RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: An evaluation is made of the hospital mortality predicting capacity of the main predictive scoring systems. DESIGN: A 2-year retrospective cohort study was carried out. SETTING: A third level ICU with surgical and medical patients. PATIENTS: All patients with multiorgan failure during the first day in the ICU. MAIN VARIABLES: APACHE II and IV, SAPS II and III, MPM II and hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 568 patients were included. Mortality rate: 39.8% (226 patients). Discrimination (area under the ROC curve; 95% CI): APACHE IV (0.805; 0.751-0.858), SAPS II (0.755; 0.697-0.814), MPM II (0.748; 0.688-0.809), SAPS III (0.737; 0.675-0.799) and APACHE II (0.699; 0.633-0.765). MPM II showed the best calibration, followed by SAPS III. APACHE II, SAPS II and APACHE IV showed very poor calibration. Standard mortality ratio (95% CI): APACHE IV 1.9 (1.78-2.02); APACHE II 1.1 (1.07-1.13); SAPS III 1.1 (1.06-1.14); SAPS II 1.03 (1.01-1.05); MPM 0.9 (0.86-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: APACHE IV showed the best discrimination, with poor calibration. MPM II showed good discrimination and the best calibration. SAPS II, in turn, showed the second best discrimination, with poor calibration. The APACHE II calibration and discrimination values currently disadvise its use. SAPS III showed good calibration with modest discrimination. Future studies at regional or national level and in certain critically ill populations are needed.
Assuntos
APACHE , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Humanos , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de DoençaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use and effectiveness of a routine invasive strategy (RIS) in patients with acute coronary syndrome without persistent ST-segment elevation with renal dysfunction in the real world scenario. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study based on the ARIAM-SEMICYUC Registry (2011-2014) was carried out. Renal dysfunction was defined as GFR (Cockroft-Gault)<60ml/min (moderate dysfunction) or<30ml/min (severe dysfunction). Patients in which early angiography (<72h) was performed due to cardiogenic shock or recurrent myocardial ischemia were excluded. The primary endpoint was hospital mortality. Confounding factors were controlled using propensity score analysis. RESULTS: A total of 4,279 patients were analyzed, of which 26% had moderate renal dysfunction and 5% severe dysfunction. Patients with renal dysfunction had greater severity and comorbidity, higher hospital mortality (8.6 vs. 1.8%), and lesser use of the RIS (40 vs. 52%). The adjusted OR for mortality in patients without/with renal dysfunction were 0.38 (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 0.17 to 0.81) and 0.52 (95%CI 0.32 to 0.87), respectively (interaction P-value=.4779). The impact (adjusted risk difference) of RIS was higher in the group with renal dysfunction (-5.1%, 95%CI -8.1 to -2.1 vs. -1.6%, 95%CI -2.6 to -0.6; interaction P-value=.0335). No significant interaction was detected for the other endpoints considered (ICU mortality, 30-day mortality, myocardial infarction, acute renal failure or moderate/severe bleeding). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the effectiveness of IRS is similar in patients with normal or abnormal renal function, and alert to the under-utilization of this strategy in such patients.
Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/terapia , Angiografia Coronária , Nefropatias/complicações , Revascularização Miocárdica , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/terapia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/complicações , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio sem Supradesnível do Segmento ST/diagnóstico por imagem , Pontuação de Propensão , Recidiva , Sistema de Registros , Estudos Retrospectivos , Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Espanha/epidemiologia , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prognosis of mechanically ventilated elderly patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). DESIGN AND SCOPE: Sub-analysis of a prospective multicenter observational cohort study conducted over a period of two years in 13 medical-surgical ICUs in Spain. PATIENTS: Adult patients who required mechanical ventilation (MV) for longer than 24 hours. INTERVENTIONS: None. STUDY VARIABLES: Demographic data, APACHE II, SOFA, reason for MV, comorbidity, functional condition, reintubation, duration of MV, tracheotomy, ICU mortality, in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1661 patients were recruited. Males accounted for 67.9% (n=1127), with a mean age of 62.1 ± 16.2 years. APACHE II: 20.3 ± 7.5. Total SOFA: 8.4 ± 3.5. Four hundred and twenty-three patients (25.4%) were ≥ 75 years of age. Comorbidity and functional condition rates were poorer in these patients (p<0.001 for both variables). Mortality in the ICU was higher in the elderly patients (33.6%) than in the younger subjects (25.9%) (p=0.002). Also, in-hospital mortality was higher in those ≥ 75 years of age. No differences in duration of MV, prevalence of tracheostomy or reintubation incidence were found. Regarding the indication for MV, only the patient ≥ 75 years of age with pneumonia, sepsis or trauma had a higher in-ICU mortality than the younger patients (46.3% vs 33.1%, p=0.006; 55% vs 25.8%, p=0.002; 63.6% vs 4.5%, p<0,001, respectively). No differences were found referred to other reasons for MV. CONCLUSION: Older patients (≥ 75 years) have significantly higher in-ICU and in-hospital mortality than younger patients without differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation. Differences in mortality were at the expense of pneumonia, sepsis and trauma.
Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Respiração Artificial , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To design a probability model for prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) using variables obtained during the first 24 hours of the start of MV. DESIGN: An observational, prospective, multicenter cohort study. SCOPE: Thirteen Spanish medical-surgical intensive care units. PATIENTS: Adult patients requiring mechanical ventilation for more than 24 hours. INTERVENTIONS: None. STUDY VARIABLES: APACHE II, SOFA, demographic data, clinical data, reason for mechanical ventilation, comorbidity, and functional condition. A multivariate risk model was constructed. The model contemplated a dependent variable with three possible conditions: 1. Early mortality; 2. Early extubation; and 3. PMV. RESULTS: Of the 1661 included patients, 67.9% (n=1127) were men. Age: 62.1±16.2 years. APACHE II: 20.3±7.5. Total SOFA: 8.4±3.5. The APACHE II and SOFA scores were higher in patients ventilated for 7 or more days (p=0.04 and p=0.0001, respectively). Noninvasive ventilation failure was related to PMV (p=0.005). A multivariate model for the three above exposed outcomes was generated. The overall accuracy of the model in the training and validation sample was 0.763 (95%IC: 0.729-0.804) and 0.751 (95%IC: 0.672-0.816), respectively. The likelihood ratios (LRs) for early extubation, involving a cutoff point of 0.65, in the training sample were LR (+): 2.37 (95%CI: 1.77-3.19) and LR (-): 0.47 (95%CI: 0.41-0.55). The LRs for the early mortality model, for a cutoff point of 0.73, in the training sample, were LR (+): 2.64 (95%CI: 2.01-3.4) and LR (-): 0.39 (95%CI: 0.30-0.51). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed model could be a helpful tool in decision making. However, because of its moderate accuracy, it should be considered as a first approach, and the results should be corroborated by further studies involving larger samples and the use of standardized criteria.
Assuntos
Modelos Estatísticos , Respiração Artificial , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The current official model of training in Intensive Care Medicine (ICM) in Spain is based on exposure to experiences through clinical rotations. The main objective was to determine the level of competency (I novice to V independent practitioner) achieved by the residents at the end of the 3rd year of training (R3) in ICM through a simulation-based OSCE. Secondary objectives were: (1) To identify gaps in performance, and (2) To investigate the reliability and feasibility of conducting simulation-based assessment at multiple sites. DESIGN: Observational multicenter study. SETTING: Thirteen Spanish ICU Departments. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty six R3. INTERVENTION: The participants performed on five, 15-min, high-fidelity crisis scenarios in four simulation centers. The performances were video recorded for later scoring by trained raters. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Via a Delphi technique, an independent panel of expert intensivists identified critical essential performance elements (CEPE) for each scenario to define the levels of competency. RESULTS: A total of 176 performances were analyzed. The internal consistency of the check-lists were adequate (KR-20 range 0.64-0.79). Inter-rater reliability was strong [median Intraclass Correlation Coefficient across scenarios: 0.89 (0.65-0.97)]. Competency levels achieved by R3 were: Level I (18.8%), II (35.2%), III (42.6%), IV/V (3.4%). Overall, a great heterogeneity in performance was observed. CONCLUSION: The expected level of competency after one year in the ICU was achieved only in half of the performances. A more evidence-based educational approach is needed. Multiple center simulation-based assessment showed feasibility and reliability as an evaluation method of competency. TRIAL REGISTRATION: COBALIDATION. NCT04278976. (https://register. CLINICALTRIALS: gov).
Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência , Internato e Residência , Competência Clínica , Cuidados Críticos , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Humanos , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Clinical Information Systems (CIS) are becoming a useful tool for managing patients and data in the ICU. However, the existing CIS differ in their capabilities and technical requirements. It is therefore essential for intensivists, as the end clients of these applications, to define the suitable minimum specifications required in order to be operative and helpful. OBJECTIVES: The Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units, through its Organization and Management Workgroup, has designated a group of clinical and software experts to draft a document with the recommendable technical and operating requirements of these systems. METHODS: The group was formed by ten people supported by managers or engineers from the five principal industries producing CIS in Spain. The project involved the following phases: a) Completion of a check list. This step was considered necessary in order to establish the precise current situation of CIS applications. b) Discussion of the results by the group of experts in a meeting and in online format. RESULTS: The requirements were grouped into four sections: technical, functional, safety and data management. All requirements were classified as basic and optional in order to allow the end user to choose among different options according to the existing budget, though ensuring a minimal set of useful characteristics. A chronogram for the installation process was also proposed.
Assuntos
Sistemas de Informação Hospitalar/organização & administração , Sistemas de Informação Hospitalar/normas , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , HumanosRESUMO
Patient care after major head and neck surgery has changed in recent years. Tumors are the most common reasons for this type of surgery, though it is also used to treat benign conditions. Recent advances in equipment and surgical techniques have improved the postoperative course in this field, allowing early recovery, less pain and infection, a shorter hospital stay, and even better aesthetic results. This is due to the use of minimally invasive techniques, which are gaining relevance. Such techniques allow complex procedures in the head and neck region, through natural orifices or small incisions, with minimal damage and sequelae for the patients. Despite these advances, however, the complexity of the treatment intervention requires multidisciplinary patient management, mostly in the Intensive Care Unit, in order to monitor the possible occurrence of complications. Potential risk factors include previous comorbidity, the type of surgery involved (e.g., bilateral cervical lymphadenectomy), multiple transfusions, and the appearance of early complications requiring repeat surgery. Despite the existence of several studies, there are no standardized protocols for the postoperative period in surgeries of this kind. This causes many specialists to resort to accelerated recovery protocols (ERAS: "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery") that have already been established in other surgical specialties.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Manuseio das Vias Aéreas/métodos , Analgesia , Circulação Sanguínea , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Tempo de Internação , Insuficiência de Múltiplos Órgãos/terapia , Dor Pós-Operatória/terapia , Admissão do Paciente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/terapia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Transplante de Pele , Trombose/terapia , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Departments of Critical Care Medicine are characterized by high medical assistance costs and great complexity. Published recommendations on determining the needs of medical staff in the DCCM are based on low levels of evidence and attribute excessive significance to the structural/welfare approach (physician-to-beds ratio), thus generating incomplete and minimalistic information. The Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units established a Technical Committee of experts, the purpose of which was to draft recommendations regarding requirements for medical professionals in the ICU. The Technical Committee defined the following categories: 1) Patient care-related aspects; 2) Activities outside the ICU; 3) Patient safety and clinical management aspects; 4) Teaching; and 5) Research. A subcommittee was established with experts pertaining to each activity category, defining criteria for quantifying the percentage time of the intensivists dedicated to each task, and taking into account occupational category. A quantitative method was applied, the parameters of which were the number of procedures or tasks and the respective estimated indicative times for patient care-related activities within or outside the context of the DCCM, as well as for teaching and research activities. Regarding non-instrumental activities, which are more difficult to evaluate in real time, a matrix of range versus productivity was applied, defining approximate percentages according to occupational category. All activities and indicative times were tabulated, and a spreadsheet was created that modified a previously designed model in order to perform calculations according to the total sum of hours worked and the hours stipulated in the respective work contract. The competencies needed and the tasks which a Department of Critical Care Medicine professional must perform far exceed those of a purely patient care-related character, and cannot be quantified using structural criteria. The method for describing the 5 types of activity, the quantification of specific tasks, the respective times needed for each task, and the generation of a spreadsheet led to the creation of a management instrument.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/organização & administração , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Departamentos Hospitalares/organização & administração , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/organização & administração , Corpo Clínico Hospitalar/provisão & distribuição , Eficiência Organizacional , Humanos , Medicina , Modelos Teóricos , Segurança do Paciente , Pesquisa , Espanha , Estudos de Tempo e MovimentoRESUMO
There are different parameters aimed at assessing nutritional status. These parameters may be of some help to assess nutritional status prior to patients' admission. However, their application in the critically ill patient is troublesome since results interpretation is interfered by changes originated by the acute disease or treatment measures. This is particularly true in relation to anthropometrical variables that are severely affected by changes in water distribution in the critical patient. Biochemical markers (creatinine/height index, serum albumin, etc.) are also interfered as a result of the metabolic changes that modify the synthesis and degradation processes. Short half-life proteins (prealbumin, retinol-bound protein) are not indicative of the nutritional status although they do inform about an appropriate response to nutrients intake and concurrence of new conditions of metabolic stress. Functional assessment parameters, such as muscular function test, are also difficult to apply in a great number of patients. Subjective global assessment, although it requires some degree of expertise, may be an appropriate tool. Some theoretically more accurate methods, such as bioelectrical impedance, need further investigation in these patients before being recommended.
Assuntos
Estado Terminal/terapia , Avaliação Nutricional , Distúrbios Nutricionais/diagnóstico , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Estado Terminal/reabilitação , Humanos , Distúrbios Nutricionais/terapia , Estado NutricionalRESUMO
Critically ill patients have important modifications in their energetic requirements, in which the clinical situation, treatment applied and the time course take part. Thus, the most appropriate method to calculate the caloric intake is indirect calorimetry. When this test is not available, calculations such as Harris-Benedict's may be used, although not using the so high correction factors as previously recommended in order to avoid hypercaloric intakes. The intake of a fixed caloric amount (comprised between 25-30 KcalKg/min) is adequate for most critically ill patients. Carbohydrates intake must be of 5 g/kg/day) maximum. Glucose plasma levels must be controlled in order to avoid hyperglycemia. With regards to fat intake, the maximum limit should be 1.5 g/kg/day. The recommended protein intake is 1.0-1.5 g/kg/day, according to the clinical situation characteristics. Special care must be taken with micronutrients intake, an issue that is many times undervalued. In this sense, there are data to consider some micronutrients such as Zn, CU, Mn, Cr, Se, Mo and some vitamins (A, B, C, and E) of great importance for patients in a critical condition, although specific requirements for each one of them have not been established.
Assuntos
Ingestão de Energia , Necessidades Nutricionais , Apoio Nutricional/normas , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Carboidratos da Dieta/administração & dosagem , Carboidratos da Dieta/normas , Gorduras na Dieta/administração & dosagem , Gorduras na Dieta/normas , Proteínas Alimentares/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Alimentares/normas , Humanos , Micronutrientes/administração & dosagem , Micronutrientes/normas , Apoio Nutricional/métodos , Vitaminas/administração & dosagem , Vitaminas/normasRESUMO
El cuidado del paciente tras cirugía mayor de cabeza y cuello ha cambiado en los últimos años. La patología que acapara este tipo de intervenciones es la tumoral; aunque también se utiliza para resolución de patologías benignas. Recientes avances en el equipamiento y en las técnicas quirúrgicas han mejorado el postoperatorio en este campo, permitiendo una recuperación precoz, un menor grado de dolor y tasa de infección, una menor estancia hospitalaria e incluso unos mejores resultados estéticos. Esto se debe al uso de técnicas mínimamente invasivas, que están cobrando protagonismo en los últimos años. Estas permiten realizar procedimientos complejos en la región de cabeza y cuello, a través de orificios naturales o pequeñas incisiones, con mínimo daño y mínimas secuelas para los pacientes. A pesar de estos avances, dada la complejidad de la intervención, el manejo de estos pacientes requerirá un enfoque multidisciplinar, fundamentalmente en las unidades de cuidados intensivos para vigilar la posible aparición de complicaciones. Entre los factores de riesgo potenciales destacan: comorbilidad previa, el tipo de intervención, como el vaciamiento cervical bilateral, la necesidad de politransfusión y la aparición de complicaciones precoces que requieren una reintervención. A pesar de diversos estudios realizados, no existen protocolos estandarizados para el período postoperatorio de este tipo de intervenciones, lo que hace que muchos trasladen protocolos de recuperación precoz (ERAS: «Enhanced Recovery After Surgery») ya instaurados en otras especialidades quirúrgicas
Patient care after major head and neck surgery has changed in recent years. Tumors are the most common reasons for this type of surgery, though it is also used to treat benign conditions. Recent advances in equipment and surgical techniques have improved the postoperative course in this field, allowing early recovery, less pain and infection, a shorter hospital stay, and even better aesthetic results. This is due to the use of minimally invasive techniques, which are gaining relevance. Such techniques allow complex procedures in the head and neck region, through natural orifices or small incisions, with minimal damage and sequelae for the patients. Despite these advances, however, the complexity of the treatment intervention requires multidisciplinary patient management, mostly in the Intensive Care Unit, in order to monitor the possible occurrence of complications. Potential risk factors include previous comorbidity, the type of surgery involved (e.g., bilateral cervical lymphadenectomy), multiple transfusions, and the appearance of early complications requiring repeat surgery. Despite the existence of several studies, there are no standardized protocols for the postoperative period in surgeries of this kind. This causes many specialists to resort to accelerated recovery protocols (ERAS: "Enhanced Recovery After Surgery") that have already been established in other surgical specialties
Assuntos
Humanos , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios/métodos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Fatores de Risco , Seleção de Pacientes , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/tendênciasRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the prognosis and costs of mechanical ventilation in patients with exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) treated with long-term oxygen therapy. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. Follow-up at 1 and 5 years. Cost utility analysis. SETTING: A medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) in a university hospital. PATIENTS: 20 patients with previous COPD treated with long-term oxygen therapy and needing mechanical ventilation due to acute respiratory failure. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mortality in the ICU, in-hospital mortality (ICU plus ward), and mortality at 1 and 5 years, and factors associated with prognosis and cost-utility were assessed. The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score was 20 (median 20 range 12-36). Cumulative mortality was 35% in the ICU, 50% in hospital, 75% at 1 year, and 85% at 5 years. Factors significantly associated with mortality in the ICU were low levels of albumin (p = 0.05) and sodium (p = 0.01) at admission. Patients who died in hospital and in the first year after discharge had a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) than survivors (p = 0.03 and p = 0.05, respectively). The cost per Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) was U.S. $26283 and U.S. $44602 in a "best" (cost/QALY calculated for the life expectancy in Spain) and a "worst case scenario" (cost/QALY calculated for a 68-year life expectancy), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Applying mechanical ventilation to COPD patients treated with long-term oxygen therapy carries a high mortality and cost. Factors significantly associated with mortality in the ICU were albumin and sodium concentrations and FEV1 in hospital and in the first year after discharge.
Assuntos
Pneumopatias Obstrutivas/diagnóstico , Pneumopatias Obstrutivas/terapia , Oxigenoterapia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Respiração Artificial , Adulto , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Pneumopatias Obstrutivas/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Respiração Artificial/economia , Respiração Artificial/mortalidade , Espanha/epidemiologia , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
A case of diffuse and recidivant alveolar hemorrhage is presented in a patient with hepatitis C virus-related type II mixed cryoglobulinemia with membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. The patient was a 48-year-old white woman who suffered several outbreaks of pulmonary hemorrhage refractory to treatment with steroids, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, plasmapheresis and interferon-alpha. The patient also presented persistent increased titers of immune complexes and rheumatoid factor with no histological hepatic alterations. Some considerations about evolution and treatment are given according to the updated physiopathology of this disease.
