hundred and fifty-eight patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) > 8.0%] in therapy with different oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin were enrolled in this study and randomised to take orlistat 120 mg three times a day plus L-carnitine 2 g one time a day or orlistat 120 mg three times a day. We evaluated at baseline, and after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months these parameters: body weight, body mass index (BMI), HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), post-prandial plasma glucose (PPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (Tg), retinol binding protein-4 (RBP-4), resistin, visfatin, high sensitivity-C reactive protein (Hs-CRP). We observed a faster, and better decrease of body weight, HbA(1c), FPG, PPG, LDL-C, HOMA-IR with orlistat plus L-carnitine compared to orlistat. A faster improvement of TC, Tg, FPI, resistin, RBP-4, visfatin, and Hs-CRP was reached with orlistat plus L-carnitine compared to orlistat. We can safely conclude that the association of orlistat plus L-carnitine was better than orlistat in improving body weight, glycemic and lipid profile, insulin resistance, and inflammatory parameters and no significant adverse events were recorded.

Oral fat load effects on inflammation and endothelial stress markers in healthy subjects.

The aim was to study the effect of a standardized oral fat load (OFL) on different inflammatory parameters in a large sample of adult healthy subjects (n = 286) of both sexes. The fat load was given between 08:00 and 09:00 h after a 12-h fast. Blood samples were drawn before and 3, 6, 9, and 12 h after the OFL. All patients underwent a measurement of body mass index (BMI), blood glucose (BG), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (Tg), soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1), soluble E-selectin (sE-selectin), and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) increase was +3.26% at 3 h, +4.35% at 6 h, +1.09% at 9 h while FPG decrease was -1.09% at 12 h. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol increase was +2.08% at 3 h, and at 12 h during OFL study; a significant HDL-C decrease was present in subjects after 6 h (-4.17%; P < 0.05 vs 0). A significant Tg change was observed after 6 h (+70.37%; P < 0.01 vs 0) and 9 h (+58.33%; P < 0.05 vs 0) respectively, and the increase was +22.22% at 3 h and +18.52% at 12 h. Total cholesterol increase was +0.52% after 3 h, +1.04% after 6 h, while after 12 h the decrease was -0.52%. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol increase was +1.64% after 6 h with a decrease of -0.82% at 9 and 12 h. A significant sICAM-1, hsCRP, and sE-selectin variation was observed after 6 and 9 h, while a significant sVCAM-1 change occurred after 3, 6, and 9 h. Soluble ICAM-1 increase was +20.58% at 3 h, +34.10% at 6 h (P < 0.05 vs 0) +25.94% at 9 h (P < 0.01 vs 0), and +19.14% at 12 h; sVCAM-1 increase was +13.97% (P < 0.05 vs 0) at 3 h, +18.55% at 6 h (P < 0.01 vs 0), +12.02% at 9 h (P < 0.05 vs 0), and +8.70% at 12 h. High-sensitivity CRP increase was +36.36% at 3 h, +90.91% at 6 h (P < 0.01 vs 0), +63.64% at 9 h (P < 0.05 vs 0), and +36.36% at 12 h. Soluble E-selectin increase was +27.11% at 3 h, +51.90% at 6 h (P < 0.05 vs 0), +45.19% at 9 h (P < 0.01 vs 0), and +20.12% at 12 h. Interleukin-6 increase was +61.11% at 3 h (P < 0.05 vs 0), +83.33% at 6 h (P < 0.001 vs 0), +55.56% at 9 h (P < 0.01 vs 0), and +22.22% at 12 h. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha increase was +42.86% at 3 h (P < 0.05 vs 0), +71.43% at 6 h (P < 0.01 vs 0), (+50.00% at 9 h (P < 0.05 vs 0), and +28.57% at 12 h. We observed that the OFL induces a complex and massive systemic inflammatory response that includes IL-6, TNF-alpha, hsCRP, and cell adhesion molecules, even before Tg significantly rises.

