Meta-analysis of cardiovascular superiority trials published in the New England Journal of Medicine to elucidate the concept of superiority margin.

OBJECTIVE: To show that overpowered trials claim statistical significance detouring clinical relevance and warrant the need of superiority margin to avoid such misinterpretation. DESIGN: Selective review of articles published in the New England Journal of Medicine between 1 January 2015 and 31 December 2018 and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses checklist. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES AND METHODS: Published superiority trials evaluating cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus with positive efficacy outcome were eligible. Fixed effects meta-analysis was performed using RevMan V.5.3 to calculate overall effect estimate, pooled HR and it was compared with mean clinically significant difference. RESULTS: Thirteen eligible trials with 164 721 participants provided the quantitative data for this review. Largely, the primary efficacy endpoint in these trials was the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring rehospitalisation, coronary revascularisation and fatal or non-fatal stroke. The pooled HR was 0.86 (95% CI 0.84 to 0.89, I2=45%) which was lower than the mean clinically significant difference of 0.196 (19.6%, range: 0.09375-0.35) of these studies. There was a wide 95% CI in these studies from 0.56 to 0.99. The upper margin of CI in most of the studies was close to the line of no difference. Absolute risk reduction was small (1.19% to 2.3%) translating to a high median number needed to treat of 63 (range: 43 to 84) over a follow-up duration of 2.95 years. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis indicate that overpowered trials give statistically significant results undermining clinical relevance. To avoid such misuse of current statistical tools, there is a need to derive superiority margin. We hope to generate debate on considering clinically significant difference, used to calculate sample size, as superiority margin.

A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacy, tolerability, and cost of oral iron preparations in iron-deficiency anemia in pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, and cost of four commonly prescribed oral iron preparations: ferrous sulfate (FS), ferrous fumarate (FF), ferrous ascorbate (FA), and carbonyl iron (CI) in the treatment of iron-deficiency anemia (IDA) in pregnant women. METHODS: It was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded endpoint (PROBE) design with four parallel active control groups: FS, FF, FA, CI. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants becoming non-anemic (Hb ≥ 11 g%) at the end of the study period. The secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants achieving normal red blood corpuscular indices such as mean corpuscular volume, mean corpuscular hemoglobin, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration; the proportion of participants achieving normal iron indices such as serum iron, serum ferritin, total iron-binding capacity, and transferrin saturation; and comparison of incidence of any adverse events between treatment groups and comparison of costs of individual drug therapy between treatment groups. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty patients were randomized to four different groups (n = 30). The results of the present study show that all the four iron salts at the dose of 200 mg elemental iron per day were equally effective in improving hemoglobin concentration and other hematological parameters. The adverse effects were more common in the FF group (56.7%). The pharmacoeconomic analysis showed that all the drugs are equally cost-effective. CONCLUSION: To conclude from the results of the present study, it can be said that FS, FF, FA, and CI are equally effective in treating IDA and they can be prescribed interchangeably.

Molecular mechanisms underlying attenuation of cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury by epicatechin gallate.

Cisplatin, a platinum compound, is used as a first-line agent against various forms of solid cancers. Nephrotoxicity is an important adverse effect of cisplatin therapy, which involves increased oxidative stress, inflammation, apoptosis, and activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway. It is well known that the bioactive compounds present in green tea are used to treat various disorders due to their biological activities. With this background, the present study was aimed to investigate the effect of epicatechin gallate (ECG), a green tea polyphenol, in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. To achieve this, ECG (1.25, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg; intraperitoneal (i.p.)) was administered to male albino Wistar rats for the period of 10 days. On the 7th day, a single i.p. injection of cisplatin (8 mg/kg) was injected into rats to produce kidney injury and the animals were then killed on the 10th day. Cisplatin toxicity was associated with enhanced oxidative stress, impaired renal function along with marked tubular necrosis in Histopathology. Furthermore, cisplatin activated the MAPK pathway, which contributed to inflammation and apoptosis in the kidney of treated rats. In contrast, ECG (5 mg/kg) pretreatment normalized cisplatin-induced oxidative stress, renal function, and histopathological changes. ECG also prevented the activation of the MAPK pathway, and attenuated inflammation and apoptosis in rats. These findings suggest that ECG prevented cisplatin-induced oxidative stress, inflammation, and apoptosis by downregulating the MAPK pathway and resulted in improved renal function.

Physical therapy intervention versus corticosteroid injection for lateral elbow tendinopathy. Does slow and steady win the race? - A systematic review.

Background: Lateral elbow tendinopathy is one of the most common chronic and degenerative diseases which significantly affects quality of life and the activities of daily living of a person. The following is a systematic review reporting a comparison between physical therapy intervention and corticosteroid injection for the treatment of lateral elbow tendinopathy. Method: PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched using headings related to treatment options for Lateral elbow tendinopathy. The following keywords were used: lateral epicondylitis, physical therapy, and corticosteroid injection. Result: We descriptively analyzed and reviewed a total of 12 studies including a total of 1253 patients for lateral elbow tendinopathy. The physical therapy intervention included interventions like electrotherapy, manual therapy, and exercise. The studies included had an overall low to unknown risk of bias. Conclusion: Our review suggests corticosteroid injection provides beneficial short-term effects and physical therapy interventions provide intermediate to long-term effects, less additional treatment and low recurrence rate in patients with lateral elbow tendinopathy. Although high-quality randomized control trials are required in order to have a better understanding of both intervention types.

