Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Actas Urol Esp ; 33(9): 956-9, 2009 Oct.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19925754

RESUMO

The impossibility to identify cancer in the final surgical specimen has been reported in some patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. This has been attributed to either a wrong diagnosis or pathological technique, or to spontaneous or biopsy-induced cure of the tumor. This study assessed the incidence of vanishing prostate cancer in our department for 12 years, the clinical characteristics of patients, and their follow-up. The initial puncture biopsies were also re-evaluated using inmunohistochemical stains. Prostate cancer could not be confirmed in the surgical specimen in six out of 346 operated patients (1.73%) receiving no neoadjuvant therapy. When the initial biopsies were reviewed, cancer was only confirmed in three patients. Incidence of vanishing cancer at our department in the 12-year period considered was 0.86% (3/346). No tumor relapse occurred during 4.5 years of follow-up.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Biópsia por Agulha , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia
2.
Actas urol. esp ; Actas urol. esp;33(9): 956-959, oct. 2009. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS (Espanha) | ID: ibc-84989

RESUMO

Se ha descrito en pacientes portadores de cáncer prostático, sometidos a prostatectomía radical, la imposibilidad de identificar cáncer en la pieza quirúrgica definitiva. Este fenómeno se ha atribuido a un error en el diagnóstico o de la técnica anatomopatológica o a la curación del tumor, espontánea o inducida por la biopsia. En este estudio se evalúa la incidencia de cáncer evanescente en nuestro servicio durante 12 años, las características clínicas de los pacientes y su seguimiento. Adicionalmente, se revalúan las biopsias por punción iniciales con uso de tinciones inmunohistoquímicas. De un total de 346 pacientes operados y en ausencia de terapia neoadyuvante, en 6 (1,73%) no se pudo confirmar un cáncer prostático en la pieza quirúrgica. Al someter las placas iniciales a revisión, sólo se confirmó cáncer en 3 casos. La incidencia de cáncer evanescente en nuestro servicio para los 12 años evaluados es de un 0,86% (3/346). Durante 4,5 años de seguimiento ningún caso presentó recidiva tumoral (AU)


The impossibility to identify cancer in the final surgical specimen has been reported in some patients with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. This has been attributed to either a wrong diagnosis or pathological technique, or to spontaneous or biopsy-induced cure of the tumor. This study assessed the incidence of vanishing prostate cancer in our department for 12 years, the clinical characteristics of patients, and their follow-up. The initial puncture biopsies were also re-evaluated using inmunohistochemical stains. Prostate cancer could not be confirmed in the surgical specimen in six out of 346 operated patients (1.73%) receiving no neoadjuvant therapy. When the initial biopsies were reviewed, cancer was only confirmed in three patients. Incidence of vanishing cancerat our department in the 12-year period considered was 0.86% (3/346). No tumor relapse occurred during 4.5 years of follow-up (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias da Próstata/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Prostatectomia , Imuno-Histoquímica , Biópsia por Agulha , Antígeno Prostático Específico/análise , Queratinas , Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA