Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an effective surgical treatment for severe osteoarthritis of the hip. While THA is considered a reliable and safe procedure, outcome data on patients who have Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) is limited. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of postoperative complications after primary THA in patients who have EDS against matched controls. METHODS: A large national database was searched to identify patients who underwent THA between 2009 and 2020. Patients younger than 18 years, those who have a history of prior THA, and those undergoing THA for a hip fracture were excluded from analysis. Propensity score matching was utilized to match patients who had EDS with patients who did not have EDS at a 1:4 ratio. Rates of medical and surgical complications at 90 days and 2 years were queried and compared between the cohorts using multivariable logistic regression. We identified 118 patients who had EDS and underwent primary THA, who were then matched with 418 controls. RESULTS: At 90 days, the EDS cohort had greater rates of dislocation (8.5 versus 3.8%, P = 0.038). At 2 years, the EDS cohort had greater odds of dislocation (OR [odds ratio] 2.47, P = 0.018), aseptic loosening (OR 6.91, P = 0.002), and aseptic revision (OR 2.66, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have EDS possess significantly higher odds of complications after THA compared to matched controls, including dislocation, aseptic loosening, and aseptic revision. Careful surgical planning in these patients should be made to prevent dislocation and potentially minimize the risk of other prosthesis-related complications leading to revision.

Outcomes of Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Who Have Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an excellent surgical option for patients who have end-stage knee osteoarthritis. While rates of major postoperative complications have steadily decreased with modern implants and operative techniques, contemporary outcome data for patients who have Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) are scarce. The goal of this study was to compare complication rates after primary TKA in patients who have EDS versus matched controls. METHODS: A large administrative database was used to identify patients who underwent primary TKA from 2009 to 2020. Patients who had a diagnosis of EDS were identified by International Classification of Diseases Coding. Propensity scores were utilized to match these patients with controls at a 1:4 ratio based on age, sex, and various comorbidities. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to compare the rates of medical and surgical complications at 90 days and 2 years. A total of 188 patients who had EDS and 752 controls were included in this study. RESULTS: After univariate analysis, Ehlers-Danlos patients exhibited significantly higher rates of wound complications (4.8 versus 0.9%, P = .001) at 90 days. When adjusted for comorbidities, Ehlers-Danlos patients still exhibited significantly increased odds of developing wound complications (odds ratio: 7.06; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who have EDS undergoing TKA exhibited significantly higher rates of wound complications within 90 days postoperatively compared to matched controls. Rates of instability, manipulation under anesthesia, periprosthetic joint infection, aseptic loosening, and aseptic revision arthroplasty did not significantly differ between the cohorts. This study found generally favorable short-term outcomes of TKA in this population; however, the inability to control for implant type and other confounding variables may have influenced the lack of difference in complication rates at 2 years. Surgeons should monitor for the potentially increased risk of wound complications and consider the possible need for increased constraint in this population during preoperative planning.

Outcomes of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Receiving Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Although total knee arthroplasty has been considered the gold-standard treatment for severe osteoarthritis of the knee, unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) has become an increasingly favorable alternative for single-compartment osteoarthritis of the knee. Few studies have examined potential high-risk populations undergoing this procedure. The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of UKA in patients receiving long-term anticoagulation therapy. METHODS: In this study, a large administrative database was queried to identify patients undergoing UKA between 2009 and 2019, who were then divided into a cohort receiving long-term anticoagulation and a control cohort. Propensity scores were utilized to match these patients. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to compare 90-day and 2-year complication rates between cohorts. RESULTS: Patients who were on long-term anticoagulation had significantly increased odds of extended length of stay, surgical site infection, wound complication, transfusion, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and readmission at 90-day follow-up. The long-term anticoagulation cohort also experienced significantly higher odds of periprosthetic joint infection and mechanical complications at 2-year follow-up; however, odds of conversion to total knee arthroplasty were not increased. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that long-term anticoagulation use was associated with poorer medical and surgical outcomes at both 90 days and 2 years postoperatively in patients undergoing UKA, even after rigorous adjustment for confounders.

