RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: We describe a model capable of predicting prostate cancer (PCa)-specific mortality up to 20 years after a radical prostatectomy (RP), which can adjust the predictions according to disease-free interval. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 752 patients were treated with RP for organ-confined PCa. Cox regression modeled the probability of PCa-specific mortality. The significance of the predictors was confirmed in competing risks analyses, which account for other-cause mortality. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 11.4 years. The 5-, 10-, 15- and 20-year actuarial rates of PCa-specific survival were 99.0, 95.5, 90.9 and 85.7%, respectively. RP Gleason sum (p < 0.001), pT stage (p = 0.007), adjuvant radiotherapy (p = 0.03) and age at RP (p = 0.004) represented independent predictors of PCa-specific mortality in the Cox regression model as well as in competing risks regression. Those variables, along with lymph node dissection status (p = 0.4), constituted the nomogram predictors. After 200 bootstrap resamples, the nomogram achieved 82.6, 83.8, 75.0 and 76.3% accuracy in predicting PCa-specific mortality at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years post-RP, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At 20 years, roughly 20% of men treated with RP may succumb to PCa. The current nomogram helps to identify these individuals. Their follow-up or secondary therapies may be adjusted according to nomogram predictions.
Assuntos
Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Algoritmos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Antígeno Prostático Específico/metabolismo , Recidiva , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) on the rate of cancer-specific and overall survival after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a group of patients with a long-term follow-up, as there is controversy about the benefit of aRT after RP for prostate cancer when endpoints beyond biochemical and local recurrence are considered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Within a study cohort of 752 patients treated with RP, 118 (15.7%) received aRT; these patients were matched with controls who did not receive aRT after RP. Exact matches were made for pT stage, RP Gleason sum, surgical margin status, age (+/-10 years), year of surgery (+/-10 years) and delivery of hormonal therapy. Kaplan-Meier and life-table analyses were used to assess overall and cancer-specific survival RESULTS: The median (range) follow-up was 11.4 (0.1-41) years. The 10- and 20-year overall survival after RP in those with no aRT were, respectively, 81.1% and 44.8%, vs 75.5% and 40.0% in the aRT group (P = 0.1). The corresponding probabilities for cause-specific survival were, respectively, 97.3% and 89.0% vs 86.3% and 69.3% (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall and cause-specific survival between the groups after matching (hazard ratio 0.9, log rank P = 0.6; and 2.1, log rank P = 0.1, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed that, in a matched case-control study, aRT has no effect on overall and cancer-specific survival. Further randomized long-term studies are necessary to confirm these results.
Assuntos
Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos de Coortes , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To develop and internally validate a nomogram predicting the individual probability of metastatic progression after radical prostatectomy according to the length of disease-free interval. METHODS: Cox regression modeled the probability of metastatic progression of prostate cancer in 752 patients treated with radical prostatectomy with a mean follow up of 11.6 years (median 11.4; range 0.1-40.5). The significance of the predictors was confirmed in competing risks analysis, which accounts for other causes of mortality. The Cox regression model-based nomogram was internally validated with 200 bootstrap resamples. RESULTS: Eighty-five of 752 patients (11.3%) developed metastatic progression. The 5, 10, 15 and 20-year actuarial rates of metastatic progression-free survival were, respectively, 95.9, 90.5, 84.8 and 80.5%. Pathological stage T3, elevated radical prostatectomy Gleason sum and delivery of adjuvant radiotherapy represented independent predictors of metastatic progression in both Cox and competing risks regression models, and constituted the nomogram predictors along with a fourth variable describing the presence of co-morbidities. After 200 bootstrap resamples the nomogram achieved 80.2, 77.7, 77.6 and 76.0% accuracy in predicting metastatic progression at 5, 10, 15 and 20 years after radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic progression is a sign of poor prognosis in men with prostate cancer. Our nomogram is able to accurately predict the conditional probability of metastatic progression up to 20 years after radical prostatectomy.
Assuntos
Nomogramas , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Progressão da Doença , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , PrognósticoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To review the pioneering contributions of Dr. Robert Gibbons of Virginia Mason Medical Center to the evolution and development of the modern ureteral stent. METHODS: We reviewed Dr. Gibbons' extensive work through primary sources, including interviews, projector slides, radiology images, stent prototypes, his personal writings, and archived documents. In addition, we performed a review of historical texts and manuscripts describing important innovations in the development of the ureteral stent. RESULTS: In 1972, motivated by a desire to provide his patients with a long-term alternative to open nephrostomy and inspired by Drs. David Davis and Paul Zimskind, who in 1967 had described the use of indwelling ureteral silicone tubing, Dr. Gibbons began to experiment with modifications to improve upon existing stents. To address distal migration, Dr. Gibbons added "wings" that collapsed as the stent was advanced and expanded once in proper position to secure the stent in place. Barium was embedded into the proximal tip to facilitate radiographic visualization. A flange was added to the distal end, preventing proximal migration and minimizing trigonal irritation, and a tail was attached to aid in stent removal. The result was the original Gibbons stent, the first commercially available ureteral stent, and the establishment of Current Procedural Terminology code 52332, still used today. CONCLUSION: The ureteral stent is a fundamental component of urologic practice. In developing the Gibbons stent, Dr. Gibbons played a pivotal role in addressing the challenge of internal urinary diversion particularly for those who needed long-term management. Urologists and the patients they serve owe Dr. Gibbons and other surgeon-inventors a debt of gratitude for their innovative work.
Assuntos
Desenho de Equipamento/história , Stents/história , Cateteres Urinários/história , História do Século XX , Humanos , Invenções/história , Doenças Urológicas/história , Doenças Urológicas/terapiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Men who undergo radical prostatectomy (RP) are at long-term risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR). In this report, the authors have described a model capable of predicting BCR up to at least 15 years after RP that can adjust predictions according to the disease-free interval. METHODS: Cox regression was used to model the probability of BCR (a prostate-specific antigen level>0.1 ng/mL and rising) in 601 men who underwent RP with a median follow-up of 11.4 years. The statistical significance of nomogram predictors was confirmed with a competing-risks regression model. The model was validated internally with 200 bootstraps and externally at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years in 2 independent cohorts of 2963 and 3178 contemporary RP patients from 2 institutions. RESULTS: The 5-year, 10-year, 15-year, and 20-year actuarial rates of BCR-free survival were 84.8%, 71.2%, 61.1%, and 58.6%, respectively. Pathologic stage, surgical margin status, pathologic Gleason sum, type of RP, and adjuvant radiotherapy represented independent predictors of BCR in both Cox and competing-risks regression models and constituted the nomogram predictor variables. In internal validation, the nomogram accuracy was 79.3%, 77.2%, 79.7%, and 80.6% at 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, and 20 years, respectively, after RP. In external validation, the nomogram was 77.4% accurate at 5 years in the first cohort and 77.9%, 79.4%, and 86.3% accurate at 5 years, 10 years, and 15 years, respectively, in the second cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo RP remain at risk of BCR beyond 10 years after RP. The nomogram described in this report distinguishes itself from other tools by its ability to accurately predict the conditional probability of BCR up to at least 15 years after surgery.
Assuntos
Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/etiologia , Nomogramas , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Progressão da Doença , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico , Prognóstico , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia Adjuvante , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We hypothesized that prostate cancer-specific survival (PCaSS) could be accurately predicted in men in whom radical prostatectomy (RP) failed and who received hormonal therapy (HT) after RP failure. METHODS: Between 1954 and 1994, 752 consecutive patients underwent RP without neoadjuvant therapy. Of those, 114 patients (15.2%) received HT at RP failure and represent the focus of this analysis. Cox regression models and a nomogram targeted PCaSS. The main predictor was timing of HT initiation: at prostate-specific antigen (PSA) versus local versus distant recurrence. Covariates included age at HT, pathologic T stage, surgical margin status and Gleason sum at RP, use of adjuvant or salvage radiation, and time from RP to HT. RESULTS: Mean and median follow-up periods were 5.1 and 3.9 yr; 70 deaths were recorded, of which 45 (39.8%) were due to PCa. At 1, 5, 10, and 15 yr, the estimates of PCaSS were, respectively, 97.1%, 68.3%, 49.3%, and 30.2% (median, 9.8 yr). Younger men and those with HT initiated at the time of distant recurrence had lower PCaSS. A nomogram predicting PCaSS at 2, 3, 4, and 5 yr after RP was developed and demonstrated 66% accuracy after 200-bootstrap internal validation. CONCLUSION: Despite RP failure, half the patients can expect to survive for 10 yr. The nomogram can help in discriminating between those with better versus worse PCaSS, better than relying on most educated guesses.
Assuntos
Antagonistas de Androgênios/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Próstata/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Terapia Combinada , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Nomogramas , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangue , Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/sangue , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
PURPOSE: We report on 25-year cancer control and survival outcomes after radical prostatectomy in a single center series of patients treated during a 40-year period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1954 and 1994, 787 consecutive patients underwent radical prostatectomy at Virginia Mason Medical Center in Seattle, Washington. Kaplan-Meier 25-year probabilities of prostate cancer specific, overall, prostate specific antigen progression-free, local and distant progression-free survival were determined. Multivariate Cox regression models addressed prostate cancer specific mortality. RESULTS: Prostate cancer specific survival, overall survival, prostate specific antigen progression-free survival, local and distant progression-free survival ranged from 99.0% to 81.5%, 93.5% to 19.3%, 84.8% to 54.5%, 95.3% to 87.8% and 95.9% to 78.2%, respectively. In univariate analyses pathological stage, surgical margin status, pathological Gleason sum, delivery of hormonal therapy and radiotherapy represented statistically significant predictors of prostate cancer specific mortality (all p < or =0.001). In multivariate analyses only Gleason sum (p = 0.03) and delivery of hormonal therapy (p < 0.001) remained significant. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the most mature radical prostatectomy series. It demonstrates that long-term biochemical cancer control outcomes after radical prostatectomy might be suboptimal. However, local and distant control outcomes are excellent, and cancer specific mortality is minimal even 25 years after surgery.
Assuntos
Prostatectomia , Neoplasias da Próstata/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Taxa de Sobrevida , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: There is controversy as to whether extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy fragmentation and ERCP retrieval of pancreatic stones are associated with relief of chronic pain or relapsing attacks of pancreatitis. Our most recent experience with this technology is reviewed. METHODS: Forty patients with chronic calcific pancreatitis who required extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy between 1995 and 2000 to facilitate pancreatic duct stone removal were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected included patient presentation, number of lithotripsy and ERCP sessions required, complications, and outcomes measures to include pre- and post-ESWL pain scale, monthly oxycodone (5 mg)-equivalent pills ingested, yearly hospitalizations, and need for subsequent surgery. RESULTS: A single extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy session was required for 35 patients who underwent a total of 86 ERCPs to achieve complete stone extraction from the main pancreatic duct. Minor complications occurred in 20%. There was one episode of pancreatic sepsis that was treated with antibiotics and removal of an occluded pancreatic prosthesis. At a mean [SD] follow-up of 2.4 (0.6) years, 80% of patients had avoided surgery and there was a statistically significant decrease in pain scores (6.9 [1.3] vs. 2.9 [1.1]; p = 0.001), yearly hospitalizations for pancreatitis (3.9 [1.9] vs. 0.9 [0.9]; p = 0.001), and oxycodone-equivalent narcotic medication ingested monthly (125 [83] vs. 81 [80]; p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy fragmentation of pancreatic duct calculi in conjunction with endoscopic clearance of the main pancreatic duct is associated with significant improvement in clinical outcomes in most patients with chronic pancreatitis.