Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Med Res ; 28(1): 559, 2023 Dec 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38049903

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the performance of severity indices for indicating intensive care and predicting mortality in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of trauma patients. This study aimed to compare the performance of severity indices to predict trauma patients' ICU admission and mortality. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study which analyzed the electronic medical records of trauma patients aged ≥ 18 years, treated at a hospital in Brazil, between 2014 and 2017. Physiological [Revised Trauma Score (RTS), New Trauma Score (NTS) and modified Rapid Emergency Medicine Score (mREMS)], anatomical [Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS)] and mixed indices [Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), New Trauma and Injury Severity Score (NTRISS), Base-deficit Injury Severity Score (BISS) and Base-deficit and New Injury Severity Score (BNISS)] were compared in analyzing the outcomes (ICU admission and mortality) using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics Curves (AUC-ROC). RESULTS: From the 747 trauma patients analyzed (52.5% female; mean age 51.5 years; 36.1% falls), 106 (14.2%) were admitted to the ICU and 6 (0.8%) died in the unit. The ISS (AUC 0.919) and NISS (AUC 0.916) had better predictive capacity for ICU admission of trauma patients. The NISS (AUC 0.949), TRISS (AUC 0.909), NTRISS (AUC 0.967), BISS (AUC 0.902) and BNISS (AUC 0.976) showed excellent performance in predicting ICU mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomical indices showed excellent predictive ability for admission of trauma patients to the ICU. The NISS and the mixed indices had the best performances regarding mortality in the ICU.


Assuntos
Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Ferimentos e Lesões , Humanos , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Hospitalização , Curva ROC
2.
Trauma Case Rep ; 26: 100291, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32123719

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Prosthetic titanium plates are frequently used in the stabilization of rib fractures and are typically contoured to the patient's anatomy at the time of implant in the operating room. Smith et al. [17] described the use of a 3D prototype biomodel of his patient's skeletal anatomy for preoperative customization of standard titanium plates for rib fractures. This process facilitated the preoperative planning and provided implants appropriate for a patient's unique anatomy. Further, the approach facilitated repair of complex fractures and may decrease operating time. Besides that, it provides idealized conditions for plate shaping and may facilitate implantation. METHODS: We performed rib fixation combined with 3D biomodels for surgical planning for the first time in Brazil, achieving reduced operating time with a good outcome for our patient. RESULTS: Surgical planning was conducted one day before the surgery using a 3D printer to make a patient-specific model. The printing time of the model was 16 h. The 3D biomodel was used for simulating the surgical procedure, pre-molding the titanium plates, and measuring the screw sizes that would be used in the procedure. All five fractures were fixed on the 3D biomodel and the total simulation time was 58 min. We used four pre-contoured titanium plates of 1.5 mm thickness and one straight 1.5 mm thickness titanium plate. We used the printed model to measure screw size, as we would do in the surgery. After planning, the material was processed and sterilized according to the hospital standards to be implanted in the patient the following day. CONCLUSION: This is the second reported case of surgical stabilization of rib fractures using a 3D model. Both cases demonstrated the advantages of this approach. More studies are needed to validate the safety and benefits for the patient, as well as the impact on cost savings.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA