Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Rev Med Virol ; 34(4): e2569, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986606

RESUMO

We aimed to assess the performance of Ag-RDT and RT-qPCR with regard to detecting infectious SARS-CoV-2 in cell cultures, as their diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) compared to virus isolation remains largely unknown. We searched three databases up to 15 December 2021 for DTA studies. The bivariate model was used to synthesise the estimates. Risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2/C. Twenty studies (2605 respiratory samples) using cell culture and at least one molecular test were identified. All studies were at high or unclear risk of bias in at least one domain. Three comparative DTA studies reported results on Ag-RDT and RT-qPCR against cell culture. Two studies evaluated RT-qPCR against cell culture only. Fifteen studies evaluated Ag-RDT against cell culture as reference standard in RT-qPCR-positive samples. For Ag-RDT, summary sensitivity was 93% (95% CI 78; 98%) and specificity 87% (95% CI 70; 95%). For RT-qPCR, summary sensitivity (continuity-corrected) was 98% (95% CI 95; 99%) and specificity 45% (95% CI 28; 63%). In studies relying on RT-qPCR-positive subsamples (n = 15), the summary sensitivity of Ag-RDT was 93% (95% CI 92; 93%) and specificity 63% (95% CI 63; 63%). Ag-RDT show moderately high sensitivity, detecting most but not all samples demonstrated to be infectious based on virus isolation. Although RT-qPCR exhibits high sensitivity across studies, its low specificity to indicate infectivity raises the question of its general superiority in all clinical settings. Study findings should be interpreted with caution due to the risk of bias, heterogeneity and the imperfect reference standard for infectivity.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2/isolamento & purificação , SARS-CoV-2/genética , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/virologia , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/métodos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase Via Transcriptase Reversa/normas , Técnicas de Cultura de Células/métodos , Teste para COVID-19/métodos , Teste de Ácido Nucleico para COVID-19/métodos , Testes de Diagnóstico Rápido
2.
Rev Med Virol ; 32(5): e2342, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35366033

RESUMO

The cornerstone of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) detection is reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) of viral RNA. As a surrogate assay SARS-CoV-2 RNA detection does not necessarily imply infectivity. Only virus isolation in permissive cell culture systems can indicate infectivity. Here, we review the evidence on RT-PCR performance in detecting infectious SARS-CoV-2. We searched for any studies that used RT-PCR and cell culture to determine infectious SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory samples. We assessed (i) diagnostic accuracy of RT-PCR compared to cell culture as reference test, (ii) performed meta-analysis of positive predictive values (PPV) and (iii) determined the virus isolation probabilities depending on cycle threshold (Ct) or log10 genome copies/ml using logistic regression. We included 55 studies. There is substantial statistical and clinical heterogeneity. Seven studies were included for diagnostic accuracy. Sensitivity ranged from 90% to 99% and specificity from 29% to 92%. In meta-analysis, the PPVs varied across subgroups with different sampling times after symptom onset, with 1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%-7%) in sampling beyond 10 days and 27% (CI, 19%-36%) to 46% (CI, 33%-60%) in subgroups that also included earlier samples. Estimates of virus isolation probability varied between 6% (CI, 0%-100%) and 50% (CI, 0%-100%) at a Ct value of 30 and between 0% (CI, 0%-22%) and 63% (CI, 0%-100%) at 5 log10 genome copies/ml. Evidence on RT-PCR performance in detecting infectious SARS-CoV-2 in respiratory samples was limited. Major limitations were heterogeneity and poor reporting. RT-PCR and cell culture protocols need further standardisation.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Teste para COVID-19 , Humanos , RNA Viral/genética , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
3.
Trop Med Infect Dis ; 7(5)2022 May 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35622707

RESUMO

Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) contributes to increased morbidity and mortality worldwide. In particular, children in resource-poor settings suffer from frequent episodes of diarrhea. A variety of pathogens, including bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa, can cause AGE. Common viruses associated with AGE are norovirus, rotavirus, astrovirus, adenovirus, and sapovirus. Due to their similar clinical presentation, AGE pathogens cannot be distinguished on clinical grounds rendering the etiological diagnosis challenging. However, reliable diagnosis is essential for individual and public health reasons, e.g., to limit transmission, for appropriate antibiotic use, prognostic appreciation, and vaccination programs. Therefore, high-quality data derived by accurate diagnostics are important to improve global health. In Western industrialized countries, diagnosis relies on microbiological testing, including culture methods, microscopy, immunochromatography, and single-target molecular methods. Recently, multiplex PCR or syndromic panels have been introduced, which simultaneously analyze for multiple pathogens in a very short time. A further technological advancement is cartridge-based syndromic panels, which allow for near patient/point-of-care testing independently from a laboratory. In resource-poor tropical regions, however, laboratory diagnosis is rarely established, and there are little routine laboratory data on the epidemiology of viral AGE pathogens. Limiting factors for the implementation of syndromic panels are high costs, sophisticated equipment, and the need for trained personnel. In addition, pilot studies have shown a large number of viral (co-)detections among healthy controls, thus further challenging their clinical utilization. Hence, there are little evidence-based data on the impact of multiplex syndromic panels from resource-limited regions. Here, we aim to provide a brief overview of what is known about the use of syndromic panels for virus-associated AGE in tropical regions and to address future challenges.

