Romiplostim as a transfusion saving strategy in 20 patients after heart or lung transplantation: a single centre before-after pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Thrombocytopenia is a common disorder after heart or lung transplantation. Platelet transfusion is often required to maintain haemostasis but represents a specific cause of morbidity and mortality in this setting including alloimmunisation and graft rejection. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: As part of a health-care quality improvement project, in a single-centre before-after pilot study, the relevance of a platelet transfusion saving strategy based on romiplostim administration after transplantation was assessed in patients with platelet count <100 × 109/L. Transfusions on days 28 and 90 were compared using propensity matched score for adjustment of demographic characteristics at baseline. The primary outcome was platelet transfusion until day 28 after transplantation. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients were analysed (73 before vs. 20 after). The median [interquartile range] number of platelet concentrate was 1 [0;4.0] before versus 0.5 [0;2.0] in the after period, mean difference 0.5 confidence interval 95% [-0.7 to 1.7], p = 0.39. On day 28, median [interquartile range] red blood cell transfusion was significantly higher in the before versus the after period, 7 [2.0;13.5] versus 6 [1.5;8.5], mean difference 3.2 CI 95% [0.4-6.0], p = 0.02. At 6 months, the rate of patients with de novo anti-human leukocyte antigen alloimmunisation was 45% before versus 53% in the after period (p = 0.56). Deep venous thrombosis was detected in nine patients (12%) before versus seven patients (35%) in the after period (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: Romiplostim did not significantly reduce platelet transfusion after heart or lung transplantation. Its relevance and safety in a global transfusion strategy remains to be studied in this setting in a large randomised study.

Association between continuous hyperosmolar therapy and survival in patients with traumatic brain injury - a multicentre prospective cohort study and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial hypertension (ICH) is a major cause of death after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Continuous hyperosmolar therapy (CHT) has been proposed for the treatment of ICH, but its effectiveness is controversial. We compared the mortality and outcomes in patients with TBI with ICH treated or not with CHT. METHODS: We included patients with TBI (Glasgow Coma Scale ≤ 12 and trauma-associated lesion on brain computed tomography (CT) scan) from the databases of the prospective multicentre trials Corti-TC, BI-VILI and ATLANREA. CHT consisted of an intravenous infusion of NaCl 20% for 24 hours or more. The primary outcome was the risk of survival at day 90, adjusted for predefined covariates and baseline differences, allowing us to reduce the bias resulting from confounding factors in observational studies. A systematic review was conducted including studies published from 1966 to December 2016. RESULTS: Among the 1086 included patients, 545 (51.7%) developed ICH (143 treated and 402 not treated with CHT). In patients with ICH, the relative risk of survival at day 90 with CHT was 1.43 (95% CI, 0.99-2.06, p = 0.05). The adjusted hazard ratio for survival was 1.74 (95% CI, 1.36-2.23, p < 0.001) in propensity-score-adjusted analysis. At day 90, favourable outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale 4-5) occurred in 45.2% of treated patients with ICH and in 35.8% of patients with ICH not treated with CHT (p = 0.06). A review of the literature including 1304 patients from eight studies suggests that CHT is associated with a reduction of in-ICU mortality (intervention, 112/474 deaths (23.6%) vs. control, 244/781 deaths (31.2%); OR 1.42 (95% CI, 1.04-1.95), p = 0.03, I 2 = 15%). CONCLUSIONS: CHT for the treatment of posttraumatic ICH was associated with improved adjusted 90-day survival. This result was strengthened by a review of the literature.

Evaluation of the impact of HMS Plus on postoperative blood loss compared with ACT Plus in cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: The standardized management of anticoagulation during the cardiopulmonary bypass seems inaccurate because of patients and surgeries variability. This study evaluates if an individualized management of heparin and protamine guided by the HMS Plus system during cardiopulmonary bypass could reduce postoperative blood loss. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, controlled, unblinded, single-center study. One-hundred and eighthy-eight patients operated for cardiac surgery were included. Patients were divided in ACT Plus group (standardized approach) and HMS Plus group (individualized approach). The primary outcome was blood-loss volume during the first 24 postoperative hours. The main secondary outcomes were the need for allogeneic blood transfusions and the final protamine/heparin ratio. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups for baseline characteristics. Medium blood-loss volume in the ACT Plus group was 522±260 mL vs. 527±255 mL in the HMS Plus group (P=0.58). The final protamine/heparin ratio in the ACT Plus group was 0.94±0.1 vs. 0.58±0.1 in the HMS Plus group (P<0.0001). The transfusion rate during surgery in the ACT Plus group was 25% vs. 14% in the HMS Plus group (P=0.09). CONCLUSIONS: HMS Plus did not reduce the mean blood-loss volume during the first 24 postoperative hours compared with ACT Plus. Its utility for potential transfusion rate reduction remains to be proven.

Speckle-Tracking analysis of left ventricular systolic function in the intensive care unit.

Speckle-tracking analysis is a new available tool in order to assess left ventricular function in cardiology. Its novelty relies on the technological ability to track natural acoustic markers (known as speckle) within the myocardium during the cardiac cycle. This technology allows the evaluation of myocardium strain during systole and diastole. To date, global longitudinal strain (GLS) has been extensively studied in cardiology. It is now well established that GLS is more sensitive than left ventricular ejection fraction with 2D echocardiography in detecting systolic function impairment. It is also superior to left ventricular ejection fraction in the prediction of major cardio-vascular events. In the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, data are scarce. In experimental model and human studies in septic shock, speckle-tracking analysis suggests that GSL is impaired along with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Recent data also suggest that GLS impairment could predict in-ICU mortality in septic shock. In severe subarachnoid haemorrhage patients, speckle-tracking analysis could be more sensitive in detecting stress cardiomyopathy. However, there are many gaps to fill in the critically ill patient. For instance, the influence of mechanical ventilation on GLS is not fully elucidated, and there are, to date, too few data to exactly assess potential GLS alterations on the patient's outcome. Nonetheless, this new tool provides objective and sensitive data with acceptable intra and inter-observer variability and may be of primary interest in the evaluation of left-ventricular systolic function in the ICU.