Patient Safety and Surgery: the Experience of the Lombardy Region. A Project on External Evaluation of Best Practices Implementation.

Meta-analysis studies published over the past 20 years document that approximately 10 -14 % of hospitalised patients have an adverse event in Surgery and at least half of these adverse events are considered preventable using the current standards of care. In order to improve the safety of surgical patients and increasing adherence to current standard of care in surgery, including communication within the team and teamwork, in 2007 the WHO launched the campaign "Safe Surgery Saves Lives". The WHO has also built a checklist for safety in the operating room containing 19 item in support of the operating team. The Ministry of Health in 2009 has taken the instruments produced by WHO in the "Guide to Safety in the operating room: Recommendations and Checklist". Studies conducted in industrialized countries report a strong heterogeneity in compliance to the check list for the surgical safety, with a range of between 38% and 96%. The aim of this project was to adopt the methodology of the external "peer review" to improve quality and patient safety applied to the surgical process and assess the degree of implementation of good practice in the operating room, both in public and private structures. Between 2015 and 2018 we have carried out 16 external evaluation visits. These visits included a first plenary session followed by the inspection of the operating theaters identified and a second plenary session. Several factors emerged during the visits; these factors represent both the strengths and criticalities of the organizations. The creation of a team of experts, coordinated by the Lombardy Region with the role of leadership, using the "peer review" methodology, is the leverage to promote among operators the growth of awareness of the usefulness of the tools.

Physician-to-Nurse Handover: A Systematic Review on the Effectiveness of Different Models.

OBJECTIVES: Effective professional communication and accurate transfer of relevant clinical information are crucial components of healthcare delivery. National and international health authorities strongly recommend the adoption of effective handover practice. Still, scant evidence is available on the impact of different multiprofessional handover models. METHODS: We carried out a systematic review following the Prepared Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines to retrieve, pool, and critically appraise the available evidence on the effectiveness of different physician-to-nurse handover models adopted in inpatient settings. RESULTS: We identified 1.243 citations searching the databases Medline, Embase, and CINAHL. After screening, 10 studies were included in the review reporting results on the effectiveness of 8 different handover models, measured on 44 different outcomes, grouped into: (1) process of care and efficiency outcomes, (2) patients' outcomes, and (3) healthcare professionals-related outcomes. Overall, applying structured handover tools improve healthcare practice and selected outcomes; however, not only solid evidence on the effectiveness of different handover models is scant but also global consensus is lacking on which standardized measures and indicators to use to assess their impact. CONCLUSIONS: In times of healthcare delivery models of growing complexity, multiprofessional handover is a key component of care paths. Although there is overall consensus on the need for improving the quality and safety of multiprofessional handover, the evidence on the tools available to achieve it and the metrics to measure their impact is heterogeneous. We urge that rigorous studies are conducted to inform the planning, implementation, and monitoring of effective handover, with the ultimate aim of improving quality of care and patient safety.

Lipoprotein(a), fibrinogen and vascular mortality in an elderly northern Italian population.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High lipoprotein a [Lp(a)] and fibrinogen levels are suggested risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke morbidity and mortality. Experimental data strongly suggest that the mechanisms of atherothrombosis include an interaction between fibrinogen and Lp(a), but little clinical evidence of a synergism between these two parameters has been reported. DESIGN AND METHODS: Within the frame of a prospective population study conducted in the area of Cremona (Lombardy, Italy), 343 women and 216 men aged > or =65 years were evaluated for clinical and biochemical cardiovascular risk factors. Lp(a) levels > or =30 mg/dL were observed in 22.7% and 23.9% of men and women, respectively. Fibrinogen levels were higher in women (p<0.0001). After a median follow-up of 6.3 years 107 deaths were recorded, of which 33 were due to CHD or ischemic stroke. RESULTS: The combined incidence rate of CHD and stroke mortality increased from 10.8 (per 1000 person-years) for subjects with either Lp(a) > or =30 mg/dL or fibrinogen within the 5th quintile of the gender-specific distribution to 38.4 for subjects with both Lp(a) > or =30 mg/dL and fibrinogen within the 5th quintile. Age (p<0.0001), insulin (p<0.0002) and the combination of high Lp(a) and fibrinogen (hazard ratio=3.11, p=0.014), but not fibrinogen or Lp(a) levels in isolation, were independent predictors of CHD and stroke mortality. In a subgroup of 447 subjects in whom C-reactive protein (CRP) was measured, CRP levels were not predictive of combined CHD and stroke mortality. INTERPRETATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results obtained in a relatively small population of elderly subjects, the association of high Lp(a) and fibrinogen levels appears to carry an increased risk of pooled CHD and stroke mortality.