Chronic kidney disease progression in patients with resistant hypertension subject to 2 therapeutic strategies: Intensification with loop diuretics vs aldosterone antagonists. / Progresión de la enfermedad renal crónica en pacientes con hipertensión resistente sometidos a 2 estrategias terapéuticas: intensificación con diuréticos de asa vs. antagonistas de la aldosterona.

INTRODUCTION: Actualy, there are few data about glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) drop in patients with resistant hypertension and how diferent therapies can modify chronic kidney disease progression (CKD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate CKD progression in patients with resistant hypertension undergoing 2diferent therapies: treatment with spironolactone or furosemide. METHODS: We included 30 patients (21M, 9W) with a mean age of 66.3±9.1 years, eGFR 55.8±16.5ml/min/1.73 m2, SBP 162.8±8.2 and DBP 90.2±6.2mmHg: 15 patients received spironolactone and 15 furosemide and we followed up them a median of 32 months (28-41). RESULTS: The mean annual eGFR decrease was -2.8±5.4ml/min/1.73 m2. In spironolactone group was -2.1±4.8ml/min/1.73 m2 and in furosemide group was -3.2±5.6ml/min/1.73 m2, P<0.01. In patients received spironolactone, SBP decreased 23±9mmHg and in furosemide group decreased 16±3mmHg, P<.01. DBP decreased 10±8mmHg and 6±2mmHg, respectively (P<.01). Treatment with spironolactone reduced albuminuria from a serum albumin/creatine ratio of 210 (121-385) mg/g to 65 (45-120) mg/g at the end of follow-up, P<.01. There were no significant changes in the albumin/creatinine ratio in the furosemide group. The slower drop in kidney function was associated with lower SBP (P=.04), higher GFR (P=.01), lower albuminuria (P=.01), not diabetes mellitus (P=.01) and treatment with spironolactone (P=.02). Treatment with spironolactone (OR 2.13, IC 1.89-2.29) and lower albuminuria (OR 0.98, CI 0.97-0.99) maintain their independent predictive power in a multivariate model. CONCLUSION: Treatment with spironolactone is more effective reducing BP and albuminuria in patients with resistant hypertension compared with furosemide and it is associated with a slower progression of CKD in the long term follow up.

[Progression factors for chronic kidney disease. Secondary prevention]. / Factores de progresion de la enfermedad renal cronica. Prevencion secundaria.

The natural history of most chronic kidney diseases (CKD) indicates that glomerular filtration gradually declines over time, progressing to more advanced stages of kidney failure. Since the publication of the first studies by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study Group, numerous factors have been identified that can accelerate this progression. Some are dependent on the etiology, but other are common to all and may accelerate progression of kidney disease: Non-modifiable progression factors for CKD: - Etiology of kidney disease - Degree of initial kidney function - Gender - Age - Ethnicity/Other genetic factors - Birth weight Modifiable progression factors for CKD: - Proteinuria - High blood pressure - Poor glycemic control in diabetes - Smoking - Obesity - Metabolic syndrome/Insulin resistance - Dyslipidemia - Anemia - Metabolic factors (Ca/P, uric acid) - Use of nephrotoxic drugs. Therapeutic intervention on these factors has shown that it reduce the rate of progression of CKD (Strength of Recommendation A).There is no clear evidence that correction of these factors slows CKD (Strength of Recommendation C), although it has been shown to have a beneficial effect on cardiovascular risk at other levels.

[Calciphylaxis: fatal complication of cardiometabolic syndrome in patients with end stage kidney disease]. / Calcifilaxis: complicación grave del síndrome cardio-metabólico en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica terminal (ERCT).

UNLABELLED: Calciphylaxis characterized by schemic skin ulceration due to subcutaneous small arterioles calcification, is a rare disease but usually fatal. Disorders of calcium metabolism and vascular calcifications are common in dialysis patients but calciphylaxis prevalence is low in patients with end stage renal disease. So we proposed other emergent factors implicated in calciphylaxis development. METHODS: We studied retrospective 8 patients who developed calciphylaxis in our service from january 2001 to december 2006. RESULTS: All patients were female with mean age at diagnosis 68.5+/-6.7 years. All patients were receiving hemodialysis therapy and 6 patients had been receiving hemodialysis less than four months. Six patients had diabetes mellitus type II and all patients were obese (BMI >25 kg/m2). All patients had metabolic syndrome (APTIII) with bad control hypertension and 6 (75%) were receiving anticoagulation therapy with warfarin. Patients didn t have severe alterations of calcium metabolism, all had product calcium-phosphorus <55. All patients developed low blood pressure at the beginning of dialysis treatment (98.3+/-22.7/60+/-18,29 mmHg). 7 patients present proximal lesions in fatty regions like abdomen and thighs. Histopathologic examination reveals calcium deposits in arteriole-sized and small vessels with vascular thrombosis. Prognosis was poor, seven patients died secondary to a sepsis originated in infected cutaneous ulcers. CONCLUSIONS: calciphylaxis is a disease with poor prognosis and high mortality, without specific treatment actually. Female gender, obesity associated with diabetes mellitus and cardiometabolic syndrome, anticoagulant therapy with warfarin and low blood pressure associated with hemodialysis therapy, are risk factors to develop calciphylaxis, in absence of severe disorders of calcium metabolism. In these patients is important to avoid hypotension episodes during dialysis, dialysis hypotension appears to be an important risk factor who promotes ischemia of subcutaneous adipose tissue.

[Therapeutic guidelines fulfillment in clinical practice in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)]. / Evaluación del cumplimiento de las guías terapéuticas en la práctica clínica en pacientes con enfermedad renal crónica (ERC).

OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to determine the degree of fulfillment of the therapeutic objectives recommended in the clinical guidelines in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) in a nephrology outpatient clinic and the treatment that the patients were receiving to control these objectives. METHODS: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was performed in unselected patients with CKD (stages 1-5) who attended the nephrology outpatient clinic of the Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón for follow up between 1st January and 1st April 2006. RESULTS: Data from 600 patients with a mean age of 62.8 years (56.5% male) were collected. The distribution of patients according to the stage (S) of CKD was as follows: S1: 11.5%, S2: 18%, S3: 36.7%, S4: 27.5% and S5: 6.3%. The target blood pressure (BP) < 130/80 mmHg was reached in 35.5%. The target diastolic blood pressure was controlled in 70%. However, systolic blood pressure increasing significantly with age and the degree of renal failure was controlled only in 42%. Total cholesterol was or=50 mg/l in 64.1% of patients. Triglyceride level was related to renal function (p=0.04). Most of the patients (94%) had hemoglobin (Hb) levels >or=11 g/dl, because of a significant increase in the percentage of patients treated with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents as the degree of renal function is reduced. Target levels of calcium-phosphorus (CaXP) product (<55 mg2/dl 2) were maintained in all the stages at the expense of decreased Ca and increased P in relation to the decrease in glomerular filtrate (p=0.001). Target Ca (8.4-9.5 mg/dl) was reached in 85% of cases (2% of patients in S3, 37% of patients in S4 and 54% in S5 were receiving calcitriol). Phosphorus levels were adequate in 80% of patients, but target levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH) were maintained only in 28.6% of patients in S3 (35-70 pg/ml), 14% of patients in S4 (70-110 pg/ml) and 28% in S-5 (115-300 pg/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Anemia is the best controlled factor of all the factors related to renal function. The degree of control of blood pressure (BP) has improved in recent years. However, it is still poor, particularly the control of systolic blood pressure getting worse with renal failure and age. It is difficult to reach the target PTH, despite adequate levels of Ca and P. Cholesterol levels, unlike triglyceride levels, do not depend on renal function and require an increase in the use and/or doses of cholesterol-lowering drugs.

[Evaluation of efficacy of darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly as treatment of anemia in predialysis patients with chronic kidney disease]. / Evaluación de la eficacia de la darbepoetina alfa subcutánea administrada en dosis única mensual en el tratamiento de la anemia en pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónica prediálisis.

BACKGROUND: Darbepoetin alfa has demonstrated its efficacy when is administered subcutaneously once-weekly and once every 2 weeks as treatment of anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of subcutaneus darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly in patients with progressive CKD who maintained stable levels of Hb treated on once every other week dosing. METHODS: Patients included in the study maintained hemoglobin (Hb) > 11 g/dl and were receiving darbepoetin alfa once every other week during at least 4 months. We studied a frequency interval dose change: once every other week frequency was converted to once monthly at equivalent dose. The study completers were 12 patients over the third month and 7 at the end of one year evaluation period. RESULTS: A statistic significant decrease in Hb and hematocrit (Hto) was observed over the third month, although all patients maintain Hb levels higher than 11 g/dl. At the same time it was appreciated a statistic significant increased on creatinine (Cr) and parathyroid hormone levels (PTH). At the end of one year evaluation period no differences were observed in any of variables. CONCLUSION: Darbepoetin alfa administered once monthly is an efficacious option as treatment of anemia for patientes with CKD. With a dose of 1 mcg/kg/month, all patientes maintain Hb > 11 g/dl.

Renal vascular disease in the elderly.

The aging of Western societies is causing a progressive increase in the number of patients over 65 starting dialysis. The EDTA Registry shows that in 1995 this section of the population represented nearly 45% of patients under dialysis, and the percentage is even higher in the USRDS at 48%, 20% of whom are over 75. These changes have not only been quantitative, but have also modified the causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Diabetic nephropathy (DN) and renal vascular disease (RVD) account for more than 50% of all these causes, reaching 66% according to the latest USRDS calculations. According to these numbers, RVD represents 29% of all causes, the incidence varying with the age group, and has become the main cause of ESRD in the elderly (38% of all cases). Until a few years ago, RVD was synonymous with hypertension, but as the population ages, the range of diseases in this group is increasing. The main RVDs that cause ESRD in the elderly are: hypertensive RVD (nephrosclerosis), atheromatous RVD (either as ischemic atherosclerotic nephropathy or as atheroembolism), and acute occlusion of renal arteries (either bilateral or unilateral in single-kidney patients). The diagnosis of nephrosclerosis in the absence of histological confirmation is a presumed clinical diagnosis, made in most cases by exclusion, and is therefore clearly overestimated. On the other hand, atheromatous RVD is an underdiagnosed disease that is often overlooked. The prevalence, natural history, diagnosis and prognosis are discussed in this report.

Effects of antihypertensive therapy on progression of diabetic nephropathy.

There is a clear relationship between hypertension and the microvascular complications of diabetes. Genetic predisposition to hypertension has been correlated to the risk of diabetic nephropathy in type I diabetes, and hypertension is a well known risk factor for developing nephropathy in patients with type II diabetes. Multiple studies have emphasized the importance of hypertension on renal disease progression, and blood pressure control with conventional antihypertensive drugs slows the rate of renal function loss in diabetic nephropathy. Furthermore, evidence of the role of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) on progression of renal damage has focused much interest on the therapeutic action of the RAS blockade. In patients with type I diabetes, blocking the RAS with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors prevents progression from microalbuminuria to overt nephropathy, and in overt nephropathy decreases the gradual loss of renal function beyond its blood pressure lowering effect. Less clinical information is available in type II diabetic nephropathy, but our experience and some recent studies suggest that ACE inhibitors also have a renoprotective action in type II diabetes. The role of calcium channel blockers in diabetic nephropathy is not clear. Several short-term studies with the first generation dihydropyridine calcium antagonists showed a lower effect on urinary albumin excretion and a more rapid progression to renal failure than with ACE inhibitors. However, other calcium channel blockers, particularly of the non-dihydropyridine type, have been shown to have a beneficial effect on diabetic nephropathy, decreasing proteinuria and slowing progression.

[Renal and cardiovascular protection associated to antihypertensive treatment in the elderly]. / Protección cardiovascular y renal asociada al tratamiento antihipertensivo en el anciano.

The incidence of arterial hypertension increases with age in such a way that by the age of 60 the incidence is greater than 50% in men and women. This increase is particularly relevant if we consider the changes in systolic blood pressure (increase) and diastolic blood pressure (decrease) in relation to age and as a consequence in the reduction of vascular compliance which is common in men and women over the age of 60. These disorders are associated to artheriosclerosis and the corresponding increase in pulse pressure. It is for these reasons that the most common form of hypertension is isolated systolic hypertension (SBP > 140 mmHg and SBP < 90 mmHg), which represents 50% of hypertensive patients in the elderly population. Isolated systolic hypertension is also associated to an increase in cardiovascular disease (MI, stroke), increasing the risk of mortality four times. In elderly people, hypertension and isolated systolic hypertension are risk factors that can be managed. Today there is sufficient evidence from clinical trials that show a clear benefit in the reduction of the cardiovascular and renal risk associated to the antihypertensive treatment in the elderly, at least when the blood pressure is greater than 160/90 mmHg. The target blood pressure figures to control in the elderly person, probably below 160/90 mmHg, still need to be determined.

Progresión de la enfermedad renal crónica en pacientes con hipertensión resistente sometidos a 2 estrategias terapéuticas: intensificación con diuréticos de asa vs. antagonistas de la aldosterona / Chronic kidney disease progression in patients with resistant hypertension subject to 2 therapeutic strategies: Intensification with loop diuretics vs aldosterone antagonists

INTRODUCCIÓN: En la actualidad, existen pocos datos sobre la evolución de la función renal en pacientes con hipertensión arterial (HTA) resistente y enfermedad renal crónica (ERC), así como de la influencia de diferentes tipos de tratamiento en dicha progresión. OBJETIVO: Evaluar la progresión de la ERC en pacientes con ERC e HTA resistente tratados mediante 2 estrategias terapéuticas diferentes: tratamiento con espironolactona vs. furosemida. MÉTODOS: Incluimos a 30 pacientes (21 H, 9M) con una edad media de 66,3 ± 9,1 años, FGe 55,8 ± 16,5 ml/min/1,73 m2, PAS 162,8 ± 8,2 y PAD 90,2 ± 6,2 mmHg: 15 tratados con espironolactona y 15 con furosemida, seguidos durante un tiempo medio de 32 meses (28-41). RESULTADOS: El descenso medio anual del FGe fue de -2,8 ± 5,4 ml/min/1,73 m2. En el grupo de espironolactona fue de -2,1 ± 4,8ml/min/1,73 m2 y en el de furosemida -3,2 ± 5,6 ml/min/1,73 m2, p < 0,01. En los pacientes con espironolactona la PAS disminuyó 23 ± 9 mmHg vs. 16 ± 3mmHg en el grupo de furosemida (p < 0,01). La PAD se redujo 10 ± 8 mmHg y 6 ± 2 mmHg, respectivamente (p < 0,01). El tratamiento con espironolactona redujo la albuminuria de una mediana de 210 (121-385) mg/g a 65 (45-120) mg/g al final del seguimiento, p < 0,01. En el grupo de furosemida la albuminuria no descendió. La progresión más lenta en la enfermedad renal se asoció con una menor PAS (p = 0,04), mayor FGe basal (p = 0,01), menor albuminuria (p = 0,01), no tener diabetes mellitus (p = 0,01) y recibir tratamiento con espironolactona (p = 0,02). El tratamiento con espironolactona (OR 2,13; IC 1,89-2,29) y la menor albuminuria (OR 0,98; IC 0,97-0,99) mantienen su poder predictivo independiente en un modelo multivariante. CONCLUSIONES: El tratamiento con espironolactona reduce más la presión arterial y la albuminuria en pacientes con HTA resistente comparado con la furosemida y esto se asocia con una progresión más lenta de la ERC a largo plazo

INTRODUCTION: Actualy, there are few data about glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) drop in patients with resistant hypertension and how diferent therapies can modify chronic kidney disease progression (CKD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate CKD progression in patients with resistant hypertension undergoing 2 diferent therapies: treatment with spironolactone or furosemide. METHODS: We included 30 patients (21 M, 9 W) with a mean age of 66.3 ± 9.1 years, eGFR 55.8 ± 16.5 ml/min/1.73 m2, SBP 162.8 ± 8.2 and DBP 90.2 ± 6.2 mmHg: 15 patients received spironolactone and 15 furosemide and we followed up them a median of 32 months (28-41). RESULTS: The mean annual eGFR decrease was -2.8 ± 5.4 ml/min/1.73 m2. In spironolactone group was -2.1 ± 4.8 ml/min/1.73 m2 and in furosemide group was -3.2 ± 5.6 ml/min/1.73 m2, P < 0.01. In patients received spironolactone, SBP decreased 23 ± 9 mmHg and in furosemide group decreased 16 ± 3 mmHg, P<.01. DBP decreased 10 ± 8 mmHg and 6 ± 2mmHg, respectively (P<.01). Treatment with spironolactone reduced albuminuria from a serum albumin/creatine ratio of 210 (121-385) mg/g to 65 (45-120) mg/g at the end of follow-up, P<.01. There were no significant changes in the albumin/creatinine ratio in the furosemide group. The slower drop in kidney function was associated with lower SBP (P=.04), higher GFR (P=.01), lower albuminuria (P=.01), not diabetes mellitus (P=.01) and treatment with spironolactone (P=.02). Treatment with spironolactone (OR 2.13, IC 1.89-2.29) and lower albuminuria (OR 0.98, CI 0.97-0.99) maintain their independent predictive power in a multivariate model. CONCLUSION: Treatment with spironolactone is more effective reducing BP and albuminuria in patients with resistant hypertension compared with furosemide and it is associated with a slower progression of CKD in the long term follow up

Prevalence of hypertension in renal disease.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension (HTN) is very frequent in patients with renal disease and its prevalence increases as renal failure progresses. METHODS: We studied the prevalence of HTN in 1921 patients with different nephropathies. Patients on dialysis and renal transplant patients were not included in the study. HTN was defined as SBP>140 and/or DBP>90 mmHg, or requiring antihypertensive therapy. RESULTS: The prevalence of HTN in the total group of patients with renal diseases was 60.5%, but this prevalence varied widely depending upon the type of underlying nephropathy. The prevalence of HTN was practically universal in patients with renal vascular disease (93%) and in patients with established diabetic nephropathy (87%), and 74% of the patients with polycystic kidney disease, 63% of the patients with chronic pyelonephritis and 54% of the patients diagnosed with glomerulonephritis were hypertensive. The prevalence of HTN in patients with renal insufficiency (80%) is significantly higher than that in patients without renal insufficiency (43% P<0.001). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, the independent risk factors defining HTN in renal patients were: renal failure, age, the presence of diabetes, hypertriglyceridaemia and proteinuria. Antihypertensive treatment consisted of diet alone in 4% of the patients, one drug in 45%, two drugs in 36%, three medications in 13% and more than three drugs in 2.5%. The angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors were the most frequently prescribed drug (39% of the patients treated in monotherapy) followed by calcium channel blockers (27%), diuretics (18%) and beta-blockers (9%). The most common combined therapy was a diuretic plus an ACE inhibitor. The percentage of patients with BP controlled according to current recommendations for renal patients (BP<130/85) was very low; SBP in only 49% and DBP in 24%. Control of both was only achieved in 10% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high prevalence of HTN in renal patients, which depends on the type of nephropathy and the degree of renal failure. Other independent risk factors for HTN in patients with renal disease are: advanced age, the presence of diabetes, hypertriglyceridaemia and the severity of proteinuria. BP control in renal patients is quite poor and should be improved to reduce progression of the renal disease.

Effect of strict blood pressure control on proteinuria in renal patients treated with different antihypertensive drugs.

BACKGROUND: The severity of proteinuria is the main predictive factor in the progression of renal failure in chronic nephropathies. Therefore, action aimed at reducing proteinuria should be a priority in the treatment of these patients. Various antihypertensive drugs, in particular the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), have a greater antiproteinuric effect, although it is difficult to establish whether this is due only to their effect on arterial blood pressure (BP) or to other mechanisms associated with blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS). METHODS: The evolution of proteinuria after two successive treatment periods was studied prospectively for 2 years in 22 patients with chronic glomerulonephritis. In period I, which lasted for 12 months, BP was strictly controlled (<125/75 mmHg) and the patients received random and double-blind treatment with a beta-blocker (betaB), atenolol; a non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (CCB), verapamil; an ACEI, trandolapril; or a fixed combination of the latter two. In period II, all of the patients received treatment openly for an additional 12 months with a fixed combination of verapamil+trandolapril at half the dose of the preceding period, to obtain conventional control of BP at <140/90 mmHG: RESULTS: The mean level for basal SBP/DBP was 136+/-14/86+/-7 mmHg, which decreased in period I to 121+/-15/76+/-8 mmHg (P=0.01) and to 124+/-5/78 +/-8 mmHg (P<0.05) at 6 and 12 months of treatment, respectively. There were no differences in the BP reached in the four therapy groups; however, proteinuria only decreased in the patients treated with trandolapril alone or in combination with verapamil. In period II, BP levels rose to 134+/-10/84+/-8 mmHg (P<0.05); this increase in BP was accompanied by an increase in proteinuria in those patients who had received the ACEI alone or in combination in the previous period, while in patients previously treated with a betaB or a CCB, proteinuria decreased, in spite of the increase in BP. CONCLUSIONS: With equal BP control, treatment with the ACEI trandolapril alone, or in combination with a CCB, has a greater antiproteinuric effect than that obtained with other antihypertensive drugs, but this effect is attenuated if BP is not strictly controlled.

Daño renal en pacientes con síndrome metabólico que consultan en atención primaria / Renal damage in primary care patients with metabolic syndrome

Introducción. Estudiar en condiciones de práctica clínica real el daño renal, la prevalencia y grado de control de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con síndrome metabólico atendidos en atención primaria. Material y método. Estudio observacional realizado a pacientes con síndrome metabólico (criterios ATP III). Realizado en centros de atención primaria de la Región de Murcia y Asturias. Se incluyó a 485 pacientes. Los datos recogidos fueron edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal (IMC), presión arterial, presión de pulso, glucosa, hemoglobina glucosilada, perfil lipídico, factores de riesgo cardiovascular, tratamiento, componentes de síndrome metabólico y datos de afectación renal. Resultados. De los 458 pacientes, el filtrado glomerular es < 90ml/min en 375 (77,5%). La microalbuminuria ha sido positiva en 94 pacientes (22%). Las cifras medias de presión arterial fueron 143,6±16,0mm de Hg para la sistólica y 82,8±10,2mm de Hg para la diastólica. El LDL colesterol (LDLc) medio fue de 129,88±36,77mg/dl y la hemoglobina glucosilada, de 6,47±1,45g/dl. El fármaco más utilizado para el control de la diabetes fue la metformina en el 33,6% de los diabéticos. Respecto a la hipertensión arterial (HTA) los fármacos más utilizados fueron los bloqueantes del sistema renina angiotensina en el 41,1% de los hipertensos y para el control lipídico fueron las estatinas en el 63,1% de los dislipidémicos. Conclusiones. Se detecta afectación renal en un alto porcentaje de los pacientes. Es necesario lograr un alto grado de control de los factores de riesgo cardiovascular en estos pacientes (AU)

Introduction: To study, under routine clinical practice conditions, renal damage, prevalence and control of cardiovascular risk factors in patients with metabolic syndrome treated in Primary Care centres in Spain. Material and methods: An observational study in patients with metabolic syndrome (ATP III criteria) was conducted in Primary Care Centres in Murcia and Asturias. A total of 485 patients were included. The data collected were: age, sex, body mass index, blood pressure, pulse pressure, glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin, lipid profile, cardiovascular risk factors, treatment, components of metabolic syndrome and data on renal involvement. Results: Of the 485 patients, 375 (77.5%) had a glomerular filtration rate of < 90 ml/min. Microalbuminuria was positive in 94 patients (22%). The means of blood pressure were 143.6±16.0 mmHg for systolic, and 82.8±10.2 mmHg for diastolic. The mean LDL cholesterol was 129.88±36.97 mg/dL and for glycosylated haemoglobin it was 6.47±1.45 g/dL. The drug most used for the control of the diabetes was metformin in 33.6% of the diabetics. With respect to hypertension the drugs more used were the renin-angiotensin system blockers in 41.1% of the hypertensive patients. Statins were used for lipid control in 63.1% of the patients. Conclusions: Renal damage was detected in a high percentage of the patients. An increased level of control of cardiovascular risk factors is required in these patients (AU)