Paracrine crosstalk between intestinal L- and D-cells controls secretion of glucagon-like peptide-1 in mice.

DPP-4 inhibitors, used for treatment of type 2 diabetes, act by increasing the concentrations of intact glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), but at the same time, they inhibit secretion of GLP-1, perhaps by a negative feedback mechanism. We hypothesized that GLP-1 secretion is feedback regulated by somatostatin (SS) from neighboring D-cells, and blocking this feedback circuit results in increased GLP-1 secretion. We used a wide range of experimental techniques, including gene expression analysis, immunohistochemical approaches, and the perfused mouse intestine to characterize the paracrine circuit controlling GLP-1 and SS. We show that 1) antagonizing the SS receptor (SSTr) 2 and SSTr5 led to increased GLP-1 and SS secretion in the mouse, 2) SS exhibits strong tonic inhibition of GLP-1 secretion preferentially through SSTr5, and 3) the secretion of S was GLP-1 receptor dependent. We conclude that SS is a tonic inhibitor of GLP-1 secretion, and interventions in the somatostain-GLP-1 paracrine loop lead to increased GLP-1 secretion.

GIP(3-30)NH2 is an efficacious GIP receptor antagonist in humans: a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) is an incretin hormone secreted postprandially from enteroendocrine K cells, but despite therapeutically interesting effects, GIP physiology in humans remains incompletely understood. Progress in this field could be facilitated by a suitable GIP receptor antagonist. For the first time in humans, we investigated the antagonistic properties of the naturally occurring GIP(3-30)NH2 in in vivo and in in vitro receptor studies. METHODS: In transiently transfected COS-7 cells, GIP(3-30)NH2 was evaluated with homologous receptor binding and receptor activation (cAMP accumulation) studies at the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2), glucagon, secretin and growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) receptors. Ten healthy men (eligibility criteria: age 20-30 years, HbA1c less than 6.5% [48 mmol/mol] and fasting plasma glucose [FPG] less than 7 mmol/l) were included in the clinical study. Data were collected as plasma and serum samples from a cubital vein cannula. As primary outcome, insulin secretion and glucose requirements were evaluated together with in a randomised, four-period, crossover design by infusing GIP(3-30)NH2 (800 pmol kg-1 min-1), GIP (1.5 pmol kg-1 min-1), a combination of these or placebo during hyperglycaemic clamp experiments. The content of the infusions were blinded to the study participants and experimental personnel. No study participants dropped out. RESULTS: GIP(3-30)NH2 neither bound, stimulated nor antagonised a series of related receptors in vitro. The elimination plasma half-life of GIP(3-30)NH2 in humans was 7.6 ± 1.4 min. Markedly larger amounts of glucose were required to maintain the clamp during GIP infusion compared with the other days. GIP-induced insulin secretion was reduced by 82% (p < 0.0001) during co-infusion with GIP(3-30)NH2, and the need for glucose was reduced to placebo levels. There were no effects of GIP(3-30)NH2 alone or of GIP with or without GIP(3-30)NH2 on plasma glucagon, GLP-1, somatostatin, triacylglycerols, cholesterol, glycerol or NEFA. GIP(3-30)NH2 administration was well tolerated and without side effects. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: We conclude that GIP(3-30)NH2 is an efficacious and specific GIP receptor antagonist in humans suitable for studies of GIP physiology and pathophysiology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT02747472. FUNDING: The study was funded by Gangstedfonden, the European Foundation for the Study of Diabetes, and Aase og Ejnar Danielsens fond.

Novel agonist and antagonist radioligands for the GLP-2 receptor. Useful tools for studies of basic GLP-2 receptor pharmacology.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) is a pro-glucagon-derived hormone secreted from intestinal enteroendocrine L cells with actions on gut and bones. GLP-2(1-33) is cleaved by DPP-4, forming GLP-2(3-33), having low intrinsic activity and competitive antagonism properties at GLP-2 receptors. We created radioligands based on these two molecules. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The methionine in position 10 of GLP-2(1-33) and GLP-2(3-33) was substituted with tyrosine (M10Y) enabling oxidative iodination, creating [125 I]-hGLP-2(1-33,M10Y) and [125 I]-hGLP-2(3-33,M10Y). Both were characterized by competition binding, on-and-off-rate determination and receptor activation. Receptor expression was determined by target-tissue autoradiography and immunohistochemistry. KEY RESULTS: Both M10Y-substituted peptides induced cAMP production via the GLP-2 receptor comparable to the wildtype peptides. GLP-2(3-33,M10Y) maintained the antagonistic properties of GLP-2(3-33). However, hGLP-2(1-33,M10Y) had lower arrestin recruitment than hGLP-2(1-33). High affinities for the hGLP-2 receptor were observed using [125 I]-hGLP-2(1-33,M10Y) and [125 I]-hGLP-2(3-33,M10Y) with KD values of 59.3 and 40.6 nM. The latter (with antagonistic properties) had higher Bmax and faster on and off rates compared to the former (full agonist). Both bound the hGLP-1 receptor with low affinity (Ki of 130 and 330 nM, respectively). Autoradiography in wildtype mice revealed strong labelling of subepithelial myofibroblasts, confirmed by immunohistochemistry using a GLP-2 receptor specific antibody that in turn was confirmed in GLP-2 receptor knock-out mice. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Two new radioligands with different binding kinetics, one a full agonist and the other a weak partial agonist with antagonistic properties were developed and subepithelial myofibroblasts identified as a major site for GLP-2 receptor expression.

GLP-2 and GIP exert separate effects on bone turnover: A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study in healthy young men.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-2 (GLP-2) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) both inhibit bone resorption in humans but the underlying mechanisms are poorly understood. In vitro, GLP-2 activates the GIP-receptor (GIPR). OBJECTIVE: Based on in vitro studies, we hypothesized that the antiresorptive effect of GLP-2 was mediated through the GIPR. This was tested using the selective GIPR-antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2. METHODS: The study was a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled, crossover study conducted at Hvidovre University Hospital, Denmark. Eight healthy young men were included and studied on four study days: GIP (200 µg), GLP-2 (800 µg), GIP(3-30)NH2 (800 pmol/kg/min) + GLP-2 (800 µg), and placebo. The main outcomes were bone resorption measured as collagen type 1 C-terminal telopeptide (CTX) and bone formation measured as procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP). RESULTS: CTX (mean ±â€¯SEM) significantly decreased after both GIP (to 55.3 ±â€¯6.3% of baseline at t = 90 min) and GLP-2 (to 60.5 ±â€¯5.0% of baseline at t = 180 min). The maximal reduction in CTX after GIP(3-30)NH2 + GLP-2 (to 63.2 ±â€¯3.1% of baseline) did not differ from GLP-2 alone (p = 0.95) nor did net AUC0-240 (-6801 ±â€¯879%*min vs -6027 ±â€¯648%*min, p = 0.56). At t = 30 min, GIP significantly (p < 0.0001) increased P1NP to 115.1 ±â€¯2.2% of baseline compared with 103.1 ±â€¯1.5% after placebo. Both GLP-2 and GIP(3-30)NH2 + GLP-2 significantly (p < 0.0001) decreased P1NP to 91.3 ±â€¯1.1% and 88.1 ±â€¯3.0% of baseline, respectively (at t = 45 min) compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: GIPR antagonism did not inhibit the GLP-2-induced reduction in bone resorption (CTX) in healthy young men. In contrast to GLP-2, GIP increased P1NP despite decreasing CTX indicating an uncoupling of bone resorption from formation. Thus, GLP-2 and GIP seem to exert separate effects on bone turnover in humans. CLINICAL TRIALS INFORMATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03159741).

Separate and Combined Glucometabolic Effects of Endogenous Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide and Glucagon-like Peptide 1 in Healthy Individuals.

The incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) are secreted postprandially and contribute importantly to postprandial glucose tolerance. In this study, we assessed the individual and combined contributions of endogenous GIP and GLP-1 to the postprandial changes in glucose and glucoregulatory hormones using the novel GIP receptor antagonist GIP(3-30)NH2 and the well-established GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin(9-39)NH2 During 4-h oral glucose tolerance tests (75 g) combined with an ad libitum meal test, 18 healthy men received on four separate days in randomized, double-blinded order intravenous infusions of A) GIP(3-30)NH2 (800 pmol/kg/min) plus exendin(9-39)NH2 (0-20 min: 1,000 pmol/kg/min; 20-240 min: 450 pmol/kg/min), B) GIP(3-30)NH2, C) exendin(9-39)NH2, and D) saline, respectively. Glucose excursions were significantly higher during A than during B, C, and D, while glucose excursions during B were higher than during C and D. Insulin secretion (assessed by C-peptide/glucose ratio) was reduced by 37 ± 16% (A), 30 ± 17% (B), and 8.6 ± 16% (C) compared with D (mean ± SD). A and C resulted in higher glucagon levels and faster gastric emptying. In conclusion, endogenous GIP affects postprandial plasma glucose excursions and insulin secretion more than endogenous GLP-1, but the hormones contribute additively to postprandial glucose regulation in healthy individuals.