4.
Respir Med Case Rep ; 38: 101681, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35734343

RESUMO

Asymptomatic patients with hemoglobin (Hb) variants can be detected by low oxygen levels in pulse oximetry (SpO2). Depending on the type of Hb variant, low SpO2 values are either falsely low, with corresponding normal arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), or truly low, with low SaO2 values, as observed in Hb variants with low oxygen binding affinity. In this context, attention must be paid to the method of determining SaO2. Low oxygen affinity Hb variants such as Hb Rothschild (HbR) might compensate for low oxygen loading in the lung through unloading more oxygen in peripheral tissues. This is the first case report to illustrate that maximal oxygen uptake and the workload are unimpaired in HbR variant patients.

5.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 103(1): 115663, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35331603

RESUMO

The rapid and reliable detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is of high importance for individual patient care and hospital infection prevention. We aimed to evaluate the performance of the Sofia SARS-CoV-2 antigen rapid diagnostic test (Ag-RDT) in comparison to real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). We conducted a prospective, monocentric cross-sectional study in an emergency department of a German university hospital from November 2020 to March 2021. We tested all samples using both Sofia SARS-CoV-2 Ag-RDT and real-time RT-PCR. A total of 7877 patients were included. Overall sensitivity of the Ag-RDT was 62.9% and specificity was 99.4%. Sensitivity varied across study months, whereas specificity remained high. Sensitivity increased to 94.2% in samples with a cycle threshold (Ct)-value ≤25. The Sofia Ag-RDT proved to be a rapid tool to detect samples with high viral loads (Ct-value ≤25) and might thus help to identify infectious patients.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Antígenos Virais , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
6.
Cells ; 10(11)2021 10 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34831169

RESUMO

Prematurely born infants often require supplemental oxygen that impairs lung growth and results in arrest of alveolarization and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). The growth hormone (GH)- and insulin-like growth factor (IGF)1 systems regulate cell homeostasis and organ development. Since IGF1 is decreased in preterm infants, we investigated the GH- and IGF1 signaling (1) in newborn mice with acute and prolonged exposure to hyperoxia as well as after recovery in room air; and (2) in cultured murine lung epithelial cells (MLE-12) and primary neonatal lung fibroblasts (pLFs) after treatment with GH, IGF1, and IGF1-receptor (IGF1-R) inhibitor or silencing of GH-receptor (Ghr) and Igf1r using the siRNA technique. We found that (1) early postnatal hyperoxia caused an arrest of alveolarization that persisted until adulthood. Both short-term and prolonged hyperoxia reduced GH-receptor expression and STAT5 signaling, whereas Igf1 mRNA and pAKT signaling were increased. These findings were related to a loss of epithelial cell markers (SFTPC, AQP5) and proliferation of myofibroblasts (αSMA+ cells). After recovery, GH-R-expression and STAT5 signaling were activated, Igf1r mRNA reduced, and SFTPC protein significantly increased. Cell culture studies showed that IGF1 induced expression of mesenchymal (e.g., Col1a1, Col4a4) and alveolar epithelial cell type I (Hopx, Igfbp2) markers, whereas inhibition of IGF1 increased SFTPC and reduced AQP5 in MLE-12. GH increased Il6 mRNA and reduced proliferation of pLFs, whereas IGF1 exhibited the opposite effect. In summary, our data demonstrate an opposite regulation of GH- and IGF1- signaling during short-term/prolonged hyperoxia-induced lung injury and recovery, affecting alveolar epithelial cell differentiation, inflammatory activation of fibroblasts, and a possible uncoupling of the GH-IGF1 axis in lungs after hyperoxia.


Assuntos
Hormônio do Crescimento/metabolismo , Hiperóxia/metabolismo , Fator de Crescimento Insulin-Like I/metabolismo , Lesão Pulmonar/metabolismo , Transdução de Sinais , Actinas/metabolismo , Animais , Animais Recém-Nascidos , Biomarcadores/metabolismo , Proliferação de Células , Células Epiteliais/metabolismo , Feminino , Hiperóxia/complicações , Lesão Pulmonar/complicações , Masculino , Mesoderma/metabolismo , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Miofibroblastos/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-akt/metabolismo , Alvéolos Pulmonares/metabolismo , Alvéolos Pulmonares/patologia , Receptores da Somatotropina/metabolismo , Fator de Transcrição STAT5/metabolismo , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA