Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cureus ; 16(4): e57520, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38707094

RESUMO

Background The thoracic ultrasound (TUS) is a monitoring tool that has gained worldwide popularity in various scenarios, offering the opportunity for dynamic, bedside evaluations. Recent studies indicate that the use of TUS enables the diagnosis of pathologies resulting from blunt chest trauma (BCT), yielding favorable outcomes. This study aimed to compare the utility of TUS versus chest radiography (CXR) in diagnosing pulmonary pathologies resulting from closed-chest traumas. Methodology A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 58 patients diagnosed with BCT who sought emergency care at the "Dr. Luis Razetti" University Hospital in Barcelona, Venezuela, from November 2023 to January 2024. Results Of the patients, 75.9% (n = 44) were male, with an average age of 37.8 years (standard deviation = 18.4 years). Injuries were reported in 8.6% (n = 5) of the patients, including 60% (n = 3) pneumothorax and 40% (n = 2) hemothorax. Ultrasound results coincided with CXR in 94.8% (n = 55) of the cases, with a Cohen's kappa coefficient of 0.9 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.642-1.0). TUS demonstrated higher sensitivity than CXR (100% vs. 60%) for detecting hemothorax and pneumothorax in patients with BCT, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.991 (95% CI = 0.968-1.013). Conclusions BCT predominantly occurred in young males, resulting primarily in pneumothorax and hemothorax lesions, detectable with higher sensitivity through TUS compared to CXR. The use of TUS should be considered an essential component of the initial assessment for individuals with BCT.

2.
Cureus ; 16(3): e56185, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38618440

RESUMO

Background Difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) denotes the surgical extraction of the gallbladder under circumstances where associated conditions within the same organ, adjacent structures, or patient-specific conditions impede a smooth, expeditious, and comfortable dissection. It is imperative to utilize tools that aid in anticipating this challenging surgical scenario, enabling the implementation of appropriate measures. Objective This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of the Labbad-Vivas score (LVS) in predicting DLC and its correlation with the Parkland Grading Scale (PGS). Methodology A prospective study was conducted, including patients diagnosed with gallstone disease undergoing LC (laparoscopic cholecystectomy) at the "Dr. Luis Razetti" University Hospital in Barcelona, Venezuela, between September and December 2023. Results Forty patients were studied, with 80% (n=32) being female and 95% (n=38) under the age of 65; surgeries were elective in 72.5% (n=29) of cases; 35% (n=14) had an LVS ≥16 (difficult cholecystectomy); and 62.5% (n=25) of patients presented Grades 1 and 2 on the PGS. Total cholecystectomy was performed in 95% (n=38) of the patients. The LVS showed a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 92%, positive predictive value of 85.7%, and negative predictive value of 88.5% to predict DLC, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.897 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.792-1.003). A Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.805 (95% CI = 0.656 - 0.904) was obtained between both scores. Conclusion The use of the LVS score in the preoperative setting is feasible as a predictor of DLC, given its effectiveness and high correlation with the PGS.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA