Certoparin versus unfractionated heparin to prevent venous thromboembolic events in patients hospitalized because of heart failure: a subgroup analysis of the randomized, controlled CERTIFY study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the elevated risk for developing venous thromboembolic events in patients with heart failure, there are no randomized, double-blind, controlled trial data on the comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin (UFH) in this patient population. METHODS: This was a subgroup analysis of the CERTIFY trial, which included 3,239 nonsurgical, acutely ill medical patients 70 years or older. Patients were randomized to receive 3,000-U anti-Xa certoparin once daily or 5,000-IU UFH 3 times a day. The analysis was performed on a subgroup of 542 patients diagnosed with heart failure at hospital admission. RESULTS: Patients with heart failure differed from patients without heart failure in that they were more likely using antiplatelets (67.2% vs 48.9%; P < .0001) and had a lower glomerular filtration rate (8.0% vs 5.5%; ≤ 30 mL/min per 1.73 m²; P = .0232). Thromboembolic risk was comparable except for a higher incidence of distal deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in patients with heart failure (10.80% vs 7.26%; P = .0144). Within the heart failure population, patient characteristics were comparable between randomized treatment groups. The incidence of the primary end point (proximal DVT, symptomatic nonfatal pulmonary embolism, and venous thromboembolism-related death combined) was numerically, slightly smaller with certoparin (3.78% vs 4.74% with UFH; odds ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.32-1.94), and the incidence of major bleeding was 0.72% with certoparin versus 0.38% with UFH. CONCLUSIONS: Patients hospitalized for heart failure are at high risk for developing distal DVT and bleeding complications compared with acutely ill medical patients without heart failure. Within the heart failure population, the observed differences in prophylactic efficacy between 3,000-U anti-Xa certoparin once daily and 5,000-IU UFH 3 times a day were similar to those observed in the overall study population; this suggests that certoparin might be at least as effective as UFH also in this subgroup. There were no relevant differences in bleeding risk or frequency of adverse events.

Heparin based prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolic events and death in patients with cancer - a subgroup analysis of CERTIFY.

BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer have an increased risk of VTE. We compared VTE rates and bleeding complications in 1) cancer patients receiving LMWH or UFH and 2) patients with or without cancer. METHODS: Acutely-ill, non-surgical patients ≥ 70 years with (n = 274) or without cancer (n = 2,965) received certoparin 3,000 UaXa o.d. or UFH 5,000 IU t.i.d. for 8-20 days. RESULTS: 1) Thromboembolic events in cancer patients (proximal DVT, symptomatic non-fatal PE and VTE-related death) occurred at 4.50% with certoparin and 6.03% with UFH (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.23-2.39). Major bleeding was comparable and minor bleedings (0.75 vs. 5.67%) were nominally less frequent. 7.5% of certoparin and 12.8% of UFH treated patients experienced serious adverse events. 2) Thromboembolic event rates were comparable in patients with or without cancer (5.29 vs. 4.13%) as were bleeding complications. All cause death was increased in cancer (OR 2.68; 95%CI 1.22-5.86). 10.2% of patients with and 5.81% of those without cancer experienced serious adverse events (OR 1.85; 95% CI 1.21-2.81). CONCLUSIONS: Certoparin 3,000 UaXa o.d. and 5,000 IU UFH t.i.d. were equally effective and safe with respect to bleeding complications in patients with cancer. There were no statistically significant differences in the risk of thromboembolic events in patients with or without cancer receiving adequate anticoagulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT00451412.

Rationale, design, and methodology of the observational INSIGHTS-SVT study on the current state of care and outcomes of patients with superficial vein thrombosis.

OBJECTIVE: Superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) is a common disease in clinical practice. In terms of pathophysiology and outcomes, the condition is related to venous thromboembolism, bearing a potential for severe thromboembolic complications if it is not treated adequately. A wide range of treatment approaches (including oral and injectable anticoagulants, pain medication, nondrug therapy including compression therapy, and no treatment at all) are applied in clinical practice, but there is sparse information about selection of patients for therapies, current treatment pathways, and drug use as well as outcomes. The INvestigating SIGnificant Health TrendS in the management of Superficial Vein Thrombosis (INSIGHTS-SVT) study aims to close this gap by collecting representative data on the current treatment of SVT. METHODS: The observational prospective study of about 1200 patients is carried out by up to 120 clinical and office-based physicians who regularly treat patients with SVT and are capable of conducting appropriate compression ultrasound diagnostics, such as vascular physicians, phlebologists, internists, vascular surgeons, and general practitioners. Patients are eligible for inclusion if they have ultrasound-confirmed acute, isolated SVT of the lower extremities. Documentation about the characteristics of the patients, diagnostics, comorbidities, and medical and nonmedical treatment is collected at baseline, at 10 ± 3 days or at approximately 45 days (depending on treatment), at approximately 3 months, and at approximately 12 months. Patients are requested to fill in quality of life questionnaires (on pain, Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study on Quality of Life/Symptoms [VEINES-QOL/Sym], EuroQol-5 Dimension 5-Level [EQ-5D-5L]) at baseline and at approximately 3 months. Interventions are not stipulated by the trial protocol. RESULTS: The primary efficacy outcome is the incidence of venous thromboembolism at 3 months; the primary safety outcome is the combined incidence of major and clinically relevant bleeding events at 3 months. As quality measures, plausibility checks at data entry, queries based on statistical analyses that focus on outliers and distribution of values, monitoring visits, and adjudication procedures will be applied. CONCLUSIONS: This large study is expected to provide a comprehensive picture of patients with SVT under clinical practice conditions in Germany.

Post-thrombotic syndrome 3 years after deep venous thrombosis in the Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism in Out-Patients (TULIPA) PLUS Registry.

BACKGROUND: Reported post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) rates may be confounded by including patients with a history of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) before the index event, varicose veins, or chronic venous insufficiency independent of PTS. We were interested in assessing PTS incidence rates of patients without these pre-existing disease conditions. METHODS: A prospective registry with a 3-year follow-up after an initial DVT was assessed. Available for analysis were 135 ambulatory patients without a history of DVT (before the index DVT), signs of varicose veins, or chronic venous insufficiency affecting the ipsilateral or contralateral leg, and Villalta score. RESULTS: PTS was detected in 24.5% of patients, with 17.0% having mild (Villalta score, 5-9), 6.0% moderate (score, 10-14), and 1.5% severe PTS (score ≥15) after a first DVT. Of these, 52.6% had proximal and 47.4% distal DVT; 63.7% were provoked and 35.6% unprovoked (one patient missing). Patients with proximal DVT (32.4%) significantly more often developed any PTS compared with patients with distal DVT (15.6%; P = .024); however, groups were similar with regard to severity of PTS by the four-level Villalta score (P = .109). In univariate analysis, PTS was more frequent (odds ratio, 95% confidence interval) with higher age (1.06 per year; 1.02-1.09), a body mass index of 25 to 30 kg/m(2) (2.38; 0.71-7.97) and ≥30 kg/m(2) (6.08; 1.75-21.14), proximal vs distal DVT (2.59; 1.12-5.98), and calf swelling ≥3 cm larger than the asymptomatic leg (3.77; 1.66-8.55). In a multivariate analysis, age (1.05; 1.01-1.09) and calf swelling ≥3 cm larger than the asymptomatic leg (2.94; 1.20-7.20) remained predictive for PTS. Compression therapy was used by 78.5% of patients at the 1-year follow-up and by 46.7% at the 3-year follow-up. Both rates were higher in patients with PTS (93.9%) vs no PTS (66.7%). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective survey demonstrates a low rate of PTS in patients with a first DVT and no pre-existing DVT, varicose veins, or chronic venous insufficiency, and a high adherence rate to compression therapy, within the first 3 years of follow-up. Age and marked calf swelling were independent predictors of PTS.