RESUMO
Antimicrobial resistance is a major global health problem, and, among Gram-positive bacteria, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) represents a serious threat. MRSA causes a wide range of infections, including bacteremia, which, due to the limited use of ß-lactams, is difficult to treat. This study aimed to analyze 51 MRSA isolates collected in 2018 from samples of patients with bacteremia from two hospitals of the Metropolitan Health Service of Santiago, Chile, both in their resistance profile and in the identification of virulence factors. In addition, genomic characterization was carried out by the WGS of an isolate that was shown to be the one of greatest concern (N°. 42) due to its intermediate resistance to vancomycin, multiple virulence factors and being classified as ST8 PVL-positive. In our study, most of the isolates turned out to be multidrug-resistant, but there are still therapeutic options, such as tetracycline, rifampicin, chloramphenicol and vancomycin, which are currently used for MRSA infections; however, 18% were PVL positive, which suggests greater virulence of these isolates. It was determined that isolate N°42 is grouped within the USA300-LV strains (ST8, PVL+, COMER+); however, it has been suggested that, in Chile, a complete displacement of the PVL-negative ST5 clone has not occurred.
RESUMO
Coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) are frequently isolated from blood cultures, where they may be only a contaminant or the cause of bacteraemia. Determining whether an isolate of CNS represents a true CNS bacteraemia is difficult, and there is no single criterion with sufficient specificity. The aim of this study was to assess those clinical, microbiological, pathogenic and genotypic features that characterize true CNS bacteraemia. Twenty patients having two or more blood cultures positive for CNS and 20 patients with only one positive blood culture were studied. Significant bacteraemia was defined according to clinical and laboratory criteria. Incubation time for blood cultures to become positive, macroscopic appearance of colonies, species determination, biotype, susceptibility to antimicrobials, PFGE pattern and adherence capacity were all studied. Clinical bacteraemia was present in 16/20 patients with two or more positive blood cultures and in 2/20 patients with only one positive blood culture. A significant difference was seen in the median time to positivity between the 18 clinical bacteraemias and 22 contaminations (23.6 versus 29.2 h; P = 0.04, Wilcoxon). There was also a significant difference between the two groups in the median absorbance of the slime test (1.36 versus 0.58; P = 0.005). All significant bacteraemias with two or more positive blood cultures had the same species identified, the same antimicrobial susceptibility pattern and the same PFGE pattern. In two patients with true bacteraemia with only one positive blood culture, the incubation time for the culture to turn positive was <24 h and the slime production absorbance was >2.5. The most useful parameters for the diagnosis of true CNS bacteraemia for patients with two positive blood cultures were incubation time until positive, species identification, antimicrobial susceptibility pattern, slime production and PFGE pattern. For patients with only one blood culture positive for CNS, the useful parameters for prediction of true bacteraemia were incubation time until positive and slime production, both of which are simple, low-cost tests.