RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a multifaceted disease potentially responsible for various clinical manifestations including gastro-intestinal symptoms. Several evidences suggest that the intestine is a critical site of immune cell development, gut microbiota could therefore play a key role in lung immune response. We designed a monocentric longitudinal observational study to describe the gut microbiota profile in COVID-19 patients and compare it to a pre-existing cohort of ventilated non-COVID-19 patients. METHODS: From March to December 2020, we included patients admitted for COVID-19 in medicine (43 not ventilated) or intensive care unit (ICU) (14 ventilated) with a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay in a respiratory tract sample. 16S metagenomics was performed on rectal swabs from these 57 COVID-19 patients, 35 with one and 22 with multiple stool collections. Nineteen non-COVID-19 ICU controls were also enrolled, among which 14 developed ventilator-associated pneumonia (pneumonia group) and five remained without infection (control group). SARS-CoV-2 viral loads in fecal samples were measured by qPCR. RESULTS: Although similar at inclusion, Shannon alpha diversity appeared significantly lower in COVID-19 and pneumonia groups than in the control group at day 7. Furthermore, the microbiota composition became distinct between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 groups. The fecal microbiota of COVID-19 patients was characterized by increased Bacteroides and the pneumonia group by Prevotella. In a distance-based redundancy analysis, only COVID-19 presented significant effects on the microbiota composition. Moreover, patients in ICU harbored increased Campylobacter and decreased butyrate-producing bacteria, such as Lachnospiraceae, Roseburia and Faecalibacterium as compared to patients in medicine. Both the stay in ICU and patient were significant factors affecting the microbiota composition. SARS-CoV-2 viral loads were higher in ICU than in non-ICU patients. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we identified distinct characteristics of the gut microbiota in COVID-19 patients compared to control groups. COVID-19 patients were primarily characterized by increased Bacteroides and decreased Prevotella. Moreover, disease severity showed a negative correlation with butyrate-producing bacteria. These features could offer valuable insights into potential targets for modulating the host response through the microbiota and contribute to a better understanding of the disease's pathophysiology. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CER-VD 2020-00755 (05.05.2020) & 2017-01820 (08.06.2018).
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Microbiota , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Bacteroides , ButiratosRESUMO
In clinical practice, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been established as an unparalleled therapy to date for multiple recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). The implementation of the FMT in practice requires a significant investment to meet legal, security and financial requirements. Research on the microbiota is booming and multiple investigations on FMT in indications other than CDI are ongoing.
En pratique clinique, la transplantation de microbiote fécal (TMF) s'est établie comme une thérapie sans équivalent à ce jour pour les infections à Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) multirécidivantes. La mise en place de la TMF en pratique demande un investissement important pour répondre aux exigences légales, sécuritaires et financières. La recherche sur le microbiote est en plein essor et de multiples recherches sur la TMF dans d'autres indications que pour l'infection à C. difficile sont en cours.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Microbiota , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Humanos , Recidiva , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Humanos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/imunologia , Medição de Risco , Recidiva , Masculino , Feminino , Resultado do Tratamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , IdosoRESUMO
A novel KPC variant, KPC-41, was identified in a Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolate from Switzerland. This ß-lactamase possessed a three amino-acid insertion (Pro-Asn-Lys) located between amino acids 269 and 270 compared to the KPC-3 amino acid sequence. Cloning and expression of the bla KPC-41 gene in Escherichia coli, followed by determination of MIC values and kinetic parameters, showed that KPC-41, compared to KPC-3, has an increased affinity to ceftazidime and a decreased sensitivity to avibactam, leading to resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam once produced in K. pneumoniae Furthermore, KPC-41 exhibited a drastic decrease of its carbapenemase activity. This report highlights that a diversity of KPC variants conferring resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam already circulate in Europe.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is associated with a substantial Quality of life impact on patients that has not been so far measured with a generic validated instrument. METHODS: A prospective study was performed in 7 French acute-care settings in patients presenting with a bacteriologically-confirmed CDI. The EQ-5D-3 L was filled in by patients at 7 ± 2 days after CDI diagnosis to describe their state of health at that date as well as their state of health immediately before the CDI episode (baseline). Individual utility decrement was obtained by subtracting the corresponding utilities. The Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY) loss was calculated by multiplying the days spent from baseline to the date of the interview, by the decrement of utility. A multivariate analysis of variance of the utility decrement according to CDI and patients characteristics was performed. RESULTS: Eighty patients were enrolled (mean age: 69.4 years, 55% females). The utility scores dropped from a mean 0.542 (SD: 0.391) at baseline to 0.050 (SD: 0.404) during the CDI episode with a mean adjusted utility decrement of 0.492 (SD: 0.398) point. This decrement increased significantly with CDI severity (Zar score ≥ 3) (p = 0.001), in patients with a positive baseline utility (p = 0.032), in women as compared to men (p = 0.041) and in patients aged more than 65 years (p = 0.041). No association with the Charlson index was found. The associated QALY loss not integrating the excess mortality was 0.028 (SD: 0.053). CONCLUSIONS: The impact on quality of life of CDI episodes is major and translates in a substantial QALY loss despite their short duration.
