Autonomous motivation explains interprofessional education outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: In response to the observations that interprofessional education (IPE) is seemingly atheoretical or under-theorised, this quantitative research seeks to uncover students' motivational mechanisms which could explain their behavioural and collaborative outcomes using self-determination theory (SDT). While SDT has been studied in various contexts, its applicability to IPE remains underexplored. This study aims to integrate a new perspective in understanding students' motivation in IPE by exploring how the fulfilment of a need for sense of autonomy, competence and relatedness is linked to desirable IPE outcomes. METHODS: Utilising quantitative methods, we involved 255 health care students in Hong Kong from the medical, nursing and pharmacy disciplines enrolled in IPE anticoagulation therapy module. They were invited to respond to the Psychological Need Satisfaction Questionnaire and other measures as part of the post-test. RESULTS: Sense of autonomy emerged as the strongest positive predictor of behavioural (collective dedication, behavioural engagement) and collaboration outcomes (team effectiveness, goal achievement). There were no significant program-level differences across these outcomes except for behavioural engagement for which nursing students had a higher perception than medicine students. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to demonstrate that SDT is a meaningful framework in understanding behavioural and collaboration outcomes in IPE. The major theoretical contribution of this study refers to the ability of students' motivation to explain variance in their behavioural outcomes. That is, sense of autonomy consistently predicted team effectiveness, collective dedication, behavioural engagement and goal achievement. Autonomous motivation among a sample of health care students can explain behavioural outcomes. Theoretical, methodological and practical implications are discussed.

Enhancing nursing students' clinical competency using a multi-patient simulation learning model: A randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: For nurses, clinical competency is paramount in ensuring that patients receive safe, high-quality care. Multi-patient simulation (MPS) in nursing education is gaining attention, and evidence shows its suitability for real-life situations. MPS can be an effective solution for nurses' continuing clinical education. OBJECTIVES: This project compares the effectiveness of MPS (involving both a standardized patient and a high fidelity simulator) and a single high-fidelity simulation (single HFS; only involving a high fidelity simulator) for enhancing the clinical competency of nursing students. DESIGN: A stratified, permuted, block randomized controlled study design was used. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty undergraduate nursing students in years 3, 4, and 5 were selected to participate. Subgroups with each comprising three undergraduate nursing students from different years were formed. METHODS: The participants were randomized to receive either an MPS (intervention group) or single HFS (control group) for 1 day; they later received the same intervention after a 30-day washout period. One objectively measured questionnaire and two self-reported questionnaires were used to measure clinical competency: the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (CCEI), Clinical Competence Questionnaire (CCQ), and Simulation Effectiveness Tool - Modified Questionnaire (SET-M). RESULTS: The results revealed significant between-group differences. Specifically, the intervention group showed greater improvement than the control group in both the CCQ (linear contrast [d] = 71.4; 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 53.407, 89.393; P < 0.001) and CCEI total scores (d = 7.17; 95 % CI = 5.837, 8.503; P < 0.001). The SET-M results indicated that 85 % of the participants (n = 51) strongly agreed that they felt more confident about performing a patient handover to the healthcare team after the simulation. CONCLUSIONS: The study findings indicated that both the MPS and single HFS effectively enhanced students' clinical competency. However, MPSs have superior educational outcomes relative to traditional single HFSs.

Virtual simulation and problem-based learning enhance perceived clinical and cultural competence of nursing students in Asia: A randomized controlled cross-over study.

BACKGROUND: Both clinical and cultural competencies are of paramount importance in ensuring patients' safety and high-quality care. While problem-based learning (PBL) is a widely applied pedagogy in nursing education, an emerging technology-based pedagogy, virtual simulation provides a realistic clinical learning experience for students. It can be an effective solution for continuing clinical and cultural learning across countries in the era of the pandemic. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of virtual simulation and PBL on the perceived clinical and cultural competence for nursing students. DESIGN: A randomized controlled cross-over study design was used. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-one undergraduate and postgraduate nursing students from five Asian regions were selected for participation. METHODS: Participants were randomized to receive either virtual simulation (group A) or PBL (group B) for one day, followed by another intervention on the second day. Three self-reported questionnaires were used: Clinical Competence Questionnaire (CCQ), Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence among Healthcare Professionals-Student Version (IAPCC-SV), and demographic questionnaire. RESULTS: The results revealed that students in both arms had significant improvements in CCQ total score (A: d = 21.500, P < 0.001; B: d = 16.710, P = 0.001), nursing professional behavior (A: d = 8.233, P < 0.001; B: d = 6.323, P < 0.001), and advanced nursing skills (A: d = 2.533, P = 0.008; B: d = 2.129, P = 0.029) after two interventions. In addition, both arms demonstrated significant improvements in IAPCC-SV total score (A: d = 3.467, P = 0.037; B: d = 4.032, P = 0.010) and cultural skills (A: d = 0.767, P = 0.012; B: d = 1.000, P = 0.001). No significant differences were observed between the two arms. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicated that both virtual simulation and PBL were effective in promoting students' perceived clinical and cultural competence. As both education modes have their own uniqueness and effectiveness in both outcomes, the combination of both could enhance the variability of learning modalities. Notably, the use of virtual simulation first could engage students better in learning and achieve better educational outcomes.

Evaluation of students' perceived clinical competence and learning needs following an online virtual simulation education programme with debriefing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of a virtual simulation education programme with debriefing in undergraduate nursing students. Perceived clinical competence and learning needs of students in a simulation environment were also measured. BACKGROUND: Evidence showed virtual simulation education programmes provided better knowledge acquisition. However, these studies to date did not incorporate virtual simulation in the combination of a debriefing model in nursing students. DESIGN: A one-group pre-test and post-test design. METHODS: 188 final year undergraduate nursing students participated in the study. Linear mixed model analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of the programme. RESULTS: Students have perceived a significant improvement in clinical competence and nursing process. Self-efficacy has also boosted. Communication and critical thinking were applied better in the traditional clinical environment. CONCLUSION: Perceived clinical competence of Chinese nursing students has significant improvements by using virtual simulation combining a debriefing model during the COVID-19 period. Virtual simulation met students' learning needs. Future studies should include a control group for comparison and long-term measurement. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The study provided an innovative clinical learning pedagogy to serve as a potential alternative with traditional clinical practicum during the COVID-19 period as this is substantially limited.