Prevalence of surgical wound infection and related factors in patients after long bone surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an overview of the prevalence of surgical wound infection and related factors in patients after long bone surgery. A comprehensive, systematic search was conducted in different international electronic databases, such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and Persian electronic databases such as Iranmedex and Scientific Information Database using keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as "Prevalence", "Surgical wound infection", "Surgical site infection" and "Orthopedics" from the earliest to the May 1, 2023. The appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies (AXIS tool) evaluates the quality of the included studies. A total of 71 854 patients undergoing long bone surgery participated in 12 studies. The pooled prevalence of surgical wound infection in patients who underwent long bone surgery reported in the 12 studies was 3.3% (95% CI: 1.5%-7.2%; I2 = 99.39%; p < 0.001). The pooled prevalence of surgical wound infection in male and female patients who underwent long bone surgery was 4.6% (95% CI: 1.7%-11.7%; p < 0.001; I2 = 99.34%) and 2.6% (95% CI: 1.0%-6.3%; I2 = 98.84%; p < 0.001), respectively. The pooled prevalence of surgical wound infection in patients with femur surgery sites reported in nine studies was 3.7% (95% CI: 2.1-6.4%; I2 = 93.43%; p < 0.001). The pooled prevalence of surgical wound infection in open and close fractures was 16.4% (95% CI: 8.2%-30.2%; I2 = 95.83%; p < 0.001) and 2.9% (95% CI: 1.5%-5.5%; I2 = 96.40%; p < 0.001), respectively. The pooled prevalence of surgical wound infection in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) was 4.6% (95% CI: 2.3%-8.9%; I2 = 81.50%; p < 0.001), 2.7% (95% CI: 1.2%-6.0%; I2 = 83.82%; p < 0.001) and 3.0% (95% CI: 1.4%-6.4%; I2 = 69.12%; p = 0.006), respectively. In general, the different prevalence of surgical wound infection in patients undergoing surgical treatment after long bone fracture may be caused by underlying factors (gender and co-morbidity) and fracture-related factors (surgery site and type of fracture).

Prevalence of pressure ulcer and related factors in orthopaedic wards: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an overview of the prevalence of pressure ulcers (PU) in orthopaedic wards. A comprehensive, systematic search was conducted in different international electronic databases, such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Persian electronic databases such as Iranmedex, and Scientific Information Database (SID) using keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as "Prevalence", "Pressure ulcer", "Pressure sore", and "Orthopaedics" from the earliest to February 1, 2023. The appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies (AXIS tool) evaluates the quality of the included studies. Finally, 11 studies were included in the final analysis. The results indicated that the prevalence of PU in orthopaedic departments was 18% (ES: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.26, Z = 4.53, I2 : 99.09%). Although the odds ratio of PU was lower in men than women, it was not statistically significant (OR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.74-1.11, Z = 0.95, I2 : 17.4%, P = .34). Also, results showed the prevalence of PU was higher among studies with a sample size of more than 200 (ES: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10-0.28, Z = 4.07, I2 : 99.1%), Europe region (ES: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.14-0.26, Z = 6.7, I2 : 93.0%) and prospective design (ES: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.18-0.27, Z = 9.47, I2 : 83.3%) when compared with other sub-groups. In sum, considering the 18% prevalence of PU in the orthopaedic department, it is recommended to focus on detecting risk factors and design interventions to reduce PU in the patients admitted orthopaedic department.

Massive bone defects due to infection at the surgical site associated with a distal humeral fracture that was treated using fibula autograft: a case report.

Distal humerus fractures comprise between 2 and 5% of all fractures, and approximately one-third of all humerus fractures are of this type. In the present report, the authors described the massive bone defects due to infection at the surgical site associated with a distal humeral fracture that was treated using fibula autograft. Case presentation: A 28-year-old female patient experienced a fall from a height of 4 m and was referred to Poursina Educational and Medical Center. Clinical examinations and radiological imaging showed an open fracture of the right distal humerus. In the postoperative 50-day follow-up, the complication of infection at the surgical site causes bone loss of up to 8 cm. The posterior triceps-split approach (Campbell) to the distal humerus was used in this surgery. To evaluate the quality of surgery, standard radiographs of anteroposterior and lateral of the elbow joint and humeral shaft were performed after surgery. Clinical discussion: At 5 months postoperatively, the patient's initial results are good, and the range of motion of the elbow joint is ~10-120°. Conclusion: Based on the results of the present study, fibular transplantation in distal humerus fractures is considered one of the bone treatment options for repair.