Very low level viraemia and risk of virological failure in treated HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to investigate whether very low level viraemia (VLLV) (20-50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL) was associated with increased risk of virological failure (VF) as compared with persistent full suppression (< 20 copies/mL). METHODS: From the VACH Cohort database, we selected those patients who started antiretroviral therapy (ART) after January 1997 and who achieved effective viral suppression [two consecutive viral loads (VLs) < 50 copies/mL] followed by full suppression (at least one VL <20 copies/mL). We carried out survival analyses to investigate whether the occurrence of VLLV rather than maintaining full suppression at < 20 copies/mL was associated with virological failure (two consecutive VLs > 200 copies/mL or one VL > 200 copies/mL followed by a change of ART regimen, administrative censoring or loss to follow-up), adjusted for nadir CD4 cell count, sex, age, ethnicity, transmission group, type of ART and time on effective suppression at < 50 copies/mL. RESULTS: Of 21 480 patients who started ART, 13 674 (63.7%) achieved effective suppression at < 50 copies/mL, of whom 4289 (31.4%) further achieved full suppression at < 20 copies/mL after May 2009. A total of 2623 patients (61.1%) remained fully suppressed thereafter, while 1666 had one or more episodes of VL detection > 20 copies/mL (excluding virological failure). A total of 824 patients had VLLV after suppression at < 20 copies/mL. VLLV was not associated with virological failure as compared with persistent full suppression [hazard ratio (HR) 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-1.00], independently of the number of blips recorded (from one to 18). CONCLUSIONS: In our population of HIV-infected patients on ART who achieved viral suppression at < 20 copies/mL, the risk of virological failure was no different for patients who remained fully suppressed compared with those who experienced subsequent episodes of VLLV.

The relationship between antiretroviral prescription patterns and treatment guidelines in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected patients.

BACKGROUND: Reports have shown that the publication of practice guidelines does not guarantee their use in clinical practice. The objective of this study was to evaluate the agreement between antiretroviral treatments (ARTs) prescribed in clinical practice and the recommendations in published guidelines. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out in ART-naïve adults of the Spanish Asociacion Medica Vach de Estudios Multicentricos (VACH) Cohort for the period from 2003 to 2006. RESULTS: A total of 945 patients initiated ART. Of these patients, 12.3% had a CD4 cell count above 350 cells/microL. A 'nonrecommended' antiretroviral regimen was prescribed to 5.3, 5.1 and 7.8% of patients with CD4 counts <200, 200-350 and >350 cells/microL, respectively. Multivariate analyses demonstrated that only a higher viral load was associated with the selection of a combination treatment that was recommended by the guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients were prescribed initial treatments in agreement with the recommendations. Appropriate routine data collection in databases can be used to evaluate the level of antiretroviral guideline compliance. We propose that routine evaluations of the guidelines must be part of quality assessment to improve medical care.

Real World Patient-reported Outcomes in HIV-infected Adults Switching to EVIPLERA®, Because of a Previous Intolerance to cART. PRO-STR Study.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the impact of switching from stable Combined Antiretroviral Therapy (cART) to single-tablet regimen (RPV/FTC/TDF=EVIPLERA® /COMPLERA®) on patient- reported outcomes in HIV-infected adults who cannot tolerate previous cART, in a real-world setting. METHODS: PRO-STR is a 48-week observational, prospective, multicenter study. Presence and magnitude of symptoms (main endpoint), health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL), adherence, satisfaction with treatment and patient preferences were assessed. RESULTS: Three hundred patients with 48-week follow-up, who switched to EVIPLERA® (mean age: 46.6 years; male: 74.0%; 74.7% switched from a non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase-inhibitor, 25.3% from a protease inhibitor + ritonavir) were included. There was no statistical difference in median CD4+ cell count (baseline: 678.5 cells/mm3; 48-week: 683.0 cells/mm3) neither in virological suppression (≤50 copies/mL) (baseline: 98.3%; 48-week: 95.3%). The most frequent reasons for switching were neuropsychiatric (62.3%), gastrointestinal (19.3%) and biochemical/metabolic (19.3%) events. Only 7.7% of patients permanently discontinued therapy. At 48-week, all outcomes showed an improvement compared to baseline. Overall, there was a significant decrease (pvalue≤ 0.05) in number and magnitude of symptoms, while HRQoL, satisfaction and adherence improved significantly. Most patients prefered EVIPLERA® than previous cART. According to the type of intolerance, HRQoL was improved, but only significantly in patients with neuropsychiatric and gastrointestinal symptoms. Adherence improved significantly in patients with metabolic disturbances and satisfaction with EVIPLERA® was higher in the three groups. CONCLUSION: Switching to EVIPLERA® from non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase-inhibitor or protease inhibitor-based regimens due to toxicity, improved the presence/magnitude of symptoms, HRQoL, and preference with treatment. EVIPLERA® maintained a virological response, CD4+ cell count and maintained or improved adherence.

Prevalence of M. tuberculosis infection and tuberculosis disease among HIV-infected people in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (MTBI) and past/current tuberculosis (TB) among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected persons in Spain. DESIGN: Longitudinal study conducted between 2000 and 2003 at 10 HIV hospital-based clinics. Data were drawn from clinical records. Associations were measured using odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). RESULTS: Of the 1242 persons who met the eligibility criteria, most were male (75%), aged <40 years (75%) and unemployed (40%). HIV infection occurred through intravenous drug use (53%), heterosexual sex (29%) and sex between men (16%). In the initial evaluation, 315 subjects had evidence of MTBI: 84 (6.8%) had a history of TB, 23 (1.8%) current TB and 208 (16.8%) latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI). MTBI was associated with male sex, age 30-49 years, contact with a TB case, homelessness, poor education, and negatively with CD4 <100 cells/mm(3). Among subjects with MTBI, past/current TB was associated with retirement/disability (OR 6, 95%CI 1.6-22.5), CD4 <200 cells/mm(3) (OR 9.7, 95%CI 3.8-24.6), viral load >55,000 copies (OR 5.3, 95%CI 1.4-20.0), and negatively, with skilled work (OR 0.4, 95%CI 0.1-1.0) or administrative/managerial/professional work (OR 0.05, 95%CI 0.01-0.4). CONCLUSION: Social context has an impact on the effectiveness of HIV and TB control programmes even in industrialised countries with free access to health care.

Multivariate model for predicting relapse in human brucellosis.

Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data from 200 consecutive patients with acute brucellosis were analysed with univariate and multivariate methods to identify correlates of relapse. A risk score for predicting relapse was then calculated by using Cox proportional hazard model. The independent predictors of relapse were temperature of 38.3 degrees C or higher, positive blood cultures at baseline, and the duration of symptoms before treatment <10 days. Stratification according to the risk score demonstrated that rates of relapse were significantly different between risk groups (P<0.0001). The low-risk group had a 4.5% probability (6 of 135) of relapse at 12 months. In contrast, relapse was present in 15 of 47 patients in the medium-risk group (P<0.0017); and in 12 of 18 patients in the high-risk group (P<0.0001). This study provides a rational basis for estimating the risk of relapse in patients with acute brucellosis, and may be helpful in deciding what subjects might benefit from extra attention.

[A comparative therapeutic and multicenter trial of rifampicin and doxycycline versus streptomycin and doxycycline in human brucellosis]. / Ensayo terapéutico comparativo y multicéntrico de rifampicina y doxiciclina frente a estreptomicina y doxiciclina en la brucelosis humana.

BACKGROUND: Comparison and evaluation of the efficacy and safety of two treatment schedules in human brucellosis. METHODS: A comparative, randomized, multicentric, open study of 45 days doxycycline plus rifampin in the initial 21 days (group A) versus 45 doxycycline plus streptomycin in the initial 14 days (group B). 42 were included in each group. The diagnosis of brucellosis was based on blood culture or consistent clinical findings and a Wright's serum agglutination titer of 1/160 or greater. Clinical and laboratory monitoring was carried out, including blood cultures on the days 7 and 48 and after 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: 38 patients in each group were evaluable at the end of treatment. 3 group A patients and 1 group B patient had initial therapeutic failure. 31 group A patients and 35 group B patients could be followed up during 6 months or more (mean follow up of 10.5 and 11.5 months, respectively). 9 relapses (29%) developed in group A and 2 (6%) in group B (p less than 0.05). 22 patients of the 34 finally evaluated in group A (65%) were considered as cured, versus 33 of the 36 in group B (92%) (p less than 0.01). Side effects not requiring withdrawal of the treatment developed in 12 patients, without differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the therapy of human brucellosis, the association of doxycycline (45 days) and rifampin (21 days) is less effective than the classical association of doxycycline and streptomycin.

