RESUMO
Background: Metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma is a rare event and there are few references to this topic. We report an unusual case of prostate cancer metastasis and review of contemporary literature. Moreover, we discuss the pathogenesis and the clinical aspects of this event. Case presentation: A 70-year-old patient was admitted to the hospital for right scrotal pain. The ultrasound examination described an increase in testicular size, suggesting the possibility of orchiepididymitis. Past medical history reported a previous prostate adenocarcinoma. Inflammatory blood tests were normal. Importantly, PSA was 3.3 ng/ml. PET scan positivity in the scrotum raised suspicion of a relapse. Therefore, he underwent right orchiectomy. Conclusion: Although metastatic prostate adenocarcinoma is rare, a correct diagnosis is of paramount importance because the therapy changes accordingly. Patients who complain of scrotal pain need to be examined accurately. Although the most common cause behind this symptom is infectious, the patient's past medical history should be reviewed to exclude previous malignancies.
Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma , Carcinoma , Neoplasias da Próstata , Neoplasias Testiculares , Masculino , Humanos , Idoso , Próstata/patologia , Adenocarcinoma/complicações , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Testiculares/cirurgia , Dor/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: This multi-institutional retrospective real life study was conducted in 22 Italian Oncology Centers and evaluated the role of Axitinib in second line treatment in not selected mRCC patients. METHODS: 148 mRCC patients were evaluated. According to Heng score 15.5%, 60.1% and 24.4% of patients were at poor risk, intermediate and favorable risk, respectively. RESULTS: PFS, OS, DCR and ORR were 7.14 months, 15.5 months, 70.6% and 16.6%, respectively. The duration of prior sunitinib treatment correlated with a longer significant mPFS, 8.8 vs 6.3 months, respectively. Axitinib therapy was safe, without grade 4 adverse events. The most frequent toxicities of all grades were: fatigue (50%), hypertension (26%), and hypothyroidism (18%). G3 blood pressure elevation significantly correlated with longer mPFS and mOS compared to G1-G2 or no toxicity. Dose titration (DT) to 7 mg and 10 mg bid was feasible in 24% with no statistically significant differences in mPFS and mOS. The sunitinib-axitinib sequence was safe and effective, the mOS was 41.15 months. At multivariate analysis, gender, DCR to axitinib and to previous sunitinib correlated significantly with PFS; whereas DCR to axitinib, nephrectomy and Heng score independently affected overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Axitinib was effective and safe in a not selected real life mRCC population. Trial registration INT - Napoli - 11/16 oss. Registered 20 April 2016. http://www.istitutotumori.na.it.
Assuntos
Axitinibe/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Sunitinibe/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Axitinibe/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Metástase NeoplásicaRESUMO
AIM: To collect efficacy and safety data of enzalutamide after docetaxel, we retrospectively evaluated the Italian Named Patient Program results. PATIENTS & METHODS: Two hundred and nine metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients were enrolled. Median age was 73 years. Total 42.1% patients had pain, 14.4% had a performance status of two and 59.8% had a Gleason score ≥8. Total 31.1% had previously received ≥2 chemotherapies, 15.3 and 12% had been previously treated with abiraterone and cabazitaxel, respectively and 14.8% had received both. RESULTS: Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.8 and 13.1 months, respectively. A prostate-specific antigen reduction ≥50% was observed in 49.1%. Total 32.7% abiraterone-pretreated patients achieved a biochemical response compared with 56% of abiraterone-naive patients. CONCLUSION: Enzalutamide was safe and well tolerated. Its antitumor activity in abiraterone-pretreated patients was limited.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Feniltioidantoína/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Androstenos/farmacologia , Androstenos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Benzamidas , Progressão da Doença , Docetaxel/farmacologia , Docetaxel/uso terapêutico , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Calicreínas/sangue , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas , Feniltioidantoína/farmacologia , Feniltioidantoína/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/sangue , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/mortalidade , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Estudos RetrospectivosAssuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias da Próstata , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Carcinoma de Células Renais/terapia , Ácido Edético/análogos & derivados , Radioisótopos de Gálio , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Compostos RadiofarmacêuticosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) received sunitinib in a global expanded-access program (EAP). Here, we report the efficacy and safety results for the EAP subpopulation in Italy. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years old with previously treated or treatment-naïve mRCC received oral sunitinib 50 mg/day on a 4-weeks-on/2-weeks-off schedule. Tumor measurements were scheduled per local practice (using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors). Safety was regularly assessed. RESULTS: A total of 521 patients participated, including 40% aged ≥65 years, 11% with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥2, 14% with non-clear cell RCC, and 11% with brain metastases. The median treatment duration and posttreatment follow-up were 7.4 and 12.3 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 12%, and the median progression-free and overall survival was 9.1 and 27.2 months, respectively. 514 patients (99%) discontinued treatment; reasons included death (17%), nonresponse (46%), or adverse events (AEs; 13%). The most common any-grade treatment-related AEs were asthenia (44%, plus 15% reporting fatigue), thrombocytopenia and stomatitis (both 37%), diarrhea (36%), mucosal inflammation (29%), hypertension (26%), and dysgeusia (25%). The most common grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs were thrombocytopenia (10%), asthenia (9%, plus 3% reporting fatigue), neutropenia, stomatitis (both 6%), and hypertension (5%). CONCLUSION: In a large population of Italian mRCC patients, sunitinib had a manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Indóis/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Pirróis/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Anemia/induzido quimicamente , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Astenia/induzido quimicamente , Carcinoma de Células Renais/secundário , Ensaios de Uso Compassivo , Diarreia/induzido quimicamente , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esquema de Medicação , Disgeusia/induzido quimicamente , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Hipertensão/induzido quimicamente , Incidência , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Indóis/efeitos adversos , Itália , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Leucopenia/induzido quimicamente , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutropenia/induzido quimicamente , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Pirróis/efeitos adversos , Estomatite/induzido quimicamente , Sunitinibe , Trombocitopenia/induzido quimicamente , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety and efficacy of abiraterone acetate (AA) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated in a compassionate named patient programme (NPP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients with mCRPC treated with AA at the standard daily oral dose of 1000 mg plus prednisone 10 mg/day in 19 Italian hospitals. RESULTS: We assessed 265 patients with mCRPC treated with AA. The most frequent (>1%) grade 3-4 toxicities were anaemia (4.2%), fatigue (4.2%), and bone pain (1.5%). The median progression-free survival was 7 months; median overall survival was 17 months after starting AA, and 35 months after the first docetaxel administration. Our study reproduced the clinical outcomes reported in the AA pivotal trial, including those relating to special populations such as the elderly, patients with a poor performance status, symptomatic patients, and patients with visceral metastases. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show the safety and activity of AA when administered outside clinical trials, and confirm the findings of the post-docetaxel pivotal trial in the patients as a whole population and in special populations of specific interest.
Assuntos
Androstenos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Acetato de Abiraterona , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Androstenos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Ensaios de Uso Compassivo , Docetaxel , Quimioterapia Combinada , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of visceral metastases in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with abiraterone. MATERIALS & METHODS: All CRPC patients received abiraterone 1000 mg daily plus prednisone 10 mg orally daily. Liver and lung metastases were considered as visceral metastases. RESULTS: Of 265 CRPC patients, 49 had visceral metastases. Results on progression-free survival were not significantly different in patients with or without visceral metastases. Conversely, the median overall survival between the two groups was 12.4 and 18.5 months (p = 0.01), respectively, and median overall survival of patients with liver-only disease versus other sites was 10.5 versus 18.5 months (p = 0.006), respectively. CONCLUSION: Visceral disease appears to be an important predictor of clinical outcome in CRPC patients treated with abiraterone.
Assuntos
Androstenos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Vísceras/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Androstenos/farmacologia , Antineoplásicos Hormonais/farmacologia , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Docetaxel , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIM: Cabazitaxel is a novel taxane that is approved for use in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer based on the Phase III TROPIC study, which showed improved overall survival with cabazitaxel/prednisone versus mitoxantrone/prednisone. A global early-access program was initiated in order to provide early access to cabazitaxel in docetaxel-pretreated patients and to obtain real-world data. PATIENTS & METHODS: We report interim safety results from an Italian prospective, single-arm, multicenter, open-label trial of 218 patients receiving cabazitaxel 25 mg/m2 every 3 weeks plus prednisolone 10 mg/day, until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, investigator's decision or death. RESULTS: Patients completing treatment received a median of six cabazitaxel cycles. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (33.9%), leukopenia (15.6%), anemia (6%) and asthenia (6%). No peripheral neuropathy or nail disorders were observed. CONCLUSION: These results confirm that cabazitaxel has a manageable safety profile in daily clinical practice and support its use in patients with prostate cancer who progress during or after a docetaxel-based therapy.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Taxoides/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Itália , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Taxoides/administração & dosagem , Taxoides/efeitos adversos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
AIM: The Italian Retrospective Analysis of Sorafenib as First or Second Target Therapy study assessed the efficacy and safety of sorafenib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated in the community. PATIENTS & METHODS: Patients receiving first- or second-line single-agent sorafenib between January 2008 and December 2010 were eligible. Retrospective data collection started in 2012 and covers at least 1-year follow-up. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Median OS was 17.2 months (95% CI: 15.5-19.6): 19.9 months (95% CI: 15.9-25.3) in patients treated with first-line sorafenib and 16.3 months (95% CI: 13.1-18.2) with second-line sorafenib. Overall median (95% CI) progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% CI: 4.9-6.7): 6.6 (95% CI: 4.9-9.3) and 5.3 months (95% CI: 4.3-6.0) in first- and second-line patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The efficacy and safety of sorafenib in routine community practice was generally good, especially in relation to OS in patients treated in the second line, where results were similar to those seen in recent prospective clinical trials.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Neoplasias Renais/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Niacinamida/análogos & derivados , Compostos de Fenilureia/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Carcinoma de Células Renais/mortalidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Niacinamida/administração & dosagem , Niacinamida/efeitos adversos , Niacinamida/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Fenilureia/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Fenilureia/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sorafenibe , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
In oligo-metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), neither computed tomography (CT) nor bone scan is sensitive enough to detect small tumor deposits hampering early treatment and potential cure. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane glycoprotein expressed in the neo-vasculature of numerous malignant neoplasms, including RCC, that can be targeted by positron emission tomography (PET) using PSMA-targeting radioligands. Our aim was to investigate whether PSMA-expression patterns of renal cancer in the primary tumor or metastatic lesions on immunohistochemistry (IHC) are associated with PET/CT findings using [68Ga]-PSMA-HBED-CC (PSMA-PET/CT). We then analyzed the predictive and prognostic role of the PSMA-PET/CT signal. In this retrospective single-center study we included patients with renal cancer submitted to PSMA-PET/CT for staging or restaging, with tumor specimens available for PSMA-IHC. Clinical information (age, tumor type, and grade) and IHC results from the primary tumor or metastases were collected. The intensity of PSMA expression at IHC was scored into four categories: 0: none; 1: weak; 2: moderate; 3: strong. PSMA expression was also graded according to the proportion of vessels involved (PSMA%) into four categories: 0: none; 1: 1-25%; 2: 25-50%; 3: >50%. The intensity of PSMA expression and PSMA% were combined in a three-grade score: 0-2 absent or mildly positive, 3-4 moderately positive, and 5-6 strongly positive. PSMA scores were used for correlation with PSMA-PET/CT results. Results: IHC and PET scans were available for the analysis in 26 patients (22 ccRCC, 2 papillary RCC, 1 chromophobe, 1 "not otherwise specified" RCC). PSMA-PET/CT was positive in 17 (65%) and negative in 9 patients (35%). The mean and median SUVmax in the target lesion were 34.1 and 24.9, respectively. Reporter agreement was very high for both distant metastasis location and local recurrence (kappa 1, 100%). PSMA-PET detected more lesions than conventional imaging and revealed unknown metastases in 4 patients. Bone involvement, extension, and lesion number were greater than in the CT scan (median lesion number on PET/CT 3.5). The IHC PSMA score was concordant in primary tumors and metastases. All positive PSMA-PET/CT results (15/22 ccRCC, 1 papillary cancer type II, and 1 chromofobe type) were revealed in tumors with strong or moderate PSMA combined scores (3-4 and 5-6). In ccRCC tissue samples, PSMA expression was strong to moderate in 20/22 cases. The SUVmax values correlated to the intensity of PSMA expression which were assessed using IHC (p = 0.01), especially in the ccRCC subgroup (p = 0.009). Median survival was significantly higher in patients with negative PSMA-PET/CT (48 months) compared to patients with a positive scan (24 months, p= 0.001). SUVmax ≥ 7.4 provides discrimination of patients with a poor prognosis. Results of PSMA-PET/CT changed treatment planning. Conclusions: in renal cancer, positive PSMA-PET/CT is strongly correlated to the intensity of PSMA expression on immunohistochemistry in both ccRCC and chromophobe cancer. PSMA-PET/CT signal predicts a poor prognosis confirming its potential as an aggressiveness biomarker and providing paramount additional information influencing patient management.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is coming up as a superior imaging tool for prostate cancer (PCa). However, its use in primary staging is still debated. The aim of this study was to assess accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in staging patients with intermediate and high risk PCa candidates to radical prostatectomy managed in the Prostate Cancer Unit of our institution. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated patients with biopsy-proven PCa staged through PSMA PET/CT before undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) with extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). PET findings were categorized with respect to primary tumor (T), nodal (N) and distant metastasis (M). We analyzed the correspondence between PSMA PET/CT and final histopathological examination. RESULTS: We evaluated 42 men with high and intermediate risk PCa submitted to RP with ePLND. Mean age was 65.5 years (range, 49-76 years) and median preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 13 ng/mL (IQR, 8.1-20 ng/mL). Patients in the high-risk group were 23 (54.7%), and the remainders were in the intermediate risk group. The mean risk of lymph node involvement (LNI) using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC)-nomogram was 20%. The most common International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade was 3 (26.19%) after prostate biopsy. PSMA PET/CT showed focal prostatic uptake in 28 patients [mean value of maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) 18.5] and detected pelvic lymph node metastases in 6 cases (14.3%) with a median value of SUVmax 4.5 (IQR, 2-6.9). Histopathological examination detected lymph node metastases in seven patients (16.6%). In the only patient with negative PSMA PET/CT pathology revealed the presence of micrometastasis. After histopathological confirmation, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of pre-operative 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 85.7%, 100%, 100% and 97%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT holds high overall diagnostic value for lymph node staging in patients with intermediate and high risk PCa. Accuracy may depend on lymph node size.
Assuntos
Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata , Idoso , Humanos , Masculino , Linfonodos/patologia , Metástase Linfática , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada/métodos , Próstata/patologia , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) may present with a wide range of clinical pictures. Reportedly, paraneoplastic syndromes are the first sign in 20% of cases and only 15% of cases show the classic triad (flank pain, gross hematuria, and palpable abdominal mass) at presentation. The remaining cases present with signs and symptoms related to the site of distant metastases. These data may explain the reason why about 20-30% of patients are metastatic at presentation. We report the case of a 63-year-old woman who came to our attention for lower back pain. After imaging studies, we detected a left kidney mass of 86 × 61 × 79 mm, multiple right pulmonary nodules and six bone lesions. She underwent left radical nephrectomy. After 1 month, she developed signs of spinal cord compression with neurological deficits and she underwent emergency spinal decompression. In order to allow complete motor recovery, the subsequent stereotactic body radiation therapy was not performed, and she is currently taking combination immunotherapy regimens. Management of mRCC is in a continuous evolution due to availability of new target therapies and the possibility of a multimodal approach with surgical, focal and radiotherapy treatments. However, the ideal treatment algorithm is yet to come. This is why mRCC diagnosis and management are still challenging for the clinicians.
RESUMO
ABSTRACT: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) shows variable FDG uptake; recently, PET/CT with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-target radiotracers was demonstrated to be a promising tool in staging and restaging of RCC patients. We describe the case of a 77-year-old man with a lung metastasis of papillary RCC missed by CT scan who successfully underwent [18F]FDG PET/CT restaging. Targeted therapy with sunitinib was administered. A [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT performed during follow-up demonstrated, among the already known lesions, also a bone marrow metastasis, missed by previous CT scans. This case demonstrates that PET/CT molecular imaging with [18F]FDG and [68Ga]PSMA is superior to conventional imaging in RCC restaging and in assessing therapy response.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Idoso , Carcinoma de Células Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Fluordesoxiglucose F18 , Humanos , Neoplasias Renais/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , PróstataRESUMO
In order to study alternatives at the tissue biopsy to study EGFR status in NSCLC patients, we evaluated three different liquid biopsy platforms (plasma, urine and exhaled breath condensate, EBC). We also reviewed the literature of the cfDNA biological sources other than plasma and compared our results with it about the sensitivity to EGFR mutation determination. Twenty-two EGFR T790M-mutated NSCLC patients in progression to first-line treatment were enrolled and candidate to osimertinib. Plasma, urine and EBC samples were collected at baseline and every two months until progression. Molecular analysis of cfDNA was performed by ddPCR and compared to tissue results. At progression NGS analysis was performed. The EGFR activating mutation detection reached a sensitivity of 58 and 11% and for the T790M mutation of 45 and 10%, in plasma and urine samples, respectively. Any DNA content was recovered from EBC samples. Considering the plasma monitoring study, the worst survival was associated with positive shedding status; both plasma and urine molecular progression anticipated the radiological worsening. Our results confirmed the role of plasma liquid biopsy in testing EGFR mutational status, but unfortunately, did not evidence any improvement from the combination with alternative sources, as urine and EBC.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Bone remodeling is disrupted in metastatic disease, which affects > 70% of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. As a result, abnormal levels of specific bone turnover biomarkers (BTMs) are released. In this prospective ancillary analysis of the Italian real-world study ABITUDE, four markers were measured during abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) treatment in chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC men failing androgen-deprivation therapy. METHODS: Patients were enrolled if a blood sample was obtained before the first administration of abiraterone (baseline); ad-hoc blood samples were withdrawn during routine tests after 3, 6, and 12 months. A centralized lab measured bone alkaline phosphatase (BALP, osteoblast activity marker), type-I collagen-C-telopeptide (CTX-1, bone resorption marker), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and vitamin D (vitD). At each time point, intra-patient variations vs baseline were compared by the signed-rank test (statistical significance: P-value < 0.05). RESULTS: Of 481 patients enrolled in ABITUDE, 186 (median age: 76 [range: 53-93] years) met the substudy criteria: 74.7% had bone metastases, 11.8% were on bone-targeted therapies (BTT) and 14.0% on vitD supplementation. BALP decreased significantly at month 6 (P = 0.0010) and 12 (P < 0.0001) and CTX-1 at month 6 (P = 0.0028); PTH increased at month 3 (P < 0.0001); no significant difference in vitD levels was observed. Similar findings were observed in BTT-untreated patients. The reduction in BALP and CTX-1 levels was more pronounced in patients with than without bone metastases; in the latter group, no significant variation in BALP and CTX-1 levels was observed. CONCLUSIONS: AAP seems to exert an effect on the microenvironment of metastatic but not of normal bone, which likely contributes to its antitumoral activity.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pre-clinical data suggest that docetaxel and enzalutamide interfere with androgen receptor translocation and signalling. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of their concurrent administration in the first-line treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, phase II trial, previously untreated mCRPC patients were randomised 1:1 to receive eight 21-d courses of docetaxel 75 mg/m2, oral prednisone 5 mg twice daily and oral enzalutamide 160 mg/d (arm DE), or the same treatment without enzalutamide (arm D). The primary end-point was the percentage of patients without investigator-assessed disease progression 6 months after the first docetaxel administration. RESULTS: The 246 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel, prednisone and enzalutamide (n = 120) or docetaxel and prednisone (n = 126). The 6-month progression rate was 12.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.1-20.6) in arm DE and 27.8% (95% CI 22.8-39.4) in arm D (chi-squared test 10.01; P = 0.002). The most frequent grade III-IV adverse events were fatigue (12.5% in arm DE versus 5.6% in arm D), febrile neutropenia (9.3% versus 4.0%) and neutropenia (7.6% versus 5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of enzalutamide and docetaxel appears to be more clinically beneficial than docetaxel alone in previously untreated mCRPC patients, although serious adverse events were more frequent. Our findings suggest that first-line treatment with this combination could lead to an additional clinical benefit when prompt and prolonged disease control is simultaneously required. Clearly, these results should be considered cautiously because of the study's phase II design and the absence of an overall survival benefit. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: EudraCT 2014-000175-43 - NCT02453009.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Benzamidas/uso terapêutico , Docetaxel/uso terapêutico , Nitrilas/uso terapêutico , Feniltioidantoína/uso terapêutico , Prednisona/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacologia , Docetaxel/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prednisona/farmacologiaRESUMO
Aim: Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) predicts response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Most NSCLCs are diagnosed at an advanced stage and using minimally invasive diagnostic procedures that yield small biopsies or cytological samples. Methods: Cytological smears and paired histological samples from 52 advanced NSCLC patients were tested for PD-L1 expression by immunocyto/histochemistry (ICC/IHC) and for PD-L1 gene status by FISH. Results:PD-L1 was overexpressed in 9/52 (17%) cytological samples and in seven (13.5%) matched biopsies. The concordance between immunocytochemistry and IHC was 92.3% (48/52; p < 0.001). The concordance between PD-L1 gene status on cytology and histology was 69.2% (18/26; p < 0.001). No correlation between IHC and fluorescence in situ hybridization results was found. Conclusion: Our data support the feasibility and reliability of PD-L1 protein and PD-L1 gene assessment on direct cytological smears from NSCLC patients whenever histological sample are inadequate.