Assuntos
Infecções por Clostridium , Qualidade de Vida , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Idoso , Feminino , França , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) raised, in the recent years, a growing interest, mostly in Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). The concept of FMT is quite simple based on the administration of fecal matter from a healthy donor to a patient with a disease related to the gut microbiota imbalance (dysbiosis). Although the theory seems straightforward, the fine mechanisms are multiple and not yet completely understood. In Switzerland, FMT is considered as a drug under the pharmacist responsibility. The only official indication for FMT is multi-recurrent CDI. For practical reasons, most of the FMT are performed with fresh stools, but development of frozen forms and capsules should considerably enhance treatment delivery. Other indications are currently investigated but not yet in the clinical routine.
Le microbiote intestinal est devenu depuis plusieurs années une cible thérapeutique, notamment dans les infections à Clostridioides difficile. La transplantation de microbiote fécal (TMF) consiste à administrer une suspension de matières fécales issue d'un donneur sain à un patient présentant une pathologie en lien avec le microbiote intestinal. Les mécanismes d'action sont multiples et pas totalement connus. En Suisse, la TMF est considérée comme un médicament. A ce jour, la seule indication recommandée est l'infection multirécidivante à C. difficile. Le passage au transplant congelé et à la forme orale par capsule simplifie considérablement l'accès à ce traitement. D'autres indications potentielles sont en cours d'investigation ne permettant pas encore une utilisation en pratique courante.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Humanos , SuíçaRESUMO
PURPOSE: Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed the non-inferiority of fidaxomicin compared with vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) treatment and its superiority regarding recurrence rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate fidaxomicin's efficacy in clinical practice. METHODS: This single-center prospective cohort study included hospitalized patients treated with fidaxomicin for CDI. Demographic, clinical and biological data were collected. Primary outcome was efficacy of fidaxomicin (clinical cure, recurrence and global cure) at 10 weeks. Secondary outcome was efficacy among different subgroups. RESULTS: Ninety-nine patients were included: 42 severe CDI, 16 complicated CDI and 41 recurrent CDI. Rates of clinical cure, recurrence and global cure were 87, 15 and 59%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed a higher recurrence rate for patients with recurrent CDI compared with first episode (8 vs. 26%; p = 0.04). Binary toxin was associated with severe/complicated CDI (80 vs. 50%; p < 0.01) and recurrence (32 vs. 7%; p < 0.01). Fidaxomicin was used as a first line for 83% of the patients with recurrence and for only 52% of first episodes even though 86% had recurrence's risk factors. CONCLUSION: Compared with RCTs, fidaxomicin in real world is used for patients with more severe and recurrent CDI, but clinical cure and recurrence rates were similar. Comparative studies are needed in these specific subgroups. Our data also illustrate clinicians' difficulty to define a "patient at risk for recurrence" among the first episodes. Finally, we showed that binary toxin could be important in the screening for severity and recurrence risks.
Assuntos
Aminoglicosídeos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Clostridium/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Clostridioides difficile/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Fidaxomicina , França , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Detailed comparative assessment of procedure-related factors associated with faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) efficacy in Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is limited. AIMS: We took advantage of the differences in procedures at the various French FMT centres to determine clinical and procedure-related factors associated with FMT success in CDI. METHODS: We performed a nationwide retrospective multicentre cohort study. All FMTs performed within The French Faecal Transplant Group for CDI from 2018 to 2022 were included. Clinical data were collected retrospectively from recipient medical files, characteristics of stool transplant preparations were prospectively collected by each Pharmacy involved. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using Fisher's test and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-eight FMTs were performed for 617 patients in 17 centres. The overall efficacy of FMT was 84.3% (520/617), with 0.5% of severe adverse events possibly related to FMT (3/658). Forty-seven patients were treated at the first recurrence of CDI with a similar success rate (85.1%). Severe chronic kidney disease (CKD; OR: 2.18, 95%CI [1.20-3.88]), non-severe refractory CDI (OR: 15.35, [1.94-318.2]), the use of ≥ 80% glycerol (OR: 2.52, [1.11-5.67]), insufficient bowel cleansing (OR: 5.47, [1.57-20.03]) and partial FMT retention (OR: 9.97, [2.62-48.49]) were associated with CDI recurrence within 8 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Conditions of transplant manufacturing, bowel cleansing, and a route of delivery tailored to the patient's characteristics are key factors in optimising FMT efficacy. FMT at first recurrence showed high success in real-life practice, whereas it had lower efficacy in severe CDI and non-severe refractory CDI.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an established therapy for recurrent C. difficile infection, and recent studies have reported encouraging results of FMT in patients with ulcerative colitis. Few international consensus guidelines exist for this therapy, and thus FMT policies and practices differ among European countries. As of 2019, stool transplants are considered a non-standardised medicinal product in Switzerland, and a standardised production process requires authorisation by the Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products. This authorisation leads to prolonged administrative procedures and increasing costs, which reduces treatment accessibility. In particular, patients with ulcerative colitis in Switzerland can only benefit from FMT off-label, even though it is a valid therapeutic option. Therefore, this study summarised the available data on FMT and established a framework for the standardised use of FMT. METHODS: A panel of Swiss gastroenterologists with a special interest in inflammatory bowel disease was established to identify the current key issues of FMT. After a comprehensive review of the literature, statements were formulated about FMT indications, donor screening, stool transplant preparation and administration, and safety aspects. The panel then voted on the statements following the Delphi process; the statements were reformulated and revoted until a consensus was reached. The manuscript was then reviewed by an infectiologist (the head of Lausanne's FMT centre). RESULTS: The established statements are summarised in the supplementary tables in the appendix to this paper. The working group hopes these will help standardise FMT practice in Switzerland and contribute to making faecal microbiota transplantation a safe and accessible treatment for patients with recurrent C. difficile infections and selected patients with ulcerative colitis, as well as other indications in the future.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Colite Ulcerativa , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Humanos , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Colite Ulcerativa/etiologia , Colite Ulcerativa/terapia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Doenças Inflamatórias Intestinais/terapia , Suíça , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a critical nosocomial infection with more than 124,000 cases per year in Europe and a mortality rate of 15-17 %. The standard of care (SoC) is antibiotic treatment. Unfortunately, the relapse rate is high (â¼35 %) and SoC is significantly less effective against recurrent infection (rCDI). Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is a recommended treatment against rCDI from the second recurrence episode and has an efficacy of 90 %. The formulation of diluted donor stool deserves innovation because its actual administration routes deserve optimization (naso-duodenal/jejunal tubes, colonoscopy, enema or several voluminous oral capsules). Encapsulation of model bacteria strains in gel beads were first investigated. Then, the encapsulation method was applied to diluted stools. Robust spherical gel beads were obtained. The mean particle size was around 2 mm. A high loading of viable microorganisms was obtained for model strains and fecal samples. For plate-counting, values ranged from 1015 to 1017 CFU/g for single and mixed model strains, and 106 to 108 CFU/g for fecal samples. This corresponded to a viability of 30 % to 60 % as assessed by flow cytometry. This novel formulation is promising as the technology is applicable to both model strains and bacteria contained in the gut microbiota.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Humanos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Resultado do Tratamento , Fezes/microbiologia , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Infecções por Clostridium/microbiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Fecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) has become the preferred treatment for recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infections (CDI). However, donor screening is a complex process that varies between countries. The primary objective of screening is to prevent the transfer of potential pathogens from the donor to the recipient via feces. Many guidelines recommend Cytomegalovirus (CMV) testing as part of donor screening, but is the risk of CMV transmission well supported by evidence? MATERIALS/METHODS: A French prospective cross-sectional multicenter single-arm study estimated the frequency of detection of CMV in the stool of voluntary healthy donors selected for FMT. All preselected donors were tested for CMV antibodies in blood, and if positive, CMV DNA PCR was performed on whole blood and stool. For samples CMV positive in stool PCR, or case of serological markers positive for IgM, we planned isolation of CMV in cell culture. RESULTS: From June 1, 2016, to July 31, 2017, 500 healthy donors (250 per center) were recruited and 483 included. Of these, 301 were CMV seronegative, and 182 tested positive for CMV IgM and/or IgG. Stool CMV PCR was performed in 162 donors. In two cases, the initial analysis was positive, but below the limit of quantification. Repeated PCR tests using Siemens and Altostar assays were negative. No infectious CMV could be detected in cell culture of these two samples and in the stool of 6 CMV IgM-positive donors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that healthy volunteers with positive CMV serology do not shed CMV DNA in their stool, as detected by PCR or cell culture. This study provides another argument to remove CMV screening for FMT donors.
Assuntos
Infecções por Citomegalovirus , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Humanos , Citomegalovirus , Estudos Transversais , Estudos Prospectivos , Anticorpos Antivirais , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/terapia , Imunoglobulina MRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The role of the gut microbiota in health and the pathogenesis of several diseases has been highlighted in recent years. Even though the precise mechanisms involving the microbiome in these ailments are still unclear, microbiota-modulating therapies have been developed. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has shown significant results against Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), and its potential has been investigated for other diseases. Unfortunately, the technical aspects of the treatment make it difficult to implement. Pharmaceutical technology approaches to encapsulate microorganisms could play an important role in providing this treatment and render the treatment modalities easier to handle. AREAS COVERED: After an overview of CDI, this narrative review aims to discuss the current formulations for FMT and specifically addresses the technical aspects of the treatment. This review also distinguishes itself by focusing on the hurdles and emphasizing the possible improvements using pharmaceutical technologies. EXPERT OPINION: FMT is an efficient treatment for recurrent CDI. However, its standardization is overlooked. The approach of industrial and hospital preparations of FMT are different, but both show promise in their respective methodologies. Novel FMT formulations could enable further research on dysbiotic diseases in the future.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Microbioma Gastrointestinal , Infecções por Clostridium/terapia , Disbiose , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal/métodos , Humanos , Recidiva , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
Objectives: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea, often complicated by severe infection and recurrence with increased morbidity and mortality. Data from large cohorts in Switzerland are scarce. We aimed to describe diagnostic assays, treatment, outcomes, and risk factors for CDI in a large cohort of patients in Switzerland. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of CDI episodes diagnosed in patients from two tertiary care hospitals in Switzerland. During a 3-month follow-up, we used a composite outcome combining clinical cure at day 10, recurrence at week 8, or death, to evaluate a patient's response. Unfavorable outcomes consisted in the occurrence of any of these events. Results: From January 2014 to December 2018, we included 826 hospitalized patients with documented CDI. Overall, 299 patients (36.2%) had a severe infection. Metronidazole was used in 566 patients (83.7%), compared to 82 patients (12.1%) treated with vancomycin and 28 patients (4.1%) treated with fidaxomicin. Overall mortality at week 8 was at 15.3% (112/733). Eighty-six patients (12.7%) presented with clinical failure at day 10, and 78 (14.9%) presented with recurrence within 8 weeks; 269 (39.8%) met the composite outcome of death, clinical failure, or recurrence. The Charlson Comorbidity Index score (p < 0.001), leukocytes > 15 G/L (p = 0.008), and the use of metronidazole (p = 0.012) or vancomycin (p = 0.049) were factors associated with the composite outcome. Conclusions: Our study provides valuable insights on CDI treatment and outcomes in Switzerland, highlights the heterogeneity in practices among centers, and underlines the need for the active monitoring of clinical practices and their impact on clinical outcomes through large multicentric cohorts.
RESUMO
We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of hepatitis B vaccination among 40 human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with isolated positivity for antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen. No baseline factors were found to be predictive of an anamnestic response, which occurred in 32.5% of the patients. The overall response rate among patients without an anamnestic response was 74.0% after 3-6 vaccine doses.
Assuntos
Infecções por HIV/imunologia , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/sangue , Antígenos do Núcleo do Vírus da Hepatite B/imunologia , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/efeitos adversos , Vacinas contra Hepatite B/imunologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Memória Imunológica , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Clostridioides difficile (formerly Clostridium) is a major cause of healthcare associated diarrhea, and is increasingly present in the community. Historically, C difficile infection was considered easy to diagnose and treat. Over the past two decades, however, diagnostic techniques have changed in line with a greater understanding of the physiopathology of C difficile infection and the use of new therapeutic molecules. The evolution of diagnosis showed there was an important under- and misdiagnosis of C difficile infection, emphasizing the importance of algorithms recommended by European and North American infectious diseases societies to obtain a reliable diagnosis. Previously, metronidazole was considered the reference drug to treat C difficile infection, but more recently vancomycin and other newer drugs are shown to have higher cure rates. Recurrence of infection represents a key parameter in the evaluation of new drugs, and the challenge is to target the right population with the adapted therapeutic molecule. In multiple recurrences, fecal microbiota transplantation is recommended. New approaches, including antibodies, vaccines, and new molecules are already available or in the pipeline, but more data are needed to support the inclusion of these in practice guidelines. This review aims to provide a baseline for clinicians to understand and stratify their choice in the diagnosis and treatment of C difficile infection based on the most recent data available.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile/isolamento & purificação , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/diagnóstico , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/terapia , Algoritmos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Vacinas Bacterianas , Biomarcadores/análise , Clostridioides difficile/imunologia , Enterocolite Pseudomembranosa/epidemiologia , Transplante de Microbiota Fecal , Fezes/microbiologia , Humanos , RecidivaRESUMO
In highly experienced HIV-1-infected patients, a ritonavir-boosted darunavir-containing regimen was associated with dramatic immunological and virological efficacy. Patients harbouring viruses with amprenavir-specific resistance profiles, such as I50V or V32I + I47V, failed on a darunavir/ritonavir-containing regimen. These key amprenavir mutations were also selected at the time of failure, suggesting their impact on darunavir efficacy.