[Evaluation of 2 tuberculosis chemoprophylaxis regimens in patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. The GECMEI Group]. / Evaluación de dos pautas de quimioprofilaxis tuberculosa en pacientes infectados por el virus de la inmunodeficiencia humana. Grupo GECMEI.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the compliance, tolerance and efficacy of a short chemoprophylaxis regimen (IR) for tuberculosis using isoniazid (INH) plus rifampin (RIF) during 3 months versus a standard regimen (I) of isoniazid during 12 months in HIV positive patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, comparative, randomized and open clinical trial in four general hospitals and one prison hospital of Castilla-La Mancha. Prophylaxis was administered to PPD-positive patients and to anergic patients according to the CDC recommendations (1991). Patients were randomized in two treatment groups: regimen IR, isoniazid 300 mg daily and rifampin 600 mg daily; regimen I, isoniazid 300 mg during 12 months. RESULTS: 133 patients were included, 64 to regimen I and 69 to regimen IR. Regimen IR had a better tolerance with a 28% of adverse effects versus 55% in regimen I. Hepatotoxicity was more frequent in regimen I with a RR = 2.2 (CI 95% 1.23-4.01). Severe hepatotoxicity leading to treatment withdrawal was related to drug administration time and was more frequent in the 12 months regimen group. Short regimen showed a better compliance, without significant differences. Tuberculosis incidence rate was a 4.23 cases/100 persons--year for regimen I and 2.08 in regimen IR, with a relative risk for developing tuberculosis with regimen IR group of 0.51 (CI 95% 0.09-2.8) versus regimen I group, without statistical significance. Prison stay was associated to a significant risk for tuberculosis, regardless of both regimens (RR = 9.2 CI 95%, 1.06-80.2). CONCLUSIONS: In HIV-infected patients with PPD(+) or anergic, regimen with IR is at least as effective as regimen I for preventing the development of tuberculous disease, and has less adverse effects.

[Comparative study of the Brucellacapt test versus the Coombs test for Brucella]. / Estudio comparativo del test Brucellacapt con el test de Coombs para Brucella.

BACKGROUND: To compare the results obtained by Brucella Coombs' test with those obtained by Brucellacapt. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 145 serum samples from 112 patients with brucellosis or with brucellar infection suspected on clinical grounds and a history of occupational exposure were analyzed. All serum samples were tested for Rose Bengal, agglutinations whenever Rose Bengal was positive, Brucella Coombs' test and Brucellacapt. RESULTS: There was a direct correlation between both methods (p < 0.01). Negative serum samples and most serum samples with titers between 1/40 and 1/2,560 as tested by Brucella Coombs' test showed similar results into a range of one to two dilutions by Brucellacapt. However, serum samples with titres between 1/5,120 and 1/40,960 by Brucella Combs' test yielded also higher titres by Brucellacapt and for this reason we were unable to define a titre. CONCLUSIONS: Brucellacapt is a rapid assay to exclude infection and yield results comparable to Brucella Coombs' test in range 1/40 to 1/2,560. Significantly higher and more rapid titres were obtained in acute brucellosis by Brucellacapt as compared with those obtained by Brucella Coombs' test. Titre's evolutions by Brucellacapt is similar to Brucella Coombs' test. Unfortunately it was difficult the titres definition of Brucellacapt at high titres.

[Surgical treatment of unique cerebral metastasis: survival factors]. / Tratamiento quirúrgico de la metástasis cerebral única: factores de supervivencia.

Ninety patients operated for single cerebral metastasis in the Hospital General de Vigo between 1978 and 1986 were retrospectively studied. All of them also received radiotherapy after surgery. Several prognosis factors were studied with the aim of using them in future patients. The most significant factors were: histologic diagnosis Karnofsky's presurgery index, gap between diagnosis of the primary tumor and the time when the metastasis showed up, age and the TAC's morphology of the metastasis. These results are an important help when considering either surgery or a more conservative attitude.

[Brucellar sacroiliitis. A detailed review with an analysis of treatment efficacy]. / Sacroileítis brucelar. Una revisión detallada con análisis de la eficacia de los tratamientos.

All patients diagnosed of brucellosis in 4 regional hospitals during a period of nine years were reviewed, in an attempt to evaluate the efficacy of different antimicrobic regimens and also the clinical features. Evolution and complications of brucellar sacroiliitis. Of a total of 548 patients, 12% had been diagnosed of sacroiliitis and, of theme, 49 had complete data available with efficacy of different treatments, the time elapsed until fever and pain ceased was evaluated, together with initial therapeutic failures, relapses and length of hospital stay. Brucellar sacroiliitis is the most frequent osteoarthral complication of Brucella sp. in our setting. Keeping an stable incidence. It is predominant among young male (82%) population (mean age 25 +/- 12 years). The illness evolution is acute and less frequently subacute with a evolution mean-time before referral of 38 +/- 44 days (minimum 4 days, maximum 180 days). Fever (81%) and pain on gluteus and low lumbar localizations (100%) are the more frequent clinical features. Time elapsed until pain ceased was longer with doxycycline plus rifampicin (68 +/- 86) than with doxycycline plus streptomycin (28 +/- 43) (less than 0.05) and length of hospital stay was also longer with said treatment (p less than 0.05). There were no differences concerning time frame until fever ceased, initial therapy failures and relapses. Sequelae are infrequent and consist in persistency of pain. In resume response to treatment with usual regimens, doxycycline plus streptomycin of doxycycline rifampicin is good, being however time elapsed until pain ceases of mean length in hospital stay shorter in the group receiving doxycycline plus streptomycin. Control studies to confirm these data are need.

Treatment of human brucellosis with netilmicin and doxycycline.

We conducted a prospective, noncomparative, multicenter study to assess the safety and efficacy of doxycycline and netilmicin in the treatment of human brucellosis. The study included 64 patients who had acute brucellosis without endocarditis or neurobrucellosis. The treatment schedule consisted of the administration of 100 mg of doxycycline (or 5 mg/[kg.d] if body weight < or = 40 kg) twice a day orally for 45 days, plus 300 mg of netilmicin (6 mg/[kg.d] if body weight < or = 50 kg) intramuscularly once daily for 7 days. Therapeutic failure was noted in 5 patients (7.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5%-17.1%), of whom 2 had spondylitis, 1 had sacroiliitis, and 1 had a splenic abscess that required splenectomy. Relapse was noted in eight patients (12.5%; 95% CI, 5.6%-23.2%). When relapse was considered in combination with initial lack of efficacy, 13 patients (21.9%; 95% CI, 12.3%-33.9%) failed to respond to therapy. Fifteen patients (23%; 95% CI, 13.5%-35.2%) had adverse effects, and one patient (1.5%) had a treatment-limiting adverse effect. Combination therapy with netilmicin/doxycycline may be effective in treating acute brucellosis. However, prospective controlled trials must confirm these results.

Treatment of human brucellosis with doxycycline and gentamicin.

The objective of the present prospective, noncomparative, multicenter study was assess the safety and efficacy of gentamicin and doxycycline therapy for human brucellosis. In the first part of the study, a cohort of 17 patients received 100 mg of doxycycline (or 50 mg/kg of body weight per day if the body weight was < 40 kg) orally every 12 h for 45 days (cohort 1). In the second part of the study a subsequent cohort of 35 patients was treated with doxycycline at the same dosage for 30 days (cohort 2). All patients were treated intramuscularly with gentamicin at 240 mg (or 5 mg/kg per day if the body weight was < 50 kg) once daily for the first 7 days. Both cohorts showed a favorable response during therapy, and there were no therapeutic failures. Relapse was noted in 1 (5.9%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.15 to 28.7%) of the 17 patients in cohort 1 and in 8 (22.9%; 95% CI, 10.4 to 40.1%) of the 35 patients in cohort 2. Nineteen patients (36.5%; 95% CI, 23.6 to 51.0%) had adverse effects, with no differences between cohorts, and no patients had a treatment-limiting adverse effect. The study indicates that the combination of doxycycline for 45 days and gentamicin for 7 days is an effective and well-tolerated therapy for human brucellosis. The relapse rates obtained with doxycycline treatment for 30 days appear to be higher than those obtained with doxycycline treatment for 45 days.

Doxycycline-rifampin versus doxycycline-streptomycin in treatment of human brucellosis due to Brucella melitensis. The GECMEI Group. Grupo de Estudio de Castilla-la Mancha de Enfermedades Infecciosas.

Brucellosis is a common zoonosis in many parts of the world; the best regimen for the treatment of brucellosis has not been clearly determined. We have carried out a multicenter, open, controlled trial in five general hospitals in Spain to compare the efficacy and safety of doxycycline and rifampin (DR) versus doxycycline and streptomycin (DS) for the treatment of human brucellosis. The study included 194 ambulatory or hospitalized patients with acute brucellosis, without endocarditis or neurobrucellosis. The diagnostic criterion was isolation of Brucella species from blood or other tissues (n = 120) or a standard tube agglutination titer of 1/160 or more for anti-Brucella antibodies with compatible clinical findings (n = 74). Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 100 mg of doxycycline twice daily plus rifampin, 900 mg/day, in a single morning dose for 45 days (DR group) or the same dose of doxycycline for 45 days plus streptomycin, 1 g/day, intramuscularly for 14 days (DS group). A lack of therapeutic efficacy developed in 8 of the 100 patients in the DR group (8%) and in 2 of the 94 patients in the DS group (2%)(P = 0.10). Relapses occurred in 16 of the 100 patients in the DR group (16%) but in only 5 of the 94 patients in the DS group (5.3%) (P = 0.02). When relapse was considered in combination with initial lack of efficacy, 26 patients in the DR group (24%) and 7 patients in the DS group (7.45%) failed to respond to therapy (P = 0.0016). In general, therapy was well tolerated and only four patients (4%) in the DR group and two (2%) in the DS group had episodes of adverse effects necessitating discontinuation of treatment (P> 0.2). We conclude that a doxycycline-and-rifampin regimen is less effective than the doxycycline-and-streptomycin regimen in patients with acute brucellosis.