Liver Retransplantation in Patients With HIV-1 Infection: An International Multicenter Cohort Study.

Liver retransplantation is performed in HIV-infected patients, although its outcome is not well known. In an international cohort study (eight countries), 37 (6%; 32 coinfected with hepatitis C virus [HCV] and five with hepatitis B virus [HBV]) of 600 HIV-infected patients who had undergone liver transplant were retransplanted. The main indications for retransplantation were vascular complications (35%), primary graft nonfunction (22%), rejection (19%), and HCV recurrence (13%). Overall, 19 patients (51%) died after retransplantation. Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 56%, 51%, and 51%, respectively. Among patients with HCV coinfection, HCV RNA replication status at retransplantation was the only significant prognostic factor. Patients with undetectable versus detectable HCV RNA had a survival probability of 80% versus 39% at 1 year and 80% versus 30% at 3 and 5 years (p = 0.025). Recurrence of hepatitis C was the main cause of death in the latter. Patients with HBV coinfection had survival of 80% at 1, 3, and 5 years after retransplantation. HIV infection was adequately controlled with antiretroviral therapy. In conclusion, liver retransplantation is an acceptable option for HIV-infected patients with HBV or HCV coinfection but undetectable HCV RNA. Retransplantation in patients with HCV replication should be reassessed prospectively in the era of new direct antiviral agents.

"Very early" intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in cirrhotic patients: should liver transplantation be reconsidered in these patients?

A retrospective cohort multicenter study was conducted to analyze the risk factors for tumor recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) in cirrhotic patients found to have an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) on pathology examination. We also aimed to ascertain whether there existed a subgroup of patients with single tumors ≤2 cm ("very early") in which results after LT can be acceptable. Twenty-nine patients comprised the study group, eight of whom had a "very early" iCCA (four of them incidentals). The risk of tumor recurrence was significantly associated with larger tumor size as well as larger tumor volume, microscopic vascular invasion and poor degree of differentiation. None of the patients in the "very early" iCCA subgroup presented tumor recurrence compared to 36.4% of those with single tumors >2 cm or multinodular tumors, p = 0.02. The 1-, 3- and 5-year actuarial survival of those in the "very early" iCCA subgroup was 100%, 73% and 73%, respectively. The present is the first multicenter attempt to ascertain the risk factors for tumor recurrence in cirrhotic patients found to have an iCCA on pathology examination. Cirrhotic patients with iCCA ≤2 cm achieved excellent 5-year survival, and validation of these findings by other groups may change the current exclusion of such patients from transplant programs.

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma or mixed hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma in patients undergoing liver transplantation: a Spanish matched cohort multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcome of patients with hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (I-CC) on pathological examination after liver transplantation for HCC. BACKGROUND: Information on the outcome of cirrhotic patients undergoing a transplant for HCC and with a diagnosis of HCC-CC or I-CC by pathological study is limited. METHODS: Multicenter, retrospective, matched cohort 1:2 study. STUDY GROUP: 42 patients undergoing a transplant for HCC and with a diagnosis of HCC-CC or I-CC by pathological study; and control group: 84 patients with a diagnosis of HCC. I-CC subgroup: 27 patients compared with 54 controls; HCC-CC subgroup: 15 patients compared with 30 controls. Patients were also divided according to the preoperative tumor size and number: uninodular tumors 2 cm or smaller and multinodular or uninodular tumors 2 cm or larger. Median follow-up: 51 (range, 3-142) months. RESULTS: The 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rate differed between the study and control groups (83%, 70%, and 60% vs 99%, 94%, and 89%, respectively; P < 0.001). Differences were found in 1-, 3-, and 5-year actuarial survival rates between the I-CC subgroup and their controls (78%, 66%, and 51% vs 100%, 98%, and 93%; P < 0.001), but no differences were observed between the HCC-CC subgroup and their controls (93%, 78%, and 78% vs 97%, 86%, and 86%; P = 0.9). Patients with uninodular tumors 2 cm or smaller in the study and control groups had similar 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate (92%, 83%, 62% vs 100%, 80%, 80%; P = 0.4). In contrast, patients in the study group with multinodular or uninodular tumors larger than 2 cm had worse 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates than their controls (80%, 66%, and 61% vs 99%, 96%, and 90%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HCC-CC have similar survival to patients undergoing a transplant for HCC. Preoperative diagnosis of HCC-CC should not prompt the exclusion of these patients from transplant option.

Liver retransplantation in HIV-infected patients: a prospective cohort study.

Information regarding liver retransplantation in HIV-infected patients is scant. Data from 14 HIV-infected patients retransplanted between 2002 and 2011 in Spain (6% retransplantation rate) were analyzed and compared with those from 157 matched HIV-negative retransplanted patients. In HIV-infected patients, early (≤30 days) retransplantation was more frequently indicated (57% vs. 29%; p = 0.057), and retransplantation for HCV recurrence was less frequently indicated (7% vs. 37%; p = 0.036). Survival probability after retransplantation in HIV-positive patients was lower than in HIV-negative patients, 42% versus 64% at 3 years, although not significantly (p = 0.160). Among HIV-infected patients, those with undetectable HCV RNA at retransplantation and those with late (>30 days) retransplantation showed better 3-year survival probability (80% and 67%, respectively), similar to that in their respective HIV-negative counterparts (72% and 70%). In HIV-infected and HIV-negative patients, 3-year survival probability in those with positive HCV RNA at retransplantation was 22% versus 65% (p = 0.008); in those with early retransplantation, 3-year survival probability was 25% versus 56% (p = 0.282). HIV infection was controlled with antiretroviral therapy after retransplantation. In conclusion, HIV-infected patients taken as a whole have unsatisfactory survival after liver retransplantation, although patients with undetectable HCV RNA at retransplantation or undergoing late retransplantation show a more favorable outcome.

Extended criteria donors in liver transplantation: adapting donor quality and recipient.

Despite the progressive increase in the number of liver transplantations, the mortality on the waiting list remains between 5% and 10%, and patients have to deal with longer waiting periods. Facing this situation, transplant centers have developed alternatives to increase the number of grafts by accepting donors who were previously considered to be inadequate, because they are at higher risk of initial poor function and graft failure or may cause disease transmission. Currently, some marginal donors are being routinely used: elderly donors, steatotic grafts, non-heart-beating donors, hepatitis C virus-positive (HCV+) or hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors. These so-called marginal or extended-criteria donors were initially used in high-risk or urgent recipients; however, the number of marginal grafts has significantly increased, forcing the transplant community toward their more rationale use to maintain excellent results of liver transplantation. In this new scenario, the adequacy between donor and recipient may be paramount. Advanced donor age seems to be related to a greater graft failure rate in HCV+ recipients. Early survival seems to be significantly reduced when steatotic grafts are used in recipients with high Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. Moreover, a decreased survival has been observed among high-risk patients receiving organs from marginal donors. No benefit seems to exist when high-donor risk index grafts are transplanted into recipients with low MELD Scores. The recognition of various donor groups according to their quality and the need for good donor and recipient selection must lead us to define new policies for organ allocation of marginal grafts that may come into conflict with current policies of organ allocation according to the risk of death among patients awaiting a liver transplantation.

Survival and hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation in HIV- and hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients: experience in a single center.

INTRODUCTION: Posttransplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence has been shown to negatively impact graft and patient survivals. It has been suggested that HCV recurrence among HIV- and HCV-coinfected transplant recipients is even more aggressive. OBJECTIVE: To compare the histological severity and survival of posttransplant HCV recurrence between HIV- and HCV-coinfected and HCV-monoinfected patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 72 adult patients who underwent primary liver transplantation at our institution for HCV-related cirrhosis between October 2001 and April 2007. We excluded one coinfected patient who died on postoperative day 5 leaving 12 HIV- and HCV-coinfected patients for comparison with 59 monoinfected patients. When listed, all coinfected patients fulfilled the criteria of the Spanish Consensus Document for transplantation in HIV patients. Immunosuppression did not differ between the two groups: all were treated with tacrolimus + steroids (slow tapering). Aggressive HCV recurrence was defined as cholestatic hepatitis and/or a fibrosis grade > or =2 during the first posttransplant year. RESULTS: Coinfected patients were younger than monoinfected patients: 45 +/- 6 years vs 55 +/- 9 years (P = .0008). There were no differences in Child score, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, donor age, graft steatosis, ischemia time, HCV pretransplant viral load or genotype between the groups. Significant rejection episodes were also equally distributed (25% vs 14%; P = .38). Seven coinfected patients and 29 monoinfected patients developed aggressive HCV recurrences (58% vs 49%; P = .75). Median follow-up was 924 days. Global survival at 3 years was 80%. Survivals at 1, 2, and 3 years were 83%, 75%, 62% in the coinfected vs 98%, 89%, 84% in the monoinfected patients, respectively (log-rank test = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The severity of histological recurrence was similar among HIV- and HCV-coinfected and monoinfected HCV liver recipients in the first posttransplant year. Mortality attributed to recurrent HCV was similar in the groups. There were no short-term (3-year) differences in survival between the two groups of patients.

Hepaticojejunostomy in Orthotopic Liver Transplant: A Retrospective Case Control Study.

The reported biliary morbidity rate for deceased donor full-size orthotopic liver transplantation is up to 30%. The technique used may be influenced by multiple factors, and in some situations, biliary reconstruction must be carried out through Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. The aim of our study was to determine the results of the orthotopic liver transplantation according to the technique used in the biliary reconstruction. A retrospective study was performed with the first 1000 orthotopic liver transplants (951 patients) carried out consecutively (1996-2013) with follow-up until 2017. A matched case-control study was designed in 1:3 ratio (47/136) to compare the reconstruction by hepaticojejunostomy vs the end-to-end coledoco-coledocostomy. Hepaticojejunostomy was associated with patients with cholestatic (44.7% vs 3.7%) and ischemic disease (14.9% vs 0%; P < .001) and previous transplant (29.8% vs 1.5%; P = .003). The mean biliary duct reconstruction, surgery, and cold ischemia times were also higher. Vascular complications were significantly more frequent in the hepaticojejunostomy group (36.1% vs 10.4%; P < .001), mainly because of differences in early arterial complications. Nevertheless, there were no differences in the total biliary complication (21.2% vs 16.9%; P = .5). The biliary leakage rate and the biliary stricture rate were also similar. Hepaticojejunostomy in orthotopic liver transplantation presented longer biliary reconstruction, surgery, and cold ischemia times when compared with end-to-end coledoco-coledocostomy. In addition, it was followed by a higher incidence of arterial complications but had similar biliary complication rate and graft survival. Differences could be explained by the fact that hepaticojejunostomy was used more often in cholestatic or ischemic diseases and in retransplant procedures.

Octogenarian Donors in Liver Transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Due to the disparity between the number of patients on the list for liver transplantation and the availability of organs, the use of older donors has become necessary. The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of liver transplantation using octogenarian donors. METHODS: From December 2003 to February 2016, 777 liver transplantations were performed at our institution, 33 of them (4.2%) with donors 80 years old and above. Our policy for the acceptance of these donors is based on preoperative liver function tests, donor hemodynamic stability, and intraoperative normal gross aspect. Octogenarian grafts were deliberately not assigned to retransplantations or to recipients with multiple previous surgical procedures or extensive portal thrombosis. RESULTS: Mean donor age was 82.7 ± 2.1 years, with a range between 80 and 88. Only 12.1% suffered hemodynamic instability during the intensive care unit stay. Three donors (9.1%) had a history of diabetes mellitus. The mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score among recipients was 14.7 ± 5.6. Mean cold ischemia time was 302 ± 61 minutes. After a median follow-up of 18.5 months (range 7.5 to 47.5), no graft developed primary nonfunction. We observed hepatic artery thrombosis in 1 patient (3%) and biliary complications in 4 patients (12.5%). There was 1 case of ischemic-type biliary lesion, although it was related to hepatic artery thrombosis. Patient survival at 1 and 3 years was 90.3%, whereas graft survival was 92.6% and 86.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Excellent mid-term results can be obtained after liver transplantation with octogenarian donors with strict donor selection and adequate graft allocation.

Intraoperative Portal Flow of Less Than 1 Liter per Minute After Orthotopic Liver Transplantation Is Not Associated Per Se With an Increased Rate of Early Graft Dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether a portal flow of <1,000 mL/min in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is associated with a higher incidence of early graft dysfunction (EGD) and graft loss. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 540 OLTs carried out consecutively from December 2004 to December 2013. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, portal flow <1,000 mL/min; and group B, portal flow >1,000 mL/min. We studied the incidence of EGD and graft survival. A subanalysis was performed to define the minimum acceptable portal flow/100 g of liver weight to reduce the development EGD and graft loss. RESULTS: Group A included 29 patients and group B, 511 patients. Group A had significantly lower-weight donors and recipients, female recipients with cholestatic disease, lower MELD scores, and lower hepatic artery flow. EGD occurred in 7 patients in group A (24.1%) versus 101 patients in group B (19.8%; P = .43). No significant differences were found in 1- and 5-year graft survival. A portal flow of <80 mL/min/100 g of liver weight was related to a significantly higher risk of developing EGD (odds ratio, 4.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.46-12.91; P = .008) and graft loss (hazard ratio, 4.05; 95% CI, 1.32-12.42; P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative portal flow of <1,000 mL/min in OLT was not related per se with a higher incidence of EGD or graft loss. Significantly higher risk of developing EGD and graft loss was associated with a portal flow of <80 mL/min/100 g of liver weight.

Safety and Efficacy of Early Everolimus When Calcineurin Inhibitors Are Not Recommended in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation.

Our aim was to study the safety and efficacy of immunosuppression with everolimus (EVL) within the 1st month after orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) when calcineurin inhibitors are not recommended. For this purpose, 28 recipients who had been treated with EVL within the 1st month after adult LT were eligible to enter in a retrospective multicenter study. Patients were followed up for 12 months after LT. EVL therapy was initiated at a median of 14 days (range, 4-24) after LT. The reason for early EVL was neurotoxicity in 14 cases, renal dysfunction in 12, and acute cellular rejection combined with renal impairment in 2. In 23 patients, immunosuppression was EVL + mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolate sodium + steroids, and EVL + tacrolimus + steroids/mycophenolate sodium was used in 4 cases. Neurotoxicity disappeared in all patients. Renal function in patients with renal impairment improved from a median of 32 mL/min/1.73 m2 at the moment of implementation of EVL to 62 mL/min/1.73 m2 at 1 year. Four patients (14.3%) developed acute cellular rejection. We observed incisional hernia in 4 patients (14.3%), hematologic complications in 6 (21.4%), proteinuria in 2 (7.1%), edema and/or effusions in 8 (28.6%), and dyslipidemia in 12 (42.8%). No arterial complications were observed. EVL was withdrawn in 5 patients during the 1st year after LT. One-year patient survival was 92.7%. In conclusion, use of EVL within the 1st month after LT when calcineurin inhibitors are not recommended seems to be an effective therapeutic option with an acceptable safety profile.

Donors older than 70 years in liver transplantation.

INTRODUCTION: Expansion of donor criteria has become necessary with the increasing number of liver transplantation candidates, as aged donors who have been considered to yield marginal organs. METHODS: Our database of 477 liver transplants (OLT) included 55 cases performed from donors at least 70 years old vs 422 with younger donors. We analyzed pretransplantation donor and recipient characteristics as well as evolution of the recipients. RESULTS: The old donor group showed significantly lower ALT (23 +/- 17 vs 48.9 +/- 67; P = .0001) and LDH (444 +/- 285 vs 570 +/- 329; P = .01). There was a trend toward fewer hypotensive events in the aged donor group (27.2% vs 40.5%; P = .07). No steatosis (>10%) was accepted in the old donor group. Cold ischemia time was statistically shorter for the aged donors (297 +/- 90 minutes vs 346 +/- 139 minutes; P = .03). With these selected donors, the results were not different for primary nonfunction, arterial and biliary complications, hospitalization, acute reoperation or acute retransplantation, and hospital mortality when donors > or =70 years old were compared to younger donors. Functional cholestasis, neither related to rejection nor to biliary complications, was seen more frequently in old donor recipients (40% vs 22%; P = .03). No differences in 1, and 3 year survivals were observed between recipients of donors over 70 years old and these of younger organs: 93.8% and 90.6% vs 90.7% and 82.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: When using selected donors > or =70 years old the outcomes were comparable to those obtained with younger donors. Strict selection is necessary to achieve good long-term survival.

"Pseudoseptic" pseudogout associated with hypomagnesemia in liver transplant patients.

Hypomagnesemia has been associated with deposition of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystals in articular structures, causing pseudogout, also known as calcic gout. Occasionally, pseudogout may mimic septic arthritis; this "pseudoseptic" attack may be of especial concern in the immunocompromised host, such as transplant recipient patients, who may be indeed at risk of developing septic arthritis. We report the cases of two patients in whom pseudogout developed after liver transplantation. Synovial fluid appearance and leukocyte counting in synovial fluid mimicked septic arthritis, but calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate crystals were observed. Magnesium depletion before transplantation and further tacrolimus-induced renal magnesium leakage were probably working in these patients.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients.

A consecutive series of 88 patients underwent transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma with cirrhosis over a 7-year period. Liver transplantation was indicated because of the tumor in 75 cases (85.2%); tumor was an incidental finding in 13 cases (14.8%). One patient was retransplanted due to primary nonfunction. The perioperative mortality was 4.5%. Tumor recurrence was observed in seven patients (7.95%) with incidental tumor recurrence in one case. As in patients with known primary liver tumors pretransplant, a thorough follow-up is advisable to establish an early diagnosis of recurrence. The actuarial survival for nonincidental hepatocellular carcinoma at 1, 3, and 5 year was 92%, 77%, and 75%, respectively. The differences in actuarial survival between hepatitis C negative and positive hepatocellular carcinoma were not significant (log-rank test P=.27), though there was a clear improvement in results (94%, 85%, and 78% vs 90%, 71%, and 71%), at 1, 3, and 5 years meaning that HCV infection is an important prognostic factor. Although transplantation for HCC has the advantages of removing the tumor and the cirrhotic liver, it remains a controversial topic. In our experience patients showing lesions less than 5 cm or three or fewer lesions experience an equivalent survival to transplanted patients who do not have cancer.

Risk factors for biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation with T-tube: a single-center cohort of 743 transplants.

BACKGROUND: Despite recent advances in organ preservation, surgical procedures, and immunosuppression, biliary reconstruction after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains as a major source of morbidity. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of biliary complications (BCs) after end-to-end choledochocholedochostomy (EE-CC) with a T-tube as the standard technique for biliary reconstruction after OLT. METHODS: A total of 833 consecutive liver transplantations that took place from February 1996 to April 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with concomitant hepatic artery complications were excluded, as were those who underwent urgent retransplantation or died within 1 week after transplantation. Finally, the study group comprised 743 patients. RESULTS: The overall BC rate was 9.8% (73 patients), including stricture in 19 patients (2.6%) and bile leakage in 39 patients (5.2%). After univariate analysis, significant risk factors for BCs were surgery time >5 hours, arterial ischemia time >30 minutes, use of a classic transplant technique, transfusion of red blood cells ≥5 units, anti-cytomegalovirus treatment, and period of transplantation between 1996 and 2002. Stepwise logistic regression study was performed, including those variables with a value of P <.200. Multivariate analysis showed that pretransplant serum creatinine (odds ratio = 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-1.57; P = .025) and arterial ischemia time >30 minutes (odds ratio = 2.44; 95% CI, 1.45-4.12; P = .001) were the only independent risk factors related to the development of BCs after biliary reconstruction with the T-tube. CONCLUSIONS: The performance of different variables in predicting occurrence of BCs was assessed with the use of receiver operating characteristic analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of our model was 0.637 (95% CI, 0.564-0.710), and therefore we must conclude that other variables not included in our model may have influence in the development of BCs after OLT with an EE-CC with a T-tube as the procedure for biliary reconstruction.

Biliary complications after orthotopic liver transplantation: a review of incidence and risk factors.

Biliary complications (BCs) are a common source of morbidity after liver transplantation, leading to long-term and repeated therapies. The incidence of BCs currently ranges from 5% and 25%. Biliary strictures and leaks are the most common complications after deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT), occurring in 9%-12% and 5%-10% of cases, respectively. Hepatic artery complications are recognized as the major risk factor for BCs; however, other circumstances such as advanced donor age, prolonged cold and warm ischemia times, grafts from donors after cardiac death, occurrence of a previous bile leak, T-tube use, cytomegalovirus infection, or graft steatosis have also been reported to be potential risk factors. Use of various preservation solutions has not significantly improved the biliary complication rate after DDLT. Technical modifications in biliary reconstruction have been proposed to improve outcomes after DDLT; the use of a T-tube for biliary reconstruction continues to be controversial. Non anastomotic strictures (NAS) are recognized to be different from anastomotic strictures. Although they have been associated with ischemic or immunological mechanisms, bile salt toxicity has recently been recognized as a potential factor for NAS. Donation after cardiac death is a significant source of organs that has been associated with decreased graft survival due to the increased BCs.

Biliary complications in orthotopic liver transplantation using choledochocholedochostomy with a T-tube.

Despite significant advances in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), biliary tract reconstruction is still a major source of complications. Choledochocholedochostomy with a T-tube used to be the standard procedure for biliary reconstruction after OLT. However, many centers currently avoid use of the T-tube because of the high incidence of complications. Our aim was to study the biliary complications occurring at our center when end-to-end choledochocholedochostomy (EE-CC) over a T-tube was used as the standard procedure for biliary reconstruction. A retrospective review was conducted of all patients who underwent liver transplantation from February 1, 1996, to April 30, 2010. Only patients requiring any therapy to treat biliary complications were considered, whereas those with concomitant hepatic artery complications were excluded. The study cohort consisted of 743 patients who had EE-CC with a T-tube. Of these, 73 patients (9.8%) experienced any biliary complication. Anastomotic strictures occurred in 17 patients (2.3%), and non-anastomotic strictures in 2 (0.3%). Fifteen patients with anastomotic strictures were successfully treated by dilatation and stenting. Bile leakage was diagnosed in 39 patients (5.2%). Leakage occurred at the anastomosis in 15 patients (2%), and at the exit site of the T-tube in 24 patients (3.2%). Tube opening was the only treatment used in 30 patients with bile leakage (76.9%). Seven patients experienced leaks after elective T-tube removal (1%). Overall, repeat surgery to manage biliary complications was needed in 9 patients (1.2%). The mortality rate from biliary complications was 0.13%. In conclusion, EE-CC with a T-tube was followed by a low incidence of biliary complications. The complication rate after elective T-tube removal and the repeat surgery rate were extremely low. These results might challenge the current trend to avoid T-tube stenting in OLT.