Current treatment options for pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to briefly summarize the challenges associated with the treatment of pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), discuss its carbapenem-resistance, and review the literature supporting the current treatment paradigm and therapeutic options. RECENT FINDINGS: In a multicenter, randomized, and controlled trial the novel ß-lactam-ß-lactamase inhibitor sulbactam-durlobactam was compared to colistin, both in addition to imipenem-cilastatin. The drug met the prespecified criteria for noninferiority for 28-day all-cause mortality while demonstrating higher clinical cure rates in the treatment of CRAB pneumonia. In an international, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled trial colistin monotherapy was compared to colistin combined with meropenem. In this trial, combination therapy was not superior to monotherapy in the treatment of drug-resistant gram-negative organisms including CRAB pneumonia. SUMMARY: CRAB pneumonia is a preeminent public health threat without an agreed upon first line treatment strategy. Historically, there have been drawbacks to available treatment modalities without a clear consensus on the first-line treatment regimen. CRAB pneumonia is a top priority for the continued development of antimicrobials, adjuvant therapies and refinement of current treatment strategies.

Microbial Cell-Free DNA Identifies the Causative Pathogen in Infective Endocarditis and Remains Detectable Longer Than Conventional Blood Culture in Patients with Prior Antibiotic Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE) can be difficult, particularly if blood cultures fail to yield a pathogen. This study evaluates the potential utility of microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) as a tool to identify the microbial etiology of IE. METHODS: Blood samples from patients with suspected IE were serially collected. mcfDNA was extracted from plasma and underwent next-generation sequencing. Reads were aligned against a library containing DNA sequences belonging to >1400 different pathogens. mcfDNA from organisms present above a statistical threshold were reported and quantified in molecules per milliliter (MPM). Additional mcfDNA was collected on each subject every 2-3 days for a total of 7 collections or until discharge. RESULTS: Of 30 enrolled patients with suspected IE, 23 had definite IE, 2 had possible IE, and IE was rejected in 5 patients by modified Duke Criteria. Only the 23 patients with definite IE were included for analysis. Both mcfDNA and blood cultures achieved a sensitivity of 87%. The median duration of positivity from antibiotic treatment initiation was estimated to be approximately 38.1 days for mcfDNA versus 3.7 days for blood culture (proportional odds, 2.952; P = .02771), using a semiparametric survival analysis. mcfDNA (log10) levels significantly declined (-0.3 MPM log10 units, 95% credible interval -0.45 to -0.14) after surgical source control was performed (pre- vs postprocedure, posterior probability >0.99). CONCLUSION: mcfDNA accurately identifies the microbial etiology of IE. Sequential mcfDNA levels may ultimately help to individualize therapy by estimating a patient's burden of infection and response to treatment.

Rationale and design of the Prone Position and Respiratory Outcomes in Non-intubated COVID-19 PatiEnts: The "PRONE" Study.

While benefits of prone position in mechanically-ventilated patients have been well-described, a randomized-control trial to determine the effects of prone positioning in awake, spontaneously-breathing patients with an acute pneumonia has not been previously conducted. Prone Position and Respiratory Outcomes in Non-Intubated COVID-19 PatiEnts: the "PRONE" Study (PRONE) was conducted in non-intubated hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia as defined by respiratory rate ≥ 20/min or an oxyhemoglobin saturation (SpO2) ≤ 93% without supplemental oxygen [1]. The PRONE trial was designed to investigate the effects of prone positioning on need for escalation in respiratory support, as defined by need for transition to a higher acuity level of care, increased fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), or the initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation. Secondary objectives were to assess the duration of effect of prone positioning on respiratory parameters such as respiratory rate and SpO2, as well as other outcomes such as time to discharge or transition in level of care.