Failure to Rescue and Mortality Differences After Appendectomy in a Low-Middle-Income Country and the United States.

BACKGROUND: Major disparities in complications and mortality after appendectomy between countries with different income levels have not been well characterized, as comparative studies at patient level between countries are scant. This study aimed to investigate variations in postoperative complications, mortality, and failure to rescue after appendectomy between a high-income country and a low-to-middle-income country. METHODS: Hospital discharges on adult patients who underwent appendectomy were extracted from administrative databases from Colombia and 2 states of the United States (Florida and New York). Outcomes included major postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality, and failure to rescue. Univariate analyses were conducted to compare outcomes between the 2 countries. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the independent effect of country on outcomes after adjustment for patient age, sex, comorbidity index, severity of appendicitis, and appendectomy route (laparoscopic/open). RESULTS: A total of 62,338 cases from Colombia and 57,987 from the United States were included in the analysis. Patients in Colombia were significantly younger and healthier but had a higher incidence of peritonitis. Use of laparoscopy was significantly lower in Colombia (5.9% vs 89.4%; P < .0001). After adjustment for covariates, multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that compared to the United States, Colombia had lower complication rates (2.8% vs 6.6%; odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39-0.44; P < .0001) but higher mortality (0.44% vs 0.08%; OR, 8.92; 95% CI, 5.69-13.98; P < .0001) and failure to rescue (13.6% vs 1.0%; OR, 17.01; 95% CI, 10.66-27.16; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Despite lower rates of postoperative complications, in-hospital mortality after appendectomy was higher in Colombia than in the United States. This difference may be explained by higher rates of failure to rescue in the low-to-middle-income country (ie, decreased ability of Colombian hospitals to rescue patients from complications).

Health Insurance Scheme: Main Contributor to Inequalities in COVID-19 Mortality in Colombia.

Objectives. To quantify socioeconomic inequalities in COVID-19 mortality in Colombia and to assess the extent to which type of health insurance, comorbidity burden, area of residence, and ethnicity account for such inequalities. Methods. We analyzed data from a retrospective cohort of COVID-19 cases. We estimated the relative and slope indices of inequality (RII and SII) using survival models for all participants and stratified them by age and gender. We calculated the percentage reduction in RII and SII after adjustment for potentially relevant factors. Results. We identified significant inequalities for the whole cohort and by subgroups (age and gender). Inequalities were higher among younger adults and gradually decreased with age, going from RII of 5.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.25, 9.82) in participants younger than 25 years to RII of 1.49 (95% CI = 1.41, 1.58) in those aged 65 years and older. Type of health insurance was the most important factor, accounting for 20% and 59% of the relative and absolute inequalities, respectively. Conclusions. Significant socioeconomic inequalities exist in COVID-19 mortality in Colombia. Health insurance appears to be the main contributor to those inequalities, posing challenges for the design of public health strategies. (Am J Public Health. 2022;112(S6):S586-S590. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306637).

[Health insurance scheme: main contributor to inequalities in COVID-19 mortality in ColombiaTipo de cobertura de assistência à saúde: o principal fator contribuinte para as desigualdades em mortalidade por COVID-19 na Colômbia]. / Plan de seguro de salud: factor que más contribuye a las desigualdades en la mortalidad por COVID-19 en Colombia.

Objectives: To quantify socioeconomic inequalities in COVID-19 mortality in Colombia and to assess the extent to which type of health insurance, comorbidity burden, area of residence, and ethnicity account for such inequalities. Methods: We analyzed data from a retrospective cohort of COVID-19 cases. We estimated the relative and slope indices of inequality (RII and SII) using survival models for all participants and stratified them by age and gender. We calculated the percentage reduction in RII and SII after adjustment for potentially relevant factors. Results: We identified significant inequalities for the whole cohort and by subgroups (age and gender). Inequalities were higher among younger adults and gradually decreased with age, going from RII of 5.65 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.25, 9.82) in participants younger than 25 years to RII of 1.49 (95% CI = 1.41, 1.58) in those aged 65 years and older. Type of health insurance was the most important factor, accounting for 20% and 59% of the relative and absolute inequalities, respectively. Conclusions: Significant socioeconomic inequalities exist in COVID-19 mortality in Colombia. Health insurance appears to be the main contributor to those inequalities, posing challenges for the design of public health strategies.

