Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 2024 Aug 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39218213

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and oncological outcomes of irreversible electroporation (IRE) of unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) close to critical structures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center, institutional review board (IRB)-approved, retrospective analysis of patients who underwent percutaneous computed tomography (CT)-guided IRE of CRLM. Between August 2018 and October 2023, 26 patients had 46 tumors treated with percutaneous IRE in 30 ablation sessions. Primary end points were tumor response and local progression-free survival analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Secondary end points were overall survival (OS), distant progression-free survival (DPFS) analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, adverse events rated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: All tumors were close to critical structures, including the portal and hepatic veins, inferior vena cava, bile ducts, and gallbladder. All patients received preprocedural systemic therapy (median 10 cycles). Median length of hospital stay was 1 night. Adverse events occurred in 7 (23%) of 30 procedures, with four Grade 1 and two Grade 2 adverse events, including pleural effusions (n = 2), ileus (n = 1), small hematoma (n = 1), and pneumothorax (n = 2) requiring chest tube placements. Following IRE, the 1- and 2-year local tumor progression-free survival rates were 55.0% and 51.3%. The median DPFS was 3.5 months, with 1- and 2-year DPFS rates of 23.3% and 9.7%. Six patients (23.1%) died during follow-up, with a median OS of 40.4 months. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 90.9% and 83.9%. CONCLUSIONS: IRE is a safe and viable option in the treatment of unresectable CRLMs in locations close to critical structures, but carries a risk of local recurrence.

2.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 47(8): 1066-1073, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38943032

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Demonstrating the safety and efficacy of percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) for the treatment of lymph node metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An IRB-approved, single-center retrospective review was performed on patients with lymph node metastases gastrointestinal, and genitourinary primary cancers. Primary objective safety was evaluated by assessing complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification, and efficacy was determined by tumor response on follow-up imaging and local progression-free survival (LPFS). Secondary outcome measures were technical success (complete ablation with an adequate ablative margin > 5 mm), length of hospital stay and distant progression-free survival (DPFS). RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent percutaneous IRE between June 2018 and February 2023 for lymph node metastases, close to critical structures, such as vasculature, bowel, or nerves. The technical success was achieved in all cases. Complications occurred in four patients (21.1%), including two self-limiting grade 1 hematomas, a grade 1 abdominal pain, and grade 2 nerve pain treated with medication. Seventeen patients were hospitalized overnight, one patient stayed two nights and another patient stayed fourteen nights. Median follow-up was 25.5 months. Median time to local progression was 24.1 months (95% CI: 0-52.8) with 1-, 2-, and 5-year LPFS of 57.9%, 57.9% and 20.7%, respectively. Median time to distant progression was 4.3 months (95% CI: 0.3-8.3) with 1-, 2-, and 5-year DPFS of 31.6%, 13.2% and 13.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION: IRE is a safe and effective minimally-invasive treatment for lymph node metastases in locations, where temperature dependent ablation may be contraindicated. Care should be taken when employing IRE near nerves.


Assuntos
Eletroporação , Metástase Linfática , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Eletroporação/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto , Técnicas de Ablação/métodos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/patologia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinais/terapia , Neoplasias Urogenitais/terapia , Neoplasias Urogenitais/patologia , Linfonodos/patologia , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem
3.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 47(7): 883-890, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38844684

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Hepatic epithelioid hemangioendothelioma (HEHE) is a rare tumor with currently no established standard of care. This international multicenter retrospective study assesses the use of percutaneous irreversible electroporation (IRE) as an ablative tool to treat HEHE and provides a clinical overview of the current management and role of IRE in HEHE treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 2017 and 2023, 14 patients with 47 HEHE tumors were treated with percutaneous IRE using CT-scan guidance in 23 procedures. Baseline patient and tumor characteristics were evaluated. Primary outcome measures included safety and effectiveness, analyzed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and treatment response by mRECIST criteria. Secondary outcome measures included technical success, post-treatment tumor sizes and length of hospital stay. Technical success was defined as complete ablation with an adequate ablative margin (intentional tumor free ablation margin > 5 mm). RESULTS: IRE treatment resulted in technical success in all tumors. Following a median follow-up of 15 months, 30 tumors demonstrated a complete response according to mRECIST criteria. The average tumor size pre-treatment was 25.8 mm, accompanied by an average reduction in tumor size by 7.5 mm. In 38 out of 47 tumors, there was no evidence of local recurrence. In nine tumors, residual tumor was present. There were no cases of progressive disease. Median length of hospital stay was one day. Only one grade 3 CTCAE event occurred, a pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement. CONCLUSION: The current study provides evidence that IRE is a safe and efficacious minimally invasive treatment option for HEHE.


Assuntos
Eletroporação , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/cirurgia , Hemangioendotelioma Epitelioide/terapia , Adulto , Eletroporação/métodos , Idoso , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA