RESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264442.].
RESUMO
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0000336.].
RESUMO
Differentiated models of HIV care (DMOC) aim to improve health care efficiency. We describe outcomes of five DMOC in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: facility adherence clubs (facility AC) and community adherence clubs (community AC), community antiretroviral treatment (ART) groups (CAG), spaced fast lane appointments (SFLA), and community pick up points (PuP). This retrospective cohort study included 8241 eligible patients enrolled into DMOC between 1/1/2012 and 31/12/2018. We assessed retention in DMOC and on ART, and viral load suppression (<1000 copies/mL). Kaplan-Meier techniques were applied to describe crude retention. Mixed effects parametric survival models with Weibull distribution and clustering on health center and individual levels were used to assess predictors for ART and DMOC attrition, and VL rebound (≥1000 copies/mL). Overall DMOC retention was 85%, 80%, and 76% at 12, 24 and 36 months. ART retention at 12, 24 and 36 months was 96%, 93%, 90%. Overall incidence rate of VL rebound was 1.9 episodes per 100 person-years. VL rebound rate was 4.9 episodes per 100 person-years among those enrolled in 2012-2015, and 0.8 episodes per 100 person-years among those enrolled in 2016-2018 (RR 0.12; 95% CI, 0.09-0.15, p<0.001). Prevalence of confirmed virological failure was 0.6% (38/6113). Predictors of attrition from DMOC and from ART were male gender, younger age, shorter duration on ART before enrollment. Low level viremia (>200-399 copies/mL) was associated with higher hazards of VL rebound and attrition from ART. Concurrent implementation of several DMOC in a large ART program is feasible and can achieve sustained retention on ART and VL suppression.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Innovative models to distribute oral HIV self-tests (HIVST) provide an opportunity to increase access to HIV testing, especially for hard-to-reach populations. This study aimed to describe the acceptability of unsupervised peer-distribution of HIVST as a method to scale-up HIV testing. METHODS: In this study, lay counsellors or community health workers provided HIVST kits to primary recipients (PRs) for distribution to their sexual partners, anyone in their social network (termed secondary recipients) or for self-testing, from September 2018 to March 2020. The study was conducted in Eshowe and Mbongolwane areas in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. A structured questionnaire was administered during the recruitment and passive follow-up, when people came for confirmatory HIV testing. Electronic records were retrospectively examined to determine initiation of antiretroviral treatment (ART) for all HIVST users and non-users. RESULTS: Among 36,708 people approached to be primary recipients, 9,891 (26.9%) accepted; 31,341 HIVST kits were distributed with a median of three (IQR: 2-4) per peer. PRs were predominately recruited at primary health clinics (PHCs). However, acceptability of HIVST was thrice as high at community-based testing sites compared to PHCs (64.5% vs. 21.0%; p<0.001). During the study period, 34,715 adults were tested for HIV at both PHCs and community-based testing sites; of these, 1,089 individuals reported HIVST use. Among HIVST users, 893 (82.0%) returned to the clinic for confirmatory testing after testing negative on HIVST; 196 (17.9%) were confirmed HIV positive following a positive HIVST. After excluding 36/196 (18.4%) participants for whom clinical records could not be found in electronic register and 25/160 (15.6%) who were already on ART before receiving HIVST, 129/135 (95.5%) initiated ART, whereas 2,362/2685 (88%) of HIV positive HIVST non-users-initiated ART. CONCLUSION: Unsupervised peer-distribution of HIVST was feasible and acceptable, with more than 25% accepting to be peer-distributors. Acceptability of HIVST was thrice as high in community sites compared to clinics.