Evaluation of metalloproteinase 2 and 9 levels and their inhibitors in combined dyslipidemia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the distribution of matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2), matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and their specific inhibitors in a sample of patients affected by mild dyslipidemia but not yet treated with antihyperlipidemic drugs. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-eight Caucasian patients aged >or=18 yr of either sex with combined dyslipidemia and who had never previously taken lipid-lowering medications were evaluated. As a control population, we enrolled 179 Caucasian healthy subjects, aged >or=18 yr of either sex. We evaluated body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostasis model assessment (HOMA index), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (Tg), lipoprotein(a) Lp(a), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), homocysteine (Hct), fibrinogen (Fg), high sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), adiponectin (ADP), MMP-2, MMP-9, tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1), and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2). RESULTS: TC, Tg, and LDL-C were higher (P < < 0.05, P < < 0.01 and P < < 0.05, respectively) in the dyslipidemic group, while HDL-C levels were lower (P < < 0.01) compared with the control group. Increases of PAI-1, Hct, Fg, and Hs-CRP (P < < 0.01, P < < 0.05, P < < 0.05, and P < < 0.05, respectively) were present in the dyslipidemic group, while ADP level was lower (P < < 0.01) in the dyslipidemic patients compared with controls. MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 levels were higher (P < < 0.0001) in the dyslipidemic group. CONCLUSIONS: Combined hyperlipidemic patients have increased levels of prothrombotic and microinflammatory parameters and higher levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 than control subjects. The prognostic importance of this observation has to be evaluated in adequately designed prospective studies.

Effects of insulin therapy with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in diabetic patients: comparison with multi-daily insulin injections therapy (MDI).

We compared the effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and multi-daily insulin injections therapy (MDI) on glicemic control and on lipid profile in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients. We divided the patients in two groups: in the first one (n=32) CSII was administered, in the second one (n=32) MDI was administered. HbA(1C) value was lower after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months with CSII compared to MDI. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) value was lower with CSII after 3, 6, and 12 months compared to MDI. Post-prandial glucose (PPG) value was lower in the group with CSII after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months compared to MDI. A significant TC decrease was observed in the group treated with CSII at 9, and 12 months while a significant TC increase was observed with MDI at 6, and 12 months. A significant LDL-C decrease was obtained with CSII after 9, and 12 months while no significant changes were observed with MDI. A significant HDL-C increase was observed with CSII after 12 months. A significant Tg decrease was observed with CSII after 12 months while a significant Tg increase was observed with MDI at 6, and at 12 months. CSII therapy allows a faster and better achievement of the therapeutic target and also gives an improvement of the lipid profile.

Rosiglitazone therapy improves insulin resistance parameters in overweight and obese diabetic patients intolerant to metformin.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have directly compared rosiglitazone and metformin effects on adipocytokines. The aim was to observe the possible effects of rosiglitazone and metformin on glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, plasma leptin (pL), adiponectin (ADN), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and resistin (R) in overweight and obese diabetic patients intolerant to metformin. METHODS: Six hundred and ninety-four consecutive overweight and obese type 2 diabetic patients were evaluated and 56 patients were intolerant to metformin at maximum dosage. We added rosiglitazone to metformin in these intolerant patients (RM) and we compared them with 61 patients treated with metformin (M) in a single-blind placebo-controlled trial. We evaluated body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), pL, ADN, TNF-alpha, and R at baseline and after 3 and 6 months. Furthermore, we calculated insulin resistance index (HOMA-index) using FPG and FPI. RESULTS: Glycated hemoglobin, FPG, FPI, and HOMA-index results were lower than baseline values in RM and M groups. Glycated hemoglobin and HOMA-index values were significantly lower in RM group compared to M group at 6 months. Plasma leptin, ADN, TNF-alpha, and R were significantly improved in RM group compared to M group at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: No BMI change was observed, probably because rosiglitazone was added to metformin, that could mitigate the body increase of rosiglitazone. Rosiglitazone improved glycemic control and insulin resistance-correlated parameters when added to intolerant metformin patients. These data suggest that rosiglitazone may be the drug of choice for the treatment of overweight and obese type 2 diabetic patients.

Metalloproteinases in diabetics and nondiabetics during acute coronary syndromes and after 3 months.

The authors hypothesized that matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, MMP-9, tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1, and TIMP-2 would be abnormal in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Forty-six diabetic and 78 nondiabetic patients during ACS and after 3 months were enrolled in this study. MMP-2, -9 and TIMP-1, -2 plasma levels were measured. Significant decrease of MMP-2, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 plasma levels was observed in the nondiabetic group with ACS after 3 months compared to the baseline value. Significant decrease of MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 plasma levels was observed in the diabetic group with ACS after 3 months compared to the baseline value. MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 plasma levels were higher in diabetic patients during ACS compared to nondiabetic patients during ACS. TIMP-1 and TIMP-2 increases were observed in diabetic patients with ACS at 3 months compared to nondiabetic patients after ACS. MMPs and TIMP-1 and -2 plasma levels were alterated in nondiabetic and diabetic patients during ACS and after 3 months, which may reflect abnormal extracellular matrix metabolism in diabetes during and after acute event.

Metalloproteinase-2 and -9 in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects during acute coronary syndromes.

The authors hypothesized that matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, -9, and tissue inhibitor metalloproteinase (TIMP)-1, -2 would be abnormal in acute coronary syndromes (ACSs). MMP-2, -9, and TIMP-1, -2 plasma levels were measured in diabetic patients with ACSs compared to nondiabetic patients with ACSs. A total of 46 diabetic and 78 nondiabetic patients with ACSs were enrolled. The following parameters were measured: body mass index (BMI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), homeostasis model assessment index (HOMA index), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (Tg), lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), homocysteine (Hct), fibrinogen (Fg), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), and plasma levels of MMP-2, MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2. Significant HbA1c, FPG, FPI, HOMA index, DBP, Tg, Hct, and Fg increases were present in the diabetic group with ACSs, whereas hs-CRP was lower in these patients compared to nondiabetic patients with ACSs. MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 plasma levels were higher in diabetic patients with ACSs compared to nondiabetic patients with ACSs. MMP-9, TIMP-1, and TIMP-2 plasma levels were increased in diabetic patients with ACSs, which may reflect abnormal extracellular matrix metabolism in diabetes during acute event.

Effect of telmisartan-amlodipine combination at different doses on urinary albumin excretion in hypertensive diabetic patients with microalbuminuria.

BACKGROUND: Aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the telmisartan-amlodipine combination at different doses on urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) in hypertensive diabetic patients with microalbuminuria. METHODS: After a 2-week placebo period, 300 hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria were treated with the 40 mg of telmisartan and 2.5 mg of amlodipine combination. After 4 weeks 210 patients whose blood pressure (BP) was not controlled (BP >130/80 mm Hg) were randomized to two-dose titration regimens, one based on increasing doses of telmisartan (up to 160 mg daily) and fixed 2.5-mg dose of amlodipine, the other based on increasing doses of amlodipine (up to 10 mg daily) and fixed 40-mg dose of telmisartan. After 12 weeks the nonresponder patients were given transdermic clonidine (0.1mg/d). After 16 weeks the patients yet not controlled were discontinued, the others were followed for 48 weeks. Office BP, UAER, creatinine clearance, plasma potassium, fasting glycemia, and glycosylated hemoglobin were assessed at the end of the telmisartan (40 mg)/amlodipine (2.5 mg) treatment period and after 48 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Similar decrease in systolic/diastolic BP values were obtained with both regimens (-24/-21, -23/-21, and -24/-21 mm Hg, all P < .001 v baseline, with increasing telmisartan; -25/-22, -25/-21, and -25/-22 mm Hg, all P < .001 v baseline with increasing amlodipine). Reductions of UAER were 47.5% (P < .01), 65.3% (P < .001), and 77% (P < .0001) for telmisartan 80, 120, and 160 mg/amlodipine 2.5 mg daily, respectively, whereas reductions of UAER were 34% (P < .03), 37% (P < .03), and 33% (P < .03) for amlodipine 5, 7.5, and 10 mg/telmisartan 40 mg daily, respectively, The difference between the two regimens was statistically significant (P < .05, P < .01, and P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that, at comparable levels of BP reduction, UAE decreased more in subjects treated with escalating doses of telmisartan.

Prevalence of primary aldosteronism among unselected hypertensive patients: a prospective study based on the use of an aldosterone/renin ratio above 25 as a screening test.

Primary aldosteronism (PA) has been considered a rare cause of hypertension. The introduction of the aldosterone/renin ratio (ARR) as a screening test has led to an increase in the detection rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of PA among unselected hypertensive patients by using an ARR >25 as a screening test. We studied 3,000 consecutive unselected hypertensive patients. Blood samples for the determination of plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone (ALD) and electrolytes were drawn in the morning, and patients with an ARR >25 underwent intravenous saline infusion as a confirmatory test. Adrenal CT and a dexamethasone suppression test were performed in patients with confirmed PA. Patients with a positive dexamethasone test underwent genetic testing for glucocorticoid-remediable aldosteronism (GRA). Out of 3,000 hypertensives, 684 (22.8%) showed an ARR >25 and 177 of them (5.9% of the whole population) had a positive saline loading test. Only 44 of them (24.8%) were hypokalemic. CT was performed in all the patients with confirmed PA and 53 of them (29.9%) had a solitary adrenal macroadenoma, 112 (63.3%) had bilateral adrenal enlargement and 12 (6.8%) had normal appearing adrenal glands. Of 177 patients given dexamethasone to identify GRA, 8 (4.5%) showed aldosterone suppression but only one (0.1%) tested positive for the chimeric gene. In conclusion, our findings indicate that standardized application of an ARR >25 to unselected hypertensive patients, followed by i.v. saline loading as a confirmatory test, can result in the detection of a large number of patients with PA (5.9% of the studied population), most of whom are normokalemic. Bilateral adrenal hypertrophy represents the more common form of PA.

Blood pressure control and inflammatory markers in type 2 diabetic patients treated with pioglitazone or rosiglitazone and metformin.

The aim of the study was to assess the effects of the combination of metformin plus pioglitazone or rosiglitazone on glucose and blood pressure in type 2 diabetic patients with metabolic syndrome, as well as its tolerability in those patients. In this 12-month, multicentric, double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial, all patients began with metformin. Patients were randomized for self-administration of either pioglitazone or rosiglitazone for 12 months. We assessed body mass index (BMI), glycemic control (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)], fasting and postprandial plasma glucose and insulin levels [FPG, PPG, FPI and PPI, respectively] and homeostasis model assessment [HOMA] index) and systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively), at baseline and at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment, as well as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), nitrites/nitrates and adiponectin (ADN) at baseline and at 12 months of treatment. Significant HbA(1c) decreases were obtained after 9 (p<0.05) and 12 (p<0.01) months in both groups. After 9 and 12 months, mean FPG and PPG levels were decreased in both groups (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). We observed decreases in FPI and PPI at 9 and 12 months (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively) compared to the baseline values in both groups. Furthermore, HOMA index improvement over the baseline value was obtained only at 12 months (p<0.05) in both groups. SBP and DBP improved significantly (p<0.05, for each) in both groups after 12 months. hs-CRP decreased significantly (p<0.05) in both groups after 12 months; nitrites/nitrates and ADN increased significantly (p<0.05, for each) in both groups after 12 months. The combination of thiazolinediones and metformin is associated with a slight but significant improvement in the long-term blood pressure control of these patients, and with an improvement in the anti-inflammatory state, both of which are related to a similar reduction in insulin-resistance.

Effect on the development of ankle edema of adding delapril to manidipine in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension: a three-way crossover study.

BACKGROUND: Use of the combination of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and a calcium channel blocker (CCB) is considered a rational approach in patients whose hypertension is not controlled by monotherapy, providing better blood pressure (BP) control than the individual components with a lower incidence of adverse effects. In particular, such combinations have been found to reduce the incidence of ankle edema, the most common adverse effect of dihydropyridine annhypertensives. OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to evaluate the effect on the development of ankle edema of adding the ACEI delapril to the CCB manidipine in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. METHODS: Patients between the ages of 30 and 70 years who had mild to moderate hypertension (diastolic BP [DBP] >90 and <110 mm Hg) were included in the study. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, eligible patients were randomized to receive 6 weeks each of manidipine 10 mg/d, delapril 30 mg/d, and both in a crossover fashion. There was a 2-week washout period between treatments. Ankle edema was assessed based on ankle-foot volume (AFV) and pretibial subcutaneous tissue pressure (PSTP). Sitting BP, AFV, and PSTP were measured at the end of the placebo run-in period and the end of each active-treatment period. RESULTS: The study enrolled 40 patients with previously untreated hypertension (21 women, 19 men). Both manidipine and delapril monotherapy were associated with significant reductions from baseline in systolic BP (SBP) (mean [SD], -17.3 [4] and -14.8 [4] mm Hg, respectively; both, P<0.01) and DBP (-14.6 [3] and -12.9 [3] mm Hg; both, P<0.01). Compared with monotherapy, the combination of manidipine and delapril was associated with greater reductions from baseline in SBP (-21.8 [5] mm Hg; P<0.001) and DBP (-18.6 [4] mm Hg; P<0.001). Manidipme monotherapy was associated with significant increases from baseline in both AFV (7.9%; P<0.001) and PSTP (36.6%; P<0.01). Compared with manidipine alone, the combination of manidipine and delapril was associated with less pronounced increases in AFV (3.3%; P<0.05) and PSTP (10.4%; P<0.05). Ankle edema was clinically evident in 3 patients after receipt of manidipine monotherapy and in 1 patient after receipt of combination treatment. CONCLUSION: In these patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension, the addition of delapril to manidipine partially counteracted the manidipine-induced microcirculatory changes responsible for ankle edema.

Metabolic and antihypertensive effects of moxonidine and moxonidine plus irbesartan in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild hypertension: a sequential, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: The autonomic nervous system plays an important part in the homeostasis of blood pressure (BP), and sympathetic overactivity may contribute to metabolic conditions such as glycemic intolerance or insulin resistance. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the anti-hypertensive and metabolic effects of moxonidine, a selective imidazoline II-receptor agonist that lowers BP by central inhibition of the sympathetic nervous system, and moxonidine plus the angiotensin II-receptor blocker irbesartan in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and mild hypertension. METHODS: This was a study in patients with type 2 diabetes previously untreated with medication and untreated mild hypertension (diastolic blood pressure [DBP] >90 and <105 mm Hg). For the first 3 months of the study, all patients were treated for hypertension with moxonidine 0.2 mg once daily (M0.2) to establish a moxonidine baseline. After this single-arm period, patients were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with moxonidine 0.2 mg BID (M0.4) or moxonidine 0.2 mg plus irbesartan 150 mg (M0.2+1) once daily for 3 months. Changes in DBP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), body mass index (BMI), fasting and postprandial plasma glucose (FPG and PPG), fasting and postprandial plasma insulin (FPI and PPI), glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), Homeostasis Model Assessment of insulin sensitivity (HOMA-S), total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), and triglycerides (TG) were evaluated at baseline, 3 months (end of single arm period), and 6 months (end of randomized treatment period). RESULTS: The study enrolled 99 patients (50 men, 49 women; mean [SD] age, 55 [7] years; mean BMI, 26.8 [0.9]). No significant changes in BMI, PPG, PPI, TC, or LDL-C were observed over the entire study period. At 3 months, treatment with M0.2 was associated with significant improvements from baseline in SBP and DBP (P < 0.05), whereas there were no significant changes in HbA(1c), FPG, FPI, HOMA-S, HDL-C, or TG. At 6 months, significant decreases from baseline in HbA(1c), FPG, FPI, HOMA-S, and TG were observed in the M0.4 group (all, P < 0.05), but not in the M0.2+1 group. The M0.4 group also had a significant increase from baseline in HDL-C (P < 0.05) that was not seen in the M0.2+1 group. The changes in FPI and HOMA-S were significantly greater in the M0.4 group compared with the M0.2+1 group (P < 0.05). Significant decreases from baseline in SBP and DBP were observed in both the M0.4 and M0.2+1 groups (P < 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively). No patient withdrew from the study because of a drug-related adverse event, and there were no clinically significant drug-related changes in laboratory values during the study. CONCLUSION: In these patients with type 2 diabetes and mild hypertension, the M0.4 group had greater improvements in measures of glucose metabolism and the plasma lipid profile compared with those treated with M0.2+1.

Retraction notice to "Acarbose on insulin resistance after an oral fat load: a double-blind, placebo controlled study".

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy). The article is a substantial duplication of an earlier published paper by the same group of authors (below), to which no reference was made during the manuscript submission or review process: Acarbose actions on insulin resistance and inflammatory parameters during an oral fat load. Giuseppe Derosa, Pamela Maffioli, Ilaria Ferrari, Elena Fogari, Angela D'Angelo, Ilaria Palumbo, Sabrina Randazzo, Lucio Bianchi, Arrigo FG Cicero. European Journal of Pharmacology 651 (2011) 240-250. http://doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2010.11.015. The authors had declared during the editorial process that the article had not been published or was under consideration elsewhere. The article is being retracted per journal policy and academic standards.