Chronic Anticoagulation is Associated With Increased Risk for Postoperative Complications Following Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: With an aging global population, the incidence of revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) is expected to increase markedly. While patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty who require chronic anticoagulation (AC) have been associated with increased postoperative complications, less is known about the impact of chronic AC status on postoperative complications in the rTHA setting. This study sought to compare complication rates following aseptic rTHA between patients who were on chronic AC and those who were not. METHODS: A large national database was utilized to retrospectively identify 9,421 patients who underwent aseptic rTHA between 2014 and 2019. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: 1,790 patients (19.0%) were in the chronic AC cohort (ie, having an AC prescription filled within 6 months prior to and following rTHA), and 7,631 patients (81.0%) were not on chronic AC. Postoperative complications at 90-days and 2-years were compared between cohorts utilizing univariate and multivariate analyses, controlling for sex, age, and comorbidities. RESULTS: At 90-days, chronic AC patients had increased odds of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) (odds ratio [OR] 3.2, P < .001), surgical site infections (OR 3.6, P < .001), and mechanical prosthetic complications (OR 3.5, P < .001), which included any aseptic loosening, implant dislocation, or broken prosthetic. At 2-years, chronic AC patients had increased odds of PJI (OR 3.3, P < .001) as well as mechanical prosthetic complications (OR 3.2, P < .001). Chronic AC patients were also at increased risk for reoperation within 2 years after initial aseptic rTHA (OR 1.9, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on chronic AC have significantly higher odds of 90-day and 2-year complications after aseptic rTHA. This includes increased odds of PJI, surgical site infection, and mechanical prosthetic complications. Patients receiving chronic AC who undergo rTHA should be counseled on the risk-benefit ratio of their chronic AC status in a multidisciplinary setting to optimize their postoperative outcomes.

Complications and opioid-prescribing patterns following genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation versus intra-articular injection: a matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is an emerging procedure used to relieve pain from severe knee osteoarthritis. While there have been rare reports of significant complications, their incidence has not been well established. The objective of this study was to examine complication rates at 30 and 90 days post treatment as well as characterize opioid-prescribing patterns before and after treatment. METHODS: A large national database was queried to identify patients undergoing GNRFA from 2015 to 2022 and matched to control cohorts composed of patients receiving either intra-articular corticosteroid (CSI) or hyaluronic acid injection (HAI) of the knee. Complication rates at 30 and 90 days were analyzed. Opioid utilization was assessed in the 6 months before and after treatment. RESULTS: Rates of infection (0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5% vs 0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6%), septic arthritis (<0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4% vs 0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5%), deep vein thrombosis (2.0%, CI 1.3% to 2.7% vs 1.6%, CI 1.0% to 2.2%), pulmonary embolism (1.2%, CI 0.6% to 1.7% vs 1.3%, CI 1.1% to 2.5%), bleeding (<0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%), seroma (<0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4% vs 0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6%), nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%) and thermal injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%) were not different between CSI and GNRFA cohorts at 30 days. Rate of swelling was significantly greater in the GNRFA cohort (9.4%, CI 7.6% to 10.4% vs 6.4%, CI 4.8% to 7.2%, p=0.003) at 30 days. At 90 days, rates of septic arthritis (0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5% vs 0.3%, CI 0.08% to 0.7%), deep vein thrombosis (3.1%, CI 2.1% to 3.8% vs 3.1%, CI 2.2% to 3.9%), pulmonary embolism (1.5%, CI 0.9% to 2.1% vs 1.8%, CI 1.2% to 2.5%), and nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs <0.1%, CI 0.003% to 0.4%) were not significantly different.Between HAI versus GNRFA cohorts, no significant differences were seen in rates of infection (0.3%, CI 0.08% to 0.07% vs 0.7%, CI 0.3% to 1.2%), septic arthritis (0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6% vs 0.4%, CI 0.2% to 0.9%), deep vein thrombosis (2.0%, CI 1.3% to 2.7% vs 1.9%, CI 1.2% to 2.7%), pulmonary embolism (1.5%, CI 0.9% to 2.2% vs 1.7%, CI 1.1% to 2.5%), bleeding (0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5% vs 0.2%, CI 0.05% to 0.6%), seroma (<0.1%, CI 0.03% to 0.4% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%), nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0%, CI 0% to 0.3%), swelling (14.0%, CI 11.6% to 15.1% vs 12.0%, CI 10.3% to 13.6%), and thermal injury (<0.1%, CI 0.03% to 0.4% vs <0.01%, CI 0.3% to 0.4%) at 30 days. Rates of infection (0.7%, CI 0.3% to 1.2% vs 1.4%, CI 0.9% to 2.1%), septic arthritis (0.3%, CI 0.1% to 0.8% vs 0.5%, CI 0.2% to 1.1%), deep vein thrombosis (3.6%, CI 2.6% to 4.4% vs 3.1%, CI 2.2% to 4.0%), pulmonary embolism (2.3%, CI 1.5% to 3.0% vs 2.1%, CI 1.4% to 3.0%) and nerve injury (0%, CI 0% to 0.3% vs 0.1%, CI 0.02% to 0.5%) were not significantly different at 90 days.There were no significant differences in level of pretreatment opioid utilization although overall consumption in mean daily morphine equivalents was greater in the GNRFA cohort. Opioid utilization significantly increased in the first 30 days after ablation in patients with no prior opioid use compared to controls. In patients with some and chronic prior opioid use, opioid requirements were generally decreased in all treatment groups at 6 months with no clearly superior treatment in reducing opioid consumption. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrated that GNRFA possesses a safety profile similar to that of intra-articular injections although significant adverse events such as venous thromboembolism and septic arthritis may occur rarely. Although opioid utilization generally increased in the 30 days after ablation compared with intra-articular injection, similar reduction in opioid consumption at 6 months was seen in patients with prior opioid use in the ablation and control cohorts.