Objetivos: Quantificar as desigualdades socioeconômicas na mortalidade por COVID-19 na Colômbia e avaliar até que ponto o tipo de cobertura de assistência à saúde, a carga de comorbidades, o local de residência e a etnia contribuíram para tais desigualdades. Métodos: Analisamos dados de uma coorte retrospectiva de casos de COVID-19. Calculamos os índices relativo e angular de desigualdade (RII e SII, respectivamente) utilizando modelos de sobrevivência em todos os participantes, estratificando-os por idade e gênero. Calculamos o percentual de redução no RII e no SII após ajuste para fatores possivelmente relevantes. Resultados: Identificamos desigualdades significativas na coorte como um todo e por subgrupos (idade e gênero). As desigualdades foram maiores para adultos mais jovens e decaíram gradualmente com a idade, indo de um RII de 5,65 (intervalo de confiança [IC] de 95% = 3,25; 9,82] nos participantes com idade inferior a 25 anos a um RII de 1,49 [IC 95% = 1,41; 1,58] nas pessoas com 65 anos ou mais. O tipo de cobertura de assistência à saúde foi o fator mais importante, representando 20% e 59% das desigualdades relativa e absoluta, respectivamente. Conclusões: Desigualdades socioeconômicas significativas afetaram a mortalidade por COVID-19 na Colômbia. O tipo de cobertura de saúde parece ser o principal fator contribuinte para essas desigualdades, impondo desafios à elaboração de estratégias de saúde pública.

Mental health consequences of armed conflicts in adults: an overview.

Armed conflicts (AC) in the world are still active and lead to the growth of violence, with a possible impact on mental health (MH).

Global control of COVID-19: good vaccines may not suffice.

The COVID-19 pandemic has unveiled health and socioeconomic inequities around the globe. Effective epidemic control requires the achievement of herd immunity, where susceptible individuals are conferred indirect protection by being surrounded by immunized individuals. The proportion of people that need to be vaccinated to obtain herd immunity is determined through the herd immunity threshold. However, the number of susceptible individuals and the opportunities for contact between infectious and susceptible individuals influence the progress of an epidemic. Thus, in addition to vaccination, control of a pandemic may be difficult or impossible to achieve without other public health measures, including wearing face masks and social distancing. This article discusses the factors that may contribute to herd immunity and control of COVID-19 through the availability of effective vaccines and describes how vaccine effectiveness in the community may be lower than that expected. It also discusses how pandemic control in some countries and populations may face vaccine accessibility barriers if market forces strongly regulate the new technologies available, according to the inverse care law.

La pandemia de COVID-19 ha puesto al descubierto inequidades socioeconómicas y de salud en todo el mundo. Un control epidémico eficaz requiere el logro de la inmunidad colectiva, mediante la cual se confiere a las personas vulnerables una protección indirecta al estar rodeadas de personas inmunizadas. El umbral de inmunidad colectiva determina la proporción de personas que deben vacunarse para llegar a la inmunidad colectiva. Sin embargo, el número de personas vulnerables y las oportunidades de contacto entre las personas infecciosas y las personas vulnerables influyen en el progreso de una epidemia. Por lo tanto, además de la vacunación, el control de una pandemia puede ser difícil o imposible de lograr sin otras medidas de salud pública, como las mascarillas y el distanciamiento social. Este artículo trata sobre los factores que pueden contribuir al logro de la inmunidad colectiva y el control de la COVID-19 mediante la disponibilidad de vacunas efectivas y describe cómo la efectividad de las vacunas en la comunidad puede ser inferior a la prevista. También aborda cómo el control pandémico en algunos países y grupos poblacionales puede enfrentarse a obstáculos que dificultan la accesibilidad de las vacunas si las fuerzas del mercado son el principal factor que regula las nuevas tecnologías disponibles, como se indica en la ley de atención inversa.

A pandemia de COVID-19 revelou iniquidades socioeconômicas e de saúde no mundo todo. Um controle epidêmico eficaz requer a obtenção da imunidade coletiva, em que indivíduos suscetíveis recebem proteção indireta por estarem rodeados de indivíduos imunizados. A proporção de pessoas que precisam ser vacinadas para se alcançar a imunidade coletiva é definida pelo limiar da imunidade coletiva. Porém, o número de indivíduos suscetíveis e as oportunidades de contato entre indivíduos infecciosos e suscetíveis influenciam o progresso de uma epidemia. Portanto, além da vacinação, o controle de uma pandemia pode ser difícil ou impossível de ser alcançado sem outras medidas de saúde pública, incluindo o uso de máscaras e o distanciamento social. Este artigo discute os fatores que podem contribuir para a imunidade coletiva e para o controle da COVID-19 por meio da disponibilidade de vacinas eficazes, e descreve como a eficácia das vacinas na comunidade pode ser menor do que o esperado. Também discute como o controle da pandemia em alguns países e populações pode enfrentar barreiras de acessibilidade às vacinas se as forças de mercado regularem fortemente as novas tecnologias disponíveis, conforme a lei dos cuidados inversos.

Comparison of shear wave elastography (supersonic) with liver biopsy in a cohort of patients from a medium-income country: an observational study.

INTRODUCTION: shear-wave elastography is a non-invasive diagnostic test that calculates the degree of liver fibrosis by measuring liver elasticity. This technique was recently introduced in Colombia. Thus, cutoff points delineating the change between fibrosis stages (using the Metavir scale) have not been previously defined in our patient population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: a retrospective study was performed of patients who had undergone two-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE) and liver biopsy (LB) between June 2010 and June 2018 at a private outpatient hepatology center in Bogota, Colombia. We used a training dataset (subjects with time between biopsy and 2D-SWE of ≤ 6 months) to establish diagnostic cutoff values and a test dataset (subjects with time between biopsy and 2D-SWE of > 6 months) to validate our results. RESULTS: a total of 453 subjects (training dataset, n = 153; test dataset, n = 300) were included. In the training dataset, the cutoff points were 7.6, 8.4, 9.5 and 10.9 kPa, and the areas under the curve were 0.75, 0.83, 0.89 and 0.94 for mild fibrosis, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis, respectively. In the test dataset, the areas under the curve were 0.77, 0.78, 0.83 and 0.89 for mild fibrosis, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis, respectively. CONCLUSION: two-dimensional shear-wave elastography was reliable and useful for the non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis, particularly in patients with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis. Cutoff points for fibrosis in a Hispanic population were described.

An overview of reviews on strategies to reduce health inequalities.

BACKGROUND: Governments are incentivized to develop and implement health action programs focused on equity to ensure progress with effective strategies or interventions. OBJECTIVE: Identify and synthesize strategies or interventions that facilitate the reduction of health inequalities. METHODS: A systematic search strategy was carried out up until August 2019 in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, LILACS, Scopus, Scielo and Epistemonikos. In addition, a snowball strategy was used. Literature reviews (LRs) of experimental and quasi-experimental studies were included. The identified interventions and outcomes were categorized based on the recommendation by the Cochrane group in "Effective Practice and Organization of Care". The quality of the included LRs was evaluated using the AMSTAR 2 tool. RESULTS: Four thousand ninety-five articles were identified, of which 97 were included in the synthesis of evidence. Most of the studies included focused on the general population, vulnerable populations and minority populations. The subjects of general health and healthy lifestyles were the most commonly addressed. According to the classification of the type of intervention, the domain covered most was the delivery arrangements, followed by the domain of implementation strategies. The most frequent group of outcomes was the reported outcome in (clinical) patients, followed by social outcomes. CONCLUSION: The strategies that facilitate the reduction of health inequalities must be intersectoral and multidisciplinary in nature, including all sectors of the health system. It is essential to continue generating interventions focused on strengthening health systems in order to achieve adequate universal health coverage, with a process of comprehensive and quality care.