Assuntos
Antígeno B7-H1/genética , Antígeno B7-H1/metabolismo , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Citodiagnóstico/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Biomarcadores Tumorais/metabolismo , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Feminino , Dosagem de Genes , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Hibridização in Situ Fluorescente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at increased risk of complicated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, but it is still unclear if the risk of mortality is influenced by cancer type or ongoing anti-cancer treatments. An interesting debate concerning the potential relationship between androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and SARS-CoV-2 infection has recently been opened in the case of prostate cancer (PC), and the aim of this multi-centre cohort study was to investigate the incidence and outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostrate cancer (mCRPC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients with mCRPC who developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, and recorded their baseline clinical characteristics, their history of PC and SARS-CoV-2 infection, and their oncological status and treatment at the time of infection. The primary study end point was the death rate and the possible impact of the patients' PC-related history and treatments on mortality. RESULTS: Thirty-four of the 1433 patients with mCRPC attending the participating centres (2.3%) developed SARS-CoV-2 infection, 22 (64.7%) of whom were hospitalised. Most of the patients were symptomatic, the most frequent symptoms being fever (70.6%), dyspnoea (61.8%), cough (52.9%) and fatigue (38.2%). After a median follow-up of 21 days (interquartile range: 13-41), 13 patients had died (38.2%), 17 recovered (50.0%) and four (11.7%) were still infected. The number of treatments previously administered for mCRPC had a significant impact on mortality (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings contribute additional data to the current debate concerning the postulated protective role of ADT, which seems to be less in patients with metastatic PC.
Assuntos
Betacoronavirus/isolamento & purificação , Neoplasias Ósseas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ósseas/mortalidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/epidemiologia , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Ósseas/secundário , Neoplasias Ósseas/virologia , COVID-19 , Terapia Combinada , Infecções por Coronavirus/transmissão , Infecções por Coronavirus/virologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/transmissão , Pneumonia Viral/virologia , Prognóstico , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/patologia , Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração/virologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Real-world data on chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with abiraterone plus prednisone are limited, largely deriving from small retrospective studies. METHODS: ABitude is an Italian, observational, prospective, multicenter study of mCRPC patients receiving abiraterone plus prednisone in clinical practice. Chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients were consecutively enrolled at abiraterone start (February 2016 to June 2017) and are being followed for 3 years, with evaluation approximately every 6 months. Several clinical and patients reported outcomes were examined. RESULTS: In this second interim analysis, among 481 enrolled patients, 453 were evaluable for analyses. At baseline, the median age was 77 years and ~69% of patients had comorbidities (mainly cardiovascular diseases). Metastases were located mainly at bones and lymph nodes; 8.4% of patients had visceral metastases. During a median follow-up of 18 months, 1- and 2-year probability of radiographic progression-free survival were 73.9% and 56.2%, respectively; the corresponding rates for overall survival were 87.3% and 70.4%. In multivariable analyses, the number of bone metastases significantly affected radiographic progression-free survival and overall survival. During abiraterone plus prednisone treatment, 65% of patients had a ⩾50% prostate-specific antigen decline, and quality of life remained appreciably high. Among symptomatic patients according to the Brief Pain Inventory) (32%), scores significantly declined after 6 months of treatment. Overall, eight patients (1.7%) had serious adverse reactions to abiraterone. CONCLUSIONS: Abiraterone plus prednisone is effective and safe for chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients in clinical practice.