National Overview of Nonprofit Hospitals' Community Benefit Programs to Address Housing.

BACKGROUND: Housing is a critical social determinant of health that can be addressed through hospital-supported community benefit programming. OBJECTIVES: To explore the prevalence of hospital-based programs that address housing-related needs, categorize the specific actions taken to address housing, and determine organizational and community-level factors associated with investing in housing. RESEARCH DESIGN: This retrospective, cross-sectional study examined a nationally representative dataset of administrative documents from nonprofit hospitals that addressed social determinants of health in their federally mandated community benefit implementation plans. We conducted descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses to examine hospital and community characteristics associated with whether a hospital invested in housing programs. Using an inductive approach, we categorized housing investments into distinct categories. MEASURES: The main outcome measure was a dichotomous variable representing whether a hospital invested in one or more housing programs in their community. RESULTS: Twenty percent of hospitals invested in one or more housing programs. Hospitals that addressed housing in their implementation strategies were larger on average, less likely to be in rural communities, and more likely to be serving populations with greater housing needs. Housing programs fell into 1 of 7 categories: community partner collaboration (34%), social determinants of health screening (9%), medical respite centers (4%), community social determinants of health liaison (11%), addressing specific needs of homeless populations (16%), financial assistance (21%), and targeting high-risk populations (5%). CONCLUSIONS: Currently, a small subset of hospitals nationally are addressing housing. Hospitals may need additional policy support, external partnerships, and technical assistance to address housing in their communities.

Barriers and Facilitators to Establishing Partnerships for Substance Use Disorder Care Transitions Between Safety-Net Hospitals and Community-Based Organizations.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of hospital-based transitional opioid programs (TOPs), which aim to connect patients with substance use disorders (SUD) to ongoing treatment in the community following initiation of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) treatment in the hospital, hinges on successful patient transitions. These transitions are enabled by strong partnerships between hospitals and community-based organizations (CBOs). However, no prior study has specifically examined barriers and facilitators to establishing SUD care transition partnerships between hospitals and CBOs. OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers and facilitators to developing partnerships between hospitals and CBOs to facilitate care transitions for patients with SUDs. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semi structured interviews conducted between November 2022-August 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Staff and providers from hospitals affiliated with four safety-net health systems (n=21), and leaders and staff from the CBOs with which they had established partnerships (n=5). APPROACH: Interview questions focused on barriers and facilitators to implementing TOPs, developing partnerships with CBOs, and successfully transitioning SUD patients from hospital settings to CBOs. KEY RESULTS: We identified four key barriers to establishing transition partnerships: policy and philosophical differences between organizations, ineffective communication, limited trust, and a lack of connectivity between data systems. We also identified three facilitators to partnership development: strategies focused on building partnership quality, strategic staffing, and organizing partnership processes. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that while multiple barriers to developing hospital-CBO partnerships exist, stakeholders can adopt implementation strategies that mitigate these challenges such as using mediators, cross-hiring, and focusing on mutually beneficial services, even within resource-limited safety-net settings. Policymakers and health system leaders who wish to optimize TOPs in their facilities should focus on adopting implementation strategies to support transition partnerships such as inadequate data collection and sharing systems.

New insights about community benefit evaluation: Using the Community Health Implementation Evaluation Framework to assess what hospitals are measuring.

BACKGROUND: Nonprofit hospitals are required to conduct community health needs assessments (CHNA) every 3 years and develop corresponding implementation plans. Implemented strategies must address the identified community needs and be evaluated for impact. PURPOSE: Using the Community Health Implementation Evaluation Framework (CHIEF), we assessed whether and how nonprofit hospitals are evaluating the impact of their CHNA-informed community benefit initiatives. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a content analysis of 83 hospital CHNAs that reported evaluation outcomes drawn from a previously identified 20% random sample ( n = 613) of nonprofit hospitals in the United States. Through qualitative review guided by the CHIEF, we identified and categorized the most common evaluation outcomes reported. RESULTS: A total of 485 strategies were identified from the 83 hospitals' CHNAs. Evaluated strategies most frequently targeted behavioral health ( n = 124, 26%), access ( n = 83, 17%), and obesity/nutrition/inactivity ( n = 68, 14%). The most common type of evaluation outcomes reported by CHIEF category included system utilization ( n = 342, 71%), system implementation ( n = 170, 35%), project management ( n = 164, 34%), and social outcomes ( n = 163, 34%). PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: CHNA evaluation strategies focus on utilization (the number of individuals served), with few focusing on social or health outcomes. This represents a missed opportunity to (a) assess the social and health impacts across individual strategies and (b) provide insight that can be used to inform the allocation of limited resources to maximize the impact of community benefit strategies.

Association of Medicaid expansion and 1115 waivers for substance use disorders with hospital provision of opioid use disorder services: a cross sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Opioid-related hospitalizations have risen dramatically, placing hospitals at the frontlines of the opioid epidemic. Medicaid expansion and 1115 waivers for substance use disorders (SUDs) are two key policies aimed at expanding access to care, including opioid use disorder (OUD) services. Yet, little is known about the relationship between these policies and the availability of hospital based OUD programs. The aim of this study is to determine whether state Medicaid expansion and adoption of 1115 waivers for SUDs are associated with hospital provision of OUD programs. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of a random sample of hospitals (n = 457) from the American Hospital Association's 2015 American Hospital Directory, compiled with the most recent publicly available community health needs assessment (2015-2018). RESULTS: Controlling for hospital characteristics, overdose burden, and socio-demographic characteristics, both Medicaid policies were associated with hospital adoption of several OUD programs. Hospitals in Medicaid expansion states had significantly higher odds of implementing any program related to SUDs (OR: 1.740; 95% CI: 1.032-2.934) as well as some specific activities such as programs for OUD treatment (OR: 1.955; 95% CI: 1.245-3.070) and efforts to address social determinants of health (OR: 6.787; 95% CI: 1.308-35.20). State 1115 waivers for SUDs were not significantly associated with any hospital-based SUD activities. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion was associated with several hospital programs for addressing OUD. The differential availability of hospital-based OUD programs may indicate an added layer of disadvantage for low-income patients with SUD living in non-expansion states.

Hospital adoption of harm reduction and risk education strategies to address substance use disorders.

Background: Hospitals are well-positioned to integrate harm reduction into their workflow. However, the extent to which hospitals across the United States are adopting these strategies remains unknown.Objectives: To assess what factors are associated with hospital adoption of harm reduction/risk education strategies, and trends of adoption across time.Methods: We constructed a dataset marking implementation of harm reduction/risk education strategies for a 20% random sample of nonprofit hospitals in the U.S (n = 489) using 2019-2021 community health needs assessments (CHNAs) and implementation strategies obtained from hospital websites. We used two-level mixed effects logistic regression to test the association between adoption of these activities and organizational and community-level variables. We also compared the proportion of hospitals that adopted these strategies in the 2019-2021 CHNAs to an earlier cohort (2015-2018.)Results: In the 2019-2021 CHNAs, 44.7% (n = 219) of hospitals implemented harm reduction/risk education programs, compared with 34.1% (n = 156) in the 2015-2018 cycle. In our multivariate model, hospitals that implemented harm reduction/risk education programs had higher odds of having adopted three or more additional substance use disorder (SUD) programs (OR: 10.5: 95% CI: 5.35-20.62), writing the CHNA with a community organization (OR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.15-3.97), and prioritizing SUD as a top three need in the CHNA (OR: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.54-4.47.)Conclusions: Our results suggest that hospitals with an existing SUD infrastructure and with connections to community are more likely to implement harm reduction/risk education programs. Policymakers should consider these findings when developing strategies to encourage hospital implementation of harm reduction activities.

Differences in buprenorphine prescribing readiness among primary care professionals with and without X-waiver training in the US.

BACKGROUND: Medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) are effective at preventing overdose and infectious disease but are vastly under-prescribed in the US. For decades, prescribers faced additional training and regulation to prescribe buprenorphine which stigmatized the medication and lessened support for a harm reduction approach to treating opioid use disorder. The Drug Enforcement Administration removed the X-waiver requirement for prescribing buprenorphine in late 2022, which removed stigma and lessened important barriers to prescribing but also left training at the discretion of individual organizations. Our study aimed to assess differences in knowledge, confidence, and stigma regarding buprenorphine between those who went through the X-waiver training and those who did not, among practicing primary care providers (PCPs). METHODS: We assessed buprenorphine prescribing readiness among primary care aligned outpatient providers in Ohio, USA. Using survey data, we conducted bivariate and regression analyses predicting primary prescribing outcomes. Primary outcomes measured knowledge of and confidence in buprenorphine, as well as perceived adequacy of one's training. Secondary outcomes were attitudes toward patients with OUD, including bias toward OUD patients, stress when working with them, and empathy toward them. Participants (n = 403) included physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants practicing in primary care aligned disciplines. RESULTS: Survey data showed that PCPs who received X-waiver training were more likely to understand and have confidence in the mechanism of buprenorphine, and consider their training on treating OUD to be adequate. PCPs with an X-waiver showed more empathy, less negative bias, and experienced less stress when working with patients with OUD. CONCLUSION: Removing restrictive policies for prescribing buprenorphine is an important step to expanding access and reducing the stigma associated with opioid use disorder treatment. Yet, our findings suggest that the training received alongside regulation may be important for improving prescribing confidence and reducing stigma. Strategies to increase buprenorphine prescribing are unlikely to be effective without also expanding access to prescribing support for primary care providers across the career course.

For-Profit Hospital Reflections on Community Relationships in the Time of COVID-19.

GOALS: Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals and their staffs have been pushed to their limits. Hospitals have had to rethink how they support community health while also providing critical acute care services to combat the morbidity and mortality associated with COVID-19. As anchor institutions, hospitals have a significant effect on not only community health and well-being but also on local economies as primary employers and contractors. This study aimed to understand how the pandemic reshaped interactions with community members, staff, and other community organizations and changed the nature of hospital-community engagement among for-profit hospitals. METHODS: We recruited leaders of for-profit hospitals, systems, and a business association that represents for-profit hospitals. We interviewed 28 participants in various leadership roles via telephone or videoconferencing and then thematically coded interview transcriptions. The themes identified in early interviews guided the structure of forthcoming interviews. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: For-profit hospitals appear motivated to address community health needs as anchor institutions in their communities, and these efforts have strengthened and changed in important ways as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this study, three themes emerged regarding the influence of COVID-19 on hospital-community relationships: Hospitals refocused outreach and engagement efforts to support employees, found essential new ways to safely engage with the community through partnerships and collaborations, and were reminded of the critical roles of social and cultural factors in the health and well-being of individuals and communities. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS: Hospitals may be able to use lessons learned during the pandemic to support the growing need for community engagement and attention to social determinants of health. The themes that emerged from this study present valuable opportunities for hospitals to carry forward the lessons learned over the course of the pandemic, as they have the potential to improve the delivery of healthcare and community engagement in day-to-day operations as well as in crises.

Community Engagement in Nonprofit Hospital Community Health Needs Assessments and Implementation Plans.

CONTEXT: Nonprofit hospitals are required to provide community benefits in exchange for their tax-exempt status. This includes a community health needs assessment (CHNA) to identify community needs and an implementation plan (IP) with strategies to address top needs every 3 years. In addition, hospitals are required to engage community members in these assessments. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore community engagement and representation in CHNAs and IPs. DESIGN: The researchers conducted a content analysis of CHNAs and IPs from a nationally representative sample of 503 nonprofit hospitals between 2018 and 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For CHNAs, a coding sheet was used to record the types of community members engaged by hospitals. For IPs, the team coded whether community engagement was reported at all and then performed an in-depth analysis to identify categories of community members, engagement methods used, and roles of community input. Finally, frequencies of categories across IPs were quantified. RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent of hospitals (n = 449) engaged community members in their CHNA, but only 14% (n = 71) engaged community members in their IP. An in-depth look at these IPs found that hospitals engaged underserved/minority populations, low-income populations, high school students, public health experts, and stakeholder organizations. Community members were involved in multiple steps, including brainstorming ideas, narrowing down needs, developing strategies, and reacting to proposed strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Although IPs are intended to benefit the community, there is a lack of community involvement reported in IPs. Hospitals may need incentives, resources, and personnel support to ensure representation of community members throughout the entire CHNA and IP process.

Trends in the Provision of Community-Building Activities by Nonprofit Hospitals, 2010-2019.

As part of their annual tax report, nonprofit hospitals are asked to report their community-building activities (CBAs); yet, little is known to date about hospitals' spending on such activities. CBAs are activities that improve community health by addressing the upstream factors and social determinants that impact health. Using data from Internal Revenue Service Form 990 Schedule H, this study used descriptive statistics to examine trends in the provision of CBAs by nonprofit hospitals between 2010 and 2019. While the number of hospitals reporting any CBA spending remained relatively stable at around 60%, the share of total operating expenditures that hospitals contributed to CBAs decreased from 0.04% in 2010 to 0.02% in 2019. Despite the increasing attention paid by policy makers and the public to the contributions that hospitals make to the health of their communities, nonprofit hospitals have not made corresponding efforts to increase their spending on CBAs.

Hospital Community Benefit Reporting: How Group Reporting Practices Limit Accountability.

OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence of group reporting of hospital community benefit efforts to the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and understand hospital and community characteristics associated with this practice. DESIGN: The study was based on data collected from publicly available community benefit reports from 2010 to 2019, as well as secondary data from the 2020 American Hospital Association (AHA) Annual Survey. The sample was drawn from the entire nonprofit US hospital population reporting community benefit activities. The analytic plan employed descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis. SETTING: The United States. PARTICIPANTS: All data are self-reported by US hospitals, either through the publication of community benefit reports (IRS Form 990 Schedule H) or a response to the AHA Annual Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Analyzed variables include whether a hospital reported its community benefit expenditures individually or as a group member; community benefit spending as a percentage of hospital operating expenses; and whether the hospital was part of a multihospital system, with consideration of hospital and community characteristics. RESULTS: Between 2010 and 2019, more than 40% of hospitals participated in group reporting, with most doing so consistently. System membership and hospital size were significantly and positively tied to group reporting, with state community benefit policy tied to the lower prevalence of group reporting. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of group reporting limits accountability to communities and restricts an accurate assessment of community benefit expenditures, counter to policy intentions. Stakeholders should consider what modifications to reporting rules could be made to promote transparency and to ensure that the effects of community benefit policies align with intentions.

Evaluation of Community Benefit Activities Among Nonprofit Hospitals, 2018-2021.

OBJECTIVE: This study examined approaches that nonprofit hospitals use to evaluate community benefit activities in the Community Health Needs Assessment/Implementation Plan (CHNA/IP) process. DESIGN: Content analysis of CHNAs/IPs completed between 2018 and 2021 from a 20% stratified random sample (n = 503) of US nonprofit hospitals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A coding sheet was used to record details about the evaluation content reported by hospitals in their CHNAs/IPs. Evaluation was coded into 4 categories: (1) no mention of evaluation; (2) description of evaluation without reporting any measures; (3) reporting reach (number of people served) only; and (4) reporting social/health outcomes. For logistic regression analyses, categories 1 and 2 were grouped together into "no evaluation measures" and categories 3 and 4 were grouped into "evaluation measures" for binary comparison. Multinomial logistic regression was also used to individually examine categories 3 and 4 compared with no evaluation measures. RESULTS: While a majority of nonprofit hospitals (71.4%, n = 359) mentioned evaluation in their CHNAs, almost half (49.7%, n = 250) did not report any evaluation measures. Among the 50.3% (n = 253) of hospitals that reported evaluation measures, 67.2% (n = 170) only reported reach. Fewer than 1 in 5 hospitals (16.5%, n = 83) reported social/health outcomes. Hospitals that hired a consultant (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.08-2.43) and system members (AOR = 1.76; 95% CI, 1.12-2.75) had higher odds of reporting evaluation measures. Using hospitals that reported no measures as the base category, system members (AOR = 7.71; 95% CI, 2.97-20.00) also had significantly higher odds of reporting social/health outcomes, while rural locations had lower odds (AOR = 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Although hospitals are required to evaluate the impact of actions taken to address the health needs identified in their CHNAs, few hospitals are reporting social/health outcomes of such activities. This represents a missed opportunity, as health/social outcomes could be used to inform the allocation of resources to maximize community benefits and the expansion of successful community initiatives.

