North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) N0432: phase II trial of docetaxel with capecitabine and bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy for patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (T; Taxotere) with capecitabine (X) is active against metastatic breast cancer (MBC); bevacizumab (BV) has demonstrated efficacy with taxanes in the first-line setting. This study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of TX-BV in patients with MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-arm, multicenter phase II study, patients received first-line bevacizumab 15 mg/kg and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1 and capecitabine 825 mg/m(2) twice per day on days 1-14 every 21 days. Primary and secondary end points were tumor response rate (RR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 45 assessable patients received TX-BV for a median of seven cycles. Two complete and 20 partial responses were observed (overall RR 49%); nine patients had stable disease >6 months, for a clinical benefit rate of 69%. Median response duration was 11.8 months. Median OS and PFS were 28.4 and 11.1 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events included hand-foot syndrome (29%), fatigue (20%), febrile neutropenia (18%), and diarrhea (18%). In cycles 3-10, median dose levels of docetaxel and capecitabine were 60 mg/m(2) and 660 mg/m(2), respectively. CONCLUSION: TX-BV demonstrated significant activity; dose modifications were required to manage drug-related toxic effects.

Controlled trial of megestrol acetate for the treatment of cancer anorexia and cachexia.

Preliminary information has suggested that megestrol acetate leads to appetite stimulation and nonfluid weight gain in patients with breast cancer, other cancers, and AIDS. Pursuant to this, we developed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of megestrol acetate in patients with cancer-associated anorexia and cachexia. We randomly assigned 133 eligible patients to receive 800 mg of megestrol acetate per day or a placebo. Patients assigned to megestrol acetate more frequently reported improved appetite (P = .003) and food intake (P = .009) when compared with patients receiving the placebo. A weight gain of 15 lb or more over baseline was seen in 11 of 67 (16%) patients receiving megestrol acetate compared with one of 66 (2%) given the placebo (P = .003). Patients receiving megestrol acetate reported significantly less nausea (13% vs. 38%; P = .001) and emesis (8% vs. 25%, P = .009). No clinically or statistically significant toxic reactions were ascribed to megestrol acetate, with the exception of mild edema. This study convincingly demonstrated that megestrol acetate can stimulate appetite and food intake in patients with anorexia and cachexia associated with cancer, leading to significant weight gain in a proportion of such patients.

A randomized prospective assessment of recombinant leukocyte A human interferon with or without aspirin in advanced renal adenocarcinoma.

We performed a prospective, controlled trial of recombinant leukocyte A interferon (IFN-alpha 2A) with or without aspirin (ASA) in 176 patients with assessable advanced renal cell cancer in light of a 34% response rate (10 of 29 patients) from the two-agent regimen in an earlier nonrandomized trial. This encouraging result was substantially higher than the 15% response rate typically achieved with IFN therapy alone. Eighty-seven patients received IFN-alpha 2A 20 x 10(6) U/m2 intramuscularly three times a week, and 89 received the same IFN therapy with ASA 600 mg orally four times each day. Each group was balanced as to relevant prognostic discriminants. Response rates were 8% for the group receiving ASA in addition to IFN, and 13% for the group receiving IFN alone (P = .30). The median times to progression were 1.9 months for the group receiving IFN with ASA and 2.7 months for the group receiving IFN alone (log-rank P = .36). The median survival durations were 8.8 months for the IFN and ASA group and 8.0 months for the IFN-only group (log-rank P = .60). These figures are also inferior to those typically reported from other studies. Our findings reemphasize the crucial role of randomized trials, admittedly cumbersome and time-consuming, to determine accurately the value of apparently promising therapies. Although some patients may derive benefit from IFN therapy, our findings raise disturbing questions regarding the potential IFN-alpha 2A according to the dose and schedule used in this trial to have any substantive impact on the ultimate outcome of disseminated renal cell cancer.