When Corona Came to Canada: The 2003 SARS Outbreak and Its Aftermath.

Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) was the first pandemic of the 21st century, and Canada was the only Western nation to experience an outbreak. The effects of the outbreak on Canadian society provide a window to understanding responses to future pandemics. Over the short run, SARS had a major effect on the Canadian economy: adverse effects were experienced by health-care workers, who were at greatest risk of contracting the disease; by workers in the hospitality industry, who lost income as tourism and travel ground to a halt; and by the Chinese-Canadian community, who experienced discrimination because of the Chinese origins of SARS. However, over the long term there were few consequences of the outbreak in Canada, whether in the social, economic, or political domains. The principal effects were improvements in the Canadian public health system, many of which were rolled back after a decade without a major epidemic.

Merchants of Health: Shaping the Experience of Illness Among Older People.

Despite nearly universal health-care coverage for older Americans, the quality of care for the sickest and frailest remains sub-optimal. Understanding why requires analysis of the medical ecosystem. This paper considers the role of four of the principal actors in this system: physicians, hospitals, drug companies, and Medicare. Physicians spend more time in the office addressing diabetes and hypertension than they do evaluating falls and impaired cognition because of their training and their interests. Hospital administrators affect the hospital experience by investing in procedural specialties at the expense of low-tech, high-touch care. Pharmaceutical companies affect the medications older patients take by direct-to-consumer advertising and marketing to physicians. Medicare affects the patient's experience by prospective payment for hospitals, resulting in the burgeoning of post-acute care to accommodate early hospital discharges. Determining how to improve the quality of care for older people requires identifying a lever that affects the entire system. Medicare is uniquely positioned to serve this role. Reforming Medicare by introducing cost-effectiveness criteria for reimbursement of expensive devices, by instituting requirements that medical resident training programs include exposure to multidisciplinary team care, and by introducing a new benefit package for the frail elderly could improve American geriatric care.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a CPR and Intubation Video Decision Support Tool for Hospitalized Patients.

BACKGROUND: Decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and intubation are a core part of advance care planning, particularly for seriously ill hospitalized patients. However, these discussions are often avoided. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to examine the impact of a video decision tool for CPR and intubation on patients' choices, knowledge, medical orders, and discussions with providers. DESIGN: This was a prospective randomized trial conducted between 9 March 2011 and 1 June 2013 on the internal medicine services at two hospitals in Boston. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and fifty seriously ill hospitalized patients over the age of 60 with an advanced illness and a prognosis of 1 year or less were included. Mean age was 76 and 51% were women. INTERVENTION: Three-minute video describing CPR and intubation plus verbal communication of participants' preferences to their physicians (intervention) (N = 75) or control arm (usual care) (N = 75). MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was participants' preferences for CPR and intubation (immediately after viewing the video in the intervention arm). Secondary outcomes included: orders to withhold CPR/intubation, documented discussions with providers during hospitalization, and participants' knowledge of CPR/ intubation (five-item test, range 0-5, higher scores indicate greater knowledge). RESULTS: Intervention participants (vs. controls) were more likely not to want CPR (64% vs. 32%, p <0.0001) and intubation (72% vs. 43%, p < 0.0001). Intervention participants (vs. controls) were also more likely to have orders to withhold CPR (57% vs. 19%, p < 0.0001) and intubation (64% vs.19%, p < 0.0001) by hospital discharge, documented discussions about their preferences (81% vs. 43%, p < 0.0001), and higher mean knowledge scores (4.11 vs. 2.45; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Seriously ill patients who viewed a video about CPR and intubation were more likely not to want these treatments, be better informed about their options, have orders to forgo CPR/ intubation, and discuss preferences with providers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01325519 Registry Name: A prospective randomized trial using video images in advance care planning in seriously ill hospitalized patients.

Re-engineering shared decision-making.

Shared decision-making is widely accepted as the gold standard of clinical care. Numerous obstacles to achieving shared decision-making have been identified, including patient factors, physician factors and systemic factors. Until now, the paradigm is seldom successfully implemented in clinical practice, raising questions about the practicality of the process recommended for its use. A re-engineered model is proposed in which physicians elicit and prioritise patients' goals of care and then help translate those goals into treatment options, after clarifying the patient's underlying health status. Preliminary evidence suggests that each step of this revised process is feasible and that patients and physicians are comfortable with this strategy. Adoption of this model, after further testing, would allow the goal of shared decision-making to be realised.

Targeted chemotherapy, the medical ecosystem, and the future of American health care.