Comparison of Nonprofit Hospital Community Benefit Substance Abuse Identification and Practice Implementation in Appalachian and Non-Appalachian Counties.

CONTEXT: As substance use continues to be a public health crisis nationally, it disproportionately affects the Appalachian region. OBJECTIVES: Our research seeks to explore whether there is a greater substance use burden in Appalachia and whether that burden is being prioritized in local hospital systems' community health needs assessments (CHNAs) and implementation strategies (ISs). SETTING: The setting for this study is the 13 states that are represented within the Appalachian region. PARTICIPANTS: This study examines CHNAs and ISs of a stratified random sample (n = 140) representing 20% of the hospital population within the identified states (those with counties within the Appalachian region). Each sampled hospital is labeled as Appalachian or non-Appalachian based on its county designation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our main outcome measures were the percentage of hospitals listing substance abuse in their CHNAs, with comparisons between Appalachian and non-Appalachian subgroups, and percent addressing substance use in their ISs in Appalachia and non-Appalachia. DESIGN: Community health needs assessments and ISs produced between the years 2018 and 2021 were gathered for each hospital within the sample; each document was then coded for the inclusion of substance use. Chi-square tests and logistic regression were employed to conduct the analysis and draw conclusions. RESULTS: Although all non-Appalachian Counties that had substance use listed as a need within a CHNA correspondingly addressed that need in their ISs, only 75% of Appalachian counties that listed substance use a need went on to prioritize substance use in an IS. In addition, logistic regression indicated no significant link between overdose rates and addressing substance use. CONCLUSIONS: These findings further support other literature that suggests that lack of resources is limiting Appalachian health care organizations' ability to address substance use issues.

Barriers to Working with Patients Who Misuse Opioids and Physician Burnout: Implications for Medical Education.

BACKGROUND: Physicians are on the front lines of the U.S. opioid epidemic, providing care in multiple treatment settings. Very little is known, however, about whether this experience has contributed to physician burnout. This information is critical for guiding efforts to expand the relatively low level of training on opioid misuse currently available in medical education. METHODS: We surveyed 408 board-certified physicians practicing in Ohio about their experiences working with patients who misuse opioids. We also collected quantitative measures of physicians' burnout and their level of contact with this patient population. We coded and analyzed open-ended responses and calculated a partial correlation between contact and burnout, controlling for relevant factors. RESULTS: Physicians experienced three primary barriers when working with patients who misuse opioids: inadequate knowledge and training, limited external resources and partnerships in their communities, and an incomplete context for understanding problematic patient behaviors. 70% of physicians experienced negative emotions when working with this patient population and 19% mentioned experiencing burnout specifically. Contact with patients who misuse opioids was significantly and positively associated with burnout scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings underscore the need for medical educators to take a proactive approach to equipping physicians with the knowledge, skills, and resources needed to effectively work with patients who misuse opioids.

The impact of Maryland's payment reforms on hospital community benefit efforts.

BACKGROUND: In 2014, Maryland established a global budget policy for all hospitals in the state. Under this policy, hospitals are incentivized to not only provide clinical care services to individual patients but also address the health needs of their broader patient population through prevention efforts and investment in the upstream social and economic factors that determine health. PURPOSE: To better understand the incentives created for hospitals under this policy, our study assessed whether the implementation of global budgets changed the levels and patterns of Maryland hospitals' investments in community benefits. APPROACH: Data on hospital community benefit spending from the Internal Revenue Service Form 990 Schedule H for the years 2010-2016 were utilized for this study. RESULTS: We found that Maryland hospitals' total spending on community benefits decreased under the global budget policy. Unlike hospitals in similar states without a global budget policy, Maryland hospitals did not experience any increases in Medicaid shortfalls between 2014 and 2016. Although Maryland hospitals provided more subsidized health services, their investment in broader community health improvement activities remained unchanged. CONCLUSION: Our analysis suggests that Maryland hospitals have shifted strategies because of the implementation of the global budget policy. The ability to report community benefit in a way that accurately considers the context and constraints of a state's policies would provide hospitals better means of communicating these efforts to stakeholders. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Our results suggest that global budgets impact the levels and patterns of hospitals' community benefit investments.

Assessing the Strategies That Children's Hospitals Adopt to Engage the Social Determinants of Health in US Cities.

CONTEXT: There is growing evidence that social factors contribute disproportionately to health outcomes in the United States as compared with health care services. As a result, nonprofit hospitals are incorporating strategies to address social needs into their Internal Revenue Service (IRS)-mandated community benefit work. Much of the research base on this subject, however, has focused on the efforts of adult-serving hospitals. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether communities surrounding children's hospitals are unique with regard to social needs and categorize how children's hospitals are addressing social needs in their IRS-mandated community benefit work. METHODS: Using county-level health and economic data, we compared community characteristics of children's hospital counties with the national average. We then coded and analyzed the community benefit reports of all nonprofit children's hospitals in the United States to categorize the different strategies that hospitals adopt to address social needs. RESULTS: Children's hospitals (N = 168) serve communities with greater social needs than the national average. In terms of community benefit investments, children's hospitals were more likely to identify social needs in their community health needs assessment than adult-serving hospitals, but still less than half identified or addressed 1 or more social needs. Children's hospitals were more likely to adopt interventions that address broader population health rather than strategies that focus on clinical services or children and adolescents in particular. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric health care institutions have a profound opportunity to reduce health disparities by altering the social environments in which children develop. Policy makers and scholars should provide support and resources to increase community benefit investments in this area.

The Role of Local Health Departments in Strengthening the Alignment Between Nonprofit Hospitals' Community Health Needs Assessments and Their Implementation Strategies.

Nonprofit hospitals frequently partner with their local health department on developing community health needs assessments (CHNAs); yet, little is known about the role that such partnerships play in strengthening the alignment between needs identified in hospitals' assessments and the strategies adopted by hospitals to address identified needs. Using data for 486 hospitals from the third round of CHNAs (spanning the years 2018-2021), this study showed strong alignment between the health needs identified in the CHNAs and those addressed in hospitals' implementation strategies, independent of collaboration with the local health department. One noteworthy exception to this finding was that hospital-public health collaboration remained important for improved alignment of needs related to substance use. Involvement of the local health department may strengthen hospitals' capacity to address needs outside their traditional areas of expertise, such as substance use.

Beyond political affiliation: an examination of the relationships between social factors and perceptions of and responses to COVID-19.

A significant challenge in the United States' response to COVID-19 continues to be wide variation in the extent to which individuals believe the virus is a credible health threat and are willing to undertake measures to protect personal and public health. In this study, data were collected from a national sample of 1141 participants from the United States to examine how beliefs and behavioral responses to COVID-19 have been shaped by sociopolitical characteristics. The relationships between social predictors; perceived severity, knowledge, and fear of the virus; and health behaviors were tested using path analysis. Social characteristics significantly predicted perceived severity, knowledge, and fear, as well as health behaviors, even after controlling for an objective indicator of the risk of contracting the virus. Our findings suggest that perceptions and knowledge of the virus, especially believing that the virus poses a serious threat to one's individual health, are important determinants of behavior, but also that perceptions and knowledge are strongly driven by social and cultural factors above and beyond political affiliation.

For-profit hospitals as anchor institutions in the United States: a study of organizational stability.