Effect of Obesity on Patient-Perceived Outcomes After First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: While first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis is a common and effective procedure, there is a paucity of studies examining obesity's effect on outcomes of 1st MTPJ arthrodesis. This study's purpose was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes following 1st MTPJ arthrodesis in obese versus non-obese patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 94 patients undergoing first MTPJ fusion over the age of 18 with a diagnosis of hallux valgus or hallux rigidus was performed. Surgical and postoperative outcomes were examined preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months follow-up via Visual Analog Pain scale (VAS), and Short Form 36 (SF-36) surveys, and data were stratified into 2 patient groups: BMI < 30 (n = 62, mean age 63.9 ± 9.1 and ≥ 30 (n = 32, mean age 61.9 ± 8.4). RESULTS: Average overall VAS and SF-36 physical component scores improved significantly at 6 months (P < .001, .006) and 1 year postoperative visits (P < .001, .007) with no differences in survey scores, outcomes, or complications between weight groups. CONCLUSION: Our study showed first MTPJ fusion improves short-term pain and physical quality-of-life in arthritic obese and non-obese patients without differences in nonunion, complications, or patient-reported measures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Prognostic, Case-Control Study.

USE of CLINICAL TEST CLUSTERS VERSUS ADVANCED IMAGING STUDIES in the MANAGEMENT of PATIENTS with a SUSPECTED SLAP TEAR.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram (MRA) has served as the gold standard for identifying patients with possible Superior Labrum Anterior-Posterior (SLAP) lesions and are often required by orthopaedic surgeons prior to clinical evaluation. However, as the literature shows MRA sensitivity as 0.65-0.98, and specificity between 0.80-1.00, there is still room for misinterpretation of the imaging study, and potential mismanagement of a patient who may or may not exhibit a true SLAP lesion. It is proposed that by grouping a series of clinical special tests it may be possible to develop greater sensitivity in identifying a SLAP lesion, resulting in the ability to better manage this patient population, thus avoiding unnecessary and costly imaging studies and decreased referrals to surgical specialists. The purpose of this study is to examine specific combinations of SLAP lesion special tests and identify which clusters of tests have the highest sensitivity and specificities. This may allow therapists to improve the management of their patients by reliably diagnosing a SLAP lesion and referring only those who may need surgery to a physician. STUDY DESIGN: Literature review, diagnostic sensitivity/specificity outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective search of the current peer-reviewed literature was performed in an effort to identify the clinical special tests with the greatest sensitivity and specificity in identifying SLAP lesions. Based upon that search, the study was limited to five special tests: Biceps Load I, Biceps Load II, Speed's, Passive Compression, and O'Brien's tests. A multiple regression analysis was performed that looked at grouping of the tests to determine the diagnostic sensitivity/specificity when grouped. RESULTS: Obtaining positive results on three of the five special tests resulted in a sensitivity of 0.992-0.999 and a specificity of 0.992-0.999. The combination of the Biceps Load I/II and O'Brien's showed the highest sensitivity and specificity. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that a combination of at least three positive SLAP lesion tests may be clinically useful in diagnosing a shoulder SLAP lesion with greater diagnostic accuracy than those reported for MRI/MRA, thus improving patient management by referring only those who may require surgical intervention to a physician. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c, "Outcomes" Research.