In light of the difficulties experienced by the pharmaceutical industry in developing important new drugs, the rapid design and introduction of the targeted chemotherapeutic agent, crizotinib, is a significant achievement. Understanding the roles of the patient, the physician, the regulator (FDA), health insurance companies, and the manufacturer (Pfizer) in the development of this drug can shed light on the prospects for future drugs and on the workings of the complicated health-care ecosystem. Patients were eager for an effective drug against lung cancer with minimal toxicity but were reluctant to enroll in clinical trials. Oncologists were enthusiastic about the new drug but have a financial incentive favoring intravenous medicines over oral agents. The FDA was under pressure to approve new drugs quickly. The drug manufacturer modified its corporate structure and developed collaborations with academics and international partners, but was pressured by stockholders to maximize short-term profitability. Insurance companies balked at the price of the drug and used tiered pricing to limit their costs. The successful design, development, and diffusion of crizotinib may signal a new departure for the pharmaceutical industry, but whether such successes are replicated in the future will depend on the delicately balanced ecosystem that constitutes American health care.

The medical ecoculture at work: the case of the metal-on-metal hip.

The United States has the most expensive, technologically intensive system of medical care in the world, but not the most effective. Reforming health care will require understanding the interactions among the many individuals and institutions that collectively constitute the health-care ecoculture, an ecosystem with a major human component. Because technology is a key driver of health-care costs and a critical component of the patient's experience of American medicine, it is fruitful to consider an example of a particular technology: why it was embraced, who benefited from its use, and the response of the ecoculture when a critical flaw in the technology emerged. The case of the introduction, diffusion, and withdrawal of metal-on-metal hip prostheses will be discussed from the perspective of patients, physicians, device manufacturers, regulators, and the legal system. Each of these groups responded to external stimuli by adaptation in an attempt to maximize its own interests. Interactions between the groups served as a further mechanism of maintaining the status quo within medicine. A single change, such as modification of the payment system or incentivizing patients, is thus unlikely to be effective in transforming health care; instead, a multi-pronged approach, along with reforms outside medicine, will likely be necessary.

Controlling off-label medication use.

Off-label prescribing may lead to innovative new uses of old medications, is essential in such fields as pediatrics, and avoids the lengthy and expensive process of modifying U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) drug labeling. Using medications for unapproved indications, however, raises concerns about patient safety when the drugs have a high potential for toxicity and generates economic concerns when their cost is high. A possible means of controlling the use of off-label drugs is to focus on medications used off-label that are both expensive and potentially risky. These are principally biotechnology drugs, such as recombinant enzymes, cytokines, and monoclonal antibodies. This article suggests a 2-step process for controlling use of such drugs, analogous to that used for devices. Once a drug is FDA approved, it would undergo scrutiny using the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) National Coverage Determination method if its cost exceeds a specified benchmark-for example, $12 000, which is the average cost of a pacemaker. The CMS would pay only for off-label uses for which there is adequate evidence in its National Coverage Determination process. Other insurance companies would probably adopt the recommendations of CMS.

Medicine as ecoculture.

The use of diagnostic tests, especially imaging studies, varies markedly across the United States-with higher costs but no better patient outcomes associated with the highest-use regions. A proposed new model of the health care system draws on an analogy with the ecosystem to explain the geographic variations in physician test ordering. This framework emphasizes the adaptability and interdependence of the components of the system. Patients and physicians are influenced by the health care organizations in their community, including the practice site in which the physician works, local hospitals, malpractice lawyers, and imaging centers. These are in turn influenced by institutions in society at large, including the media, health care plans, and the government. Further adaptations to the explanatory model account for the psychologic and sociologic aspects of physician behavior. Understanding the medical ecoculture is essential for effective health care reform because widely touted changes, such as the introduction of an electronic medical record or comparative effectiveness studies, do not address the adaptability and interdependence that characterize the medical ecoculture.

Using video images of dementia in advance care planning.

BACKGROUND: Advance care planning is a process by which patients plan for future medical care under circumstances of impaired decision-making. Central to this process is the patient's understanding and ability to imagine future health states. METHODS: A before and after oral survey was used to compare the effect of a video depiction with that of a verbal description of a patient with advanced dementia for individuals selecting level of medical care at 7 primary care clinics at 2 US medical centers. The study enrolled 120 adults, half of whom were nonwhite. RESULTS: A total of 120 subjects completed the interview. Before watching the video, 60 (50.0%) subjects preferred comfort care, 25 (20.8%) desired life-prolonging care, 22 (18.3%) chose limited care, and 13 (10.8%) were unsure of their preferences. Subject preferences changed significantly after the video: 107 (89.2%) of the subjects chose comfort care, none desired life-prolonging care, 10 (8.3%) chose limited care, and 3 (2.5%) were unsure of their preferences (P < .001). Unadjusted analysis revealed a statistically significant difference regarding preferences, based on race/ethnicity, before watching the video: 40% of African Americans and 43% of Latinos chose comfort care, compared with 58% of whites (P = .04). Differences were also noted for educational level (P = .03). After the video, differences in preferences based on race/ethnicity and educational level disappeared. CONCLUSIONS: Watching the video significantly changed preferences for care, transcending apparent differences in preferences associated with race/ethnicity and educational level. This study suggests that using video in addition to improved verbal communication may lead to more informed advance care planning by enhancing the ability of patients to imagine a hypothetical health state.

The effect of underlying health status on patient or surrogate preferences for end-of-life care: a pilot study.

This study explored the role of health status, as measured by the Palliative Performance Score, in shaping patient preferences for end-of-life care. Scores were correlated with 3 potential goals of care: prolonging life, maintaining function, and maximizing comfort among patients seen in palliative care consultation. Eighty-six patients expressed treatment preferences: 16 (19%) preferred prolonging life, 23 (27%) preferred maintaining function, and 47 (54%) preferred maximizing comfort (P < .0001); their average scores +/- standard deviation were, respectively, 51.9 +/- 19.4, 56.5 +/- 16.7, and 45.3 +/- 14.1 (P = .0459). There was a significant relationship between patient preferences and Palliative Performance Score, with lower scores indicating preferences for comfort and higher scores indicating a preference for maintaining function and life expectancy. Further research is needed to test the sensitivity of health status, as measured by the Palliative Performance Score, in affecting patient preferences.

Molecular medicine, the Medicare drug benefit, and the need for cost control.

The implementation of Medicare Part D, although successful in improving access to prescription drugs for millions of beneficiaries, will lead to a marked escalation in the cost of the Medicare program. An important component of the rise in costs will be specialty pharmaceuticals, including a group of drugs that are self-administered and that cost at least 1,000 dollars/month. The rate of growth in expenditures on specialty pharmaceuticals has been 34% per year. Although all these drugs confer benefits, the degree of benefit varies from dramatic (e.g., imatinib for chronic myelogenous leukemia) to cost-effective (e.g., tumor necrosis factor-alpha blockers for rheumatoid arthritis) to more modest (e.g., disease-modifying drugs used in multiple sclerosis). Historically, when costs within the Medicare program have risen, Congress has enacted price controls, as it did with hospitalization, physician services, and outpatient care. The Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) currently prohibits such an approach. Resorting instead to competition from generic drugs will be of little utility, because there is currently no mechanism to allow biogeneric drugs and patents in the biopharmaceutical industry to limit competition. Controlling the cost of the Medicare Part D program, as dramatically illustrated by the case of specialty pharmaceuticals, will require patent reform, giving the Food and Drug Administration jurisdiction over biogenerics, and amending the MMA to allow the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to institute price controls.

The use of advance care planning to guide decisions about artificial nutrition and hydration.

Advance care planning is important to ensure that patients, when competent, can influence the kind of medical care they receive if they lose decision-making capacity. Because decisions by surrogates to for-go nutrition support remain controversial, specific inclusion of artificial nutrition and hydration as a part of advance care planning has taken on growing importance. This article reviews the choices about artificial nutrition and hydration that are possible using conventional advance directives such as the living will, the instructional directive, values histories, and combination directives. It summarizes the legal basis for such documents. It also describes the ways that physicians' orders to limit treatment can help implement decisions about the use of artificial nutrition and hydration. Finally, it stresses the importance of clarifying with patients and families the risks and benefits of nutrition support in a variety of common situations such as advanced dementia and metastatic cancer as an essential prerequisite to meaningful advance care planning.

Rethinking the central dogma of palliative care.

Palliative care defines itself as complementary to life-prolonging therapy. Consideration should be given instead to viewing palliative care as the gold standard for all patients with progressive, life-threatening illness. The dichotomy between cure on the one hand and palliation on the other reflects the oncologic roots of palliative medicine, as well as the widespread societal view of medical treatment as overwhelmingly focused on cure. Because the treatment of patients with serious and complex illness is seldom curative, it makes more sense to think of the care of such patients as inherently palliative. Patients must choose among various forms of potentially life-prolonging therapies, each with its own side-effect profile and likelihood of success, depending on how they prioritize their goals of care. From this perspective, palliative care, an interdisciplinary approach that attends to advance care planning, psychosocial issues, and management of symptoms, should be the standard of care for these patients. Palliative care physicians can either provide primary care to patients with serious illness or can serve as consultants in the care of particularly challenging cases.

Do we need to create geriatric hospitals?

During a single illness episode, the sickest, frailest older patients are often treated in multiple distinct sites, including the emergency room, the intensive care unit, a general medical floor, and a skilled nursing facility. Such frequent transfers involve changes in physician, changes in nursing care, the rewriting of orders, and physical dislocation, all of which can adversely affect outcomes. This system, although efficient, increases the chance of medical errors, promotes delirium, and undermines the doctor-patient relationship. Partial solutions include a team approach to care, an electronic medical record, and substitution of home for hospital care. A more comprehensive solution is to create a geriatric hospital for treatment of the most common medical and surgical problems and for provision of rehabilitative or skilled nursing care. Designing new institutions for geriatric care will require new legislation and a new set of regulations but should be considered for the oldest and frailest patients.