Assuntos
Crioglobulinemia/complicações , Glomerulonefrite Membranoproliferativa/complicações , Hemorragia/etiologia , Hepatite C/complicações , Pneumopatias/etiologia , Alvéolos Pulmonares , Crioglobulinemia/sangue , Crioglobulinemia/terapia , Evolução Fatal , Feminino , Glomerulonefrite Membranoproliferativa/sangue , Glomerulonefrite Membranoproliferativa/terapia , Hemorragia/patologia , Hemorragia/terapia , Hepatite C/sangue , Hepatite C/terapia , Humanos , Pneumopatias/patologia , Pneumopatias/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
The object of this is to evaluate the influence of several micronutrients on the survival rate of septic patients following abdominal surgery. A retrospective assessment was done of sixty-one patients suffering from neoplastic or non-neoplastic pathology associated to septicemia. On admission the following parameters were determined: number of total lymphocytes, serum albumin, transferrin, zinc, copper, magnesium, iron, calcium, phosphorus, and copper/zinc levels. The differences obtained between surviving and non-surviving patients were analyzed. The most relevant findings revealed statistically significant lower serum albumin, zinc and transferrin values in the latter group. We conclude by stating that such parameters may be of prognostic value in this type of patients, and that supplemental micronutrients must be administered in order to improve prognosis.
Assuntos
Infecções/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Oligoelementos/deficiência , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Feminino , Humanos , Infecções/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/sangue , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/microbiologia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Oligoelementos/sangueRESUMO
A case of a 38-year-old smoker male who had vasoconstriction and instep claudication of the right hand, is presented. After a year of evolution, he experienced the same alteration on the left foot. He was diagnosed as suffering from thromboangiitis obliterans, by means of angiography. After oral nifedipine treatment, combined with cessation of smoking, all symptoms and trophics regressed.
Assuntos
Nifedipino/uso terapêutico , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Tromboangiite Obliterante/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Braço/irrigação sanguínea , Humanos , Perna (Membro)/irrigação sanguínea , Masculino , Indução de Remissão , Tromboangiite Obliterante/diagnósticoRESUMO
Los servicios de medicina intensiva se asocian a una alta complejidad asistencial y un alto coste monetario. Las recomendaciones sobre el cálculo de las necesidades de intensivistas adolecen de baja evidencia y favorecen un criterio estructural y asistencial (proporción médico/camas), lo que origina modelos reduccionistas. La Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva y Unidades Coronarias constituyó una comisión técnica para redactar unas recomendaciones sobre la necesidad de intensivistas en los servicios de medicina intensiva. La comisión técnica definió 5 actividades: 1) asistencial; 2) actividades extra-UCI; 3) seguridad del paciente y gestión clínica; 4) docencia; y 5) investigación. Para cada actividad o categoría se crearon subcomités específicos que definieron criterios para cuantificar el porcentaje que supone cada tarea para los intensivistas por rango profesional. Para las actividades asistenciales dentro y fuera de la UCI, y también para las actividades docentes e investigadoras, se siguió un sistema cuantitativo del número de procedimientos o tareas por tiempos estimados. En relación con las actividades no instrumentales, más difíciles de evaluar en tiempo real, se siguió una matriz de ámbito/productividad, definiendo los porcentajes aproximados de tiempo dedicado por categoría profesional. Se elaboró una hoja de cálculo, modificando un modelo previo, atendiendo la suma de horas estipuladas por contrato. Las competencias exigidas van más allá de la asistencia intra-UCI, y no pueden calcularse bajo criterios estructurales. La metodología sobre 5 actividades, la cuantificación de sus tareas específicas y tiempos y la construcción de una hoja de cálculo generan un instrumento adecuado de gestión (AU)
Departments of Critical Care Medicine are characterized by high medical assistance costs and great complexity. Published recommendations on determining the needs of medical staff in the DCCM are based on low levels of evidence and attribute excessive significance to the structural/welfare approach (physician-to-beds ratio), thus generating incomplete and minimalistic information. The Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units established a Technical Committee of experts, the purpose of which was to draft recommendations regarding requirements for medical professionals in the ICU. The Technical Committee defined the following categories: 1) Patient care-related aspects; 2) Activities outside the ICU; 3) Patient safety and clinical management aspects; 4) Teaching; and 5) Research. A subcommittee was established with experts pertaining to each activity category, defining criteria for quantifying the percentage time of the intensivists dedicated to each task, and taking into account occupational category. A quantitative method was applied, the parameters of which were the number of procedures or tasks and the respective estimated indicative times for patient care-related activities within or outside the context of the DCCM, as well as for teaching and research activities. Regarding non-instrumental activities, which are more difficult to evaluate in real time, a matrix of range versus productivity was applied, defining approximate percentages according to occupational category. All activities and indicative times were tabulated, and a spreadsheet was created that modified a previously designed model in order to perform calculations according to the total sum of hours worked and the hours stipulated in the respective work contract. The competencies needed and the tasks which a Department of Critical Care Medicine professional must perform far exceed those of a purely patient care-related character, and cannot be quantified using structural criteria. The method for describing the 5 types of activity, the quantification of specific tasks, the respective times needed for each task, and the generation of a spreadsheet led to the creation of a management instrument (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Cuidados Críticos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Avaliação das Necessidades/normas , Sociedades Médicas/organização & administração , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Governança Clínica/organização & administraçãoRESUMO
Objectives The current official model of training in Intensive Care Medicine (ICM) in Spain is based on exposure to experiences through clinical rotations. The main objective was to determine the level of competency (I novice to V independent practitioner) achieved by the residents at the end of the 3rd year of training (R3) in ICM through a simulation-based OSCE. Secondary objectives were: (1) To identify gaps in performance, and (2) To investigate the reliability and feasibility of conducting simulation-based assessment at multiple sites. Design Observational multicenter study. Setting Thirteen Spanish ICU Departments. Participants Thirty six R3. Intervention The participants performed on five, 15-min, high-fidelity crisis scenarios in four simulation centers. The performances were video recorded for later scoring by trained raters. Main variables of interes Via a Delphi technique, an independent panel of expert intensivists identified critical essential performance elements (CEPE) for each scenario to define the levels of competency. Results A total of 176 performances were analyzed. The internal consistency of the check-lists were adequate (KR-20 range 0.640.79). Inter-rater reliability was strong [median Intraclass Correlation Coefficient across scenarios: 0.89 (0.650.97)]. Competency levels achieved by R3 were: Level I (18.8%), II (35.2%), III (42.6%), IV/V (3.4%). Overall, a great heterogeneity in performance was observed. Conclusio The expected level of competency after one year in the ICU was achieved only in half of the performances. A more evidence-based educational approach is needed. Multiple center simulation-based assessment showed feasibility and reliability as an evaluation method of competency (AU)
Objetivos El modelo de formación en medicina intensiva (MI) en España se basa en la experiencia adquirida durante una serie de rotaciones programadas por diferentes áreas clínicas. El objetivo principal del estudio fue determinar el nivel de competencia (I principiante V autónomo) de los residentes de MI al finalizar el tercer año de residencia (R3) mediante una ECOE basada en simulación. Objetivos secundarios: 1) identificar brechas en el desempeño; 2) investigar la fiabilidad y validez de una ECOE simulada multicéntrica como método de evaluación. Diseño Estudio multicéntrico observacional. Ámbito Trece servicios españoles de Medicina Intensiva. Participantes Treinta y seis R3. Intervención Los 36 R3 participaron en cinco escenarios clínicos simulados de 15 minutos de duración en cuatro centros de simulación. Las actuaciones se grabaron en video y posteriormente se calificaron por pares de expertos. Variables de interés principales Un panel de intensivistas expertos seleccionó mediante el método Delphi los elementos críticos esenciales de cada escenario para definir los niveles de competencia. Resultados La consistencia interna de los listados de verificación fue adecuada (KR-20:0,64-0,79). La fiabilidad interjueces fue elevada (coeficiente de correlación intraclase [mediana]: 0,89 [0,65-0,97]). Los niveles de competencia conseguidos fueron: nivel I (18,8%), II (35,2%), III (42,6%), IV/V (3,4%). Globalmente, se observó una gran heterogeneidad en el desempeño. Conclusión El nivel de competencia esperado se logró únicamente en la mitad de las actuaciones. Se necesita un modelo de formación más basado en objetivos y evidencias. La evaluación mediante escenarios simulados en múltiples centros demostró ser factible y fiable (AU)
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação Baseada em Competências , Treinamento por Simulação , Internato e Residência , Competência Clínica , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
OBJETIVO: Valorar el grado en que las escalas pronósticas son capaces de predecir la mortalidad hospitalaria. DISEÑO: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo de 2 años. ÁMBITO: UCI médico-quirúrgica de un hospital de tercer nivel. PACIENTES: Todos los pacientes con síndrome de disfunción multiorgánica en el primer día de ingreso. Variables de interés: APACHE II y IV, SAPS II y III, MPM II y muerte hospitalaria. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 568 pacientes. Mortalidad hospitalaria: 39,8% (226 pacientes). Discriminación (área bajo la curva; IC 95%): APACHE IV (0,805; 0,751-0,858), SAPS II (0,755; 0,697-0,814), MPM II (0,748; 0,688-0,809), SAPS III (0,737; 0,675-0,799) y APACHE II (0,699; 0,633-0,765). El MPM II es el que mejor calibra, seguido por el SAPS III. APACHE II, SAPS II y APACHE IV presentan una muy mala calibración. Razón estandarizada de mortalidad (IC 95%): APACHE IV 1,9 (1,78-2,02); APACHE II 1,1 (1,07-1,13); SAPS III 1,1 (1,06-1,14); SAPS II 1,03 (1,01-1,05); MPM 0,9 (0,86-0,94). CONCLUSIONES: APACHE IV tiene la mejor capacidad discriminativa y mala calibración. MPM II tiene una buena discriminación y la mejor calibración. En cuanto al SAPS II, mantiene la segunda mejor discriminación y una mala calibración. El APACHE II muestra unos valores de calibración y discriminación que desaconsejarían su utilización en la actualidad, y el SAPS III mantiene una adecuada calibración y una discriminación moderada. La valoración de estos resultados podría marcar el inicio de nuevos estudios a nivel regional/nacional en determinadas poblaciones de pacientes críticos
OBJECTIVE: An evaluation is made of the hospital mortality predicting capacity of the main predictive scoring systems. DESIGN: A 2-year retrospective cohort study was carried out. SETTING: A third level ICU with surgical and medical patients. PATIENTS: All patients with multiorgan failure during the first day in the ICU. Main variables: APACHE II and IV, SAPS II and III, MPM II and hospital mortality. RESULTS: A total of 568 patients were included. Mortality rate: 39.8% (226 patients). Discrimination (area under the ROC curve; 95% CI): APACHE IV (0.805; 0.751-0.858), SAPS II (0.755; 0.697-0.814), MPM II (0.748; 0.688-0.809), SAPS III (0.737; 0.675-0.799) and APACHE II (0.699; 0.633-0.765). MPM II showed the best calibration, followed by SAPS III. APACHE II, SAPS II and APACHE IV showed very poor calibration. Standard mortality ratio (95% CI): APACHE IV 1.9 (1.78-2.02); APACHE II 1.1 (1.07-1.13); SAPS III 1.1 (1.06-1.14); SAPS II 1.03 (1.01-1.05); MPM 0.9 (0.86-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: APACHE IV showed the best discrimination, with poor calibration. MPM II showed good discrimination and the best calibration. SAPS II, in turn, showed the second best discrimination, with poor calibration. The APACHE II calibration and discrimination values currently disadvise its use. SAPS III showed good calibration with modest discrimination. Future studies at regional or national level and in certain critically ill populations are needed