BACKGROUND: Anchor institutions, by definition, have a long-term presence within their local communities, but it is uncertain as to whether for-profit hospitals meet this definition; most research on anchor institutions to date has been limited to nonprofit organizations such as hospitals and universities. Accordingly, this study aims to determine whether for-profit hospitals are stable enough to fulfill the role of anchor institutions through a long-term presence in communities which may help to stabilize local economies. METHODS: This longitudinal study analyzes national, secondary data between 2008 and 2017 compiled from the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care, the American Hospital Association Annual Survey, and County Health Rankings. We use descriptive statistics to calculate the number of closures and mergers of hospitals of different ownership type, as well as staffing levels. Using logistic regression, we also assessed whether for-profit hospitals had higher odds of closing and merging, controlling for both organization and community factors. RESULTS: We found for-profit hospitals to be less stable than their public and nonprofit hospital counterparts, experiencing disproportionately more closures and mergers over time, with a multivariable analysis indicating a statistically significant difference. Furthermore, for-profit hospitals have fewer full-time employees relative to their size than hospitals of other ownership types, as well as lower total payroll expenditures. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings suggest that for-profit hospitals operate more efficiently in terms of expenses, but this also may translate into a lower level of economic contributions to the surrounding community through employment and purchasing initiatives. For-profit hospitals may also not have the stability required to serve as long-standing anchor institutions. Future studies should consider whether for-profit hospitals make other types of community investments to offset these deficits and whether policy changes can be employed to encourage anchor activities from local businesses such as hospitals.

Attitudes toward and experiences working with patients who misuse opioids among board certified physicians in Ohio.

Background: The United States has experienced substantial consequences associated with the opioid epidemic. One such consequence has been an increased need for patients who misuse opioids to interface with health care professionals. As such, it is important to understand physician attitudes toward and experiences with this patient population. The goal of this paper is to assess the extent to which physicians hold negative attitudes toward patients who misuse opioids and whether this patient population receives differential treatment. Methods: Using a mixed methods design, we surveyed board-certified physicians in Ohio regarding their attitudes toward patients who misuse opioids as well as their observations of bias toward these patients in health care settings. Results: Our findings suggest that negative attitudes toward patients who misuse opioids are common among physicians as were personal experiences of bias toward this patient population. We also found that physicians rationalized treating these patients differently and perceived barriers to achieving more equitable treatment. Finally, some physicians expressed a desire for additional training and resources to reduce bias. Conclusions: Negative attitudes toward patients who misuse opioids may serve as a critical barrier to patients accessing care in areas heavily affected by the U.S. opioid epidemic.

Are Nonprofit Hospitals Addressing the Most Critical Community Health Needs That They Identify in Their Community Health Needs Assessments?

CONTEXT: Virtually all nonprofit hospitals are in compliance with the Affordable Care Act's new Community Health Needs Assessments requirements. OBJECTIVE: To assess what needs have emerged in the Community Health Needs Assessments hospitals complete nationally, the degree to which identified needs reflect the most pressing community health issues, and the extent to which hospitals address identified needs. DESIGN: Using both bivariate and logistic regressions, we analyzed the Community Health Needs Assessments and implementation strategies of nonprofit hospitals to determine whether identified needs overlapped with county health-ranking indicators of need and whether institutional or community-level factors predicted hospital willingness to address identified needs. PARTICIPANTS: We included a 20% random sample of US nonprofit hospitals (n = 496). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our main outcome measures were whether nonprofit hospitals addressed each of the most common needs. RESULTS: Mental health, access to care, obesity, substance abuse, diabetes, cancer, and the social determinants of health were the most commonly identified needs across the sample. The rate at which hospitals chose to address each of these needs in their implementation strategies, however, varied considerably, ranging from 56% (cancer) to 85% (obesity). We found that several institutional and community characteristics predicted hospital willingness to address each need; whether the community ranked a need as number 1 was a better predictor of hospital investment than the severity of the need, as measured by county health-rankings data. CONCLUSIONS: These findings may help inform local, state, and federal policy makers as they consider interventions aimed at encouraging hospitals to invest in improving the health of their communities.