Dose-dependent renoprotection efficacy of sglt2 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

AIM: To compare the relative effects of different dosages of sodium-glucose cotransport inhibitors (SGLT2i) for renoprotection in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: The study searched different databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science) for studies comparing dose-dependent renoprotective efficacy defined as a decline in eGFR with the different "-flozins namely Empagliflozin, Canagliflozin, Dapagliflozin, Ertugliflozin, Ipragliflozin, Luseogliflozin, Remogliflozin and Sotagliflozin. The studies were compared with the Bayesian approach of network meta-analysis coupled with the random-effect model using the Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2.0), and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) score was allotted to each dosage of different SGLT-2i. RESULTS: A total of 43,434 citations were identified, out of which forty-five randomized trials with 48,067 patients, mentioning the flozin dose and eGFR as an endpoint, were found to be eligible for further analysis. The median duration of the follow-up in the trials was 12 months (IQR 5.5-16 months). Canagliflozin 100 mg demonstrated distinct eGFR benefit with an odds ratio of 2.3 (CI 0.72-3.9) compared to placebo. A statistically non-significant eGFR benefit was observed with all other "-flozins." Canagliflozin 100 mg drug dose category showed the highest sucra rank probability score of 93%, followed by the Canagliflozin 300 mg and Dapagliflozin 5 mg with sucra rank probability scores of 69% and 65%, respectively. The Flozin-dose assessment against eGFR was similar to the albumin-creatinine ratios as the secondary endpoint in the SUCRA ranking. CONCLUSION: The renoprotective efficacy of SGLT2i is independent of the incremental doses suggesting lower doses may suffice for renal outcomes.

Essential oil nebulization in mild COVID-19(EONCO): Early phase exploratory clinical trial.

Background: Medications studied for therapeutic benefits in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have produced inconclusive efficacy results except for steroids. Objective: A prospective randomized open-label, parallel-arm Phase I/II clinical trial was planned to compare essential oil (EO) blend versus placebo nebulization in mild COVID-19. Methods: A Phase I safety evaluation was carried out in a single ascending and multiple ascending dose study designs. We assessed Phase II therapeutic efficacy on COVID-19 and general respiratory symptoms on days 0, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14 on the predesigned case record form. Viremia was evaluated on day 0, day 5, and day 10. Results: Dose-limiting toxicities were not reached with the doses, frequencies, and duration studied, thus confirming the formulation's preliminary safety. General respiratory symptoms (p < 0.001), anosmia (p < 0.05), and dysgeusia (p < 0.001) benefited significantly with the use of EO blend nebulization compared to placebo. Symptomatic COVID-19 participants with mild disease did not show treatment benefits in terms of symptomatic relief (p = 1.0) and viremia clearance (p = 0.74) compared to the placebo. EO blend was found to be associated with the reduced evolution of symptoms in previously asymptomatic reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-positive study participants (p = 0.034). Conclusion: EO nebulization appears to be a safer add-on symptomatic relief approach for mild COVID-19. However, the direct antiviral action of the EO blend needs to be assessed with different concentrations of combinations of individual phytochemicals in the EO blend.

Comparison of master two-step exercise stress test versus six-min walk test in patients tested positive for SARS-CoV-2.

Background and Aim: There has been a lack of uniformity on how to triage coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients visiting the emergency units of hospitals. Triage tools are themselves spreading the pandemic in hospital areas. The present study compared a master two-step (M2ST) exercise stress test versus a 6-min walk test (6MWT) in COVID-19-positive patients visiting the emergency unit of a hospital. Materials and Methods: Thirty-nine patients underwent 6MWT followed by M2ST, while another set of 38 patients underwent M2ST followed by 6MWT in this randomized, crossover, open-label, and noninferiority study. The exercise tests assessed the change from baseline in SpO2, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate, blood pressure, exertion, and dyspnea on the modified-Borg scale. Results: Noninferiority was established for SpO2 (P < 0.05), systolic blood pressure (SBP; P < 0.001), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP; P < 0.05), but not for HR (P = 0.3) and respiratory rate (P = 0.6). The difference between the pretest and posttest (delta change) values for the parameters SpO2, respiratory rate, HR, SBP, and DBP correlated significantly (P < 0.001) with Pearson correlation coefficient (r = 0.764, 0.783, 0.473, 0.838, and 0.783, respectively). The delta change values of modified-Borg scale for dyspnea (P = 0.291) and exertion (P = 0.208) were statistically insignificant between the two exercise tests. However, the correlation between the tests was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Conclusion: M2ST, a timesaving, cost-effective, and easy to perform exercise stress test, has been identified as a reliable alternative for 6MWT.