Efficacy and safety of dabrafenib-trametinib in the treatment of unresectable advanced/metastatic melanoma with BRAF-V600 mutation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

The current systematic review aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib-trametinib with those of other therapeutic alternatives in the treatment of patients with unresectable advanced/metastatic melanoma with BRAF-V600 mutation. The search was carried out on four databases up to July 2018. Two separate network meta-analyses (NMA) were performed using the frequentist method (random effects): one with an exclusive population with BRAF-V600 mutation (NMA-pBRAFV600) and another with mixed population (with or without the mutation: NMA-pMixed). An evidence profile was included using the GRADE method for NMA. The validity of the final estimator in the NMA-pMixed was assessed via a sensitivity analysis. Nine clinical trials were included in the NMA-pBRAFV600. Dabrafenib-trametinib was found to have a favorable effect on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with dabrafenib, vemurafenib, and dacarbazine and on partial response rate (PRR) and overall response rate compared with dacarbazine and vemurafenib. In the NMA-pMixed, dabrafenib-trametinib was found to have a positive effect on OS versus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and on PFS and PRR versus ipilimumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab. However, dabrafenib-trametinib and vemurafenib-cobimetinib significantly differed in terms of efficacy. In addition, dabrafenib-trametinib has a favorable effect on Grades 3 and 4 adverse events.

Efficacy and safety of dabrafenib-trametinib in the treatment of unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600 mutation: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

The current systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dabrafenib plus trametinib (dabrafenib-trametinib) with those of other therapeutic alternatives in the treatment of patients with BRAF V600 mutation unresectable or metastatic melanoma. The search was carried out on four databases up to July-2018. Two separate network meta-analyses (NMA) were performed using the frequentist method (random effects): one with an exclusive population with BRAF V600 mutation (NMA-pBRAFV600) and another with a mixed population (with or without the mutation: NMA-pMixed). An evidence profile was included using the GRADE method for NMA. The validity of the final estimator in the NMA-pMixed was assessed via sensitivity analysis. Five clinical trials were included in the NMA-pBRAFV600. In the NMA-pBRAFV600 population, dabrafenib-trametinib had a favorable effect on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with dabrafenib, vemurafenib, and dacarbazine, and on partial response rate (PRR) and overall response rate (ORR) compared with dacarbazine and vemurafenib. In the NMA-pMixed population, dabrafenib-trametinib had a positive effect on OS vs ipilimumab 3 mg/kg and on PFS and PRR vs ipilimumab (3 and 10 mg/kg), nivolumab, and pembrolizumab. However, dabrafenib-trametinib, and vemurafenib-cobimetinib were comparable in terms of clinical efficacy. In addition, dabrafenib-trametinib was associated with less grades 3 and 4 adverse events.

Dental Anomalies in Permanent Teeth Associated With Nonsyndromic Cleft Lip and Palate in a Group of Colombian Children.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the risk of dental anomaly presentation in permanent teeth in a group of Colombian children with nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate (NSCLP) and to determine the frequency of the anomalies according to the cleft type. METHODS: An analytical matched case-control study was conducted with 210 controls and 210 patients with NSCLP. The patients were classified into 3 groups: complete right unilateral cleft lip and palate (RCLP), complete left unilateral cleft lip and palate (LCLP), and complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP). Univariate and multivariate Poisson regression models were used to analyze paired samples (Bonferroni adjustment, P ≤ .002). RESULTS: A high risk of finding agenesis of the maxillary lateral incisors, supernumerary teeth, microdontia of the maxillary lateral incisors, and rotation of the maxillary central incisors adjacent to the cleft (P < .0001) was observed in the patients with NSCLP. One or more dental anomalies were found in 98% of patients with BCLP, in 96% of those with LCLP, and in 87% of those with RCLP. Most of the anomalies were located on the cleft area. The incidence relative risk (IRR) of anomalies was highest in patients with BCLP (IRR: 10.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.76-16.3), followed by in those with LCLP (IRR: 8.51; 95% CI: 5.64-12.8). CONCLUSIONS: Most dental anomalies were found in the cleft area; this was expected because the cleft area was the most affected in the patients included in this study.

[Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) in Colombia, Guatemala, and México.] / Escala Basada en la Experiencia de Inseguridad Alimentaria (FIES) en Colombia, Guatemala y México.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the psychometric characteristics of the Food Insecurity Experience Scale (FIES) and the grade of similitude or difference among Colombia, Guatemala, and Mexico during three years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Psychometric comparison using the Rasch model to calculate the relative severity of each item in FIES, INFIT and contrast in the Differential Functioning of Items (c-DIF). RESULTS: The majority of items showed a relative severity corresponding to the theoretical construct and acceptably fit the model (INFIT=0.7-1.3). No c-DIF above 1.0 logit was observed in the comparison men vs women. In the comparison among countries by year 87% of the items showed c-DIF below 0.5 logit. CONCLUSIONS: The FIES presents psychometric characteristics corresponding to the theoretical construct of the tool. Future studies with the inclusion of more countries and more time points are essential to evaluate the relative severity, behavior and distribution of items.

OBJETIVO: Comparar las características psicométricas de la Escala de Experiencia de Inseguridad Alimentaria (FIES, en inglés Food Insecurity Experience Scale) y el grado de similitud o diferencias entre Colombia, Guatemala y México durante tres años. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio de comparación psicométrica a través del modelo Rasch, calculando la severidad relativa, el ajuste próximo (INFIT) y funcionamiento diferencial (c-DIF) para cada ítem de la FIES. RESULTADOS: La mayoría de los ítems mostraron una severidad relativa correspondiente al constructo teórico y un ajuste aceptableal modelo (INFIT=0.7-1.3). No se observaron valores de c-DIF en la comparación hombres vs mujeres por encima de 1.0 logit; y en la comparación entre países por año, 87% de los ítems estuvieron por debajo del valor de 0.5 logit. CONCLUSIONES: La FIES presenta las características psi- cométricas correspondientes al constructo teórico de la herramienta. Futuros estudios, incluyendo más países y más puntos temporales, son esenciales para evaluar la severidad relativa, comportamiento y distribución de los ítems.

[Incorporating health equity into implementation research: review of conceptual modelsIncorporação da igualdade em saúde na pesquisa de implementação: revisão de modelos conceituais]. / Incorporación de equidad en salud en la investigación sobre implementación: revisión de los modelos conceptuales.

OBJECTIVE: Search for conceptual frameworks or models that incorporate aspects of health equity into implementation research and prepare a systematic synthesis of them. METHODS: A systematic search was done of MEDLINE-PubMed, Embase, and LILACS (1965-2016), and Scopus (1998-2016) databases, employing, in addition, a snowball strategy and gray literature search. Article type was assessed, along with elements that were included on implementation research, the science of implementation, and health equity. RESULTS: A total of 701 articles were found, of which 100 were included for review of relevance. Of these, 19 articles related to conceptual frameworks: 12 were general, five were on ethnic or racial disparities, and two related to child health. The most frequent categories were financing, infrastructure, advocacy, quality, internal barriers, and coverage. The least frequent were other sectors, outpatient needs, health status, and equity impact assessment. CONCLUSIONS: In order to reduce health gaps and with them health inequities, it becomes necessary to have a consolidated implementation research framework that includes aspects of health equity. This framework would facilitate improving implementation processes for interventions, services, and health programs.

OBJETIVO: Fazer uma busca e revisão sistemática dos marcos ou modelos conceituais que abrangem aspectos de igualdade em saúde em pesquisa de implementação. MÉTODOS: Busca sistemática nas bases de dados MEDLINE-PubMed, Embase e LILACS (1965­2016) e Scopus (1998­2016) com o uso de estratégia de amostragem em bola de neve e busca da literatura cinzenta. Foram avaliados o tipo de artigo e os elementos contidos sobre pesquisa de implementação (implementation research, IR), ciência de implementação e igualdade em saúde. RESULTADOS: Foram identificados 701 artigos, dos quais 100 foram incluídos na revisão. Destes, 19 artigos estavam relacionados aos marcos conceituais: 12 gerais, cinco sobre disparidades étnicas ou raciais e dois relacionados com saúde infantil. As categorias mais frequentes dos marcos conceituais foram: financiamento, infraestrutura, defesa da causa, qualidade, barreiras internas e cobertura. As menos frequentes foram: outros setores, necessidades dos pacientes ambulatoriais, estado de saúde e avaliação do impacto na equidade. CONCLUSÕES: Para reduzir as lacunas em saúde e as desigualdades em saúde, faz-se necessário dispor de um modelo consolidado de pesquisa de implementação no qual sejam incluídos os aspectos de igualdade em saúde. Este modelo contribuiria para melhorar os processos de implementação das intervenções, serviços e programas de saúde.

Evaluation of different landing pages on behavioural engagement with the CARA dashboard: A user research protocol.

BACKGROUND: CARA set out to develop a data-visualisation platform to facilitate general practitioners to develop a deeper understanding of their patient population, disease management and prescribing through dashboards. To support the continued use and sustainability of the CARA dashboards, dashboard performance and user engagement have to be optimised. User research places people at the centre of the design process and aims to evaluate the needs, behaviours and attitudes of users to inform the design, development and impact of a product. OBJECTIVE: To explore how different initial key messages impact the level of behavioural engagement with a CARA dashboard. METHODS: Participating general practices can upload their practice data for analysis and visualisation in CARA dashboards. Practices will be randomised to one of three different initial landing pages: the full dashboard or one of two key messages: a between comparison (their practice prescribing with the average of all other practices) or within comparison (with practice data of the same month the previous year) with subsequent continuation to the full dashboard. Analysis will determine which of the three landing pages encourages user interaction, as measured by the number of 'clicks', 'viewings' and 'sessions'. Dashboard usage data will be collected through Google analytics. DISCUSSION: This study will provide evidence of behavioural engagement and its metrics during the implementation of the CARA dashboards to optimise and sustain interaction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN32783644 (Registration date: 02/01/2024).

Patient safety incidents in Irish general practice during the COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory practice level analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patient safety is defined as the prevention of harm to patients and aims to prevent errors. This analysis explores factors associated with the reported occurrence of patient safety incidents (PSIs) in general practices in Ireland at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The PRICOV-19 was a cross-sectional study to record the (re)organisation of care provided in general practice and changes implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic in 38 countries. Primary outcomes include three potential scenarios of PSIs: delayed care due to practice factors, delayed care due to patient factors, and delayed care due to triage. Exploratory variables included demographic and organisational characteristics, triage, collaboration, and strategies to safeguard staff members' well-being. RESULTS: Of the 172 participating Irish general practices, 71% (n = 122) recorded at least one potential PSI. The most frequent incident was delayed care due to patient factors (65%), followed by practice (33%) and triage (30%). Multivariate analysis showed that delayed care due to patient factors was associated with changes in the process of repeat prescriptions (OR 6.7 [CI 95% 2.5 to 19.6]). Delayed care due to practice factors was associated with suburbs/small towns (OR 4.2 [1.1 to 19.8]) and structural changes to the reception (OR 3.5 [1.2 to 11.4]). While delayed care due to patient factors was associated with having a practice population of 6000-7999 patients (OR 4.7 [1.1 to 27.6]) and delayed care due to practice factors was associated with having a practice population of 2000-3999 patients (OR 4.2 [1.2 to 17.1]). No linear associations were observed with higher or lower patient numbers for any factor. Delayed care due to triage was not associated with any exploratory variables. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in dramatic changes in the delivery of care through general practices in Ireland. Few factors were associated with the reported occurrence of PSIs, and these did not show consistent patterns. Sustained improvements were made in relation to repeat prescriptions. The lack of consistent patterns, potentially confirms that the autonomous decisions made in general practice in response to the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic could have benefitted patient safety (See Graphical abstract).

Trends and geographical variations in outpatient antimicrobial consumption in Ireland in relation to socio-economic deprivation.

Background: Different factors have been associated with changes in antimicrobial consumption rates in Ireland, however the relationship between socio-economic deprivation and antimicrobial consumption has not been explored. The presented ecological analysis explores the temporal and geographical variation in outpatient antimicrobial consumption and socio-economic deprivation in Ireland from January 2015 to March 2022. Method: Deprivation index (DI) was used as a socio-economic proxy. A multilevel mixed model was applied to explore temporal variation and analyse the longitudinal antimicrobial consumption (DID) in relation to DI. Furthermore, maps were generated based on antimicrobial consumption rates, and spatial autocorrelation analyses were carried out to study geographical variation in antimicrobial consumption rates. Results: The antimicrobial consumption rates per month varied from 26.2 DID (January 2015) to 22.1 DID (March 2022) showing an overall reduction of 16 %. Overall, total antimicrobial consumption in the multilevel model showed a consistent correlation with higher DI score (6.6 (95%CI 3.9 to 9.3)), and winter season (3.6 (95%CI 3.2 to 3.9)). In contrast, before COVID-19 showed significant lower antimicrobial consumption rates compared to during COVID-19 (-4.0 (95%CI -4.7 to -3.23)). No consistent trends were observed for geographical variation between areas. Conclusion: Antimicrobial consumption rates decreased from 2015 to 2021 in Ireland. No geographical patterns were observed in antimicrobial consumption rates but associations between deprivation and antimicrobial consumption rates were observed.

Social determinants, symptoms and mental problems in adults internally displaced by armed conflict. Soacha, Colombia, 2019.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise social determinants of health, mental health problems and potentially problematic symptoms in the adult population displaced by internal armed conflict in Colombia. METHODS: Cross-sectional descriptive study with a random sample of 98 adults forcefully displaced to Soacha, Colombia, due to internal armed conflict. The Self Report Questionnaire to detect potentially problematic mental health problems and symptoms, and a structured questionnaire on social determinants of health were applied. RESULTS: The median age was 38 [interquartile range, 28-46] years, and women predominated (69.39%). The median time since displacement was 36 [16-48] months, and time since settlement in Soacha, 48 [5-48] months. 86.32% survived on less than the minimum wage per month and 93.87% did not have an employment contract. 42.86% and 7.14% reported being owners of their homes before and after displacement, respectively. Upon arriving in Soacha, 79.60% went to primary support networks and 3% to institutions. Before displacement, 16.33% lacked health insurance and 27.55% afterwards. Regarding mental health problems; there were possible depressive or anxious disorders in 57.29%; possible psychosis in 36.73%; and potentially problematic symptoms in 91.66%, being more prevalent and serious in women (p = 0.0025). CONCLUSIONS: A deterioration in living conditions and a higher prevalence of potentially problematic mental health problems and symptoms was reported in displaced adult populations settled in Soacha compared to other regions of the country. Analyses with complementary perspectives are required to evaluate these differences.

Design and architecture of the CARA infrastructure for visualising and benchmarking patient data from general practice.

OBJECTIVE: Collaborate, Analyse, Research and Audit (CARA) project set out to provide an infrastructure to enable Irish general practitioners (GPs) to use their routinely collected patient management software (PMS) data to better understand their patient population, disease management and prescribing through data dashboards. This paper explains the design and development of the CARA infrastructure. METHODS: The first exemplar dashboard was developed with GPs and focused on antibiotic prescribing to develop and showcase the proposed infrastructure. The data integration process involved extracting, loading and transforming de-identified patient data into data models which connect to the interactive dashboards for GPs to visualise, compare and audit their data. RESULTS: The architecture of the CARA infrastructure includes two main sections: extract, load and transform process (ELT, de-identified patient data into data models) and a Representational State Transfer Application Programming Interface (REST API) (which provides the security barrier between the data models and their visualisation on the CARA dashboard). CARAconnect was created to facilitate the extraction and de-identification of patient data from the practice database. DISCUSSION: The CARA infrastructure allows seamless connectivity with and compatibility with the main PMS in Irish general practice and provides a reproducible template to access and visualise patient data. CARA includes two dashboards, a practice overview and a topic-specific dashboard (example focused on antibiotic prescribing), which includes an audit tool, filters (within practice) and between-practice comparisons. CONCLUSION: CARA supports evidence-based decision-making by providing GPs with valuable insights through interactive data dashboards to optimise patient care, identify potential areas for improvement and benchmark their performance against other practices.Supplementary file 1. Graphical abstract.

The Effectiveness of Interactive Dashboards to Optimise Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care: A Systematic Review.

Governments and healthcare organisations collect data on antibiotic prescribing (AP) for surveillance. This data can support tools for visualisations and feedback to GPs using dashboards that may prompt a change in prescribing behaviour. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of interactive dashboards to optimise AP in primary care. Six electronic databases were searched for relevant studies up to August 2022. A narrative synthesis of findings was conducted to evaluate the intervention processes and results. Two independent reviewers assessed the relevance, risk of bias and quality of the evidence. A total of ten studies were included (eight RCTs and two non-RCTs). Overall, seven studies showed a slight reduction in AP. However, this reduction in AP when offering a dashboard may not in itself result in reductions but only when combined with educational components, public commitment or behavioural strategies. Only one study recorded dashboard engagement and showed a difference of 10% (95% CI 5% to 15%) between intervention and control. None of the studies reported on the development, pilot or implementation of dashboards or the involvement of stakeholders in design and testing. Interactive dashboards may reduce AP in primary care but most likely only when combined with other educational or behavioural intervention strategies.

Disease-Specific Quality Indicators for Outpatient Antibiotic Prescribing for Respiratory Infections (ESAC Quality Indicators) Applied to Point Prevalence Audit Surveys in General Practices in 13 European Countries.

Up to 80% of antibiotics are prescribed in the community. An assessment of prescribing by indication will help to identify areas where improvement can be made. A point prevalence audit study (PPAS) of consecutive respiratory tract infection (RTI) consultations in general practices in 13 European countries was conducted in January-February 2020 (PPAS-1) and again in 2022 (PPAS-4). The European Surveillance of Antibiotic Consumption quality indicators (ESAC-QI) were calculated to identify where improvements can be made. A total of 3618 consultations were recorded for PPAS-1 and 2655 in PPAS-4. Bacterial aetiology was suspected in 26% (PPAS-1) and 12% (PPAS-4), and an antibiotic was prescribed in 30% (PPAS-1) and 16% (PPAS-4) of consultations. The percentage of adult patients with bronchitis who receive an antibiotic should, according to the ESAC-QI, not exceed 30%, which was not met by participating practices in any country except Denmark and Spain. For patients (≥1) with acute upper RTI, less than 20% should be prescribed an antibiotic, which was achieved by general practices in most countries, except Ireland (both PPAS), Croatia (PPAS-1), and Greece (PPAS-4) where prescribing for acute or chronic sinusitis (0-20%) was also exceeded. For pneumonia in adults, prescribing is acceptable for 90-100%, and this is lower in most countries. Prescribing for tonsillitis (≥1) exceeded the ESAC-QI (0-20%) in all countries and was 69% (PPAS-1) and 75% (PPAS-4). In conclusion, ESAC-QI applied to PPAS outcomes allows us to evaluate appropriate antibiotic prescribing by indication and benchmark general practices and countries.